> On Oct 12, 2016, at 01:36, René J.V. Bertin <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday October 11 2016 16:19:50 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > >>> Why is it then that XQuartz 2.7.8 on OS X 10.9 uses the correct (true) >>> pixel resolutions for my 2 non-retina screens? >> >> Because the pixel:point ration is 1:1. > > And may I deduce from that that whatever API XQuartz uses to obtain screen > pixel resolution returns points on a Retina screen?
XQuartz doesn't get the screen resolution in pixels from macOS. It gets the resolution in points. On non retina displays, they are the same value. > Technically debatable (if you ask for pixels you shouldn't be earning any > points ;)) Nothing asks for pixels. This code existed long before the difference existed (or rather before API existed to distinguish the difference) and has just never been updated. > but understandable if you want clients to open in a readable size on a > crazy-res display > But points and pixels are probably just a scale factor away, an integer one > (I hope) Not necessarily. It is in practice, but there's no guarantee that it will always be the case. > , and I'd presume there is an API call for determining the appropriate scale > size? A whole bunch of 'em. See https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/GraphicsAnimation/Conceptual/HighResolutionOSX/APIs/APIs.html > So what happens when you use a regular (say 1080p) external in combination > with a Retina display, and for good measure you deactivate "screens have > separate spaces" to get the traditional > spaces-span-all-screens-of-the-desktop behaviour? You'd have one 1920x180 display at 1x and another display at 2x. As you drag (non X11) windows between them, they'll adjust their scale factors. > I guess it becomes hard to define Xft.dpi in that case...? Yes, but the issue existed before retina. It just got quite a bit more obviously challenging with such a larger range of dot pitch available. Ten years ago, most displays were around ~100 dpi. Now we've got displays above 400. > > I could probably find answers to all that by looking at the Qt5 code but > since my only Retina screens are in my iPhone and my own eyes I have no way > of verifying if that code handles all possible situations appropriately. > >>> Could xrandr be used to get XQuartz to use the full resolution on a Retina >>> screen, or is it going to be necessary to hack the code? >> >> Probably. > > You tell us; I wouldn't be really surprised if xrandr does squat on Mac... > and you'd need to know the appropriate modeline too. RandR doesn't really have anything to do with modelines. And thanks for that shuttering and horrific set of memories that you just conjured up by just mentioning modelines... RandR doesn't do squat. About 8 years ago, I added support for RandR to XQuartz which effectively lets you switch to various fullscreen modes that the display supports. You can use xrandr from the command line to put XQuartz into fullscreen mode at the native display pixel resolution (eg: `xrandr -s 2880x1800`), but that will be a fullscreen mode and will render your windows much smaller than what you want. > >> Oh. LOL. I missed that part. In that case, it's likely that XQuartz isn't >> delivering the mouse events for some reason... maybe it doesn't think it's >> in the foreground or something? Not sure, but if anyone wants to dig into >> it, I'll be happy to get the patch into XQuartz and get it upstreamed. > > Fullscreen X puts up a fullscreen native window I presume? What if it's > simply that this window isn't made key? > > @raf: can you add a line to your xinitrc so that xev is started up by > default, and see if that tells you anything? > > I worked a lot like you, but that goes back to 10.4, a long time ago now. I > loved having a machine with 2 faces, a modern desktop and a traditional X11 > workstation with a minimal WM (ctwm in my case, with my own hacks). Something > changed when I got my first Intel MBP under 10.6; IIRC it became an issue > that I took it back and forth (suspended) between home and work where I had > external screens with a different resolution. Or it was simply that my > workflow changed and I got fed up switching back and forth. Nowadays I still > spend a lot of time in xterms, but XQuartz is set to mingle; using xfwm4 with > a Mint theme X11 windows fit in but look just sufficiently different to make > them easy to catch. The only drawback is that I cannot move X11 windows > across Spaces (but that's rarely necessary), and I have to make a trip to the > menu each time I want to copy something to the Mac clipboard (and I forget > about pbcopy). > > R. > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > X11-users mailing list (X11firstname.lastname@example.org) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/x11-users/jeremyhu%40freedesktop.org > > This email sent to jerem...@freedesktop.org
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. X11-users mailing list (X11email@example.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/x11-users/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com