Chris,

I completely agree then with your statements about 'attentive witnessing'.

I do definitely over-define and over-draw "lines in the dust" mainly because of 
Edgar and a few others on the Forum.  I try to be ABSOLUTELY CLEAR on what I 
write so I don't have to explain a quote from me that is thrown up in my face 
days or weeks later.

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Chris Austin-Lane <chris@...> wrote:
>
> Attentive witnessing does not require thought - it is an attempt to capture
> mere presence, bare awareness, that sort of thing.
> 
> I'm still a bit sceptical that all these words aren't just trying to draw
> lines in the dust :)
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --Chris
> chris@...
> +1-301-270-6524
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Bill! <BillSmart@...> wrote:
> 
> > Chris,
> >
> > I think perceptions certainly could be seen as 'doing', if you as I do
> > consider 'thinking' as doing something.  So to follow it there is no doing
> > there would be no perceptions.
> >
> > I'm not exactly sure what you mean by 'attentive witnessing' but if it
> > involves thinking it would not be monisitc experience.  For example if it
> > involves it involves a subject/relationship/object scenario
> > (dualism/pluralism) such as a witness/observing/something then it would not
> > be a monistic experience and would in my book involve thinking and
> > perceiving.
> >
> > ...Bill!
> >
> > --- In [email protected], Chris Austin-Lane <chris@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Arg, this just shows to me the futility of words.  I was all fine but
> > then
> > > your clarification of precedes etc. leaves me all wanting to argue.
> > >
> > > Oh well.  How about this for another question:
> > >
> > > Is perception something that is related to "doing"?  If no doing is
> > > present, can perception be present?  Does mere attentive witnessing
> > already
> > > cross your line of experience?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > --Chris
> > > chris@
> > > +1-301-270-6524
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Bill! <BillSmart@> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Chris,
> > > >
> > > > I'm not locked-in to the "preceding" aspect.  As I've said on this
> > thread
> > > > I am not so concerned with the 'how' all this happens.  I just know it
> > > > happens.  Monistic experience and pluralistic perceptions may indeed
> > take
> > > > place at the same time.  In fact that does make some sense because
> > these
> > > > perceptions many times obscure monistic experience.
> > > >
> > > > I do believe monistic experience can occur without the arising of
> > > > perception (samadhi/shikantaza); and perceptions (delusions) can arise
> > that
> > > > completely obscure monistic experience ('normal' human condition); and
> > I do
> > > > believe that even when perceptions arise monistic experience (Buddha
> > > > Nature) is still present even though obscured.
> > > >
> > > > ...Bill!
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], Chris Austin-Lane <chris@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm with you 100% except for "preceding."  To me it seems to be
> > different
> > > > > categories - what you are calling experiencing is not a step in the
> > > > > process.  I can't say what I think it is.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyways, thanks for your patience.
> > > > >
> > > > > And Edgar, there's no self, never has, regardless of whatever level
> > of
> > > > zen
> > > > > training one has undertaken.  It's all just computational substrate,
> > > > right?
> > > > >  You can't cut bits out from the whole.
> > > > >
> > > > > --Chris
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > --Chris
> > > > > chris@
> > > > > +1-301-270-6524
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Bill! <BillSmart@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Chris,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Again, using your language below which talks about the brain's
> > > > functions
> > > > > > which would not be my choice of analogy...so please don't quote me
> > on
> > > > this
> > > > > > outside of this thread.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The way I see it experience is one of the most basic and
> > fundamental
> > > > > > functions of the brain of a sentient being.  In zen literature it
> > has
> > > > been
> > > > > > called such names as 'Original Mind' and 'Your Face Before Your
> > Mother
> > > > Was
> > > > > > Born'.  I am saying experience precedes the processing of any
> > > > experience by
> > > > > > the intellect which in zen literature has been called such names as
> > > > 'Small
> > > > > > Mind' and 'Monkey Mind'.  When the intellect arises it creates the
> > > > delusion
> > > > > > of dualism/pluralism.  This is the key.  The delusion of a
> > separate,
> > > > unique
> > > > > > 'self' is probably one of the first delusions that arises, but is
> > > > quickly
> > > > > > followed by all the other subject/object delusions that Edgar calls
> > > > 'forms'
> > > > > > and some Buddhist sects refer to as 'dharma' (small 'd' -
> > phenomena).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't see experience as "slightly at an angle to..." the arising
> > of
> > > > > > duality and perception, but just preceding it.  Experience is
> > > > > > "not-beginning and not-ending", sometimes referred to as 'in the
> > > > moment' or
> > > > > > 'only now'.  I do associate experience with what you call "the
> > wonder
> > > > of
> > > > > > presence" which I think I would just call 'awareness' which is
> > > > monisitic -
> > > > > > as contrasted with 'consciousness' which is dualistic.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Perceiving only is the normal human condition.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Experiencing only is Buddha Nature.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Perceiving and experiencing is what I believe many refer to as
> > > > 'awakening'
> > > > > > or 'enlightenment'.  What you 'awaken' to is the realization that
> > > > > > perceptions are delusions and only experience is real.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ...Bill!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In [email protected], Chris Austin-Lane <chris@>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bill,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > One more question on this:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Do you envision what you are calling experience to be a step in
> > the
> > > > > > brains
> > > > > > > normal functioning of responding to the environment in whatever
> > way
> > > > that
> > > > > > > the brain does that, or something slightly at an angle to the
> > work of
> > > > > > > transforming sensory stimulation into mental stimulation?
> >  Something
> > > > of
> > > > > > > which it could be said to be not-beginning and not-ending?
> > > >  Something to
> > > > > > > akin to what some people talk about as the wonder of presence?
> >  This
> > > > very
> > > > > > > moment.  That sort of thing.  Right here, right now.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Or perhaps some third thing I'm not seeing, a step in the
> > subjective
> > > > side
> > > > > > > of the brains functioning - something which is not from an
> > eternal
> > > > > > > perspective but is also not intended to be a description of the
> > > > body/mind
> > > > > > > functioning but a description of the way the human notices the
> > > > absolute
> > > > > > > along side the perception?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read
> > or
> > > > are
> > > > > > reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or
> > are
> > > > reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
> > reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to