It did sound like a threat given that no policy has been framed around this, but I am glad to know that it was not your intent.
Also, its strange that someone can just remove someone else's code review just like that on gerrit, add their own review and merge a patch. Regards, Nischay Nahata On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 3:46 PM Antoine Musso <hashar+...@free.fr> wrote: > On 08/06/2018 06:33, Nischay Nahata wrote: > > I think that advertising the COC might still have been in "good faith", > > though it should have been done with a mail to the project owners. > > > > But what I find very objecting is the way the two developers have > > communicated on the gerrit thread. Both Antoine and Chad (both senior > devs > > that we used to look up to) behaved in a rather dictatorish manner which > is > > not even seen around profit making companies. Neither cared to explain > and > > discuss on the issue, while Yaron was trying his best to. > > Hello, > > I disagree with the dictatorship manner, or I would just have force > merged my own patch. I was more waiting for feedback from the repository > owner and engage in a conversation. > > I don't have an opinion about the CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md beside that it has > been added on all mediawiki repositories hosted on Gerrit and that it > became the de factor standard on GitHub. I just happened to notice the > file was missing and for sack of consistency proposed a change to > restore it. > > > About my comment on Gerrit: > > | Well then can we just archive this repository please? > > I was reacting to Yaron comment about development happening somewhere else: > | @Ladsgroup - not all of the development of this software is done on > gerrit.wikimedia.org (actually, very little of it is). > > With the hasty conclusion on my side that: if the development is not on > Gerrit and Yaron doesn't want the COC.md file, he should be free to move > to a different hosting place. > > In restrospective, I got how that could sound as a threat to arbitrarily > delete the repository. *Yaron I apologize*, that never has been my intent. > > One sure thing, I am quite happy the topic get raised to wikitech-l > which has a much larger audience than a single Gerrit change. We will > see what the outcome happens to be. > > cheers, > > -- > Antoine Musso > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
