Chris,

Again, using your language below which talks about the brain's functions which 
would not be my choice of analogy...so please don't quote me on this outside of 
this thread.

The way I see it experience is one of the most basic and fundamental functions 
of the brain of a sentient being.  In zen literature it has been called such 
names as 'Original Mind' and 'Your Face Before Your Mother Was Born'.  I am 
saying experience precedes the processing of any experience by the intellect 
which in zen literature has been called such names as 'Small Mind' and 'Monkey 
Mind'.  When the intellect arises it creates the delusion of dualism/pluralism. 
 This is the key.  The delusion of a separate, unique 'self' is probably one of 
the first delusions that arises, but is quickly followed by all the other 
subject/object delusions that Edgar calls 'forms' and some Buddhist sects refer 
to as 'dharma' (small 'd' - phenomena).

I don't see experience as "slightly at an angle to..." the arising of duality 
and perception, but just preceding it.  Experience is "not-beginning and 
not-ending", sometimes referred to as 'in the moment' or 'only now'.  I do 
associate experience with what you call "the wonder of presence" which I think 
I would just call 'awareness' which is monisitic - as contrasted with 
'consciousness' which is dualistic.

Perceiving only is the normal human condition.

Experiencing only is Buddha Nature.

Perceiving and experiencing is what I believe many refer to as 'awakening' or 
'enlightenment'.  What you 'awaken' to is the realization that perceptions are 
delusions and only experience is real.

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Chris Austin-Lane <chris@...> wrote:
>
> Bill,
> 
> One more question on this:
> 
> Do you envision what you are calling experience to be a step in the brains
> normal functioning of responding to the environment in whatever way that
> the brain does that, or something slightly at an angle to the work of
> transforming sensory stimulation into mental stimulation?  Something of
> which it could be said to be not-beginning and not-ending?  Something to
> akin to what some people talk about as the wonder of presence?  This very
> moment.  That sort of thing.  Right here, right now.
> 
> Or perhaps some third thing I'm not seeing, a step in the subjective side
> of the brains functioning - something which is not from an eternal
> perspective but is also not intended to be a description of the body/mind
> functioning but a description of the way the human notices the absolute
> along side the perception?
>



------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to