Mike Gerdts wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2007 6:40 AM, LaoTsao(Dr. Tsao) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>  hi
>>  it seems these issues will be solved by a brandZ for s10, nv etc not?
> Is that in the works?  I've seen an example of how to do it on your
> own but I haven't heard of any supported variant. The key gotcha with
> this approach seems to be the sanity check to be sure that the kernel
> and SUNWzone* from the global zone remain compatible with the bits in
> the non-global zone(s).
> I would like to see this functionality, but as I was trying to
> articulate why in a thread (I think regarding "update on attach") I
> was having a hard time.  I really think that "update on attach" would
> also solve the issue at hand, now that I think about it.
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2007/621/

Yes, "update on attach", which is out for code review now, will address
this.  If by "brandZ for s10, nv" you mean running a solaris10 brand on
nv, there is nobody working on that that I know of.


zones-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to