Huhhh.... I see that I called a wealth of emotions... Let me underline once more: I appreciate very highly all efforts of enthusiastic programmers of open source projects. But "released" software in my understanding is one not containing obvious bugs in basic features. You blamed me on inability to contribute to or at least post bug reports. And you are right from your point of view. However, I am pressed to provide solutions to corporate needs quickly, and in such a situation basic bugs can drive a sysadm crazy. I choose Zenoss because I also understand that it is far more innovative than other SW aiming to provide enterprise grade monitoring. And yes, I tried Nagios and Cacti too, and went through that nightmare of administering. But if you will release code requiring further improvement and correction of broken features, you will close doors to enterprise market themselvs. When all is about time, money and reliability far above 99.7%, there is no time to dig into SW intended to provide necessary services. Unfortunately, in this environment I have to prefer reliability and ability to work "out-of-the-box" to innovative features.
Hi Chudler, I am not a native English speaker and I really do not know what the phrase "you don't know jack" could mean in this context. (However, I have some week idea about :-) ) Could you please explain! -------------------- m2f -------------------- Read this topic online here: http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=17359#17359 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
