John Plocher wrote: > I would like to explicitly invite AlanB to play an active role > in editing the content of the wiki page. My reference on the > page to "Alan's original proposal" should be considered a > placeholder - I would be just as happy if an updated CG > proposal were forthcoming...
I think it is probably worth distinguishing between the site content and the site infrastructure in that document. I can't really comment about the level of stagnation of the content on the site overall, because I haven't checked. However I expect there to be some significant changes in the site infrastructure over the coming year. > I would like to capture the concept of an "editorial policy > document" somewhere in the culture and ethos of this CG, > such that we can at some point move away from subjective > measurements towards objective ones. > > If Alan agrees, I (personally) would also like to be > considered as a potential core contributer in this CG. I think that would be a matter for the Website Project Leads rather than myself, although I'm happy to help out. -- Alan Burlison -- _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
