Yes, Shane had done some benchmarking about a year or so ago. PGStorage
was actually faster with small writes but slower for larger ones. As far
as packing, as a zodb implementation, packing is still required to
reduce the size of data in Postgres. BTW Stephan, where is Lovely using
it - a site example? I had read some time ago that they were exploring
it but not that it was being used.
Regards,
David
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Dieter Maurer wrote:
"OracleStorage" was abandoned because it was almost an order
or magnitude slower than "FileStorage".
Actually, Lovely Systems uses PGStorage because it is faster for them.
Regards,
Stephan
_______________________________________________
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
