On Monday 07 August 2006 03:54, Frédéric wrote: > Le lundi 7 août 2006 12:13, Olaf Gellert a écrit : > > I was thinking about doing a raw shot of some target > > (lit by a 5000k light), and then maybe converting it > > to TIFF and use SCARSE (www.scarse.org) or whatever. > > Would that be already sufficient to get good results? > > Or at least beeter than sRGB? Not sure about it... > > Shooting in raw does not need to select white balance! This is the > intersting thing in raw files. All is done in post-process. > > > It seems that it is still not too common for manufacturers > > of cameras to simply provide ICC profiles? > > Manufacturers do not give informations about profiles of their DSLR; so, > third-party raw processors have to make some calibrations. Most of them > (Bibble, LightZone) have good profiles for cameras, and you don't need to > give your own.
This is correct but yo also need to keep in mind that the profile(s) supplied with one of these packages is specific to that package. So a profile from Bibble will likely not be optimal for use in UFRAW. But it may be better than no profile at all. Hal ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Lcms-user mailing list Lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
