Let me see if I understand your position, Jones. You believe the
behavior using deuterium has no relationship to the behavior when H is
used. You believe nature has several ways to initiate LENR depending
on which isotope of hydrogen is used, with the mechanism for D only
working in Pd and the mechanism for H only working in Ni. You accept
what Rossi has said without question and apply it only to the Ni-H2
system. Consequently, nothing observed by anyone else applies.
You propose the mechanism that works for Ni+H2 is outside of
conventional nuclear behavior including not producing the calculated
amount of energy the mass change requires.
Is that a fair description?
Ed Storms
On Feb 8, 2014, at 1:56 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
From: Eric Walker
Jones Beene wrote:
The risk/reward situation is such that 99% or four nines for
leakage is not nearly good enough. One cannot simply propose the
leap that
goes all the way from partial fractionation to complete blockage.
That is precisely what is being proposed.
Then that is precisely why it is wrong.
If complete leak-proof gamma shielding is possible - we do not need
LENR and
we can go directly to subcritical fission, photofission or a small
scale
hybrid with a desktop accelerator - which is known, proved and
reliable.
Natural uranium is two orders of magnitude cheaper than deuterium.
Who needs
deuterium if gammas can be perfectly shielded by grams of loaded
metal?
Whether this suggestion is amenable to you is a different
question.
Forget me. Who is it amenable to?
Answer: a handful of LENR proponents who started out in PdD and
refuse to
see that Rossi is very different, or who would love to find
something better
but have no option?
Where is the kilowatt PdD reactor? Cough… cough… Rossi is the future
of LENR
and it is counterproductive to be lost in the past. PdD is an
exercise in
futility.
But such 100 percent efficiency in fractionation is what is
implied in the PdD research.
No it isn’t. Lack of gammas ab initio is what is implied in LENR
research.
The two are completely different, not different ways of saying the
same
thing.
Jones
<winmail.dat>
