Are you suggesting that the electrons can be toyed with very easily, but the nucleus is more rigidly locked into place by the electron fields? I hope there is some strength to the system.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, Mar 1, 2013 2:37 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Explaining Cold fusion -IV Concentrate on the electrons. Heat will cause the electrons to vibrate. This couple is how the resonance comes into play. In a dipole the ions are ridgid but the electrons can move. Cheers: axil On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:27 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: I think we should be considering a heat source that is distributed in this case. An earlier post I just wrote might help explain how a heat pulse could progress in a conic form. The coordinated addition of many thousands of individual fusion events might well lead to this result. Dave -----Original Message----- From: mixent <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, Mar 1, 2013 12:30 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Explaining Cold fusion -IV In reply to Eric Walker's message of Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:11:33 -0800: Hi Eric, I think you may have hit the nail on the head. If an explosion occurs inside the lattice, heat from it will spread out spherically in all directions, melting the metal as it goes. Where this sphere intersects the surface of the metal, a hole will form, releasing the pressure of the explosion, and the plasma, vaporized and molten metal, will all go in that direction, expanding as it goes, and producing a more or less conical crater, unless it is already very close to the surface, in which case it may just blow part of the surface away leaving a gap. [snip] >I'm not sure how explosives shielded by tamper work, but the crater >pictures look a little like that to me. It looks like there is a small >volume that turns to liquid and then possibly gas at a rate faster than the >surrounding material, creating an expanding volume. The craters we see >point outward from the surface of the substrate, and I would expect the >surface side of the molten volume to exert less pressure on the volume than >the opposing side. This in turn leads an eruption away from the inner wall >and towards the surface. In this model, the momenta of the original >sources of heat do not play a part. > >Eric Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
