But upthread you have already called this actual experimental result "not
good".


On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> No, for me an actual explanation that challenges that stance I'd call 'not
> good'.
>
>
> 2013/6/3 Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>
>
>>  In your viewpoint, an actual experimental result which challenges that
>> stance would be something you'd call "not good".
>>
>
> --
> Daniel Rocha - RJ
> danieldi...@gmail.com
>

Reply via email to