Jojo sez:
... > Please post your comment in a different forum so that I can answer it. . I've noticed that you occasionally couch your posts-of-disapproval, pertaining the posting content of others you disagree with, in terms of how their posts are dragging Vortex-l down into a pithole of irrelevant off-topicism. You've certainly targeted some of my OT posts in your cross hairs on more than one occasion. Regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the stated opinion on Global Warming, er... I mean "Climate Change", it seems to me that you may have misunderstood the nature of some of the on-going Vortex-l discussion. Global warming has occasionally been, please excuse the pun, a "hot" topic that has been discussed here. So, I'm wondering... why is it that when you decided to become an honorable contributing member of the Vort Collective that somehow topics, such as "climate change" have somehow now become taboo? But then, you go ahead and express your opinion on the matter anyway... which is fine I might add. Nevertheless, it does sound just a tad hypocritical to me. Actually, IMO, I think you're just trying to stir up the pot a little within the Collective. It's been kind of boring here lately. Rossi hasn't put his foot in his mouth in a while, so there's not much to discuss other than some real interesting nerdy techno stuff such as "Polarizable vacuum analysis of electric and magnetic fields" ...and whether protons are nothing more than EM pegged at frequencies higher than the highest gamma frequencies. That, BTW, is a fascinating premise! I wonder if there is a way to falsify it. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
