Bill, et al,

This reminds me of when I was living in Japan. One day I was walking along a 
drainage canal and saw a small white dog drowning in it. The canal had high 
concrete walls and it couldn't climb out. I jumped in and saved it and as soon 
as I got it out it bit me!

Funniest thing was that the day it happened was Buddha's birthday!

Kind of reminds me of Joe's and Bill's response for all I do for them!
:-)

Edgar




On May 2, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Bill! wrote:

> 
> Merle,
> 
> I have have been practicing for about 47 years, sometimes intensely and 
> sometimes not.  I have not yet been able to eliminate all ignorance and all 
> craving but I have been able to reduce them both in number and in intensity 
> quite a bit.
> 
> MY PERSONAL STORY
> About two years ago I discovered very young puppies tied up in a burlap bag 
> and tossed out onto the highway near my mountain home.  The bag had been run 
> over by a car and was soaked in blood.  When I opened the bag I found 2 dead 
> puppies, 1 with a broken back and a completely flattened pelvis area with 
> intestines oozing out and one was not hurt.  I killed the one with the broken 
> back with my neighbors shotgun by shooting it in the head and buried it and 
> the 2 dead puppies in the jungle.
> 
> I kept the surviving puppy and named it Batman because of it's long ears and 
> pug nose.
> 
> 
> 
> ...Bill!
> 
> --- In [email protected], Merle Lester wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > Â bill!..thank you...
> > 
> > have you been able to eliminate all ignorance and all craving?
> > 
> >  can you share a personal story  with the group?
> > 
> > merle
> > 
> > 
> > Â  
> > Merle,
> > 
> > Sorry, but that's the God-awful truth. Â Buddhism is all about the relief 
> > of suffering.
> > 
> > Here is what Wikipedia has to say about Buddhism:
> > 
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism 
> > 
> > 
> > Buddhism is a religion indigenous to the Indian subcontinent that 
> > encompasses a variety of traditions, beliefs and practices largely based on 
> > teachings attributed to Siddhartha Gautama, who is commonly known as the 
> > Buddha, meaning "the awakened one". The Buddha lived and taught in the 
> > eastern part of the Indian subcontinent sometime between the 6th and 4th 
> > centuries BCE.[1] He is recognized by Buddhists as an awakened or 
> > enlightened teacher who shared his insights to help sentient beings end 
> > their suffering (dukkha) through the elimination of ignorance (avidyÄ) by 
> > way of understanding and the seeing of dependent origination 
> > (pratÄ«tyasamutpÄda) and the elimination of craving (taṇhÄ), and 
> > thus the attainment of the cessation of all suffering, known as the sublime 
> > state of nirvÄņa.[2]
> > 
> > I've highlighted the parts to which I want to draw your attention that 
> > pertain to the question at hand.
> > 
> > And before someone jumps all over me on this I want to point out that this 
> > is BUDDHISM, not zen.
> > 
> > ...Bill!
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   rubbish..you can dissolve into the now..
> > > 
> > > life is suffering..nothing to do with attachments..
> > > 
> > > like to see you bill when you have a physical aliment..
> > > 
> > > sure you can whisk it away for a moment or two..try mental 
> > > suffering...that cannot be dissolved 
> > > 
> > > the promise of buddhism is release from suffering..
> > > 
> > > right..maybe
> > > 
> > > yes it is a way of viewing suffering however you cannot escape it..
> > > 
> > > rather you accept it
> > > 
> > > so how come buddhist monks are the first to set fire to themselves when 
> > > they see injustices done?
> > > 
> > >  that would be mega suffering and don't tell me they don't suffer as 
> > > the flames engulf them
> > > 
> > > have you ever truly suffered bill?.. or seen loved ones suffering?
> > > 
> > >  as you eat your stir fried chicken do you not realise the suffering 
> > > that was impose on this creature that you might live and live to suffer?
> > > 
> > > acceptance is the key word in my books
> > > 
> > >  acceptance,  compassion and universal love
> > > 
> > >  if that is not buddhism then well i'll be blown over by a stick
> > > 
> > >  merle
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   
> > > Merle,
> > > 
> > > Suffering can be entirely eliminated and William is right that this is 
> > > the promise of Buddhism.
> > > 
> > > This is Buddhism 101:
> > > 
> > > - Life is suffering
> > > - Suffering is caused by attachments
> > > - Attachments are caused by/enabled by identification with your self
> > > - The self is illusory
> > > 
> > > So, like a big house of cards when you dissolve the illusion of self you 
> > > take away the anchor for attachments causing them to fall away which 
> > > eliminates suffering.
> > > 
> > > And how do you come to recognize the self as illusory? My suggestion is 
> > > you do zazen (zen meditation) staring with counting your breaths. When 
> > > you stop your intellect from producing illusions (and most especially the 
> > > illusion of self) you experience Buddha Nature.
> > > 
> > > And then Voila! Just This!
> > > 
> > > ...Bill!
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester merlewiitpom@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > my understanding is suffering cannot be eliminated..how the hell can 
> > > > that come about..the very nature of life is suffering... 
> > > > point to me who does not what does not..be it animal mineral or 
> > > > vegetable..
> > > > the notion of happy happy is absurd..
> > > > we can come to terms with suffering
> > > >  we can embrace and realise that compassion and eternal 
> > > > universal love can lift us from suffering and soar us high above the 
> > > > treetops to the heavens above just as the eagle flies we too can fly..
> > > > 
> > > > merle
> > > > 
> > > >  some strawberries are sour i have noted in my many years of 
> > > > eating strawberries...this i refer to as the "chop suey" of 
> > > > life...sweet and sour...
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >   
> > > > And yet you are the one who started this conversation.  It has 
> > > > been my understanding that the primary message of Buddhism was 
> > > > addressing suffering.  What it is and how to stop it. The 
> > > > Buddha was not searching or teaching ways to survive crises but to end 
> > > > suffering.  I can agree that survivability might be enhanced by 
> > > > being fully in the moment but I see no certainty of it. In my readings 
> > > > of Zen the moment of Death is often addressed with an awareness and 
> > > > often a smile. The strawberry is so sweet. suey
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Joe desert_woodworker@
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Sent: Wed, May 1, 2013 4:27:50 PM
> > > > Subject: [Zen] Re: Someone Else's Opinion on What is Real and What is 
> > > > Not...
> > > > 
> > > >   
> > > > Hi, William,
> > > > 
> > > > The crisis is and was the one you raised earlier, about killing some 
> > > > beast or other. Thought and pondering at that scene would be 
> > > > inexcusable, while acting in accord with need, informed by your 
> > > > intimacy and full presence and awareness of conditions, would give you 
> > > > an opening to hunt another day.
> > > > 
> > > > Coming back to practice, practice enables habits to drop, so we can be 
> > > > present fully. You can still use what you've learned, but you won't be 
> > > > bound by it. That is all.
> > > > 
> > > > And that is the point. I won't engage in useless historicizing, not in 
> > > > a Zen discussion forum, anyway. If we're not already clear about how 
> > > > practice works, then the next step is clear: practice. There may be 
> > > > pointers on it here at the Forum. A real teacher face to face is the 
> > > > best teacher though, many here would agree.
> > > > 
> > > > --Joe
> > > > 
> > > > > Email wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > You've modified your original position from a statement of our genetic
> > > > inheritance to surviving a crisis. That quite a bit different. However 
> > > > from your current position are you saying that the people who died from 
> > > > the bombings in Boston were "burdened and unable to act spontaneously" 
> > > > while those who survived were "acting spontaneously and were 
> > > > unburdened"? Or is there some other type if crisis? 
> > > > > If two people, one who was unburdened and acting spontaneously and 
> > > > > had never encountered a tiger in the wild and the other who hunted 
> > > > > tigers daily, were to suddenly be faced with one, who would survive 
> > > > > this crisis?
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 

Reply via email to