Thats a good thing to know, I will do some testing of my own... Thanks
Flávio On Jan 23, 2008 2:36 AM, David Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, Shane had done some benchmarking about a year or so ago. PGStorage > was actually faster with small writes but slower for larger ones. As far > as packing, as a zodb implementation, packing is still required to > reduce the size of data in Postgres. BTW Stephan, where is Lovely using > it - a site example? I had read some time ago that they were exploring > it but not that it was being used. > > Regards, > David > > Stephan Richter wrote: > > On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Dieter Maurer wrote: > >> "OracleStorage" was abandoned because it was almost an order > >> or magnitude slower than "FileStorage". > > > > Actually, Lovely Systems uses PGStorage because it is faster for them. > > > > Regards, > > Stephan > _______________________________________________ > For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: > http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ > > ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev > -- Flávio Codeço Coelho ---------------------------------------------------------------- "My grandfather once told me that there were two kinds of people: those who do the work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was much less competition." Indira Gandhi ==================================== registered Linux user # 386432 get counted at http://counter.li.org ----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev