But upthread you have already called this actual experimental result "not good".
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: > No, for me an actual explanation that challenges that stance I'd call 'not > good'. > > > 2013/6/3 Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> > >> In your viewpoint, an actual experimental result which challenges that >> stance would be something you'd call "not good". >> > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > [email protected] >
