On 28 June 2010 19:31, Nitro <ni...@dr-code.org> wrote: > Am 28.06.2010, 16:52 Uhr, schrieb Laurence Rowe <l...@lrowe.co.uk>: > >> So why don't we all work on the same packages? The main reason is one >> of legacy. Plone is built on Zope2 and ZCatalog. It works, but it is >> not without it's issues - we can't have queries that join from that >> catalog to a zc.relation catalog. Standalone ZCatalog failed because >> it came to early - Zope2 was only recently eggified, so to be >> successful the standalone ZCatalog would need to be used in Zope2. >> Nobody has bothered with this because non-legacy code shouldn't be >> using ZCatalog anyway - there are newer and better ways of doing it. > > Oh, nice to know. I was already writing test cases for standalone ZCatalog > integration in my project as all other indices seemed tied to plone :)
In general, if it's not on PyPI it doesn't exist as far as the Zope world is concerned. (I can't find any references to standalone ZCatalog after 2005.) Laurence _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
