The Ni claims are based on Rossi's comments in his blog. Rossi claims to be "enhancing" the Nickel "fuel", and it's obvious from his comments that he's referring to changing the natural isotope ratios. Based on Rossi's statements, he *must* be doing this for no more than a few cents per gram. Based on the responses to my original question, no one has a clue how Rossi might be doing this, and apparently even his most feverish supporters believe it's a lie on Rossi's part.
Sorry if I mis-stated your position on Rossi's lies. I had understood your position to be that Rossi only lies about things other than the technical issues related to the E-Cat. I guess even you accept that Rossi lies about *everything*. You are, of course, free to add me to your kill file. I will continue to read your comments, even though they are usually based on nothing more than "argument by authority". John ________________________________ From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> To: John Milstone <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 7:38 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ni-64 enrichment John Milstone <john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com> wrote: So, you're saying that Jed Rothwell is wrong when he has stated repeatedly that he has never caught Rossi lying about his work? No, the Ni claims are not based on Rossi's own work, and they are mostly theoretical. We discussed this at length. I made it clear I do not believe those claims. I do not know what to make of them. That's really the basis of everything Rothwell is claiming: Although Rossi lies about all sorts of other things, we can trust what he says about his "science". That is not even close to what I say. You do not understand what I said. You have not read the literature. You are not contributing anything. If you keep up this blather I will be pleased to add you to my kill file. - Jed
