On 08/06/2018 06:33, Nischay Nahata wrote: > I think that advertising the COC might still have been in "good faith", > though it should have been done with a mail to the project owners. > > But what I find very objecting is the way the two developers have > communicated on the gerrit thread. Both Antoine and Chad (both senior devs > that we used to look up to) behaved in a rather dictatorish manner which is > not even seen around profit making companies. Neither cared to explain and > discuss on the issue, while Yaron was trying his best to.
Hello, I disagree with the dictatorship manner, or I would just have force merged my own patch. I was more waiting for feedback from the repository owner and engage in a conversation. I don't have an opinion about the CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md beside that it has been added on all mediawiki repositories hosted on Gerrit and that it became the de factor standard on GitHub. I just happened to notice the file was missing and for sack of consistency proposed a change to restore it. About my comment on Gerrit: | Well then can we just archive this repository please? I was reacting to Yaron comment about development happening somewhere else: | @Ladsgroup - not all of the development of this software is done on gerrit.wikimedia.org (actually, very little of it is). With the hasty conclusion on my side that: if the development is not on Gerrit and Yaron doesn't want the COC.md file, he should be free to move to a different hosting place. In restrospective, I got how that could sound as a threat to arbitrarily delete the repository. *Yaron I apologize*, that never has been my intent. One sure thing, I am quite happy the topic get raised to wikitech-l which has a much larger audience than a single Gerrit change. We will see what the outcome happens to be. cheers, -- Antoine Musso _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
