No UV and radiation are not the same value.
UV values are in bold because I made it bold to see it better.
Yes I am soure my station report the same value as it is on console I
checked that many times.
Here is my calibration section.
[[Corrections]]
# For each type, an arbitrary calibration expression can be given.
# It should be in the units defined in the StdConvert section.
# Example:
# foo = foo + 0.2
radiation = radiation * 0.731
rainRate = rainRate * 0.1
#barometer = barometer * 10.0025
pressure = pressure * 1.0035
UV = UV * 0.003
#windSpeed = windSpeed * 4.5
Dne sobota, 14. april 2018 09.44.14 UTC+2 je oseba Andrew Milner napisala:
>
> If you do not have your calibration statement are you saying that UV and
> radiation are the same value??
>
> What is your calibration?? You just said it is very high.
>
> Why are some UV values in bold print in the loop and rec packets??
>
> Are you sure that your weather station actually outputs the same index
> value which you see on the weather station console?? So far all the
> evidence seems to imply that it does not provide the UV index in the same
> form that you see it on the console.
>
>
>
> On Saturday, 14 April 2018 10:10:39 UTC+3, Damjan Hajsek wrote:
>
>> Yes I hope we can solve that, because I use now verry high factor for
>> calibration to see aproximatelly the same result as on console.
>>
>> Dne sobota, 14. april 2018 02.35.05 UTC+2 je oseba gjr80 napisala:
>>>
>>> Unlikely to be anything to do with units, UV and radiation use the same
>>> units irrespective of the unit system in use. From the loop/archive data
>>> last shown I would hazard a guess that the driver is (now) doing its thing
>>> correctly and presenting weeWX with credible UV and radiation values. If
>>> these values correspond with what is displayed on the console then I don't
>>> think there is any issue with the driver. In that case perhaps we need some
>>> elaboration on 'weewx doesn't read it right'.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> On Saturday, 14 April 2018 10:13:24 UTC+10, Andrew Milner wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Damjan
>>>>
>>>> I do not think you are telling us everything which you are
>>>> doing/changing!! When you first posted to this thread the loop records
>>>> were in US units, and UV values appeared to be very high. Your latest
>>>> posting has loop records in metric, and UV values appear to be more like
>>>> UV
>>>> index values.
>>>>
>>>> So, do you still have a problem? If you have been changing your
>>>> database units then your database could well contsin a mixture of imperial
>>>> and metric values - with very unpredictable results.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, 14 April 2018 02:49:33 UTC+3, Greg Troxel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Andrew Milner <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>> > matthew has already said tha weewx does not calculate uv index - it
>>>>> merely
>>>>> > uses the data provided by the station
>>>>>
>>>>> But if there is some hardware that provides bits in a UV field, then a
>>>>> driver for that hardware should be translating the bits into an index
>>>>> value according to the encoding used. I don't think we should be
>>>>> using
>>>>> calibration notions as a substitute for a well-understood
>>>>> representation. But maybe I'm missing something here.
>>>>>
>>>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
