On 28 June 2010 19:31, Nitro <ni...@dr-code.org> wrote:
> Am 28.06.2010, 16:52 Uhr, schrieb Laurence Rowe <l...@lrowe.co.uk>:
>> So why don't we all work on the same packages? The main reason is one
>> of legacy. Plone is built on Zope2 and ZCatalog. It works, but it is
>> not without it's issues - we can't have queries that join from that
>> catalog to a zc.relation catalog. Standalone ZCatalog failed because
>> it came to early - Zope2 was only recently eggified, so to be
>> successful the standalone ZCatalog would need to be used in Zope2.
>> Nobody has bothered with this because non-legacy code shouldn't be
>> using ZCatalog anyway - there are newer and better ways of doing it.
> Oh, nice to know. I was already writing test cases for standalone ZCatalog
> integration in my project as all other indices seemed tied to plone :)

In general, if it's not on PyPI it doesn't exist as far as the Zope
world is concerned. (I can't find any references to standalone
ZCatalog after 2005.)

For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org

Reply via email to