Edgar,

People create illusions so why can't people decide on whether they're real or 
not?

I say they're not.

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
>
> Bill,
> 
> People don't decide whether illusions are real or not. Reality does! Get that 
> through your solipsistic head!
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
> 
> On May 25, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Bill! wrote:
> 
> > Edgar,
> > 
> > As long as you agree dualism is an illusion you can call it 'reality' if 
> > you wish. I don't agree, but we can let others decide for themselves if 
> > illusions are real or not.
> > 
> > ...Bill!
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Bill,
> > > 
> > > Total agreement as stated.
> > > 
> > > Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in reality 
> > > instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
> > > 
> > > Edgar
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Siska,
> > > > 
> > > > As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite 
> > > > opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree with 
> > > > this statement ;>) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this 
> > > > post.
> > > > 
> > > > Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
> > > > 
> > > > I looked for my self,
> > > > But my self was gone.
> > > > The boundaries of my being
> > > > Had disappeared in the sea.
> > > > Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
> > > > And a voice returned me to myself.
> > > > It always happens like this.
> > > > Sea turns on itself and foams,
> > > > And with every foaming bit another body.
> > > > Another being takes form.
> > > > And when the sea sends word,
> > > > Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
> > > > - Rumi
> > > > 
> > > > I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, 
> > > > come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by 
> > > > slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later 
> > > > composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:
> > > > 
> > > > I looked for my self,
> > > > But my self was gone.
> > > > The boundaries of my being
> > > > Had disappeared in the sea.
> > > > 
> > > > Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. The 
> > > > illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as 
> > > > something independent and apart from everything else has vanished with 
> > > > it. It has vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
> > > > 
> > > > Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
> > > > And a voice returned me to myself.
> > > > It always happens like this.
> > > > 
> > > > Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
> > > > interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This alternation 
> > > > between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens 
> > > > regularly, much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach. 
> > > > 
> > > > Sea turns on itself and foams,
> > > > And with every foaming bit another body.
> > > > Another being takes form.
> > > > 
> > > > Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions, 
> > > > thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
> > > > 
> > > > And when the sea sends word,
> > > > Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
> > > > 
> > > > But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt 
> > > > back into emptiness.
> > > > 
> > > > That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see what 
> > > > Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
> > > > 
> > > > ...Bill!
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [email protected], siska_cen@ wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Bill,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I followed until: "Waves broke".
> > > > > 
> > > > > The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Siska
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: "Bill!" BillSmart@
> > > > > Sender: [email protected]
> > > > > Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29 
> > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > Reply-To: [email protected]
> > > > > Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > ..Bill!
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> >
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to