please make up your mind it cant be argued that WMAU should not administer this list, while being held accountable for what happens here and then complain that WMAU is going to operate its own lists where it can
On 17 March 2014 23:23, <to...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > David Gerard: OK, so now "wikiquette" and "personal attacks" have morphed > into "disruptive". Is that because you'd have trouble finding personal > attacks or abuses of wikiquette among my posts to this mailing list? Where > are they? You're making these accusations in a public forum, so we deserve > to know specifically what you believe these personal attacks are. > > If "disruptive" is being interpreted in such a way as to silence anyone > who asks questions about chapter governance and transparency, the matter > needs to be brought to the WMF's attention. Is this also the reason WMAU is > going to back to a secret mailing list? > > I note the violent imagery being tossed around by several people: to "kick > off" a mailing list. That and the treatment I received last year appear to > amount to personal bullying. I believe it should stop if WMAU has any > self-respect. > > Tony > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > "Wikimedia Australia Chapter" <wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > > To: > "Wikimedia Australia Chapter" <wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > Cc: > > Sent: > Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:10:16 +0000 > > Subject: > Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Apparently corrupt administration of this list > > > On 17 March 2014 14:56, John Mark Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 10:45 PM, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> FWIW, kicking people off the list in such circumstances has generally > >> been acceptable on Wikimedia lists, with or without notice. Though > >> notice is nice and adds to transparency. > > > Really? You guys have banned regular Wikimedia contributions, who are > > not banned on any project and have made useful contributions to the > > chapter, from the mailing list without notice, and left them on the > > ban list for months without telling anyone? i.e. put their email > > address on the mailman 'ban_list'? > > > > No, I neither said nor meant that. I meant more broadly, moderating or > kicking sufficiently disruptive users as needed. > > > - d > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimediaau-l mailing list > Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimediaau-l mailing list > Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l > > -- GN. Vice President Wikimedia Australia WMAU: http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/User:Gnangarra Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
_______________________________________________ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
