On Thursday October 13 2016 03:34:56 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
> > Seen like that, yes. But then you'd end up running 2 display servers,
> > XQuartz -> QuartzaWayland+xwayland.
> No, there'd be no need at all for XQuartz any more. QuartzWayland as you
> call it would be a Wayland compositor backed by Quartz. XWayland would be an
> X11 server sitting on top of it. Your xterms and whatnot would communicate
> with XWayland which would composite them using Wayland which would use Quartz.
That's what I meant, you'd *replace* XQuartz with 2 more or less non-native
> Weston is the reference implementation, written on top of Linux APIs like
> KMS, GEM, udev, etc.
Yes, I got that now. I think I must have misunderstood what xwayland really is,
then. Usually, xsomething means "something for X11" while here it means the
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
X11-users mailing list (X11firstname.lastname@example.org)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com