--On 24. Januar 2008 15:42:01 +0100 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On 23. Januar 2008 18:17:18 +0100 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:--On 22. Januar 2008 21:17:45 -0500 Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Dieter Maurer wrote:"OracleStorage" was abandoned because it was almost an order or magnitude slower than "FileStorage".Actually, Lovely Systems uses PGStorage because it is faster for them.It would be interesting where PGS is faster than filestorage. Ok, I just tried made a simple benchmark for testing write performance. I created a Plone site and then created a copy using copy/paste within the ZMI. (AMD Dualcore 2.6 GHz, Postgres 7.4.7 running on dedicated DB server): Copy&Paste using Filestorage: 3-4 seconds Copy&Paste using PGStorage: 30-40 secondsAlan asked me to so some further testing. I wrote a small script creating 100 Documents within one transaction (both in CMF and Plone) and I calculated the transaction time (not included the overhead for creating the instances)...the numbers are pretty much the self-speaking: CMF Plone PGStorage 10-12 secs 15-18 secs Filestorage 0.3-0.4 secs 0.4-0.6 secs
I must mention that all tests were done using PGStorage 0.1 - the onlyversion available to me. Rumors say that Shane might release improved versions. So the numbers must be taken with care as they reflect the state of PGStorage as of 2006.
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev