I think that advertising the COC might still have been in "good faith", though it should have been done with a mail to the project owners.
But what I find very objecting is the way the two developers have communicated on the gerrit thread. Both Antoine and Chad (both senior devs that we used to look up to) behaved in a rather dictatorish manner which is not even seen around profit making companies. Neither cared to explain and discuss on the issue, while Yaron was trying his best to. Regards, Nischay Nahata On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 9:49 AM MZMcBride <z...@mzmcbride.com> wrote: > Yaron Koren wrote: > >That's how it went until two days ago, when Antoine Musso submitted a > >patch for my Site Settings extension (I don't know why that one > >specifically), re-adding the file. I rejected the patch, on the same > >grounds as before, but another developer, Chad Horohoe, overrode me and > >merged it in. That led to a discussion featuring Antoine, Chad, a few > >other WMF developers, and me, which you can find here: > > > >https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/437555/ > > > >Some of the (unbelievable) highlights: > > > >- From Antoine: "Well then can we just archive this repository please?" > > > >- From Chad: "Yeah no that's not how it works. If it's being hosted on > >gerrit.wikimedia.org, it needs a CoC file. If you object to that, you can > >find hosting elsewhere." > > It was really inappropriate for Chad to hastily and forcefully merge this > change. > > MZMcBride > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
