Chris,

We are talking about living organisms which are computational systems WITH 
intent. The entire universe of forms is a computational system that continually 
computes its current state of existence. There is no evidence of intent in the 
non-living universe depending on how intent is defined...

Edgar



On Apr 21, 2013, at 7:47 PM, Chris Austin-Lane wrote:

> 
> Does deterministic computation imply intent?   (sum 1 1)  ... the intent is 
> what? 
> 
> I am sure that the moon can survive just fine without intent. 
> 
> Thanks,
> --Chris
> 301-270-6524
> On Apr 21, 2013 6:14 PM, "Edgar Owen" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Chris,
> 
> There can be but not necessarily (computation could be completely random). 
> But only an intelligent intentional organism is able to survive...
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 21, 2013, at 6:07 PM, Chris Austin-Lane wrote:
> 
>>  
>> 
>> Is there intention in computation?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> --Chris
>> 301-270-6524
>> On Apr 21, 2013 5:58 PM, "Edgar Owen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Chris,
>> 
>> Of course there is intention because whether it happens in the conscious or 
>> unconscious mind the actions are goal oriented no matter whether it's 
>> something simple like taking a drink or breathing to keep from dying....
>> 
>> The human body is a computational system that continually computes its 
>> actions on a logical basis. If this were not so it could not function and 
>> would soon die.
>> 
>> Edgar
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 21, 2013, at 5:44 PM, Chris Austin-Lane wrote:
>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> No, they still take place as they do, some conscious and some not, but with 
>>> no effort nor intention.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> --Chris
>>> 301-270-6524
>>> On Apr 21, 2013 3:36 PM, "Edgar Owen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Chris,
>>> 
>>> That is true only with respect to the conscious mind. The only difference 
>>> is that all the rational computations are now taking place in the 
>>> UNconscious mind, but they are STILL taking place...
>>> 
>>> Edgar
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Apr 21, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Chris Austin-Lane wrote:
>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> The opposite of monkey mind is not doing one thing but effortless activity 
>>>> - no one doing no thing. In cutting carrots each muscle,  nerve, knife and 
>>>> plant goes on just as it is, no need to do anything.
>>>> 
>>>> The 10,000 things take care of them selves with no effort and no boundary.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> --Chris
>>>> 301-270-6524
>>>> On Apr 21, 2013 8:29 AM, "Merle Lester" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>>  bill...many thanks..yes single minded would you not say?..devoted to the 
>>>> task at hand...question: why is multi tasking and multi thinking regarded 
>>>> as "the enemy"?
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> Merle,
>>>> 
>>>> This is a very common occurrence. Zen literature refers to this as the 
>>>> 'monkey mind' because it seems to just go on and on without end and 
>>>> out-of-control.
>>>> 
>>>> Zazen (and other zen teaching techniques) specifically target 'monkey 
>>>> mind' and try to calm it down until it eventually ceases all activity. 
>>>> Then you can have a direct experience of reality (Buddha Nature).
>>>> 
>>>> When you do things like weeding or probably painting you may focus your 
>>>> whole being on just weeding or just painting. If you do this it is just 
>>>> like zazen in which you may start by concentrating on your breath. This 
>>>> single-mindedness concentration is what is meant by the zen saying, "When 
>>>> sit, just sit. When walking, just walk. Above all don't wobble." That 
>>>> means when your doing anything, just do that. Don't try to do many things 
>>>> at once, and especially don't do something while thinking about something 
>>>> else. Like painting while thinking about what you're going to fix for 
>>>> dinner. Or when fixing dinner not thinking about what you're going to 
>>>> paint after eating. When painting, just paint. When fixing dinner, just 
>>>> fix dinner.
>>>> 
>>>> And yes, it's much easier said than done...
>>>> 
>>>> ...Bill!
>>>> 
>>>> --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > 
>>>> > 
>>>> > Â 
>>>> > Â bill..yes i understand..thank you..yes i agree with you..the intellect 
>>>> > chatter..that is constant with me and i find it so tiring to the point 
>>>> > where i get a headache..i go out and do weeding to freshen my brain.. i 
>>>> > am constantly asking questions mostly ones one cannot answer 
>>>> > anyway..round and round in circles i go... chewing it over and over... i 
>>>> > am a bit of a problem solver..that's what happens at night and i cannot 
>>>> > turn my mind off so i can't sleep..yes and then there is the emotions 
>>>> > rocking me around like a boat...i need to go watch a show on telly 
>>>> > now..back later..thank you bill!..i appreciate this post..merle
>>>> > 
>>>> > 
>>>> > Â  
>>>> > Merle,
>>>> > 
>>>> > You are definitely on the right track.
>>>> > 
>>>> > You can't just turn these things off. Daido talked about that. You just 
>>>> > let them come and go. The zen story about that (there's a zen story 
>>>> > about everything) is it is like when you are busy doing something and 
>>>> > someone comes to your door. You can answer the door, tell them you'r 
>>>> > busy right now and that they can come back later. What you don't do is 
>>>> > invite them in for tea and a lengthy chat.
>>>> > 
>>>> > You can begin to quiet your mind down by doing what Daido said (or by 
>>>> > chanting or bowing or koan study, etc...), and when you do reach the 
>>>> > point to where all these thoughts have been turned off (I use the word 
>>>> > 'quiesce' or 'paused' or 'temporarily halted') THEN you will experience 
>>>> > Buddha Nature - which is the direct experience of reality WITHOUT all 
>>>> > the intellectual and emotional chatter going on.
>>>> > 
>>>> > And basically that's it! Then it's just a matter of 'practicing' so you 
>>>> > can keep all that chatter at an absolute minimum - not cease it 
>>>> > permanently but only use it (your intellect/your rationality) when it's 
>>>> > appropriate. Your intellect (logic/rationality) is just one of the many 
>>>> > tools you have in your human tool bag and you shouldn't treat it like it 
>>>> > is the only one. Like I've reminded people on this forum of the old 
>>>> > saying which I apply to the intellect, "When all one has is a hammer, 
>>>> > everything looks like a nail".
>>>> > 
>>>> > I call all this intellectual chatter 'illusion' and I call only the 
>>>> > direct experience of reality (Buddha Nature) 'real' - and that's where 
>>>> > the major difference of opinion (or at least terminology) between Edgar 
>>>> > and me - at least IMO.
>>>> > 
>>>> > Enjoy...Bill! 
>>>> > 
>>>> > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 
>>>> > > 
>>>> > >  bill! yes i know the scoreboard..sometimes it's hard to turn off 
>>>> > > the mind and experience non thought..and basically it's feelings that 
>>>> > > get me into a knot...i get so many different feelings flooding 
>>>> > > me..from joy to utter despair...all bubbling away like a volcano... 
>>>> > > this is what i find difficult to turn that switch off..however i note 
>>>> > > in my study..i just let them pass as they come and then they go like a 
>>>> > > log floating down a stream..am i on the right track?..merle
>>>> > > 
>>>> > > 
>>>> > >   
>>>> > > Merle,
>>>> > > 
>>>> > > I agree with what Mike says below and would reinforce that in the 
>>>> > > statement you quoted, 'you are your best teacher'...
>>>> > > 
>>>> > > If 'you' means your self, your ego, your intellect, your dualistic, 
>>>> > > rational mind - then it is definitely not your best teacher (for zen).
>>>> > > 
>>>> > > But if 'you' means experience, Buddha Nature, the absence of ego, 
>>>> > > itellect, dualism, etc... - then it is definitely your best teacher 
>>>> > > (for zen).
>>>> > > 
>>>> > > ...Bill! 
>>>> > > 
>>>> > > --- In [email protected], uerusuboyo@ wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Merle,<br/><br/>Depends what you mean by "you". If 'you' means your 
>>>> > > > ego, then absolutely not because the mind will colour things to suit 
>>>> > > > itself. If by 'you' you mean reality, then absolutely yes! And by 
>>>> > > > reality I mean the immediacy of direct experience. Buddha said, "Be 
>>>> > > > a lamp unto yourself". Only you will know if the tea is hot or cold 
>>>> > > > (remember that topic!). A teacher is only a guide and friend. 
>>>> > > > Ultimately only you can workout your own salvation. 
>>>> > > > <br/><br/>Mike<br/><br/><br/>Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPhone
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to