Bill,

How can there be "the brain of a sentient being" if there is no self?

You keep trapping yourself in inconsistencies because your basic belief is 
inconsistent...

Edgar



On Jul 9, 2013, at 11:01 PM, Bill! wrote:

> Chris,
> 
> Again, using your language below which talks about the brain's functions 
> which would not be my choice of analogy...so please don't quote me on this 
> outside of this thread.
> 
> The way I see it experience is one of the most basic and fundamental 
> functions of the brain of a sentient being. In zen literature it has been 
> called such names as 'Original Mind' and 'Your Face Before Your Mother Was 
> Born'. I am saying experience precedes the processing of any experience by 
> the intellect which in zen literature has been called such names as 'Small 
> Mind' and 'Monkey Mind'. When the intellect arises it creates the delusion of 
> dualism/pluralism. This is the key.  The delusion of a separate, unique 
> 'self' is probably one of the first delusions that arises, but is quickly 
> followed by all the other subject/object delusions that Edgar calls 'forms' 
> and some Buddhist sects refer to as 'dharma' (small 'd' - phenomena).
> 
> I don't see experience as "slightly at an angle to..." the arising of duality 
> and perception, but just preceding it. Experience is "not-beginning and 
> not-ending", sometimes referred to as 'in the moment' or 'only now'. I do 
> associate experience with what you call "the wonder of presence" which I 
> think I would just call 'awareness' which is monisitic - as contrasted with 
> 'consciousness' which is dualistic.
> 
> Perceiving only is the normal human condition.
> 
> Experiencing only is Buddha Nature.
> 
> Perceiving and experiencing is what I believe many refer to as 'awakening' or 
> 'enlightenment'. What you 'awaken' to is the realization that perceptions are 
> delusions and only experience is real.
> 
> ...Bill!
> 
> --- In [email protected], Chris Austin-Lane <chris@...> wrote:
> >
> > Bill,
> > 
> > One more question on this:
> > 
> > Do you envision what you are calling experience to be a step in the brains
> > normal functioning of responding to the environment in whatever way that
> > the brain does that, or something slightly at an angle to the work of
> > transforming sensory stimulation into mental stimulation? Something of
> > which it could be said to be not-beginning and not-ending? Something to
> > akin to what some people talk about as the wonder of presence? This very
> > moment. That sort of thing. Right here, right now.
> > 
> > Or perhaps some third thing I'm not seeing, a step in the subjective side
> > of the brains functioning - something which is not from an eternal
> > perspective but is also not intended to be a description of the body/mind
> > functioning but a description of the way the human notices the absolute
> > along side the perception?
> >
> 
> 

Reply via email to