From: Edmund Storms
* Deuterium fusing from protons can be ruled out.
How is this ruled out? You only provide assertions.
No, I provide two facts from the Rossi experiments. No gamma. No tritium.
These are facts, not assertions. Rossi is presently the best hope for the
future of LENR and it does little good for anyone to try to confuse the
broader field by hopelessly trying to explain another anomaly in another
context. The Rossi effect, at this point in time, is worth dropping
everything else for - in order to understand it.
I consider this possibility based on evidence for tritium
production and the assumption that a similar process applies to p and d.
Tritium is not seen in Rossi, nor is it seen from protons alone, and it is
not relevant to the Rossi effect, except in its absence.
There is no evidence that a similar process to Rossi is involved in Pd-D of
P&F and it is counter-productive to confuse the two. In fact, all the
important evidence shows the two cannot be similar in any meaningful way.
So, you claim spin coupling can convert over 24 MeV/event to
heat in the case of deuterium and over 11 MeV/event in the case of
transmutation.
You must be kidding, right? There is no high energy event in the Rossi
effect, or it would have been seen in the Bianchini radiation monitoring.
Spin coupling does not apply to the fusion of deuterium into helium. You are
intentionally conflating two unrelated effects.
P&F is different from Rossi - end of story ...unless someone can supply real
proof of a connection. None has been shown. "Ockham" is not proof of
anything, and has never provided a valid level of understanding to any field
of science, especially since parsimony is completely adverse to QM. QM is
anti-Ockham.
Jones
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
