On Thu 10 May 2007 at 04:21PM, Jerry Jelinek wrote: > of the other controls is trickier although I think Dan's idea of scaling > these based on the system makes it easier. We might also want to think > about scaling based on the number of running zones.
Another way to look at it (and I think what you are saying) would be to broaden the notion of "shares" a bit to include more of the system resources-- for example, memory. What's tough there, though, is that our notion of shares today represent an entitlement, and the case of memory, we're talking about a cap on utilization. I think fundamentally we hear from two camps: those who want to proportionally partition whatever resources are available, and those who want to see the system as "virtual 512MB Ultra-2's" or "virtual 1GB, 1ghz PCs." -dp -- Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - blogs.sun.com/dp _______________________________________________ zones-discuss mailing list email@example.com