At the date of this photography, Bruno was not a part of this project. SO, stop with Bruno about with picture.
Ludovic 2013/10/16 Hartwig Thomas <hartwig.tho...@enterag.ch> > Not true! You may have built it. The „Creator“ of the intellectual > property was Bruno!**** > > Hartwig**** > > ** ** > > *From:* wikimediach-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto: > wikimediach-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] *On Behalf Of *Ludovic Péron > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:50 PM > > *To:* Wikimedians in Switzerland > *Subject:* Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)**** > > ** ** > > Thomas,**** > > ** ** > > The reprostation on this picture is the first one of this project. So the > creator of this reprostation is not Burno, it's *me*. **** > > ** ** > > Ludovic **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > 2013/10/16 Hartwig Thomas <hartwig.tho...@enterag.ch>**** > > Did you notice, that the scanning station on the picture was invented and > built by Bruno with his own mind and hands and made available to Wikipedia > for free? Did Charles Andrès ask his permission to publish a photograph of > it? Did he attribute its author correctly? Does he work for Wikimedia for > free, like Bruno does? Is his photograph even a “work” that CAN be > copyrighted?**** > > **** > > You people make me sick, when you take the achievements of others and set > up a prohibition against their using them!**** > > **** > > Hartwig**** > > **** > > *From:* wikimediach-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto: > wikimediach-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] *On Behalf Of *Ludovic Péron*** > * > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:35 PM > *To:* Wikimedians in Switzerland > *Subject:* Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)**** > > **** > > Hi Thomas,**** > > **** > > Just one point, for other I think other people could ask.**** > > **** > > You say Please embed licensing information in the metadata!!!**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > I invite you to see with jpg. It's a screanshot of the Wikimedia Commons > page of this picture. **** > > **** > > Thanks.**** > > **** > > Ludovic**** > > **** > > 2013/10/16 Hartwig Thomas <hartwig.tho...@enterag.ch>**** > > To cite another example:**** > > **** > > > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rencontres_Wikimedia_France_-_Intervention_de_Ludovic_P%C3%A9ron.JPG > **** > > **** > > states clearly, that the license is CC-BY-SA, but – very unfortunately > indeed – it does not unambiguously attribute the authorship!! Or does > “user” mean “copyright owner”???**** > > So how can one make use of WMCH content, if it is not attributed decently > in the Wikimedia repository?**** > > **** > > Whenever the license CC-BY-SA is used, an unambiguous attribution must > accompany it. Otherwise it is to be assumed, that the copyright owner has > relinquished the attribution to Wikimedia.**** > > **** > > Please embed licensing information in the metadata!!!**** > > **** > > Hartwig Thomas**** > > **** > > *From:* wikimediach-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto: > wikimediach-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] *On Behalf Of *Ludovic Péron > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:01 PM > *To:* Mailing list for Wikimedia CH > *Subject:* [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)**** > > **** > > Hi,**** > > **** > > I found this > web<http://www.bjinstitute.org/newsmessage/reprostationen-des-bj-institutes-fuer-wikipedia/10a20af93816783eefe8480b92b9f042/> > page > on the web site of BJ Institute. **** > > **** > > Problem : This image is a CC By SA photography on Commons and the credit > is wrong (good credit : Charles Andrès - CC By SA). Seeing this on the > website of one of our partners, which happens to be run by one of our board > members, makes me especially concerned about our credibility.**** > > **** > > Me, and some other volunteers of WMCH, spend many times to explain how to > use correctly free contents. We are discussing with nationals media, with > some schools, etc. **** > > **** > > We (and WMCH) loose our credibility if our contacts see this web page. *** > * > > **** > > So, thanks you to make correction very quickly. **** > > **** > > And I think it's necessary that our regular partners will be blameless > about copyright. May be it's possible to make internal workshops. I am > available for that. **** > > **** > > Regards**** > > **** > > Ludovic Péron**** > > > _______________________________________________ > http://wikimedia.ch Wikimedia CH website > Wikimediach-l mailing list > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l**** > > **** > > > _______________________________________________ > http://wikimedia.ch Wikimedia CH website > Wikimediach-l mailing list > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l**** > > ** ** > > _______________________________________________ > http://wikimedia.ch Wikimedia CH website > Wikimediach-l mailing list > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l > >
_______________________________________________ http://wikimedia.ch Wikimedia CH website Wikimediach-l mailing list https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l
