i tried to create the garden of eden..it became paradise lost by 
default...merle


  
Give the teacher an apple!

KG

On 8/3/2012 9:01 PM, Bill! wrote:

  
>Mike,
>
>I believe the story in the Bible of the 'Garden of Eden'
              is a mythologized description of what mankind's life was
              like before he became too dependent upon and attached to
              his rational mind (dualism - Knowledge of Good and Evil).
              Before that he lived at one with God - in the Garden of
              Eden.
>
>...Bill! 
>
>--- In [email protected], mike brown <uerusuboyo@...> wrote:
>>
>> Merle,
>> 
>> It's a nice sentiment to try to do that, isn't it? I
              guess the problem is is that we collect too much dust in
              our eyes as we acquire more of what the world teaches us.
              I do have a vague memory/feeling tho,  of playing in my
              parent's garden and it being what the Garden of Eden must
              be like. I would've been less surprised to come across the
              Cheshire Cat than I would if I'd come across the tabby
              next door.
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...>To: "[email protected]" 
>> <[email protected]> 
>> 
>> Sent: Friday, 3 August 2012, 8:56
>> Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Chan and zen
>> 
>> 
>>   
>> 
>> 
>>  look at life through the eyes of a young child...
              fresh, always alert and forever curious..merle
>> 
>> 
>>   
>> Chris,
>> 
>> >So I guess my question is that having now had a
              great deal more chance 
>> to see from the non-dual perspective, do you find
              that the initial 
>> experience you wrote about was really basically
              ordinary, but so far our of your thinking that you were
              surprised at its nature?  Or do you find it leaves you
              feeling there is some progression to your practice and 
>> liberation, and your ordinary experience before that
              seeing is not like 
>> your ordinary experience now? <
>> 
>> Thanks for reading and asking questions. All I can
              say about it is that the objects we normally take for
              granted were seen as they really are because the web of
              concepts we usually overlay them with was removed. They
              just were. It struck me at the time (during the episode)
              that seeing this way was the most natural and real way of
              seeing, except not seeing with the eyes, and that it was
              all so obvious. It was more like the objects were and I
              wasn't (Which is why Dogen's '10,000 things' resonates). I
              have to say that my ordinary experience is not like it was
              before, but neither is it like it was during the
              experience, which is why I do feel there is some
              progression to my practice and liberation. It's not for
              the purpose of recapturing a past experience (like a drug
              high), but to get to the bottom of what it's all about. In
              a way, I've answered 'yes' to both your questions, but
              contradictions seem okay now, too.
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: Chris Austin-Lane <chris@...>
>> To: [email protected] 
>> Sent: Friday, 3 August 2012, 4:15
>> Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Chan and zen
>> 
>> 
>>   
>> This thread has been very interesting, but I have a
              question for Mike.  I am honored that you shared your
              experience with us, and I hope I can address a question
              without antagonizing you - it's a real question I have,
              and I am perfectly willing to hear any honest answer.  
>> 
>> As far as I can tell, every time one slows down the
              rush of thinking a bit, out pops such a lovely universe as
              these dramatic experiences seem to highlight.  But, other
              than the strong emotions, I don't read anything in these
              mystical experiences that isn't there each moment, in the
              quiet still space that attending lets us notice.
                 After each exhalation, perfect stillness, balanced
              on the burning tip of creation.  Something like that.  
>> 
>> I've not had an enlightenment experience as a part of
              zen training*, but they don't read as different from my
              frequent realizing I'm lost in day dreams and returning to
              attentive zazen - tho that realization is rather dull, it
              has the full sense of okness and the noticeable lack of
              distinct boundaries.  When I stop crinkling up my mind,
              and attend to what Bill! calls raw sensory input, living
              is awfully pretty and crystalline and wonderful; even in
              the middle of an argument with my wife or kids, here we
              are; how can I not smile a bit (unless it would upset the
              companions)?  I have a fairly pleasant and orderly life,
              to be sure, but even crashing on my bike is interesting.
               That slight shift in perspective happens many times a
              day, but each time I let go (of *my* thoughts, *my*
              preferences, *my* expectations), my ass unclenches and I
              find that the moment is indeed complete and sufficient.  
>> 
>> So I guess my question is that having now had a great
              deal more chance to see from the non-dual perspective, do
              you find that the initial experience you wrote about was
              really basically ordinary, but so far our of your thinking
              that you were surprised at its nature?  Or do you find it
              leaves you feeling there is some progression to your
              practice and liberation, and your ordinary experience
              before that seeing is not like your ordinary experience
              now? 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> --Chris
>> chris@...
>> +1-301-270-6524
>> 
>> *I had a couple of "it's ok, all is one" experiences
              as a child, and occasionally as a parent (being a parent
              seems to for me to bring out all sorts of states of love
              and wonder, due I guess to the physical exhaustion, total
              dedication, and lack of personal wilfulness), that seem
              sort of like what people describe, tho of course it had
              nothing to do with zen training as I only started that a
              few years ago.  
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Joe <desert_woodworker@...> wrote:
>> 
>> Ed,
>> >
>> >Hugh bet that zen teachers use the word
              "samadhi'.  Not many talk
>> >about it.  Except in dokusan.  It's not a
              secret, but maybe since
>> >about half the folks on sesshin are pretty new,
              teachers do not make
>> >a big deal about it in public, while the
              old-timers of course are
>> >just bathed in it, to their eyebrows.  Or we can
              hope, so.
>> >
>> >--Joe
>> >
>> >
>> >"ED" <seacrofter001@> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Mike,
>> >>
>> >> Samadhi has numerous meanings.  What do you
              mean by 'samadhi'?  Joe,
>> >> what do you mean by 'samadhi' ?    Do Zen
              masters ever use the term
>> >> 'samadhi'?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >------------------------------------
>> >
>> >Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you
              recently have read or are reading! Talk about it
              today!Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

 

Reply via email to