John Milstone <john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com> wrote: So, you're saying that Jed Rothwell is wrong when he has stated repeatedly > that he has never caught Rossi lying about his work? >
No, the Ni claims are not based on Rossi's own work, and they are mostly theoretical. We discussed this at length. I made it clear I do not believe those claims. I do not know what to make of them. > That's really the basis of everything Rothwell is claiming: Although > Rossi lies about all sorts of other things, we can trust what he says about > his "science". > That is not even close to what I say. You do not understand what I said. You have not read the literature. You are not contributing anything. If you keep up this blather I will be pleased to add you to my kill file. - Jed
