Shahid,

Please don't see the executive group as an entitlement arising purely out of 
Wiki contributions. Every Wikipedian puts in volunteer effort to the extent 
they can, and we don't do it for any special previlege or quid pro quo, do we? 

The members you see here are merely who were known to have expressed a 
willingness to form a chapter during several meetups during Jimmy and Sue's 
visits. Achal collected such a list from various sources, sent them a 
questionnaire to understand both their Wiki credo as well as commitment and 
other experience required to form and bootstrap such an organisation. There 
were meetings of such a group and then the founding group crystallised. Yes, 
it's not the most scientific method, but what would be an alternative? Is there 
any other basis to pick a group for this assignment? A wiki vote would only 
measure the goodwill inside the respective Wiki. But, doesn't the Wikimedia 
Chapter guideline explicitly outline the need to have people from outside the 
community, but have the commitment and shared beliefs, if they bring in 
organisational expertise? Please reflect on these aspects.

I was part of one earlier attempt to form the India chapter and know of other 
attempts as well. None of our previous attempts succeeded and we were losing a 
lot of opportunities to spread Wiki in India. That is why, I agreed to join 
this kind of a coordinated effort to bootstrap the chapter. This is definitely 
not the end of the road for the chapter, just the beginning. The views of every 
committed Wikipedian will be accommodated and they'll have a fair chance to 
participate in the activities of the chapter. In fact, there are ideas to 
create city-wise and wiki-wise special interest groups.

And, please have a look at the list of people mentioned and say whether we are 
a bunch of politicians who can't be trusted. We are a committed set of people, 
who met every month on a weekend, did conference calls almost every week, and 
brought out this draft meeting Wikimedia Chapters' Committe recommendations and 
the Indian Law, not an easy task.

The choice of Bangalore was for two reasons: 1) this is one city which has 
people from many Indian language Wikipedias and 2) Centre for Internet and 
Society who's hosting this organisation in the bootstrapping phase is located 
here. Other than that, this is not Bangalore-centric or English Wiki-centric. 
There's enough diversity in the group if you care to observe.

I hope you'll understand the points.

Regards,
Sundar

 "That language is an instrument of human reason, and not merely a medium for 
the expression of thought, is a truth generally admitted."
- George Boole, quoted in Iverson's Turing Award Lecture




________________________________
From: Shahid Akhtar <mohd.shahid_akh...@rediffmail.com>
To: wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Fri, March 12, 2010 12:47:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Wikimedia India Chapter

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Praveen Prakash <me.prav...@gmail.com> wrote:

K. Then who is Kiruba Shankar?  What
> was the election process & criteria? How many people involved in 
>that? Why all these process were hidden? Why even Hindi not informed?
This is what I'm wondering about too! I think this process should be more 
inclusive and transparent!

Who decided the list of founding members (Signatories) mentioned on this page 
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_India/MoA#WIKIMEDIA_INDIA? And how was 
this list decided? How come Gautam K John (who is self-admittedly not involved 
with Wikipedia) was invited to be a founding member, but someone like 
User:Bhadani was not?

Why is some like HPN who has not made even 100 edits in 2009 and 2010 to 
English, 
Kannada and Sanskrit Wikipedias combined together is at the forefront of this 
initiative, but some of the most important contributors from Indic wikipedias 
are not even a part of this?

I'm all for a Wikimedia India chapter, but it should be a group of 
all the people who are actually part of the Wikipedia community! It should not 
be a bunch of politicians that want to be face of Wikipedia to the Indian media 
without having made any substantial contributions to Wikipedia.

Wikimedia India will receive thousands of rupees in donations. We need trusted 
people who are representative of the pan-India Wikipedia community to handle it.

If this is a group of people who are meeting in Bangalore for wining and 
dining, this should be named "Wikimedia Bangalore" chapter, not "Wikipedia 
INDIA" chapter!

Best regards
Shahid
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l

Reply via email to