If you are using StdCalibrate to fix radiation and UV by such large factors there is clearly something not right with the driver. As Greg said a few posts back the driver should be decoding the raw UV/radiation data and returning proper values, clearly it is not. I suggest you go back to the fourth post in this thread and provide Matthew with a debug=1 log output (you have provided the LOOP and REC data requested but you actually provided a wee_debug report not 'log output with debug=1', they are different - you need to set debug=1 in weewx.conf then restart weewx and post the log output, I would say for 10 minutes or so).
There is little else that we can do for you until the driver is fixed. Gary On Saturday, 14 April 2018 18:53:18 UTC+10, Damjan Hajsek wrote: > > No UV and radiation are not the same value. > UV values are in bold because I made it bold to see it better. > Yes I am soure my station report the same value as it is on console I > checked that many times. > Here is my calibration section. > > [[Corrections]] > > # For each type, an arbitrary calibration expression can be given. > # It should be in the units defined in the StdConvert section. > # Example: > # foo = foo + 0.2 > radiation = radiation * 0.731 > rainRate = rainRate * 0.1 > #barometer = barometer * 10.0025 > pressure = pressure * 1.0035 > UV = UV * 0.003 > #windSpeed = windSpeed * 4.5 > > Dne sobota, 14. april 2018 09.44.14 UTC+2 je oseba Andrew Milner napisala: >> >> If you do not have your calibration statement are you saying that UV and >> radiation are the same value?? >> >> What is your calibration?? You just said it is very high. >> >> Why are some UV values in bold print in the loop and rec packets?? >> >> Are you sure that your weather station actually outputs the same index >> value which you see on the weather station console?? So far all the >> evidence seems to imply that it does not provide the UV index in the same >> form that you see it on the console. >> >> >> >> On Saturday, 14 April 2018 10:10:39 UTC+3, Damjan Hajsek wrote: >> >>> Yes I hope we can solve that, because I use now verry high factor for >>> calibration to see aproximatelly the same result as on console. >>> >>> Dne sobota, 14. april 2018 02.35.05 UTC+2 je oseba gjr80 napisala: >>>> >>>> Unlikely to be anything to do with units, UV and radiation use the same >>>> units irrespective of the unit system in use. From the loop/archive data >>>> last shown I would hazard a guess that the driver is (now) doing its thing >>>> correctly and presenting weeWX with credible UV and radiation values. If >>>> these values correspond with what is displayed on the console then I don't >>>> think there is any issue with the driver. In that case perhaps we need >>>> some >>>> elaboration on 'weewx doesn't read it right'. >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>>> On Saturday, 14 April 2018 10:13:24 UTC+10, Andrew Milner wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Damjan >>>>> >>>>> I do not think you are telling us everything which you are >>>>> doing/changing!! When you first posted to this thread the loop records >>>>> were in US units, and UV values appeared to be very high. Your latest >>>>> posting has loop records in metric, and UV values appear to be more like >>>>> UV >>>>> index values. >>>>> >>>>> So, do you still have a problem? If you have been changing your >>>>> database units then your database could well contsin a mixture of >>>>> imperial >>>>> and metric values - with very unpredictable results. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Saturday, 14 April 2018 02:49:33 UTC+3, Greg Troxel wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Andrew Milner <andrew.s...@gmail.com> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>> > matthew has already said tha weewx does not calculate uv index - it >>>>>> merely >>>>>> > uses the data provided by the station >>>>>> >>>>>> But if there is some hardware that provides bits in a UV field, then >>>>>> a >>>>>> driver for that hardware should be translating the bits into an index >>>>>> value according to the encoding used. I don't think we should be >>>>>> using >>>>>> calibration notions as a substitute for a well-understood >>>>>> representation. But maybe I'm missing something here. >>>>>> >>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
