On Thursday October 13 2016 03:34:56 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > > Seen like that, yes. But then you'd end up running 2 display servers, > > XQuartz -> QuartzaWayland+xwayland. > > No, there'd be no need at all for XQuartz any more. QuartzWayland as you > call it would be a Wayland compositor backed by Quartz. XWayland would be an > X11 server sitting on top of it. Your xterms and whatnot would communicate > with XWayland which would composite them using Wayland which would use Quartz.
That's what I meant, you'd *replace* XQuartz with 2 more or less non-native display servers. > Weston is the reference implementation, written on top of Linux APIs like > KMS, GEM, udev, etc. Yes, I got that now. I think I must have misunderstood what xwayland really is, then. Usually, xsomething means "something for X11" while here it means the opposite :) R. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. X11-users mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/x11-users/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
