Does deterministic computation imply intent?   (sum 1 1)  ... the intent is
what?

I am sure that the moon can survive just fine without intent.

Thanks,
--Chris
301-270-6524
 On Apr 21, 2013 6:14 PM, "Edgar Owen" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Chris,
>
> There can be but not necessarily (computation could be completely random).
> But only an intelligent intentional organism is able to survive...
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
> On Apr 21, 2013, at 6:07 PM, Chris Austin-Lane wrote:
>
>
>
> Is there intention in computation?
>
> Thanks,
> --Chris
> 301-270-6524
>  On Apr 21, 2013 5:58 PM, "Edgar Owen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Chris,
>>
>> Of course there is intention because whether it happens in the conscious
>> or unconscious mind the actions are goal oriented no matter whether it's
>> something simple like taking a drink or breathing to keep from dying....
>>
>> The human body is a computational system that continually computes its
>> actions on a logical basis. If this were not so it could not function and
>> would soon die.
>>
>> Edgar
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 21, 2013, at 5:44 PM, Chris Austin-Lane wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> No, they still take place as they do, some conscious and some not, but
>> with no effort nor intention.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --Chris
>> 301-270-6524
>>  On Apr 21, 2013 3:36 PM, "Edgar Owen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Chris,
>>>
>>> That is true only with respect to the conscious mind. The only
>>> difference is that all the rational computations are now taking place in
>>> the UNconscious mind, but they are STILL taking place...
>>>
>>> Edgar
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 21, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Chris Austin-Lane wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The opposite of monkey mind is not doing one thing but effortless
>>> activity - no one doing no thing. In cutting carrots each muscle,  nerve,
>>> knife and plant goes on just as it is, no need to do anything.
>>>
>>> The 10,000 things take care of them selves with no effort and no
>>> boundary.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> --Chris
>>> 301-270-6524
>>>  On Apr 21, 2013 8:29 AM, "Merle Lester" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  bill...many thanks..yes single minded would you not say?..devoted to
>>>> the task at hand...question: why is multi tasking and multi thinking
>>>> regarded as "the enemy"?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Merle,
>>>>
>>>> This is a very common occurrence. Zen literature refers to this as the
>>>> 'monkey mind' because it seems to just go on and on without end and
>>>> out-of-control.
>>>>
>>>> Zazen (and other zen teaching techniques) specifically target 'monkey
>>>> mind' and try to calm it down until it eventually ceases all activity. Then
>>>> you can have a direct experience of reality (Buddha Nature).
>>>>
>>>> When you do things like weeding or probably painting you may focus your
>>>> whole being on just weeding or just painting. If you do this it is just
>>>> like zazen in which you may start by concentrating on your breath. This
>>>> single-mindedness concentration is what is meant by the zen saying, "When
>>>> sit, just sit. When walking, just walk. Above all don't wobble." That means
>>>> when your doing anything, just do that. Don't try to do many things at
>>>> once, and especially don't do something while thinking about something
>>>> else. Like painting while thinking about what you're going to fix for
>>>> dinner. Or when fixing dinner not thinking about what you're going to paint
>>>> after eating. When painting, just paint. When fixing dinner, just fix
>>>> dinner.
>>>>
>>>> And yes, it's much easier said than done...
>>>>
>>>> ...Bill!
>>>>
>>>> --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Â
>>>> > Â bill..yes i understand..thank you..yes i agree with you..the
>>>> intellect chatter..that is constant with me and i find it so tiring to the
>>>> point where i get a headache..i go out and do weeding to freshen my brain..
>>>> i am constantly asking questions mostly ones one cannot answer
>>>> anyway..round and round in circles i go... chewing it over and over... i am
>>>> a bit of a problem solver..that's what happens at night and i cannot turn
>>>> my mind off so i can't sleep..yes and then there is the emotions rocking me
>>>> around like a boat...i need to go watch a show on telly now..back
>>>> later..thank you bill!..i appreciate this post..merle
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Â
>>>> > Merle,
>>>> >
>>>> > You are definitely on the right track.
>>>> >
>>>> > You can't just turn these things off. Daido talked about that. You
>>>> just let them come and go. The zen story about that (there's a zen story
>>>> about everything) is it is like when you are busy doing something and
>>>> someone comes to your door. You can answer the door, tell them you'r busy
>>>> right now and that they can come back later. What you don't do is invite
>>>> them in for tea and a lengthy chat.
>>>> >
>>>> > You can begin to quiet your mind down by doing what Daido said (or by
>>>> chanting or bowing or koan study, etc...), and when you do reach the point
>>>> to where all these thoughts have been turned off (I use the word 'quiesce'
>>>> or 'paused' or 'temporarily halted') THEN you will experience Buddha Nature
>>>> - which is the direct experience of reality WITHOUT all the intellectual
>>>> and emotional chatter going on.
>>>> >
>>>> > And basically that's it! Then it's just a matter of 'practicing' so
>>>> you can keep all that chatter at an absolute minimum - not cease it
>>>> permanently but only use it (your intellect/your rationality) when it's
>>>> appropriate. Your intellect (logic/rationality) is just one of the many
>>>> tools you have in your human tool bag and you shouldn't treat it like it is
>>>> the only one. Like I've reminded people on this forum of the old saying
>>>> which I apply to the intellect, "When all one has is a hammer, everything
>>>> looks like a nail".
>>>> >
>>>> > I call all this intellectual chatter 'illusion' and I call only the
>>>> direct experience of reality (Buddha Nature) 'real' - and that's where the
>>>> major difference of opinion (or at least terminology) between Edgar and me
>>>> - at least IMO.
>>>> >
>>>> > Enjoy...Bill!
>>>> >
>>>> > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >  bill! yes i know the scoreboard..sometimes it's hard to turn
>>>> off the mind and experience non thought..and basically it's feelings that
>>>> get me into a knot...i get so many different feelings flooding me..from joy
>>>> to utter despair...all bubbling away like a volcano... this is what i find
>>>> difficult to turn that switch off..however i note in my study..i just let
>>>> them pass as they come and then they go like a log floating down a
>>>> stream..am i on the right track?..merle
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > ÂÂ
>>>> > > Merle,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I agree with what Mike says below and would reinforce that in the
>>>> statement you quoted, 'you are your best teacher'...
>>>> > >
>>>> > > If 'you' means your self, your ego, your intellect, your dualistic,
>>>> rational mind - then it is definitely not your best teacher (for zen).
>>>> > >
>>>> > > But if 'you' means experience, Buddha Nature, the absence of ego,
>>>> itellect, dualism, etc... - then it is definitely your best teacher (for
>>>> zen).
>>>> > >
>>>> > > ...Bill!
>>>> > >
>>>> > > --- In [email protected], uerusuboyo@ wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Merle,<br/><br/>Depends what you mean by "you". If 'you' means
>>>> your ego, then absolutely not because the mind will colour things to suit
>>>> itself. If by 'you' you mean reality, then absolutely yes! And by reality I
>>>> mean the immediacy of direct experience. Buddha said, "Be a lamp unto
>>>> yourself". Only you will know if the tea is hot or cold (remember that
>>>> topic!). A teacher is only a guide and friend. Ultimately only you can
>>>> workout your own salvation. <br/><br/>Mike<br/><br/><br/>Sent from Yahoo!
>>>> Mail for iPhone
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> 

Reply via email to