I agree.  That is along the lines of what I was thinking since the linear 
momentum appears to encourage that to happen.  The angle of the cone shape is 
not quite so easy to determine as far as I know.


Are you aware of a method that can be used to establish the expected cone 
opening angle if the effect is due to particle interaction?   Here I am 
interchanging heat for kinetic energy of a particle that is being ejected.  I 
do not think that extremely energetic particles are being released since they 
would be easy to detect.  Perhaps the helium or other ash of the fusion event 
is ejected with only a fraction of the total energy at the conclusion of a 
reaction such as Ed's.  If most of the energy escaped as photons and only a 
smaller portion escaped with the fusion product, then all we need is enough 
initial energy in the particle to overcome the losses it encounters along its 
path as it seeks additional NAE sites to trigger.


If instead of a direct trigger by impact of the lower energy particle we depend 
upon the instantaneous elevated kinetic energy absorbed by the nearby sites 
then it is important to understand why the momentum continues in the same 
general direction for new reactions.  It appears as if the momentum from the 
projectile particle is in the correct direction, so the reactions of the NAE 
sites appear to follow its lead.  We know that laser emissions are in sync with 
the incoming wave front, so perhaps this is true for other systems.  This 
concept need to be fleshed out.


Dave



-----Original Message-----
From: mixent <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, Feb 25, 2013 10:00 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Explaining Cold fusion -IV


In reply to  David Roberson's message of Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:26:49 -0500 (EST):
Hi,
[snip]
>The local heat energy release is large and can not escape the area except 
through diffusion which is a slow process compared to the reaction time 
associated with nuclear effects.

If the energy is released in the form of a fast particle, then it does not have
to depend on diffusion. A fast particle will rip through a lattice at high
speed, leaving a trail of ionized atoms in it's wake.

Note that if this fast particle then goes on to trigger other fusion reactions,
which also create fast particles, then you get a branching effect, the debris of
which looks like an inverted cone.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html


 

Reply via email to