bill!..i love dogs...batman is so cute... thank you for your story..merle Merle,
I have have been practicing for about 47 years, sometimes intensely and sometimes not. I have not yet been able to eliminate all ignorance and all craving but I have been able to reduce them both in number and in intensity quite a bit. MY PERSONAL STORY About two years ago I discovered very young puppies tied up in a burlap bag and tossed out onto the highway near my mountain home. The bag had been run over by a car and was soaked in blood. When I opened the bag I found 2 dead puppies, 1 with a broken back and a completely flattened pelvis area with intestines oozing out and one was not hurt. I killed the one with the broken back with my neighbors shotgun by shooting it in the head and buried it and the 2 dead puppies in the jungle. I kept the surviving puppy and named it Batman because of it's long ears and pug nose. ...Bill! --- In [email protected], Merle Lester wrote: > > > >  bill!..thank you... > > have you been able to eliminate all ignorance and all craving? > >  can you share a personal story  with the group? > > merle > > >  > Merle, > > Sorry, but that's the God-awful truth.  Buddhism is all about the relief of > suffering. > > Here is what Wikipedia has to say about Buddhism: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism > > > Buddhism is a religion indigenous to the Indian subcontinent that > encompasses a variety of traditions, beliefs and practices largely based on > teachings attributed to Siddhartha Gautama, who is commonly known as the > Buddha, meaning "the awakened one". The Buddha lived and taught in the > eastern part of the Indian subcontinent sometime between the 6th and 4th > centuries BCE.[1] He is recognized by Buddhists as an awakened or > enlightened teacher who shared his insights to help sentient beings end > their suffering (dukkha) through the elimination of ignorance (avidyÄ) by > way of understanding and the seeing of dependent origination > (pratÄ«tyasamutpÄda) and the elimination of craving (taṇhÄ), and > thus the attainment of the cessation of all suffering, known as the sublime > state of nirvÄņa.[2] > > I've highlighted the parts to which I want to draw your attention that > pertain to the question at hand. > > And before someone jumps all over me on this I want to point out that this is > BUDDHISM, not zen. > > ...Bill! > > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester wrote: > > > > > > > >  rubbish..you can dissolve into the now.. > > > > life is suffering..nothing to do with attachments.. > > > > like to see you bill when you have a physical aliment.. > > > > sure you can whisk it away for a moment or two..try mental suffering...that > > cannot be dissolved > > > > the promise of buddhism is release from suffering.. > > > > right..maybe > > > > yes it is a way of viewing suffering however you cannot escape it.. > > > > rather you accept it > > > > so how come buddhist monks are the first to set fire to themselves when > > they see injustices done? > > > >  that would be mega suffering and don't tell me they don't suffer as the > > flames engulf them > > > > have you ever truly suffered bill?.. or seen loved ones suffering? > > > >  as you eat your stir fried chicken do you not realise the suffering > > that was impose on this creature that you might live and live to suffer? > > > > acceptance is the key word in my books > > > >  acceptance,  compassion and universal love > > > >  if that is not buddhism then well i'll be blown over by a stick > > > >  merle > > > > > >  > > Merle, > > > > Suffering can be entirely eliminated and William is right that this is the > > promise of Buddhism. > > > > This is Buddhism 101: > > > > - Life is suffering > > - Suffering is caused by attachments > > - Attachments are caused by/enabled by identification with your self > > - The self is illusory > > > > So, like a big house of cards when you dissolve the illusion of self you > > take away the anchor for attachments causing them to fall away which > > eliminates suffering. > > > > And how do you come to recognize the self as illusory? My suggestion is > > you do zazen (zen meditation) staring with counting your breaths. When you > > stop your intellect from producing illusions (and most especially the > > illusion of self) you experience Buddha Nature. > > > > And then Voila! Just This! > > > > ...Bill! > > > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester merlewiitpom@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > my understanding is suffering cannot be eliminated..how the hell can that > > > come about..the very nature of life is suffering... > > > point to me who does not what does not..be it animal mineral or > > > vegetable.. > > > the notion of happy happy is absurd.. > > > we can come to terms with suffering > > >  we can embrace and realise that compassion and eternal universal > > > love can lift us from suffering and soar us high above the treetops to > > > the heavens above just as the eagle flies we too can fly.. > > > > > > merle > > > > > >  some strawberries are sour i have noted in my many years of > > > eating strawberries...this i refer to as the "chop suey" of life...sweet > > > and sour... > > > > > > > > >  > > > And yet you are the one who started this conversation. It has > > > been my understanding that the primary message of Buddhism was > > > addressing suffering. What it is and how to stop it. The Buddha > > > was not searching or teaching ways to survive crises but to end > > > suffering. I can agree that survivability might be enhanced by > > > being fully in the moment but I see no certainty of it. In my readings of > > > Zen the moment of Death is often addressed with an awareness and often a > > > smile. The strawberry is so sweet. suey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Joe desert_woodworker@ > > > To: [email protected] > > > Sent: Wed, May 1, 2013 4:27:50 PM > > > Subject: [Zen] Re: Someone Else's Opinion on What is Real and What is > > > Not... > > > > > >  > > > Hi, William, > > > > > > The crisis is and was the one you raised earlier, about killing some > > > beast or other. Thought and pondering at that scene would be inexcusable, > > > while acting in accord with need, informed by your intimacy and full > > > presence and awareness of conditions, would give you an opening to hunt > > > another day. > > > > > > Coming back to practice, practice enables habits to drop, so we can be > > > present fully. You can still use what you've learned, but you won't be > > > bound by it. That is all. > > > > > > And that is the point. I won't engage in useless historicizing, not in a > > > Zen discussion forum, anyway. If we're not already clear about how > > > practice works, then the next step is clear: practice. There may be > > > pointers on it here at the Forum. A real teacher face to face is the best > > > teacher though, many here would agree. > > > > > > --Joe > > > > > > > Email wrote: > > > > > > > > You've modified your original position from a statement of our genetic > > > inheritance to surviving a crisis. That quite a bit different. However > > > from your current position are you saying that the people who died from > > > the bombings in Boston were "burdened and unable to act spontaneously" > > > while those who survived were "acting spontaneously and were unburdened"? > > > Or is there some other type if crisis? > > > > If two people, one who was unburdened and acting spontaneously and had > > > > never encountered a tiger in the wild and the other who hunted tigers > > > > daily, were to suddenly be faced with one, who would survive this > > > > crisis? > > > > > >
