Mark, if you plan to drive this car for some time more (like not selling it immediately after it become driveable again), I would think that going with one of 10K options (better brand new in my view) is unfortunate circumstance of life.
I know in USA it is a lot of money to invest in the car, but this looks like the most responsible option to me. Never had an auto transmission fail on me yet... Though currently I drive stick-shift. On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Mark C <pdml-m...@charter.net> wrote: > The quotes for the remanufactured CVT are all for one from Subaru. FWIW, the > independent shop told me ~8000 to put in a remanufactured unit, in the ball > park with what the local to what the local dealer told me. The alternative > is a used CVT - i.e. one pulled from a car in a junkyard. > > I'm starting to think the used CVT route may not be a good one... > > > On 5/29/2016 11:20 AM, Zos Xavius wrote: >> >> If its Subaru remanufactured its probably fine for what its worth. I would >> only go with their rebuilds though. Warranty I wouldn't know. 6 months >> sounds reasonable to me. >> On May 29, 2016 11:18 AM, "Zos Xavius" <zosxav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
