* 2009-04-13 12:50, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
> > +1, to declaring Zope 3 dead. That should allow us to refactor the
> > remaining packages much more aggressively and reduce the dependencies.
> -1 from my standpoint. Two of my projects are fully based on the Zope 3
> server, and switching to something else would be quite some pain.
I fully agree: our company is based on zope3 technology, and we have at
least three big deployments based on zope3 (yes, the application server)
using ZODB and PostgreSQL/storm. I do not know in the details what would it
mean to switch to the zope toolkit/repoze/whatever is fashionable today,
but I suppose it would be quite painful for us.
If the question was "who is interested in zope3, the application server,
and willing to maintain it", I'd answer "me".
Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it
Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it
1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -