Although, come to think of it, didn't William O. Davis do his initial
theoretic work at EG&G?

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 7:15 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:
> Don't go gettin' all Davis on my punk-ass just because I mentioned
> discontinuity in the context of anomaly.  I did mention nuclear.
>
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
>> OK. I agree that -in general- fast rise times and shock waves can explain
>> overunity in pulsed systems, if it exists. Big “if”. But the efficiency of
>> the PS (power supply) is always critical in these systems, if any gain is to
>> be derivative from acceleration.
>>
>>
>>
>> And first & foremost, one must show overunity. One cannot say that because
>> there is a putative explanation, then that explanation severs to provide the
>> missing data. Papp, in the modern day scam, is all about the missing data.
>> It’s not just missing - there is none.
>>
>>
>>
>> BTW an adequate explanation of “why” the shock wave could be gainful, if
>> proved, is found simply in the power laws of motion wrt time, and in the
>> so-called exponential enhancements to velocity: “jerk” or “jounce”. Anything
>> above acceleration, which is fully conservative, could be gainful- to the
>> extent that the PS is efficient.
>>
>>
>>
>> But then again, vorticians share a level of suspicion (in the fizzix
>> establishment) similar to what the Jamaican Bobsled Team gets in winter
>> sports ... along with a taste for spicy food ('jerk').
>>
>>
>>
>> Patois patronization, so to speak. It’s all the derivative, mon.
>>
>>
>>
>> dL/dT........VELOCITY
>>
>> d2L/dT2 ....ACCELERATION
>>
>> d3L/dT3 ....JERK
>>
>> d4L/dT4 ....JOUNCE
>>
>>
>>
>> From: James Bowery
>>
>>
>>
>> My response to Axil was prompted by his hypothesis that the critical
>> parameter was minimizing rise time and peak power of the "ignition" pulse.
>> The efficiency of the pulse generator is of virtually no significance if it
>> is an ignitor of a larger energy source.  I'm not saying I believe Axil's
>> hypothesis about plasma shock waves -- I just don't know.  What I do know is
>> that if there is an anomalous effect it is a lot more likely to appear in
>> regimes which are rarely achieved in commonly available devices.
>>
>>
>>
>> As for your concern about Krytrons being tightly regulated, I'm not talking
>> about producing Krytrons -- I'm talking about looking at their mechanism of
>> action for a clue since the Papp system seems to have much in common.
>>
>>
>>
>> Indeed, if we are to suppose that some sort of nuclear energy source is
>> involved in the Papp engine, then it is _likely_ to involve an extrema in
>> rise time and peak power.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> As a tetrode with constant glow, the krytron is in probably in the range of
>> 50% efficiency at most. Why bother?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: James Bowery
>>
>>
>>
>> For the third time: Check out Krytron technology!!!  It used a small amount
>> of radioactive Nickel to speed the rise time of the discharge.  Papp almost
>> certainly used Radium for the same purpose.
>>
>> Quoting "Spark Gap and Triggered Gap Tubes":
>>
>> The krytron is a high speed, high current gas filled tube. This tube can
>> switch thousands of amps at thousands of volts. It is similar to a thyratron
>> except that it is a 4 terminal device. The fourth terminal is a "keep alive"
>> electrode that maintains a glow discharge in the tube at all times. This
>> make the tube much faster and the timing more uniform. There is also a small
>> amount of radioactive Nickel in the tube. The ionization helps further
>> stabilize the propagation delay.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I think James could be correct that the choice of noble gases is NOT a
>>> stage
>>> prop.
>>>
>>> However, and once again - keep in mind that Papp used radium as his prime
>>> energy source, and his patent makes this clear... the noble gases he used
>>> could have been important but ancillary in a surprising way.
>>>
>>> Papp's original IP is entitled: "Method & Means of Converting Atomic
>>> Energy
>>> Into Utilizable Kinetic Energy". The Rohner's and other scammers who came
>>> along later have clearer wanted to dodge this all-important issue of
>>> nuclear
>>> power, because they cannot legally obtain radium, which is probably the
>>> sine
>>> qua non for a working Papp engine. They cannot work without it.
>>>
>>> The most interesting detail, for real science - is why Papp used this
>>> particular mix instead of hydrogen. It probably was important and NOT a
>>> stage prop, as mentioned. This rationale could actually involve a real
>>> discovery by him - and it could related to gas interaction with an alpha
>>> emitter. That would be especially true of helium - which is the bulk of
>>> the
>>> mix, and is essentially a neutralized alpha.
>>>
>>> In short, the real discovery of Papp, unbeknownst to even himself, could
>>> relate to quantum correlation fields and entanglement.
>>>
>>> Here is my favorite citation for "wisdom from comic books"
>>> http://marvel.wikia.com/Probability_field
>>>
>>> ....and it is strangely apropos for fringe inventor and his 300 mph
>>> submarine.
>>>
>>> Jones
>>>
>>>                 From: James Bowery
>>>
>>>                 Observing all the trouble Papp went to during the fueling
>>> of
>>> his engine, it is rather difficult to believe that the noble gas was a
>>> mere
>>> stage prop.
>>>                 See:
>>>                 http://inteligentry.com/shared/PappW/4-Fueling.mp4
>>>                 Jojo Jaro wrote:
>>>
>>>                 Funny, but Papp may have found a clever and "magician
>>> trick"
>>> way of running an internal combustion engine making it appear to be
>>> overunity.  With the process appearing to work with normal air, and now
>>> hydrogen, the noble gas "mixture" may just have been a convenient and
>>> effective "magician's sleight of hand technique" to divert attention from
>>> his engine just being an ordinary Internal Combustion Engine.  Everybody
>>> was
>>> focusing on the "novelty" of using a certain "magic formula" of noble
>>> gases
>>> that nobody bothered to check the energy balance.  I believe this is what
>>> happened.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to