RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-09-01 Thread Dave Watts

 The good doctors, lawyers or plumbers keep up with whats 
 current. Those who don't fail.

There's a difference between keeping current and constant work. In fact,
most programmers don't keep current, even when they're working insane hours
- they're simply doing more work.

  In fact, I think programming is a field which many people 
  enjoy working in even when they're not especially suited 
  to it.
 
 And they are paid accordingly.

Are they? Not as far as I can tell. There seems to be relatively little
correlation between value and pay in the programming field.

 You can treat any field like a job and get your end of week
 paycheck. But those who really enjoy it like to play with it
 more often and tend to be more successful.

Again, I don't see that correlation either, in real life, as much as you
might expect. In addition, there are plenty of people who enjoy their jobs a
lot, but still don't constantly work. The difference, to me, is that there's
a general expectation that programmers work constantly, and a lot of
programmers end up fulfilling that expectation because, well, they're
expected to. There are probably lots of reasons for those expectations, but
I think that most of those reasons have to do with the immaturity of our
profession, and the general lack of standards within our profession.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444

__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-09-01 Thread Dave Watts

 I'm surprised to see such a response from you. You're one 
 of the few people I see on this list 24/7. I'm on the west 
 coast and see you post at 12:42am. If memory serves me 
 correctly you're on the east coast... 3:42am
 
 You got up early to go fishing didn't you?  ;-)

White-water rafting, actually. I'm on vacation, and I'm checking my email at
night.

 So if you have two people... equally qualified, equal 
 personalities, equal in every way except one goes fishing 
 and one likes to program in his spare time... who would 
 you choose. The short and simple answer to that question
 is the guy at home... if for no reason other than he doesn't 
 have to dock the boat before logging into the server to 
 fix the problem code that only rears it's head on the 
 weekends. ;-)

First, being a programmer shouldn't make it more likely that you're going to
be on call for weekend emergencies. Programming isn't surgery - no one's
going to die. If a programming environment is set up correctly, with
development, staging and production environments, with proper QA, this
shouldn't be an issue.

Second, the problem with hypotheticals is that, well, they're hypothetical.
I've never encountered two job applicants who were so comparable, I don't
think. If they appear so comparable, you're probably not asking the right
questions in the interview process.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444

__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Dave Watts

 One question that is always worth asking during the 
 interviewing process is What types of things/programs 
 do you work on in your spare time? If you get an answer 
 like ...not much really, I go fishing on the weekends...
 then chances are you've got a programmer who's in it 
 more for the money than the love of programming.

I find it odd that people in the field of programming are expected to be so
different from people in other fields. Do most doctors, lawyers or plumbers
practice their skills in their spare time? Why do we expect programmers to
do so? Would you use that as a criteria when hiring any other professional?

Also, just because someone enjoys what they do doesn't make them good at it.
In fact, I think programming is a field which many people enjoy working in
even when they're not especially suited to it. Finally, I think this
expectation that most of us have about being a programmer 24/7 demonstrates
the relative immaturity of our field; after all, it really should be just
like any other job, instead of being a hobby that you happen to get paid
for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work, but work is just one part of the
life of a well-rounded person.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444

__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Brian Scandale

How appropriate that you write this at 3:42 am EST ;-)

At 3:42 AM 8/29/02, you wrote:
Finally, I think this
expectation that most of us have about being a programmer 24/7 demonstrates
the relative immaturity of our field; after all, it really should be just
like any other job, instead of being a hobby that you happen to get paid
for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work, but work is just one part of the
life of a well-rounded person.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444


__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Dave Watts

 I couldn't answer too many of your Software Engineering 
 principles questions, but I can solve problems, and that's 
 what my employer wants. My background is accounting, but I 
 spent all my time automating my tasks using Excel/VBA/VB, 
 so I ended up going into programming. Nothing personal, but
 you'd be the last type of manager I would want to have. A 
 degree means you made it through four (or more) years of 
 school, and that's it. I've known a lot of people with CS 
 degrees that couldn't solve problems.

I think you're selling short the value of a CS background. Sure, there are
lots of people with CS degrees who lack problem-solving skills. There are
incompetents in every field, except for those fields in which incompetence
is weeded out automatically (incompetent soldiers being more likely to die
in combat, for example). That's not much of an argument against the value of
a CS degree, though.

I don't have a CS background either. However, I've always worked with people
who do, and I've found myself learning the lessons they'd been taught - and
I had to learn them the hard way, by trial and error. I would miss
subtleties that they would spot immediately, because of their training. For
those people, a degree meant quite a bit more than making it through four
years of school - it meant that they had gained a way to examine and
classify problems, and provide solutions that meet those software
engineering standards. This is not a trivial ability.

If I turned your initial statement on its head, I could say something like
my background is programming, but I spent all my time adding up numbers, so
I ended up going into accounting. I think my CFO would probably take issue
with that, if I presented myself as a competent accountant simply because I
had decent math skills. Any profession has a body of knowledge that has to
be understood by practitioners of that profession. Likewise, I wouldn't
necessarily be a competent surgeon just because I'm handy with a knife. I
think in both those examples, you can see the value of principles.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444

__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Tangorre, Michael

LOL..
ill go with that :-)


-Original Message-
From: Ben Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 3:23 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


 whats the difference?

I always thought programmer sounded so 80's.  Developer is just the
hip, new term.  I believe the cool name now is Information Architect.
g


Ben Johnson
Information Architect
www.architekture.com
[p] 720.934.2179
 
 


__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Dwayne Cole

Shawns' comments below should have ended this debate!
===
 programming references computer science
 
 development references computer technology
 
 
 
 science is the explanation of a phenomena
 
 technology is the application of science
 
 
 
 a programmer models concepts using computers
 
 a developer applies those concepts to problems
 
 -
 
 example (not a great one)
 
 programmer creates ip protocol
 
 developer uses ip to transfer web page
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 3:11 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer
 
 
 On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 11:06 , S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
  I've heard people use the difference to indicate that a developer does
  planning and architectural design work whereas a programmer just does
  programming and makes sure an application achieves the features requested
  in
  the functional specification, without regard to wholistic questions about
  what the application is for or who will use it. Which is usually what I
  intend to imply when I tell people I'm a developer (that is, that I do
  more
  than just programming).
 
 That's the 'distinction' I'm most familiar with over the last twenty years.
 .
 
  I've also seen or heard people make the distinction that a programmer is
  someone who works with traditional ( usually compiled ) languages like C/
  C++
  and Java whereas a developer just toys with web scripts and other
  interpreted stuff... This isn't a distinction I much care for, because
  imho
  it encourages a gratuitous continued antagonism between the old-school
  and
  the new, but I've heard it used.
 
 I agree with you Isaac (and was a little surprised to hear MD say he'd
 heard this distinction too - glad he also doesn't like it!).
 
 Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
 
 If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
 -- Margaret Atwood
 
 
 
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Bill Wheatley

I agree you'll find alot of people who don't know and who didn't goto
college.
But I can pretty much say that you'll find people from college that don't
know either.

I know I understand all those concepts and I never went to college I've been
doing software in all forms for 8 years now. I've taken training from gurus
to cover all the bases and to me more knowledge is a huge motivation for me
its awesome to learn more and more. I am also going to College classes in
free time (not much with side work and teaching CF) to get a degree so I
don't have to ever be told I'm not giving you this job because I gave it to
someone with a college degree instead.

My view is you'll find people who don't know crap anywhere, for the people
that goto college and don't know crap you should feel worse for since they
spent all the money and time and SHOULD have learned by didn't.

But on the norm I agree that you will find many people who don't know the
more detailed parts of programming/developing/yadda yadda


Bill Wheatley
Senior Database Developer
Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer
EDIETS.COM
954.360.9022 X159
ICQ 417645
- Original Message -
From: Paul Wille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 6:20 PM
Subject: programmer vs. developer


 Dan,
 You make a reasonable point.  My experience is all that dictates my
responses here.  Also, the type of projects my company brings in.  When my
team is building a complex exterprise-level application, I want
developers/programmers who can understand everything from performance tuning
to properly-formed queries/Stored Procs.  All that I've found thusfar is a
lack of that kind of knowledge in many people, except those that come from a
Software Engineering background.

 Does that mean that I wouldn't hire a perfectly competant
developer/programmer who did NOT go to college for it?  Not necessarily, but
I would want to make sure that the person had a good foundational
understanding of the type of development we do here.

 --Paul
 
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Lonny Eckert

Dave,

I think you are right on.

If only everyone thought as you do, I'd probably still be working as a
Nuclear Engineer/Health Physicist.  The number of people who think they know
something about nuclear power generation is dumbfounding.


With Regards,
Lonny Eckert

-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 4:10 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


 I couldn't answer too many of your Software Engineering
 principles questions, but I can solve problems, and that's
 what my employer wants. My background is accounting, but I
 spent all my time automating my tasks using Excel/VBA/VB,
 so I ended up going into programming. Nothing personal, but
 you'd be the last type of manager I would want to have. A
 degree means you made it through four (or more) years of
 school, and that's it. I've known a lot of people with CS
 degrees that couldn't solve problems.

I think you're selling short the value of a CS background. Sure, there are
lots of people with CS degrees who lack problem-solving skills. There are
incompetents in every field, except for those fields in which incompetence
is weeded out automatically (incompetent soldiers being more likely to die
in combat, for example). That's not much of an argument against the value of
a CS degree, though.

I don't have a CS background either. However, I've always worked with people
who do, and I've found myself learning the lessons they'd been taught - and
I had to learn them the hard way, by trial and error. I would miss
subtleties that they would spot immediately, because of their training. For
those people, a degree meant quite a bit more than making it through four
years of school - it meant that they had gained a way to examine and
classify problems, and provide solutions that meet those software
engineering standards. This is not a trivial ability.

If I turned your initial statement on its head, I could say something like
my background is programming, but I spent all my time adding up numbers, so
I ended up going into accounting. I think my CFO would probably take issue
with that, if I presented myself as a competent accountant simply because I
had decent math skills. Any profession has a body of knowledge that has to
be understood by practitioners of that profession. Likewise, I wouldn't
necessarily be a competent surgeon just because I'm handy with a knife. I
think in both those examples, you can see the value of principles.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444


__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Kwang Suh

 I think you're selling short the value of a CS background. Sure, there are
 lots of people with CS degrees who lack problem-solving skills. There are
 incompetents in every field, except for those fields in which incompetence
 is weeded out automatically (incompetent soldiers being more likely to die
 in combat, for example). That's not much of an argument against

Heh heh..

* Types incorrect code *

Computer: We're sorry, the code you wrote is wrong.

* AK-47 pops out, shoots me in the head. *



__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread S . Isaac Dealey

 I think you're selling short the value of a CS background. Sure,
 there are lots of people with CS degrees who lack problem-solving
 skills. There are incompetents in every field, except for those
 fields in which incompetence is weeded out automatically
 (incompetent soldiers being more likely to die in combat,
 for example). That's not much of an argument against

 Heh heh..

 * Types incorrect code *

 Computer: We're sorry, the code you wrote is wrong.

 * AK-47 pops out, shoots me in the head. *

I guess that would either drastically improve production or send us back to
the stone age. :)


Isaac Dealey
Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer

www.turnkey.to
954-776-0046
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Tony Carcieri

Uh I think you forgot the Architect label at the end! ;-)

-Original Message-
From: Lee Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 6:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


Nono..

It's Senior Programming Development Applications Design Analyst



| -Original Message-
| From: Tony Carcieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:06 PM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer
|
|
| and now I am applying for the position of Senior Applications
| Programmer Analyst
|
| -Original Message-
| From: Tony Carcieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:30 PM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer
|
|
| ok so what happens in this case:
|
| Web Designer
| Web Developer
| Web Application Designer
| Web Application Developer
|
| imho:
| designer = graphic intensive training (ps, fw, flash (no
| actionscript), director (no lingo), etc) programmer = coder
| but more along the lines of c++, c, vb and web technologies
| developer = more web languages (cf, asp, sql, vb, java,
| swing, js, jscript, html, dhtml, xml, wap/wml etc)
|
| And then you get a title like Web Application Engineer and
| that is where i stop trying to figure it out! ;-)
|
| Big T
|
| -Original Message-
| From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:56 PM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer
|
|
| imho:
|
| developer has these as his/her strong suit:
| 50/50 on graphical interface/programming work
|
|   photoshop/fireworks
|   flash
|   cf
|   sql
|   javascript
|   dhtml
|
| a programmer is a language guru:
|
|   all ecma based scripts
|   cf
|   maybe some vbscript/asp (if that be their flavor of
| choice)
|   sql (cant get too far without this guy)
|
|
|
| tony
|
| Tony Weeg
| Senior Web Developer
| Information System Design
| Navtrak, Inc.
| Fleet Management Solutions
| www.navtrak.net
| 410.548.2337
|
| -Original Message-
| From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:42 PM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: programmer vs. developer
|
|
| whats the difference?
|
|
|
|

__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Alex

On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Dave Watts wrote:

 I find it odd that people in the field of programming are expected to be so
 different from people in other fields. Do most doctors, lawyers or plumbers
 practice their skills in their spare time? Why do we expect programmers to
 do so? Would you use that as a criteria when hiring any other professional?

The good doctors, lawyers or plumbers keep up with whats current. Those who
don't fail.


 Also, just because someone enjoys what they do doesn't make them good at it.
 In fact, I think programming is a field which many people enjoy working in
 even when they're not especially suited to it.

And they are paid accordingly.

 expectation that most of us have about being a programmer 24/7 demonstrates
 the relative immaturity of our field; after all, it really should be just
 like any other job, instead of being a hobby that you happen to get paid
 for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work, but work is just one part of the
 life of a well-rounded person.

You can treat any field like a job and get your end of week
paycheck. But those who really enjoy it like to play with it
more often and tend to be more successful.


__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Rafael (Alan Bleiweiss)

Programmer - one who systematically re-maps the logic, thinking, and 
synaptic linking of a prospective cult candidate, replacing free-thinking 
ideas,beliefs and concepts with those of the cult leader.  Synonym: 
brainwashing

Developer - one who works and lives side by side with newly programmed 
candidates in order to reenforce the ideas, beliefs and concepts previously 
programmed into the mind of the inductee by the programmer

__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Jeff Beer

Do you work for HR at Microsoft?  cf_grin /

-Original Message-
From: Rafael (Alan Bleiweiss) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:15 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


Programmer - one who systematically re-maps the logic, thinking, and 
synaptic linking of a prospective cult candidate, replacing
free-thinking 
ideas,beliefs and concepts with those of the cult leader.  Synonym: 
brainwashing

Developer - one who works and lives side by side with newly programmed 
candidates in order to reenforce the ideas, beliefs and concepts
previously 
programmed into the mind of the inductee by the programmer


__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread S . Isaac Dealey

 On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Dave Watts wrote:

 I find it odd that people in the field of programming are expected to be
 so
 different from people in other fields. Do most doctors, lawyers or
 plumbers
 practice their skills in their spare time? Why do we expect programmers
 to
 do so? Would you use that as a criteria when hiring any other
 professional?

 The good doctors, lawyers or plumbers keep up with whats current. Those
 who
 don't fail.

I'm fairly certain that plubming tech. doesn't change anywhere near as
quickly as our industry. :) IMHO, with dr's and lawyers, their industries
are at this point so hopelessly inundated with an over-abundance of
information ( most of it bad information ) that separating the wheat from
the shaff in order to figure out what is good and useful information and
hone their skills is a losing battle. As I see it, technology in general is
headed that direction also.


Isaac Dealey
Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer

www.turnkey.to
954-776-0046
__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Casey C Cook

Well said.

CC


   

Dave Watts 

dwatts  To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]   

@figleaf.comcc:   

 Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer 

08/29/02   

02:42 AM   

Please 

respond to 

cf-talk

   

   





 One question that is always worth asking during the
 interviewing process is What types of things/programs
 do you work on in your spare time? If you get an answer
 like ...not much really, I go fishing on the weekends...
 then chances are you've got a programmer who's in it
 more for the money than the love of programming.

I find it odd that people in the field of programming are expected to be so
different from people in other fields. Do most doctors, lawyers or plumbers
practice their skills in their spare time? Why do we expect programmers to
do so? Would you use that as a criteria when hiring any other professional?

Also, just because someone enjoys what they do doesn't make them good at
it.
In fact, I think programming is a field which many people enjoy working in
even when they're not especially suited to it. Finally, I think this
expectation that most of us have about being a programmer 24/7 demonstrates
the relative immaturity of our field; after all, it really should be just
like any other job, instead of being a hobby that you happen to get paid
for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work, but work is just one part of the
life of a well-rounded person.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444


__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread todd

quote
Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about being a 
programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field; after 
all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being a hobby 
that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work, but 
work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
/quote

Dave, 

Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming as a 
hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.  How does 
intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this up is 
because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting their 
developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by right of 
employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee is 
something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.

Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked for them 
24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they could 
purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been hesitant 
to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the lack of 
time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for example.  
The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker and I 
were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it on the 
intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I just do 
that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I got 
nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job, I'd be 
pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so called 
methodology for future clients.

I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so called 
internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf handle 
creative ideas like this?  

Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out actionscripting code 
all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can to help 
people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual 
property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little script of 
code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to release it?  If 
Figleaf uses his code that he wrote on his time, does he get compensated? 
recognized?  Does Figleaf automatically by default suck in his code into 
their intellectual property library because it was used that one time?

Just curious,
~Todd

-- 

Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ |
Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion   |
http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/  |
http://www.flashCFM.com/   - webRat (Moderator)|
http://www.ultrashock.com/ - webRat (Back-end Moderator)   |


__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Matt Liotta

You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you were
hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal matters,
you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.

Matt Liotta
President  CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
 quote
 Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about being a
 programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
after
 all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being a
hobby
 that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work,
but
 work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
 
 Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
 /quote
 
 Dave,
 
 Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming as a
 hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.  How
does
 intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this up
is
 because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting their
 developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by right
of
 employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee is
 something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
 
 Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked for
them
 24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
could
 purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
hesitant
 to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
lack of
 time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
example.
 The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker and
I
 were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it on
the
 intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I just do
 that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I got
 nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job, I'd be
 pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so called
 methodology for future clients.
 
 I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
called
 internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf handle
 creative ideas like this?
 
 Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out actionscripting
code
 all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can to
help
 people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual
 property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little script
of
 code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to release it?
If
 Figleaf uses his code that he wrote on his time, does he get
compensated?
 recognized?  Does Figleaf automatically by default suck in his code
into
 their intellectual property library because it was used that one time?
 
 Just curious,
 ~Todd
 
 --
 
 Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ |
 Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion   |
 http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/  |
 http://www.flashCFM.com/   - webRat (Moderator)|
 http://www.ultrashock.com/ - webRat (Back-end Moderator)   |
 
 
 
__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Dan Haley

Dave,

I understand where you are coming from and am not discounting the value of a
CS background.  The statement that had been made seemed to indicate that a
CS background was required.  Our types of jobs are too varied to be lumped
together like doctors and accountants and lawyers.  You wouldn't see
accountants on a mailing list debating the terms bookkeeper and accountant.
Accounting IS learned from books.  When it comes time to recognize revenue
at the end of the period you don't have to take into consideration the
hardware and software available to you, you don't have to worry about load
balancing or tight code or scalability, you apply principles of accounting
to determine the revenue amount.  Or at least you're supposed to. ;)  Sure,
there is some interpretation that takes place in certain industries, and the
criticism that GAAP is a little behind the times may be valid, but you don't
hire a bookkeeper to do that interpretation.

Personally, I would love to spend some time in a true development
environment to learn more about software development (or is that software
programming ... wait ... no), and with the layoffs going on I just might
get that chance some day!  Hopefully my lack of a CS degree won't be a
problem grin, 'cuz I really don't want to go back to writing Excel macros
to automate accounting procedures!

Dan

-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:10 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


I think you're selling short the value of a CS background. Sure, there are
lots of people with CS degrees who lack problem-solving skills. There are
incompetents in every field, except for those fields in which incompetence
is weeded out automatically (incompetent soldiers being more likely to die
in combat, for example). That's not much of an argument against the value of
a CS degree, though.

__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Bryan F. Hogan

Wholly crap, there is someone else out there with the same problem I have.
Thanks Todd!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


quote
Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about being a
programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field; after
all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being a hobby
that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work, but
work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
/quote

Dave,

Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming as a
hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.  How does
intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this up is
because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting their
developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by right of
employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee is
something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.

Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked for them
24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they could
purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been hesitant
to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the lack of
time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for example.
The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker and I
were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it on the
intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I just do
that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I got
nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job, I'd be
pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so called
methodology for future clients.

I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so called
internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf handle
creative ideas like this?

Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out actionscripting code
all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can to help
people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual
property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little script of
code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to release it?  If
Figleaf uses his code that he wrote on his time, does he get compensated?
recognized?  Does Figleaf automatically by default suck in his code into
their intellectual property library because it was used that one time?

Just curious,
~Todd

--

Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ |
Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion   |
http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/  |
http://www.flashCFM.com/   - webRat (Moderator)|
http://www.ultrashock.com/ - webRat (Back-end Moderator)   |



__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread todd

little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement, but 
none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is rather 
broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some 
assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just not at 
your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the 
building).

~Todd


On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

 You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you were
 hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal matters,
 you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.
 
 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 V: 415-577-8070
 F: 415-341-8906
 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
  
  quote
  Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about being a
  programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
 after
  all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being a
 hobby
  that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work,
 but
  work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
  
  Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
  /quote
  
  Dave,
  
  Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming as a
  hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.  How
 does
  intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this up
 is
  because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting their
  developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by right
 of
  employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee is
  something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
  
  Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked for
 them
  24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
 could
  purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
 hesitant
  to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
 lack of
  time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
 example.
  The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker and
 I
  were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it on
 the
  intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I just do
  that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I got
  nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job, I'd be
  pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so called
  methodology for future clients.
  
  I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
 called
  internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf handle
  creative ideas like this?
  
  Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out actionscripting
 code
  all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can to
 help
  people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual
  property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little script
 of
  code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to release it?
 If
  Figleaf uses his code that he wrote on his time, does he get
 compensated?
  recognized?  Does Figleaf automatically by default suck in his code
 into
  their intellectual property library because it was used that one time?
  
  Just curious,
  ~Todd
  
  --
  
  Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ |
  Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion   |
  http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/  |
  http://www.flashCFM.com/   - webRat (Moderator)|
  http://www.ultrashock.com/ - webRat (Back-end Moderator)   |
  
  
  
 
__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Matt Liotta

If you didn't sign an agreement then you are not bound to one. This puts
the work on them to prove that everything you produce was done on
company time with company resources.

I suggest you get your own IP agreement and force your employer to sign
it thus protecting yourself.

Matt Liotta
President  CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:08 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
 little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement,
but
 none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is
rather
 broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some
 assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just
not at
 your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the
 building).
 
 ~Todd
 
 
 On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:
 
  You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you
were
  hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal
matters,
  you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.
 
  Matt Liotta
  President  CEO
  Montara Software, Inc.
  http://www.montarasoftware.com/
  V: 415-577-8070
  F: 415-341-8906
  P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
   To: CF-Talk
   Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
  
   quote
   Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about
being a
   programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
  after
   all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being
a
  hobby
   that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your
work,
  but
   work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
  
   Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
   /quote
  
   Dave,
  
   Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming
as a
   hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.
How
  does
   intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this
up
  is
   because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting
their
   developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by
right
  of
   employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee
is
   something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
  
   Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked
for
  them
   24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
  could
   purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
  hesitant
   to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
  lack of
   time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
  example.
   The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker
and
  I
   were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it
on
  the
   intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I
just do
   that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I
got
   nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job,
I'd be
   pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so
called
   methodology for future clients.
  
   I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
  called
   internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf
handle
   creative ideas like this?
  
   Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out
actionscripting
  code
   all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can
to
  help
   people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual
   property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little
script
  of
   code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to release
it?
  If
   Figleaf uses his code that he wrote on his time, does he get
  compensated?
   recognized?  Does Figleaf automatically by default suck in his
code
  into
   their intellectual property library because it was used that one
time?
  
   Just curious,
   ~Todd
  
   --
   
   Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ |
   Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion   |
   http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/  |
   http://www.flashCFM.com/   - webRat (Moderator)|
   http://www.ultrashock.com/ - webRat (Back-end Moderator)   |
   
  
  
 
 
__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk

RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread dennis baldwin

Not only that, it's not the easiest thing to prove that your application
was being developed during off-hours.  Personally I believe that what I
do after 6:00 is my own business yet I know this isn't always the case.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement, but

none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is rather

broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some 
assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just not
at 
your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the 
building).

~Todd


On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

 You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you 
 were hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal 
 matters, you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.
 
 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 V: 415-577-8070
 F: 415-341-8906
 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
  
  quote
  Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about being 
  a programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
 after
  all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being a
 hobby
  that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work,
 but
  work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
  
  Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
  /quote
  
  Dave,
  
  Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming as 
  a hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.  
  How
 does
  intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this up
 is
  because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting their 
  developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by 
  right
 of
  employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee is 
  something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
  
  Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked for
 them
  24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
 could
  purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
 hesitant
  to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
 lack of
  time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
 example.
  The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker 
  and
 I
  were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it on
 the
  intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I just 
  do that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I 
  got nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job, 
  I'd be pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so

  called methodology for future clients.
  
  I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
 called
  internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf handle

  creative ideas like this?
  
  Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out actionscripting
 code
  all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can 
  to
 help
  people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual 
  property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little script
 of
  code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to release 
  it?
 If
  Figleaf uses his code that he wrote on his time, does he get
 compensated?
  recognized?  Does Figleaf automatically by default suck in his code
 into
  their intellectual property library because it was used that one 
  time?
  
  Just curious,
  ~Todd
  
  -- 
  Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ |
  Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion   |
  http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/  |
  http://www.flashCFM.com/   - webRat (Moderator)|
  http://www.ultrashock.com/ - webRat (Back-end Moderator)   |
  
  
  
 

__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Weaver, Anthony

IMHO... 

Programmer and developer are the same.  However, the differences come down
to personal preference.

Both are highly skilled, over worked, and underpaid.

-Original Message-
From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: programmer vs. developer


whats the difference?

__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Haggerty, Mike

Wow, that is restrictive!

What if you wanted to work on a freelance project outside of work, maybe for
charity or something. Does the company own that code and do you have it in
writing that they do?

M

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement, but 
none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is rather 
broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some 
assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just not at 
your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the 
building).

~Todd


On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

 You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you were
 hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal matters,
 you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.
 
 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 V: 415-577-8070
 F: 415-341-8906
 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
  
  quote
  Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about being a
  programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
 after
  all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being a
 hobby
  that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work,
 but
  work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
  
  Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
  /quote
  
  Dave,
  
  Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming as a
  hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.  How
 does
  intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this up
 is
  because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting their
  developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by right
 of
  employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee is
  something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
  
  Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked for
 them
  24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
 could
  purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
 hesitant
  to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
 lack of
  time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
 example.
  The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker and
 I
  were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it on
 the
  intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I just do
  that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I got
  nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job, I'd be
  pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so called
  methodology for future clients.
  
  I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
 called
  internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf handle
  creative ideas like this?
  
  Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out actionscripting
 code
  all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can to
 help
  people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual
  property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little script
 of
  code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to release it?
 If
  Figleaf uses his code that he wrote on his time, does he get
 compensated?
  recognized?  Does Figleaf automatically by default suck in his code
 into
  their intellectual property library because it was used that one time?
  
  Just curious,
  ~Todd
  
  --
  
  Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ |
  Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion   |
  http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/  |
  http://www.flashCFM.com/   - webRat (Moderator)|
  http://www.ultrashock.com/ - webRat (Back-end Moderator)   |
  
  
  
 

__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Jillian Carroll

The interesting question that your comment raises in my mind:

If you are never truly 'off', you just aren't at your desk...

If 'they' ever fought you on intellectual property, couldn't you retort with
a rather hefty claim for overtime owed?

heheh :)

--
Jillian

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement, but
none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is rather
broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some
assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just not at
your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the
building).

~Todd


On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

 You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you were
 hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal matters,
 you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.

 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 V: 415-577-8070
 F: 415-341-8906
 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
  quote
  Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about being a
  programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
 after
  all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being a
 hobby
  that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work,
 but
  work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
 
  Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
  /quote
 
  Dave,
 
  Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming as a
  hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.  How
 does
  intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this up
 is
  because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting their
  developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by right
 of
  employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee is
  something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
 
  Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked for
 them
  24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
 could
  purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
 hesitant
  to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
 lack of
  time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
 example.
  The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker and
 I
  were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it on
 the
  intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I just do
  that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I got
  nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job, I'd be
  pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so called
  methodology for future clients.
 
  I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
 called
  internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf handle
  creative ideas like this?
 
  Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out actionscripting
 code
  all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can to
 help
  people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual
  property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little script
 of
  code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to release it?
 If
  Figleaf uses his code that he wrote on his time, does he get
 compensated?
  recognized?  Does Figleaf automatically by default suck in his code
 into
  their intellectual property library because it was used that one time?
 
  Just curious,
  ~Todd
 
  --
  
  Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ |
  Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion   |
  http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/  |
  http://www.flashCFM.com/   - webRat (Moderator)|
  http://www.ultrashock.com/ - webRat (Back-end Moderator)   |
  
 
 


__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread novakbanda

Dave,

I'm surprised to see such a response from you.  You're one of the few people
I see on this list 24/7.  I'm on the west coast and see you post at 12:42am.
If memory serves me correctly you're on the east coast... 3:42am

You got up early to go fishing didn't you?  ;-)

Seriously though...  I should have worded my original statement better.
That question by no means is a catch all or a disqualifying question.
But I have found it to be a valuable question during the interviewing
process.  And you're absolutely right... just because someone spends a lot
of time in front of the screen doesn't make them a good programmer.  But
their willingness to learn and improve their skills both at work and at home
are certainly a bonus.

So if you have two people... equally qualified, equal personalities, equal
in every way except one goes fishing and one likes to program in his spare
time... who would you choose.  The short and simple answer to that question
is the guy at home... if for no reason other than he doesn't have to dock
the boat before logging into the server to fix the problem code that only
rears it's head on the weekends. ;-)

-Novak

- Original Message -
From: Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:42 AM
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


  One question that is always worth asking during the
  interviewing process is What types of things/programs
  do you work on in your spare time? If you get an answer
  like ...not much really, I go fishing on the weekends...
  then chances are you've got a programmer who's in it
  more for the money than the love of programming.

 I find it odd that people in the field of programming are expected to be
so
 different from people in other fields. Do most doctors, lawyers or
plumbers
 practice their skills in their spare time? Why do we expect programmers to
 do so? Would you use that as a criteria when hiring any other
professional?

 Also, just because someone enjoys what they do doesn't make them good at
it.
 In fact, I think programming is a field which many people enjoy working in
 even when they're not especially suited to it. Finally, I think this
 expectation that most of us have about being a programmer 24/7
demonstrates
 the relative immaturity of our field; after all, it really should be just
 like any other job, instead of being a hobby that you happen to get paid
 for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work, but work is just one part of the
 life of a well-rounded person.

 Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
 http://www.figleaf.com/
 voice: (202) 797-5496
 fax: (202) 797-5444

 
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread todd

Not a bad idea.  Good suggestion.  Now I just need to come up with $100/hr 
to pay a lawyer. ;)

~Todd

On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

 If you didn't sign an agreement then you are not bound to one. This puts
 the work on them to prove that everything you produce was done on
 company time with company resources.
 
 I suggest you get your own IP agreement and force your employer to sign
 it thus protecting yourself.
 
 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 V: 415-577-8070
 F: 415-341-8906
 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 

Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ |
Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion   |
http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/  |
http://www.flashCFM.com/   - webRat (Moderator)|
http://www.ultrashock.com/ - webRat (Back-end Moderator)   |


__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Jillian Carroll

Re: no agreement, not bound

That is really bad advice Matt.

The laws still exist protecting intellectual property... I've had colleagues
go to court with this very battle.

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:21 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


If you didn't sign an agreement then you are not bound to one. This puts
the work on them to prove that everything you produce was done on
company time with company resources.

I suggest you get your own IP agreement and force your employer to sign
it thus protecting yourself.

Matt Liotta
President  CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:08 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

 little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement,
but
 none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is
rather
 broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some
 assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just
not at
 your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the
 building).

 ~Todd


 On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

  You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you
were
  hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal
matters,
  you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.
 
  Matt Liotta
  President  CEO
  Montara Software, Inc.
  http://www.montarasoftware.com/
  V: 415-577-8070
  F: 415-341-8906
  P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
   To: CF-Talk
   Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
  
   quote
   Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about
being a
   programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
  after
   all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being
a
  hobby
   that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your
work,
  but
   work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
  
   Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
   /quote
  
   Dave,
  
   Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming
as a
   hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.
How
  does
   intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this
up
  is
   because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting
their
   developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by
right
  of
   employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee
is
   something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
  
   Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked
for
  them
   24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
  could
   purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
  hesitant
   to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
  lack of
   time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
  example.
   The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker
and
  I
   were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it
on
  the
   intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I
just do
   that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I
got
   nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job,
I'd be
   pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so
called
   methodology for future clients.
  
   I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
  called
   internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf
handle
   creative ideas like this?
  
   Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out
actionscripting
  code
   all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can
to
  help
   people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual
   property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little
script
  of
   code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to release
it?
  If
   Figleaf uses his code that he wrote on his time, does he get
  compensated?
   recognized?  Does Figleaf automatically by default suck in his
code
  into
   their intellectual property library because it was used that one
time?
  
   Just curious,
   ~Todd
  
   --
   
   Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ |
   Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion   |
   http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/  |
   http://www.flashCFM.com/   - webRat (Moderator)|
   http://www.ultrashock.com

RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Ken Wilson

I suggest you get your own IP agreement and force
your employer to sign it thus protecting yourself.



Assuming, of course, that you're prepared to earn your living elsewhere or
that your Intellectual Property is of sufficient immediate market value to
sustain you. Not too many employers are likely to respond well to being
forced into an agreement by an employee, especially if they view the
subject of that agreement to be their own asset.

Ken

__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Paris Lundis

It rather non sensical like patents where this Intellectual Property
extension crap is going..

I mean face it, everyone takes knowledge from one job to their next.. Work
is all about experience Logically your current employer doesn't collect
money from your future employer...

Having said that, anyone who does anything proximate to what they do at work
in their spare time is bound to get spanked if they are talented...

Simple solution is to not work for tyrants.  Second, negotiate the IP clause
away as a term of employment and get it in writing... Get an employment
contract that suits you... Contracts are negotiable... If more folks would
enforce this, these companies would find suckers (and not your poor abused
folks) who want the abuse.

-paris


-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


If you didn't sign an agreement then you are not bound to one. This puts
the work on them to prove that everything you produce was done on
company time with company resources.

I suggest you get your own IP agreement and force your employer to sign
it thus protecting yourself.

Matt Liotta
President  CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:08 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

 little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement,
but
 none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is
rather
 broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some
 assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just
not at
 your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the
 building).

 ~Todd


 On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

  You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you
were
  hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal
matters,
  you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.
 
  Matt Liotta
  President  CEO
  Montara Software, Inc.
  http://www.montarasoftware.com/
  V: 415-577-8070
  F: 415-341-8906
  P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
   To: CF-Talk
   Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
  
   quote
   Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about
being a
   programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
  after
   all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being
a
  hobby
   that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your
work,
  but
   work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
  
   Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
   /quote
  
   Dave,
  
   Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming
as a
   hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.
How
  does
   intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this
up
  is
   because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting
their
   developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by
right
  of
   employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee
is
   something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
  
   Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked
for
  them
   24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
  could
   purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
  hesitant
   to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
  lack of
   time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
  example.
   The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker
and
  I
   were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it
on
  the
   intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I
just do
   that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I
got
   nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job,
I'd be
   pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so
called
   methodology for future clients.
  
   I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
  called
   internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf
handle
   creative ideas like this?
  
   Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out
actionscripting
  code
   all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can
to
  help
   people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual
   property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little
script
  of
   code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to release
it?
  If
   Figleaf uses his code that he

RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Matt Liotta

Having been on both sides of the fence on this issue I can tell you that
you must have an agreement that is very explicit. Don't feel like you
have to accept whatever agreement your employer comes up with. You can
suggest changes for your own benefit without hurting the company. My
favorite addition to an IP agreement is the toolbox clause. It
basically states that the company is hiring me for my experience and
that to prevent me from using any new experiences learned at the company
would devalue me as a professional. I go on to state explicitly what
these experiences are e.g. methodologies, design patterns, etc.

Matt Liotta
President  CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: dennis baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:23 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
 Not only that, it's not the easiest thing to prove that your
application
 was being developed during off-hours.  Personally I believe that what
I
 do after 6:00 is my own business yet I know this isn't always the
case.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:08 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
 
 little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement,
but
 
 none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is
rather
 
 broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some
 assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just
not
 at
 your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the
 building).
 
 ~Todd
 
 
 On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:
 
  You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you
  were hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal
  matters, you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.
 
  Matt Liotta
  President  CEO
  Montara Software, Inc.
  http://www.montarasoftware.com/
  V: 415-577-8070
  F: 415-341-8906
  P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
   To: CF-Talk
   Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
  
   quote
   Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about
being
   a programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our
field;
  after
   all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being
a
  hobby
   that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your
work,
  but
   work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
  
   Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
   /quote
  
   Dave,
  
   Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming
as
   a hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.
   How
  does
   intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this
up
  is
   because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting
their
   developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by
   right
  of
   employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee
is
   something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
  
   Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked
for
  them
   24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
  could
   purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
  hesitant
   to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
  lack of
   time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
  example.
   The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker
   and
  I
   were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it
on
  the
   intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I
just
   do that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I
   got nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current
job,
   I'd be pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my'
so
 
   called methodology for future clients.
  
   I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
  called
   internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf
handle
 
   creative ideas like this?
  
   Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out
actionscripting
  code
   all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can
   to
  help
   people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual
   property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little
script
  of
   code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to release
   it?
  If
   Figleaf uses his code that he wrote on his time, does he get
  compensated?
   recognized?  Does Figleaf automatically by default suck in his
code
  into
   their intellectual property

Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Patti G. L. Hall

   CFML... The people I know often use developer as a step up from
 programmer to indicate someone who designs and plans instead of just
 codes...

That's funny.  I tend to prefer to call myself a developer because I think
it signifies a step down from programmer.  I don't want to come off as
putting on airs, but I also feel that at his point, producer or something
suitably humble doesn't describe my skill level either.

__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread todd

Technically I'm not allowed to moonlight in Eastern Pa -- so, I don't. 
:)  But, yes, it's a good question.  If I come across a better way of 
doing something, then, I should in theory own it.  I guess that's why I 
quit giving the company my thoughts, opinions and ideas and turned into a 
drone worker bee.

~Todd

On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Haggerty, Mike wrote:

 Wow, that is restrictive!
 
 What if you wanted to work on a freelance project outside of work, maybe for
 charity or something. Does the company own that code and do you have it in
 writing that they do?
 
 M
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:08 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
 
 little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement, but 
 none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is rather 
 broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some 
 assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just not at 
 your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the 
 building).
 
 ~Todd
 

-- 

Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ |
Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion   |
http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/  |
http://www.flashCFM.com/   - webRat (Moderator)|
http://www.ultrashock.com/ - webRat (Back-end Moderator)   |


__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Shawn Grover

I'm in exactly that position.  I volunteer my time to do the site for the
Avro Museum (www.avromuseum.ca) (shameless plug, I know...).  
I apply a great deal of what I've learned at work to this site.  So,
technically, my employer can make a case for owning that work. (oh, I'm
salaried too, with a clause in my contract saying the company owns ANY code
I write).

However, They knew when I was hired that I was working on this site.  As an
added bonus, a lot of the problems I've had to deal with for the web site
were directly applicable to my work as well.  So in effect, they didn't have
to pay the RD time to resolve these problems.  End result is that the
company benifits because I'm working on this site, and the Avro Museum
benifits because of the nature of my work.  Nice trade off here.

The catch is that my company is aware of my work, and knows that I am not
competing with them.  Once they have any suspicion that I'm competing (i.e.
If I start making money for my volunteer work...) then they have a
legitimate beef against me.  But I don't let it get there - I talk to the
boss about anything that might be considered a conflict before undertaking
it, and he's normally very agreeable.

My thoughts.

Shawn Grover

-Original Message-
From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


Wow, that is restrictive!

What if you wanted to work on a freelance project outside of work, maybe for
charity or something. Does the company own that code and do you have it in
writing that they do?

M

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement, but 
none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is rather 
broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some 
assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just not at 
your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the 
building).

~Todd


On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

 You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you were
 hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal matters,
 you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.
 
 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 V: 415-577-8070
 F: 415-341-8906
 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
  
  quote
  Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about being a
  programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
 after
  all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being a
 hobby
  that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work,
 but
  work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
  
  Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
  /quote
  
  Dave,
  
  Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming as a
  hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.  How
 does
  intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this up
 is
  because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting their
  developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by right
 of
  employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee is
  something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
  
  Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked for
 them
  24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
 could
  purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
 hesitant
  to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
 lack of
  time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
 example.
  The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker and
 I
  were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it on
 the
  intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I just do
  that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I got
  nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job, I'd be
  pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so called
  methodology for future clients.
  
  I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
 called
  internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf handle
  creative ideas like this?
  
  Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out actionscripting
 code
  all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can to
 help
  people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual

RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Bryan F. Hogan

Not if salaried

-Original Message-
From: Jillian Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


The interesting question that your comment raises in my mind:

If you are never truly 'off', you just aren't at your desk...

If 'they' ever fought you on intellectual property, couldn't you retort with
a rather hefty claim for overtime owed?

heheh :)

--
Jillian

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement, but
none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is rather
broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some
assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just not at
your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the
building).

~Todd


On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

 You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you were
 hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal matters,
 you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.

 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 V: 415-577-8070
 F: 415-341-8906
 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
  quote
  Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about being a
  programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
 after
  all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being a
 hobby
  that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work,
 but
  work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
 
  Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
  /quote
 
  Dave,
 
  Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming as a
  hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.  How
 does
  intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this up
 is
  because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting their
  developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by right
 of
  employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee is
  something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
 
  Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked for
 them
  24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
 could
  purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
 hesitant
  to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
 lack of
  time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
 example.
  The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker and
 I
  were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it on
 the
  intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I just do
  that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I got
  nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job, I'd be
  pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so called
  methodology for future clients.
 
  I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
 called
  internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf handle
  creative ideas like this?
 
  Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out actionscripting
 code
  all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can to
 help
  people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual
  property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little script
 of
  code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to release it?
 If
  Figleaf uses his code that he wrote on his time, does he get
 compensated?
  recognized?  Does Figleaf automatically by default suck in his code
 into
  their intellectual property library because it was used that one time?
 
  Just curious,
  ~Todd
 
  --
  
  Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ |
  Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion   |
  http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/  |
  http://www.flashCFM.com/   - webRat (Moderator)|
  http://www.ultrashock.com/ - webRat (Back-end Moderator)   |
  
 
 



__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail

RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Ryan Kime

If you look at some of the IP agreements, some employers state that ANYTHING
conceived, developed, etc while employed with said company it the sole
property of said company.

Wasn't there a case in the news lately about a company that won the rights
to an employee's ideas (even off-the-clock) he had during his tenure at the
company? I think they sued him for not disclosing his idea.


-Original Message-
From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


Wow, that is restrictive!

What if you wanted to work on a freelance project outside of work, maybe for
charity or something. Does the company own that code and do you have it in
writing that they do?

M

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement, but 
none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is rather 
broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some 
assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just not at 
your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the 
building).

~Todd


On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

 You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you 
 were hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal 
 matters, you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.
 
 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 V: 415-577-8070
 F: 415-341-8906
 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
  
  quote
  Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about being 
  a programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
 after
  all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being a
 hobby
  that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work,
 but
  work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
  
  Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
  /quote
  
  Dave,
  
  Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming as 
  a hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.  
  How
 does
  intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this up
 is
  because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting their 
  developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by 
  right
 of
  employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee is 
  something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
  
  Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked for
 them
  24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
 could
  purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
 hesitant
  to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
 lack of
  time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
 example.
  The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker 
  and
 I
  were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it on
 the
  intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I just 
  do that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I 
  got nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job, 
  I'd be pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so 
  called methodology for future clients.
  
  I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
 called
  internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf handle 
  creative ideas like this?
  
  Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out actionscripting
 code
  all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can 
  to
 help
  people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual 
  property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little script
 of
  code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to release 
  it?
 If
  Figleaf uses his code that he wrote on his time, does he get
 compensated?
  recognized?  Does Figleaf automatically by default suck in his code
 into
  their intellectual property library because it was used that one 
  time?
  
  Just curious,
  ~Todd
  
  -- 
  Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ |
  Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion   |
  http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/  |
  http://www.flashCFM.com/   - webRat (Moderator)|
  http://www.ultrashock.com/ - webRat (Back-end Moderator

RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Dan Haley

Here in Washington (the state!) there has been an emphasis lately on laws
that are on the books.  If you are salaried then you can't have things like
comp time, 40 hour work weeks, etc.  Your only requirement is that you meet
the objectives set forth by your supervisor.  Caused a lot of joking around
here on Mondays about lunch time ... you done with your objectives?  yep
.. ok, done for the week!.  Of course, how close they follow these in all
work places I don't know.  I'm assuming it was a push by the unions, since
part of the laws define who should be salaried and who should be hourly, and
progralopers are borderline according to that definition.

Now if I only I had documented all thos off the clock hours when I worked at
Albertsons ...

Dan

-Original Message-
From: Jillian Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


The interesting question that your comment raises in my mind:

If you are never truly 'off', you just aren't at your desk...

If 'they' ever fought you on intellectual property, couldn't you retort with
a rather hefty claim for overtime owed?

heheh :)

--
Jillian

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement, but
none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is rather
broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some
assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just not at
your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the
building).

~Todd


On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

 You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you were
 hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal matters,
 you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.

 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 V: 415-577-8070
 F: 415-341-8906
 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
  quote
  Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about being a
  programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
 after
  all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being a
 hobby
  that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work,
 but
  work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
 
  Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
  /quote
 
  Dave,
 
  Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming as a
  hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.  How
 does
  intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this up
 is
  because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting their
  developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by right
 of
  employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee is
  something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
 
  Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked for
 them
  24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
 could
  purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
 hesitant
  to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
 lack of
  time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
 example.
  The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker and
 I
  were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it on
 the
  intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I just do
  that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I got
  nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job, I'd be
  pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so called
  methodology for future clients.
 
  I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
 called
  internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf handle
  creative ideas like this?
 
  Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out actionscripting
 code
  all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can to
 help
  people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual
  property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little script
 of
  code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to release it?
 If
  Figleaf uses his code that he wrote on his time, does he get
 compensated?
  recognized?  Does Figleaf automatically by default suck in his code
 into
  their intellectual property library because it was used that one time?
 
  Just curious,
  ~Todd

Re: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Bill Wheatley

but if you read his later post hes right.

If you dont have a agreement you need to get one signed to keep the company
from saying you work done on personal time is there work.

Bill Wheatley
Senior Database Developer
Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer
EDIETS.COM
954.360.9022 X159
ICQ 417645
- Original Message -
From: Jillian Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:01 PM
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


 Re: no agreement, not bound

 That is really bad advice Matt.

 The laws still exist protecting intellectual property... I've had
colleagues
 go to court with this very battle.

 -Original Message-
 From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:21 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


 If you didn't sign an agreement then you are not bound to one. This puts
 the work on them to prove that everything you produce was done on
 company time with company resources.

 I suggest you get your own IP agreement and force your employer to sign
 it thus protecting yourself.

 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 V: 415-577-8070
 F: 415-341-8906
 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:08 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
  little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement,
 but
  none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is
 rather
  broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some
  assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just
 not at
  your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the
  building).
 
  ~Todd
 
 
  On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:
 
   You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you
 were
   hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal
 matters,
   you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.
  
   Matt Liotta
   President  CEO
   Montara Software, Inc.
   http://www.montarasoftware.com/
   V: 415-577-8070
   F: 415-341-8906
   P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
   
quote
Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about
 being a
programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
   after
all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being
 a
   hobby
that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your
 work,
   but
work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
   
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
/quote
   
Dave,
   
Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming
 as a
hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.
 How
   does
intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this
 up
   is
because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting
 their
developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by
 right
   of
employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee
 is
something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
   
Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked
 for
   them
24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
   could
purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
   hesitant
to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
   lack of
time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
   example.
The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker
 and
   I
were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it
 on
   the
intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I
 just do
that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I
 got
nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job,
 I'd be
pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so
 called
methodology for future clients.
   
I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
   called
internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf
 handle
creative ideas like this?
   
Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out
 actionscripting
   code
all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can
 to
   help
people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual
property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little
 script
   of
code over to someone at figleaf

Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Bonnie E. Betts

 So if you have two people... equally qualified, equal personalities, equal
 in every way except one goes fishing and one likes to program in his spare
 time... who would you choose.  The short and simple answer to that
question
 is the guy at home... if for no reason other than he doesn't have to dock
 the boat before logging into the server to fix the problem code that
only
 rears it's head on the weekends. ;-)

I would put up for consideration that maybe the one that is coding on
weeknights and weekends might not have softskills that I need or might
be(come) a disgruntled employee.  A person who programs days, nights and
weekends might indicate negative things such as they don't have people
skills or they're unable to perform in non-coding functions or they're
neglecting personal goals, needs and relationships.  If you don't need the
people you hire to work in a team environment or wear more than one hat,
maybe that's ok for you.  Although I would again say that hiring people and
expecting them to NOT have a balanced life is asking for dissastisfied
employees and low morale and high turnover.

BUT .. I say alla that and I code days, nights and weekends
G.  (GAWD I need a life!)

Bonnie

__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Andre Turrettini

Don't forget, you'll be spending lots of time with this person if you work
directly with them.  If they are equal in every way, wouldn't you take the
bonus of being able to have interesting conversations as opposed to talking
only about code?  Whatcha gonna do on thanksgiving weekend?  Go over to his
house and code or go over to his house and drink a beer and watch a couple
of games?  Or maybe learn to fish?  DRE

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


Dave,

I'm surprised to see such a response from you.  You're one of the few people
I see on this list 24/7.  I'm on the west coast and see you post at 12:42am.
If memory serves me correctly you're on the east coast... 3:42am

You got up early to go fishing didn't you?  ;-)

Seriously though...  I should have worded my original statement better. That
question by no means is a catch all or a disqualifying question. But I
have found it to be a valuable question during the interviewing process.
And you're absolutely right... just because someone spends a lot of time in
front of the screen doesn't make them a good programmer.  But their
willingness to learn and improve their skills both at work and at home are
certainly a bonus.

So if you have two people... equally qualified, equal personalities, equal
in every way except one goes fishing and one likes to program in his spare
time... who would you choose.  The short and simple answer to that question
is the guy at home... if for no reason other than he doesn't have to dock
the boat before logging into the server to fix the problem code that only
rears it's head on the weekends. ;-)

-Novak

- Original Message -
From: Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:42 AM
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


  One question that is always worth asking during the interviewing 
  process is What types of things/programs do you work on in your 
  spare time? If you get an answer like ...not much really, I go 
  fishing on the weekends... then chances are you've got a 
  programmer who's in it more for the money than the love of 
  programming.

 I find it odd that people in the field of programming are expected to 
 be
so
 different from people in other fields. Do most doctors, lawyers or
plumbers
 practice their skills in their spare time? Why do we expect 
 programmers to do so? Would you use that as a criteria when hiring any 
 other
professional?

 Also, just because someone enjoys what they do doesn't make them good 
 at
it.
 In fact, I think programming is a field which many people enjoy 
 working in even when they're not especially suited to it. Finally, I 
 think this expectation that most of us have about being a programmer 
 24/7
demonstrates
 the relative immaturity of our field; after all, it really should be 
 just like any other job, instead of being a hobby that you happen to 
 get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work, but work is just one 
 part of the life of a well-rounded person.

 Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
 http://www.figleaf.com/
 voice: (202) 797-5496
 fax: (202) 797-5444

 

__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Matt Liotta

If you don't have the money to pay for a good lawyer then you might want
to make use of sample agreements available on the web from trustworthy
groups. BTW, most lawyers charge significantly more than $100/hr.

Matt Liotta
President  CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:19 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
 Not a bad idea.  Good suggestion.  Now I just need to come up with
$100/hr
 to pay a lawyer. ;)
 
 ~Todd
 
 On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:
 
  If you didn't sign an agreement then you are not bound to one. This
puts
  the work on them to prove that everything you produce was done on
  company time with company resources.
 
  I suggest you get your own IP agreement and force your employer to
sign
  it thus protecting yourself.
 
  Matt Liotta
  President  CEO
  Montara Software, Inc.
  http://www.montarasoftware.com/
  V: 415-577-8070
  F: 415-341-8906
  P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 
 Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ |
 Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion   |
 http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/  |
 http://www.flashCFM.com/   - webRat (Moderator)|
 http://www.ultrashock.com/ - webRat (Back-end Moderator)   |
 
 
 
__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Lewis Sellers

On Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:14:17 -0700, in cf-talk you wrote:

You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you were
hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal matters,
you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.

Agreed. One company I worked for sent me on a 4 day long chat with
an IP attorney once upon a time. In short, get everything IP-related
in writing before you set foot in the place, and (with this
documentation) specifically enumate any previous IP you've developed,
and are currently working on or plan to start working on so as to
exclude it.

The thing to remember is that even if the people you're working for
now are a small friendly bunch, that doesn't mean that the company
won't be sold tomorrow and the new company's lawyers will try to claim
everything you've ever done as their legal IP. ;-)

--min

__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Matt Liotta

Come on! Read the rest of my message. My advice was to get an agreement
signed.

Matt Liotta
President  CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: Jillian Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:02 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
 Re: no agreement, not bound
 
 That is really bad advice Matt.
 
 The laws still exist protecting intellectual property... I've had
 colleagues
 go to court with this very battle.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:21 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
 
 If you didn't sign an agreement then you are not bound to one. This
puts
 the work on them to prove that everything you produce was done on
 company time with company resources.
 
 I suggest you get your own IP agreement and force your employer to
sign
 it thus protecting yourself.
 
 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 V: 415-577-8070
 F: 415-341-8906
 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:08 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs.
developer)
 
  little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement,
 but
  none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is
 rather
  broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times,
some
  assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just
 not at
  your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the
  building).
 
  ~Todd
 
 
  On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:
 
   You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you
 were
   hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal
 matters,
   you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.
  
   Matt Liotta
   President  CEO
   Montara Software, Inc.
   http://www.montarasoftware.com/
   V: 415-577-8070
   F: 415-341-8906
   P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs.
developer)
   
quote
Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about
 being a
programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our
field;
   after
all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of
being
 a
   hobby
that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your
 work,
   but
work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
   
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
/quote
   
Dave,
   
Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming
 as a
hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.
 How
   does
intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring
this
 up
   is
because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting
 their
developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by
 right
   of
employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee
 is
something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
   
Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked
 for
   them
24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if
they
   could
purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
   hesitant
to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to
the
   lack of
time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
   example.
The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my
co-worker
 and
   I
were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it
 on
   the
intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I
 just do
that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I
 got
nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job,
 I'd be
pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so
 called
methodology for future clients.
   
I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
   called
internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf
 handle
creative ideas like this?
   
Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out
 actionscripting
   code
all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he
can
 to
   help
people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his
intellectual
property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little
 script
   of
code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to
release
 it?
   If
Figleaf uses his code that he wrote on his

RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread Jeffry Houser

At 10:31 AM 8/29/2002 -0400, you wrote:
  On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Dave Watts wrote:

  I find it odd that people in the field of programming are expected to be
  so
  different from people in other fields. Do most doctors, lawyers or
  plumbers
  practice their skills in their spare time? Why do we expect programmers
  to
  do so? Would you use that as a criteria when hiring any other
  professional?

  The good doctors, lawyers or plumbers keep up with whats current. Those
  who
  don't fail.

I'm fairly certain that plubming tech. doesn't change anywhere near as
quickly as our industry. :)

  I have heard that said before.  But the reality is that, as a programmer 
(or developer), very little has changed in the theory of computer 
programming.  The languages come and go, but the same principles can be 
applied to each language.  The medium of delivery has changed for many 
applications since the Internet and WWW came into wide-scale use, however 
that doesn't change the concepts.

  Hardware seems to change a lot, but as a programmer (or developer), is it 
important that I am on top of the every weekly change?  What is different 
than my computer today vs my computer ten years ago?  More RAM, more 
storage space, more processing speed, etc...
  Nothing new, just better stuff.


IMHO, with dr's and lawyers, their industries
are at this point so hopelessly inundated with an over-abundance of
information ( most of it bad information ) that separating the wheat from
the shaff in order to figure out what is good and useful information and
hone their skills is a losing battle. As I see it, technology in general is
headed that direction also.

  :eek:  I hope not.



--
Jeffry Houser | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need a Web Developer?  Contact me!
AIM: Reboog711  | Phone: 1-203-379-0773
--
My CFMX Book: 
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0072225564/instantcoldfu-20
My Books: http://www.instantcoldfusion.com
My Band: http://www.farcryfly.com 

__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Matt Liotta

I would never work for a company that didn't respect my rights.

Matt Liotta
President  CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:17 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
 I suggest you get your own IP agreement and force
 your employer to sign it thus protecting yourself.
 
 
 
 Assuming, of course, that you're prepared to earn your living
elsewhere or
 that your Intellectual Property is of sufficient immediate market
value to
 sustain you. Not too many employers are likely to respond well to
being
 forced into an agreement by an employee, especially if they view the
 subject of that agreement to be their own asset.
 
 Ken
 
 
__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Brian Ledwith

Seeing that Matt is President and CEO of Montara Software, and that a
number of us on this list have done exactly what he is suggesting, is it
really bad advice, or advice some people wouldn't want to take due to
their hesitation to anger their employers while the job market pretty
much stinks.  The last few times I accepted a job (as in becoming
someone's employee, not my consulting/contract work, which is a whole
different set of legal paperwork), when I was handed NDAs and the
typical paperwork upon negotiations, I handed over my own set.  I own
what I rightfully own, as do my employers.  I feel like if I was offered
a job with a company that was reluctant to respect my extracurricular
endeavors, I might hesitate to accept.

Now, being in the situation that has been discussed today, where people
might be approaching their current bosses with paperwork, might be
difficult.  I could certainly understand the thought of a boss saying,
Wait a second, you've worked for us for how many years, and you just
NOW want us to sign papers?  Which is exactly why, if you're going to
do it, it's easiest and least surprising to all, to do it upon hiring.

I've had subcontractors want to modify their contracts with me in the
middle of a project.  Needless to say, I'm usually reluctant to do so,
but why would I say No outright when it doesn't always make a big
difference in the end.  Most recently, I sub'd a graphic guy to do some
Flash work.  My contract with my client was in such a way where I had
X ownership to the project.  My contract with my subs said they had
Y ownership (minimal, to be honest).  When half way through the
project the designer realized that some of the work would be great for
his portfolio, I let him have it.  It cost me nothing, as we agreed that
revisions to the contract would be out of his pocket.  Sound unfair?  He
didn't think so, and neither do I.  We had the paperwork reworded in a
few places and now he can brag all he wants about the Flash, while I
can't even speak of its existence.

Fine with me.  Come the weekend, and the end of the project, I really
don't want to THINK of its existence, as there are plenty of other
things to think about, such as the next project.

Remember, lawyers, while costing a fortune, are often a great
investment.  If doing contract work, you have to cover your expenses,
and legal fees would be just one.  I'd suggest that if you don't have
any fairly generic NDAs and IP contracts to get some made.  I've been
using the same ones, which set me back a few thousand originally, for
several years.  Money WELL spent.

I too have been to court, twice, and won, once.  Was it worth my time?
Was it worth my money?  Yes.  Did I recoup my lost money and IP?
Neither time.  Just because I won didn't mean I got my money and
property, but you have to draw the line somewhere.

Oh well, business is tough.


Food for thought.

~Brian Ledwith

(anyone going to the BACFUG meeting tonight?)


 
-Original Message-
From: Jillian Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:02 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

Re: no agreement, not bound

That is really bad advice Matt.

The laws still exist protecting intellectual property... I've had
colleagues
go to court with this very battle.

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:21 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


If you didn't sign an agreement then you are not bound to one. This puts
the work on them to prove that everything you produce was done on
company time with company resources.

I suggest you get your own IP agreement and force your employer to sign
it thus protecting yourself.

Matt Liotta
President  CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:08 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

 little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement,
but
 none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is
rather
 broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some
 assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just
not at
 your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the
 building).

 ~Todd


 On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

  You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you
were
  hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal
matters,
  you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.
 
  Matt Liotta
  President  CEO
  Montara Software, Inc.
  http://www.montarasoftware.com/
  V: 415-577-8070
  F: 415-341-8906
  P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Jeffry Houser

  Of course if you don't sign one, then I think the law is on your side.

  For extra protection, don't create your own intellectual property on 
your employers time or with your employer's equipment.

  If you want extra protection, you can copyright your code and stuff.  If 
you ever end up in court and your previous employer is saying I should own 
the rights to this and you have a copyright form and they have 
nothing  I'm sure it'll go in your favor.

At 02:16 PM 8/29/2002 -0400, you wrote:
 I suggest you get your own IP agreement and force
 your employer to sign it thus protecting yourself.



Assuming, of course, that you're prepared to earn your living elsewhere or
that your Intellectual Property is of sufficient immediate market value to
sustain you. Not too many employers are likely to respond well to being
forced into an agreement by an employee, especially if they view the
subject of that agreement to be their own asset.

Ken


__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Jeffry Houser

At 12:01 PM 8/29/2002 -0600, you wrote:
Re: no agreement, not bound

That is really bad advice Matt.

  I might say that Matt's advice was not No agreement, not bound it was 
Try to get your employer to sign your own agreement.

The laws still exist protecting intellectual property... I've had colleagues
go to court with this very battle.

  But, whose side is the law on?  Is it protecting the intellectual 
property of the employer or the employee?

  I once turned down a job because there was some clause that all my 
copyrights would belong to the employer.  They refused to discuss changing 
that.  If I write a song, should the rights to that song fall back onto my 
computer programming boss?  No!  I would have even considered restricting 
it to computer programs.


--
Jeffry Houser | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need a Web Developer?  Contact me!
AIM: Reboog711  | Phone: 1-203-379-0773
--
My CFMX Book: 
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0072225564/instantcoldfu-20
My Books: http://www.instantcoldfusion.com
My Band: http://www.farcryfly.com 

__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Matt Liotta

It doesn't really matter if your boss is agreeable or not. What matters
is what kind of agreement you signed. I bet your agreeable boss doesn't
authorize in writing allowing you to work on other projects.

Matt Liotta
President  CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: Shawn Grover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:18 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
 I'm in exactly that position.  I volunteer my time to do the site for
the
 Avro Museum (www.avromuseum.ca) (shameless plug, I know...).
 I apply a great deal of what I've learned at work to this site.  So,
 technically, my employer can make a case for owning that work. (oh,
I'm
 salaried too, with a clause in my contract saying the company owns ANY
 code
 I write).
 
 However, They knew when I was hired that I was working on this site.
As
 an
 added bonus, a lot of the problems I've had to deal with for the web
site
 were directly applicable to my work as well.  So in effect, they
didn't
 have
 to pay the RD time to resolve these problems.  End result is that the
 company benifits because I'm working on this site, and the Avro Museum
 benifits because of the nature of my work.  Nice trade off here.
 
 The catch is that my company is aware of my work, and knows that I am
not
 competing with them.  Once they have any suspicion that I'm competing
 (i.e.
 If I start making money for my volunteer work...) then they have a
 legitimate beef against me.  But I don't let it get there - I talk to
the
 boss about anything that might be considered a conflict before
undertaking
 it, and he's normally very agreeable.
 
 My thoughts.
 
 Shawn Grover
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:42 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
 
 Wow, that is restrictive!
 
 What if you wanted to work on a freelance project outside of work,
maybe
 for
 charity or something. Does the company own that code and do you have
it in
 writing that they do?
 
 M
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:08 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
 
 little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement,
but
 none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is
rather
 broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some
 assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just
not at
 your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the
 building).
 
 ~Todd
 
 
 On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:
 
  You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you
were
  hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal
matters,
  you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.
 
  Matt Liotta
  President  CEO
  Montara Software, Inc.
  http://www.montarasoftware.com/
  V: 415-577-8070
  F: 415-341-8906
  P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
   To: CF-Talk
   Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
  
   quote
   Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about
being a
   programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
  after
   all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being
a
  hobby
   that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your
work,
  but
   work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
  
   Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
   /quote
  
   Dave,
  
   Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming
as a
   hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.
How
  does
   intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this
up
  is
   because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting
their
   developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by
right
  of
   employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee
is
   something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
  
   Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked
for
  them
   24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
  could
   purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
  hesitant
   to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
  lack of
   time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
  example.
   The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker
and
  I
   were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it
on
  the
   intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I
just

Re: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Bryan Stevenson

IMHO salary = Evil

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP  Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
Macromedia Associate Partner
www.macromedia.com
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder  Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message -
From: Dan Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:38 PM
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


 Here in Washington (the state!) there has been an emphasis lately on laws
 that are on the books.  If you are salaried then you can't have things
like
 comp time, 40 hour work weeks, etc.  Your only requirement is that you
meet
 the objectives set forth by your supervisor.  Caused a lot of joking
around
 here on Mondays about lunch time ... you done with your objectives?  yep
 .. ok, done for the week!.  Of course, how close they follow these in all
 work places I don't know.  I'm assuming it was a push by the unions, since
 part of the laws define who should be salaried and who should be hourly,
and
 progralopers are borderline according to that definition.

 Now if I only I had documented all thos off the clock hours when I worked
at
 Albertsons ...

 Dan

 -Original Message-
 From: Jillian Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:52 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


 The interesting question that your comment raises in my mind:

 If you are never truly 'off', you just aren't at your desk...

 If 'they' ever fought you on intellectual property, couldn't you retort
with
 a rather hefty claim for overtime owed?

 heheh :)

 --
 Jillian

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:08 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


 little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement, but
 none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is rather
 broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some
 assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just not at
 your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the
 building).

 ~Todd


 On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

  You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you were
  hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal matters,
  you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.
 
  Matt Liotta
  President  CEO
  Montara Software, Inc.
  http://www.montarasoftware.com/
  V: 415-577-8070
  F: 415-341-8906
  P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
   To: CF-Talk
   Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
  
   quote
   Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about being a
   programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
  after
   all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being a
  hobby
   that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work,
  but
   work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
  
   Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
   /quote
  
   Dave,
  
   Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming as a
   hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.  How
  does
   intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this up
  is
   because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting their
   developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by right
  of
   employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee is
   something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
  
   Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked for
  them
   24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
  could
   purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
  hesitant
   to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
  lack of
   time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
  example.
   The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker and
  I
   were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it on
  the
   intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I just do
   that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I got
   nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job, I'd be
   pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so called
   methodology for future clients.
  
   I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
  called
   internet/development companies

RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread todd

Yes, I know that Matt.  I was joking about the lawyer payscale ... and, 
like someone else mentioned, I don't think it'd go over well if I 
presented an IP agreement to my company.  Sure, not working for the tyrant 
to begin with avoids the problem, but... something's has to pay my bills 
around here and the current economy isn't really in a good position for me 
to switch jobs just yet.  In fact, Pittsburgh is pretty dead development 
wise (for CF). Majority of the CF jobs open in Pgh, well... the company I 
worked for designed/developed something for them and I can't go client 
hopping for work.

So... anyway... that's all I have to say about that.

~Todd

On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

 If you don't have the money to pay for a good lawyer then you might want
 to make use of sample agreements available on the web from trustworthy
 groups. BTW, most lawyers charge significantly more than $100/hr.
 
 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 V: 415-577-8070
 F: 415-341-8906
 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Jillian Carroll

I can't speak for the US (as I live in Canada)... but it is a common
misconception that just because you are 'on salary', that they can work you
as much as they want.

In Canada, there is a maximum of 40 hours per week or 80 hours in a 14 day
period.

Now... there are certainly other rules.  They can work you more, but you are
to be paid overtime... or if you are paid a bonus/commission, if it reaches
an amount that is comparable to what the overtime would have been... it is
considered 'in lieu' of overtime in many cases.

The Labour Board would be delighted to contact any employer and let them
know the law. :)

-Original Message-
From: Bryan F. Hogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


Not if salaried

-Original Message-
From: Jillian Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


The interesting question that your comment raises in my mind:

If you are never truly 'off', you just aren't at your desk...

If 'they' ever fought you on intellectual property, couldn't you retort with
a rather hefty claim for overtime owed?

heheh :)

--
Jillian

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement, but
none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is rather
broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some
assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just not at
your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the
building).

~Todd


On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

 You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you were
 hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal matters,
 you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.

 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 V: 415-577-8070
 F: 415-341-8906
 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
  quote
  Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about being a
  programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
 after
  all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being a
 hobby
  that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work,
 but
  work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
 
  Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
  /quote
 
  Dave,
 
  Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming as a
  hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.  How
 does
  intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this up
 is
  because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting their
  developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by right
 of
  employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee is
  something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
 
  Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked for
 them
  24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
 could
  purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
 hesitant
  to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
 lack of
  time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
 example.
  The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker and
 I
  were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it on
 the
  intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I just do
  that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I got
  nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job, I'd be
  pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so called
  methodology for future clients.
 
  I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
 called
  internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf handle
  creative ideas like this?
 
  Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out actionscripting
 code
  all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can to
 help
  people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual
  property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little script
 of
  code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to release it?
 If
  Figleaf uses his code that he wrote on his time, does he get
 compensated?
  recognized?  Does Figleaf automatically by default suck in his code
 into
  their intellectual property library

RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread John Wilker

Being salaried does not mean you are not due over time. Salary is still
based on 40 hours weeks plus/minus a few I think.

J. 
 
John Wilker  Codito, ergo sum
Web Applications Consultant, and Writer
Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Developer
President/Founder, Inland Empire CFUG.
www.red-omega.com
 
I asked Do you know DOS?
 
The reply was: No, but I met Tom and Drew a few minutes ago.


-Original Message-
From: Bryan F. Hogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


Not if salaried

-Original Message-
From: Jillian Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


The interesting question that your comment raises in my mind:

If you are never truly 'off', you just aren't at your desk...

If 'they' ever fought you on intellectual property, couldn't you retort
with a rather hefty claim for overtime owed?

heheh :)

--
Jillian

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement, but
none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is rather
broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some
assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just not
at your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the
building).

~Todd


On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

 You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you 
 were hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal 
 matters, you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.

 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 V: 415-577-8070
 F: 415-341-8906
 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
  quote
  Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about being 
  a programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
 after
  all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being a
 hobby
  that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work,
 but
  work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
 
  Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
  /quote
 
  Dave,
 
  Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming as 
  a hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.  
  How
 does
  intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this up
 is
  because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting their 
  developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by 
  right
 of
  employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee is 
  something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
 
  Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked for
 them
  24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
 could
  purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
 hesitant
  to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
 lack of
  time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
 example.
  The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker 
  and
 I
  were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it on
 the
  intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I just 
  do that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I 
  got nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job, 
  I'd be pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so

  called methodology for future clients.
 
  I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
 called
  internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf handle

  creative ideas like this?
 
  Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out actionscripting
 code
  all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can 
  to
 help
  people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual 
  property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little script
 of
  code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to release 
  it?
 If
  Figleaf uses his code that he wrote on his time, does he get
 compensated?
  recognized?  Does Figleaf automatically by default suck in his code
 into
  their intellectual property library because it was used that one 
  time?
 
  Just curious,
  ~Todd
 
  -- 
  Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com

RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread John Wilker

I think there is a difference between Keeping current and fanatically
doing nothing but coding into the wee hours and forgetting what the sun
actually looks like. I think what our industry lacks is a happy medium.

J.
 
 
John Wilker  Codito, ergo sum
Web Applications Consultant, and Writer
Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Developer
President/Founder, Inland Empire CFUG.
www.red-omega.com
 
I asked Do you know DOS?
 
The reply was: No, but I met Tom and Drew a few minutes ago.


-Original Message-
From: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Dave Watts wrote:

 I find it odd that people in the field of programming are expected to 
 be so different from people in other fields. Do most doctors, lawyers 
 or plumbers practice their skills in their spare time? Why do we 
 expect programmers to do so? Would you use that as a criteria when 
 hiring any other professional?

The good doctors, lawyers or plumbers keep up with whats current. Those
who don't fail.


 Also, just because someone enjoys what they do doesn't make them good 
 at it. In fact, I think programming is a field which many people enjoy

 working in even when they're not especially suited to it.

And they are paid accordingly.

 expectation that most of us have about being a programmer 24/7 
 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field; after all, it 
 really should be just like any other job, instead of being a hobby 
 that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work, 
 but work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.

You can treat any field like a job and get your end of week paycheck.
But those who really enjoy it like to play with it more often and tend
to be more successful.



__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread John Wilker

I do spend a good amount of my off time programming for side work or
personal projects but I agree with Dave, our industry focuses way too
much on giving up a life in the pursuit of programming. I don't enjoy
working with people who spend nights and weekends coding then come to
work and code. There needs to be a release.

I am very much not a textbook programmer but try to spend as little
time as possible coding when I don't need to. Doctors aren't judged
differently if they aren't cutting people up in their garages, or
electricians for not tearing apart their air conditioners for practice.

I love what I do and love that I seem to be pretty good, I love even
more that I am a 9-5 well actually a 6:30-4:00 programmer.

J. 
 
John Wilker  Codito, ergo sum
Web Applications Consultant, and Writer
Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Developer
President/Founder, Inland Empire CFUG.
www.red-omega.com
 
I asked Do you know DOS?
 
The reply was: No, but I met Tom and Drew a few minutes ago.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


Jeff,

Very true... I could have worded what I said a little better.  Basically
what I'm interested in knowing is Do you do any programming,
development, or learning on your own time?  Do new computers, new
software, and new programming concepts, etc fascinate you or are you
just a 9-5 programmer?

It's a very good way to weed out the people who tend to be the
textbook programmers from the ones who live and breath the stuff...

-Novak

   Arguments could definitely be made for that, however I still think 
 getting away from the computer for a bit is good for me.



__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-29 Thread John Wilker

So if you have two people... equally qualified, equal personalities,
equal in every way except one goes fishing and one likes to program in
his spare time... who would you choose.  The short and simple answer to
that question is the guy at home... if for no reason other than he
doesn't have to dock the boat before logging into the server to fix the
problem code that only rears it's head on the weekends. ;-)

My thinking on this is I would hire the guy who fishes. I want to
surround myself with quality and intelligent people, but I also don't
want them to burn out in a year or two.

All things being equal I would always pick the fisher, the home repair
handyman, the car fixer-upper, etc..

J. 
 
John Wilker  Codito, ergo sum
Web Applications Consultant, and Writer
Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Developer
President/Founder, Inland Empire CFUG.
www.red-omega.com
 
I asked Do you know DOS?
 
The reply was: No, but I met Tom and Drew a few minutes ago.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


Dave,

I'm surprised to see such a response from you.  You're one of the few
people I see on this list 24/7.  I'm on the west coast and see you post
at 12:42am. If memory serves me correctly you're on the east coast...
3:42am

You got up early to go fishing didn't you?  ;-)

Seriously though...  I should have worded my original statement better.
That question by no means is a catch all or a disqualifying
question. But I have found it to be a valuable question during the
interviewing process.  And you're absolutely right... just because
someone spends a lot of time in front of the screen doesn't make them a
good programmer.  But their willingness to learn and improve their
skills both at work and at home are certainly a bonus.

So if you have two people... equally qualified, equal personalities,
equal in every way except one goes fishing and one likes to program in
his spare time... who would you choose.  The short and simple answer to
that question is the guy at home... if for no reason other than he
doesn't have to dock the boat before logging into the server to fix the
problem code that only rears it's head on the weekends. ;-)

-Novak

- Original Message -
From: Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:42 AM
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


  One question that is always worth asking during the interviewing 
  process is What types of things/programs do you work on in your 
  spare time? If you get an answer like ...not much really, I go 
  fishing on the weekends... then chances are you've got a 
  programmer who's in it more for the money than the love of 
  programming.

 I find it odd that people in the field of programming are expected to 
 be
so
 different from people in other fields. Do most doctors, lawyers or
plumbers
 practice their skills in their spare time? Why do we expect 
 programmers to do so? Would you use that as a criteria when hiring any

 other
professional?

 Also, just because someone enjoys what they do doesn't make them good 
 at
it.
 In fact, I think programming is a field which many people enjoy 
 working in even when they're not especially suited to it. Finally, I 
 think this expectation that most of us have about being a programmer 
 24/7
demonstrates
 the relative immaturity of our field; after all, it really should be 
 just like any other job, instead of being a hobby that you happen to 
 get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work, but work is just one

 part of the life of a well-rounded person.

 Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
 http://www.figleaf.com/
 voice: (202) 797-5496
 fax: (202) 797-5444

 

__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Paris Lundis

The recent case was totally off the charts stupid...

The guy had an idea... never exercised it... totally in his free time..
nothing developed on it... His company was acquired and off he went as an
asset..  At some point he says, I want to go do something else with my life
and develop one of my ideas...

The brass says oh and idea huh... interesting... we own your mind.. Then sue
him for something that has 0 relationship to his body of responsibility, job
detail, their industry, their products, etc...

So yes, IP baloney has gone too far... I emailed the guy and said I felt bad
that our legal system has become such a  tragedy...  Even offered to drop a
few bucks his way to help him out...

The company in this matter was Alcatel...

-paris

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Kime [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


If you look at some of the IP agreements, some employers state that ANYTHING
conceived, developed, etc while employed with said company it the sole
property of said company.

Wasn't there a case in the news lately about a company that won the rights
to an employee's ideas (even off-the-clock) he had during his tenure at the
company? I think they sued him for not disclosing his idea.


-Original Message-
From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


Wow, that is restrictive!

What if you wanted to work on a freelance project outside of work, maybe for
charity or something. Does the company own that code and do you have it in
writing that they do?

M

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement, but
none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is rather
broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some
assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just not at
your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the
building).

~Todd


On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

 You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you
 were hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal
 matters, you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.

 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 V: 415-577-8070
 F: 415-341-8906
 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
  quote
  Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about being
  a programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
 after
  all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being a
 hobby
  that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work,
 but
  work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
 
  Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
  /quote
 
  Dave,
 
  Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming as
  a hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.
  How
 does
  intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this up
 is
  because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting their
  developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by
  right
 of
  employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee is
  something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
 
  Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked for
 them
  24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
 could
  purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
 hesitant
  to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
 lack of
  time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
 example.
  The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker
  and
 I
  were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it on
 the
  intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I just
  do that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I
  got nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job,
  I'd be pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so
  called methodology for future clients.
 
  I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
 called
  internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf handle
  creative ideas like this?
 
  Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out actionscripting
 code
  all day long and posts code left and right

RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread John Wilker

Good point. 

 
 
John Wilker  Codito, ergo sum
Web Applications Consultant, and Writer
Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Developer
President/Founder, Inland Empire CFUG.
www.red-omega.com
 
I asked Do you know DOS?
 
The reply was: No, but I met Tom and Drew a few minutes ago.


-Original Message-
From: Jillian Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


The interesting question that your comment raises in my mind:

If you are never truly 'off', you just aren't at your desk...

If 'they' ever fought you on intellectual property, couldn't you retort
with a rather hefty claim for overtime owed?

heheh :)

--
Jillian

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement, but
none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is rather
broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some
assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just not
at your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the
building).

~Todd


On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

 You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you 
 were hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal 
 matters, you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.

 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 V: 415-577-8070
 F: 415-341-8906
 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
  quote
  Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about being 
  a programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
 after
  all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being a
 hobby
  that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work,
 but
  work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
 
  Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
  /quote
 
  Dave,
 
  Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming as 
  a hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work time.  
  How
 does
  intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this up
 is
  because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting their 
  developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is by 
  right
 of
  employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee is 
  something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
 
  Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked for
 them
  24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
 could
  purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
 hesitant
  to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
 lack of
  time they give me for a particular project.  My methodology for
 example.
  The project manager basically scoped out what he felt my co-worker 
  and
 I
  were developing, asked me to read this over and ... published it on
 the
  intranet.  At the same time, I'm thinking to myself, why did I just 
  do that?  What did I gain from it?  I got no recognition for it, I 
  got nothing.  So, if I were to ever break away from my current job, 
  I'd be pretty screwed if they found out that I'm still using 'my' so

  called methodology for future clients.
 
  I'm very concerned about the future and maturity level of the so
 called
  internet/development companies out there.  How does figleaf handle

  creative ideas like this?
 
  Case in point, Branden Hall.  I'm sure he cranks out actionscripting
 code
  all day long and posts code left and right and handles what he can 
  to
 help
  people out.  How does Figleaf distinguish between his intellectual 
  property and commercial value?  Does Branden run every little script
 of
  code over to someone at figleaf and ask for permission to release 
  it?
 If
  Figleaf uses his code that he wrote on his time, does he get
 compensated?
  recognized?  Does Figleaf automatically by default suck in his code
 into
  their intellectual property library because it was used that one 
  time?
 
  Just curious,
  ~Todd
 
  -- 
  Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ |
  Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion   |
  http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/  |
  http://www.flashCFM.com/   - webRat (Moderator)|
  http://www.ultrashock.com/ - webRat (Back-end Moderator

RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread John Wilker

LOL. I don't know about evil, but certainly a PITA when it comes to
compensation... Though the 2.5 hours lunch I took today sure was fun ;-)

J.
 
John Wilker  Codito, ergo sum
Web Applications Consultant, and Writer
Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Developer
President/Founder, Inland Empire CFUG.
www.red-omega.com
 
I asked Do you know DOS?
 
The reply was: No, but I met Tom and Drew a few minutes ago.


-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 4:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


IMHO salary = Evil

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP  Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
Macromedia Associate Partner
www.macromedia.com
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder  Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message -
From: Dan Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:38 PM
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


 Here in Washington (the state!) there has been an emphasis lately on 
 laws that are on the books.  If you are salaried then you can't have 
 things
like
 comp time, 40 hour work weeks, etc.  Your only requirement is that you
meet
 the objectives set forth by your supervisor.  Caused a lot of joking
around
 here on Mondays about lunch time ... you done with your objectives?  
 yep .. ok, done for the week!.  Of course, how close they follow 
 these in all work places I don't know.  I'm assuming it was a push by 
 the unions, since part of the laws define who should be salaried and 
 who should be hourly,
and
 progralopers are borderline according to that definition.

 Now if I only I had documented all thos off the clock hours when I 
 worked
at
 Albertsons ...

 Dan

 -Original Message-
 From: Jillian Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:52 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


 The interesting question that your comment raises in my mind:

 If you are never truly 'off', you just aren't at your desk...

 If 'they' ever fought you on intellectual property, couldn't you 
 retort
with
 a rather hefty claim for overtime owed?

 heheh :)

 --
 Jillian

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:08 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


 little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement, 
 but none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is 
 rather broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour 
 times, some assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', 
 you're just not at your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to 
 physically leave the building).

 ~Todd


 On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

  You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you 
  were hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal 
  matters, you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.
 
  Matt Liotta
  President  CEO
  Montara Software, Inc.
  http://www.montarasoftware.com/
  V: 415-577-8070
  F: 415-341-8906
  P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
   To: CF-Talk
   Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
  
   quote
   Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about 
   being a programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of 
   our field;
  after
   all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being

   a
  hobby
   that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your 
   work,
  but
   work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
  
   Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
   /quote
  
   Dave,
  
   Curious question for you.  To those of us that enjoy programming 
   as a hobby and actually do research on our own outside of work 
   time.  How
  does
   intellectual property fit into this.  The reason why I bring this 
   up
  is
   because well, due to the immaturity of most comapnies wanting 
   their developers to work 24/7, basically anything I concieve of is

   by right
  of
   employment contract, theirs.  In their eyes, a salaried employee 
   is something akin to a ... well... a wageslave.
  
   Take the little company I work for.  They'd love it if I worked 
   for
  them
   24/7.  The partners would get a kick out of it, especially if they
  could
   purchase another SUV within a few months.  However, I have been
  hesitant
   to hand over anything, but at times, I've had no choice due to the
  lack of
   time

RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)

2002-08-29 Thread Paris Lundis

Salary shouldn't be confused with slavery...

Every state has a different say on it

Essentially, the majority of people who work bad jobs and make up the
majority of the population and at best are represented by unions to have
rights don't exactly like salaried people. They view us like they do
management and believe we are compensated well and deserve what we get...
For the most part, I have to agree with them.

It's two school's of thought, the hourly vs. the predictable salary.

At any rate, there are loads of case law on people claiming overtime
compensation because they were forced to work long hours and paid salary...
I know myself, in the past, I have put in 300+ hours in a month with no
additional benefit financially or spiritually as a salaried being..

Overall, as an employer, you can't generally make people work much more than
40 hours... 60 hours is pretty much the cap before people can say hey
That's a 12 hour work day and that still is normal in some countries...

If you find yourself working too much and its a problem write a letter to
your supervisor.. Email is fine... have them address it in email... That
gives you a time and dated transcript... Note the issue clearly... Explain
the position...

I find that at any point where I have had employees report to me, that if
such were to occur I would gladly slide them some off time flexibly so..
Pickup some in house dining or give them some $200 gadget they might want...

It's never cut clean being an employee or an employer... I personally stay
away from body shops, banking, government and other places that tend to have
employee issues... If you choose to work in stagnant environments with
abusive folks you deserve the problems you have...

People are the most expensive item to almost every company... Keeping
employees working, inspired and productive reaps a great deal more
positivity than oppressive, controlling management styles do.

-paris
Paris Lundis
Founder
Areaindex, L.L.C.
http://www.areaindex.com
http://www.pubcrawler.com
(p) 1-212-655-4477
[finding the future in the past, passing the future in the present]
[connecting people, places and things]


-Original Message-
From: John Wilker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:19 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


Being salaried does not mean you are not due over time. Salary is still
based on 40 hours weeks plus/minus a few I think.

J.

John Wilker  Codito, ergo sum
Web Applications Consultant, and Writer
Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Developer
President/Founder, Inland Empire CFUG.
www.red-omega.com

I asked Do you know DOS?

The reply was: No, but I met Tom and Drew a few minutes ago.


-Original Message-
From: Bryan F. Hogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


Not if salaried

-Original Message-
From: Jillian Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


The interesting question that your comment raises in my mind:

If you are never truly 'off', you just aren't at your desk...

If 'they' ever fought you on intellectual property, couldn't you retort
with a rather hefty claim for overtime owed?

heheh :)

--
Jillian

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)


little shops don't really have an intellectual property agreement, but
none the less... their term of everything you develop for us is rather
broad in scope... some assume that it also covers off-hour times, some
assume that as a salaried employee, you're never 'off', you're just not
at your desk (e.g. You've been given permission to physically leave the
building).

~Todd


On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Matt Liotta wrote:

 You should have signed an intellectual property agreement when you
 were hired. It details you rights in this regard. As with all legal
 matters, you are advised to seek counsel from a professional.

 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 V: 415-577-8070
 F: 415-341-8906
 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:02 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Intellectual property (was RE: programmer vs. developer)
 
  quote
  Finally, I think this expectation that most of us have about being
  a programmer 24/7 demonstrates the relative immaturity of our field;
 after
  all, it really should be just like any other job, instead of being a
 hobby
  that you happen to get paid for. Sure, it's nice to enjoy your work,
 but
  work is just one part of the life of a well-rounded person.
 
  Dave Watts, CTO

Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Michael Dinowitz

In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java or C++. A 
developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF. This is a totally 
artificial distinction and one I reject on every level. I program. So do you. We're 
programmers.


 whats the difference?
 
__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Adrian Lynch

A developer developes, a programmer programs.

-Original Message-
From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 August 2002 18:42
To: CF-Talk
Subject: programmer vs. developer


whats the difference?

__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Tony Weeg

imho:

developer has these as his/her strong suit: 
50/50 on graphical interface/programming work

photoshop/fireworks
flash
cf
sql
javascript
dhtml

a programmer is a language guru:

all ecma based scripts
cf
maybe some vbscript/asp (if that be their flavor of
choice)
sql (cant get too far without this guy)



..tony

Tony Weeg
Senior Web Developer
Information System Design
Navtrak, Inc.
Fleet Management Solutions
www.navtrak.net
410.548.2337 

-Original Message-
From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: programmer vs. developer


whats the difference?

__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Adrian Lynch

If you consider yourself a programmer because you write cfml then you're
saying cfml is a programming language?

Ade

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 August 2002 18:52
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java or
C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF. This is a
totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every level. I program.
So do you. We're programmers.


 whats the difference?
 

__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Michael Dinowitz

Define a programming language and see if CF fits into it. Does it store variables? Do 
conditional logic? iterate loops? convert data? What makes C++ a programming language 
and CF not one? If you say that CF is just built on top of C++, then every C++ and 
java programmer aren't really programmers as they're not writing machine code. 
The argument is an artificial one. 
I'm a programmer because I use a computer language to write applications (even a 
single template) that runs on a computer to process some data.


 If you consider yourself a programmer because you write cfml then you're
 saying cfml is a programming language?
 
 Ade
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 28 August 2002 18:52
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer
 
 
 In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java or
 C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF. This is a
 totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every level. I program.
 So do you. We're programmers.
 
 
  whats the difference?
  
 
 
__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Shawn Grover

no difference in my eyes. 

Unless you want to make a distinction between writing code, and designing
the architechture for the code (application analysis/design).  But I never
see these terms used to describe these two different roles.  Most
programmers have to do some architecture design anyways

Shawn

-Original Message-
From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: programmer vs. developer


whats the difference?

__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread S . Isaac Dealey

 whats the difference?

You'll probably get lots of disparate answers to this question.

I've heard people use the difference to indicate that a developer does
planning and architectural design work whereas a programmer just does
programming and makes sure an application achieves the features requested in
the functional specification, without regard to wholistic questions about
what the application is for or who will use it. Which is usually what I
intend to imply when I tell people I'm a developer (that is, that I do more
than just programming).

I've also seen or heard people make the distinction that a programmer is
someone who works with traditional ( usually compiled ) languages like C/C++
and Java whereas a developer just toys with web scripts and other
interpreted stuff... This isn't a distinction I much care for, because imho
it encourages a gratuitous continued antagonism between the old-school and
the new, but I've heard it used.


Isaac Dealey
Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer

www.turnkey.to
954-776-0046
__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Phoeun Pha

Mikey,

It's just that i saw certification classes for Java programmer, and Java
developer.  Is developer reserved for WEB?  And programmer reserved for
Stand Alone apps?

-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java or
C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF. This is a
totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every level. I program.
So do you. We're programmers.


 whats the difference?
 

__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Jason Miller

isn't one just a little uglier  older than the other ? *grin

check out http://www.webopedia.com see what you come up with.

Phoeun Pha wrote:

whats the difference?

__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Fitch, Tyler

Yes,

We program.  But in the grand scheme of things, for demographic purposes
we are considered developers, not just MM but to the computer world.
Programmers beat us to the programming way back when computers were
invented.  They got first rights to use that name in generic terms.

We don't do what they do.  We program web pages/applications, but are
considered 'developers'.

I'm glad you feel so strongly about it, but I think it doesn't really
matter and you definitely shouldn't be losing any sleep over it.  That's
just me.

t

**
Tyler M. Fitch
Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer
http://isitedesign.com
** 

-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java
or C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF.
This is a totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every
level. I program. So do you. We're programmers.


 whats the difference?
 

__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Dave Hannum

If you write applications, what's the difference (in the end) if it's done
in Java or CF?  Technically, here at Ohio University, my title is Web
Analyst/Programmer.  But I always describe myself as a web applications
developer, because most of what I do is developing applications (programs)
to utilize mainframe/legacy systems.  But instead of being a desktop fat
client application, they are web/browser based thin client applications.
Cost of ownership is much less than running around all over campus to update
software on the client workstations.  I'm with you Michael, I don't agree
with MM's take on this.

Dave

===
David R Hannum
Ohio University
Web Analyst/Programmer
(740) 597-2524
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

If your wife is having fun and you're not,
you're still having a lot more fun than if you're
having fun and she's not!'  - Red Green

- Original Message -
From: Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java or
C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF. This is a
totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every level. I program.
So do you. We're programmers.


 whats the difference?


__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Michael Dinowitz

You have to ask whoever's offering the classes. The terms are used differently by 
every group as you've seen from the responses. I only replied on one definition that 
has been used and that might not be the one they're using.


 Mikey,
 
 It's just that i saw certification classes for Java programmer, and Java
 developer.  Is developer reserved for WEB?  And programmer reserved for
 Stand Alone apps?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:52 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer
 
 
 In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java or
 C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF. This is a
 totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every level. I program.
 So do you. We're programmers.
 
 
  whats the difference?
  
 
 
__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread charlie griefer

Adrian Lynch writes: 

 A developer developes, a programmer programs.

could a developer develop programs? 

:) 

 

 -Original Message-
 From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 28 August 2002 18:42
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: programmer vs. developer 
 
 
 whats the difference? 
 
 
__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Lee Fuller

A baker bakes and a shoe smells

(sorry.. Couldn't resist)

| -Original Message-
| From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
| Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:54 AM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer
| 
| 
| A developer developes, a programmer programs.
| 
| -Original Message-
| From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: 28 August 2002 18:42
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: programmer vs. developer
| 
| 
| whats the difference?
| 

__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Tangorre, Michael

Thanks MOTO  :-)



-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:54 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


A developer developes, a programmer programs.

-Original Message-
From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 August 2002 18:42
To: CF-Talk
Subject: programmer vs. developer


whats the difference?


__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread novakbanda

Developes?  How does that differ from develop? ;-)

-Novak

- Original Message -
From: Adrian Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:54 AM
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


 A developer developes, a programmer programs.

 -Original Message-
 From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 28 August 2002 18:42
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: programmer vs. developer


 whats the difference?

 
__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Jerry Johnson

I see the difference more as a granularity division.

Programmer and coder and scripter and user of dreamweaver and geocities page designer 
all fall under the generic umbrella of developer.

Programmer, on the other hand, indicates to me the ability to use and understand logic 
constructs such as if/then, loops, case structures, boolean logic, datatypes, and 
maybe, just maybe modular code design.

Jerry Johnson

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/28/02 01:52PM 
In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java or C++. A 
developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF. This is a totally 
artificial distinction and one I reject on every level. I program. So do you. We're 
programmers.


 whats the difference?
 

__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Michael Dinowitz

Sorry son, but us humans have beaten you to the name human way back. Doesn't matter 
that your the same, but you can't be a human. How about neo-human? Its just as good.
We're programmers as much as someone 10 years ago are programmers. Hey, many of us 
were programmers back then as well.
Its a false distinction that has a definition only within the minds of those who want 
to make the distinction. 

 Yes,
 
 We program.  But in the grand scheme of things, for demographic purposes
 we are considered developers, not just MM but to the computer world.
 Programmers beat us to the programming way back when computers were
 invented.  They got first rights to use that name in generic terms.
 
 We don't do what they do.  We program web pages/applications, but are
 considered 'developers'.
 
 I'm glad you feel so strongly about it, but I think it doesn't really
 matter and you definitely shouldn't be losing any sleep over it.  That's
 just me.
 
 t
 
 **
 Tyler M. Fitch
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer
 http://isitedesign.com
 ** 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:52 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer
 
 
 In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java
 or C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF.
 This is a totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every
 level. I program. So do you. We're programmers.
 
 
  whats the difference?
  
 
 
__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Tony Carcieri

ok so what happens in this case:

Web Designer
Web Developer
Web Application Designer
Web Application Developer

imho:
designer = graphic intensive training (ps, fw, flash (no actionscript),
director (no lingo), etc)
programmer = coder but more along the lines of c++, c, vb and web
technologies
developer = more web languages (cf, asp, sql, vb, java, swing, js, jscript,
html, dhtml, xml, wap/wml etc)

And then you get a title like Web Application Engineer and that is where i
stop trying to figure it out! ;-)

Big T

-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


imho:

developer has these as his/her strong suit:
50/50 on graphical interface/programming work

photoshop/fireworks
flash
cf
sql
javascript
dhtml

a programmer is a language guru:

all ecma based scripts
cf
maybe some vbscript/asp (if that be their flavor of
choice)
sql (cant get too far without this guy)



.tony

Tony Weeg
Senior Web Developer
Information System Design
Navtrak, Inc.
Fleet Management Solutions
www.navtrak.net
410.548.2337

-Original Message-
From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: programmer vs. developer


whats the difference?


__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Tony Weeg

WHO,

they told me at walmart when I bought that
book on java that I was going to be a programmer
in 21 days.

its refund time.

programmer schmogrammers, developes schmelopers

its all the samewho caresits just nomenclature.
lets get back to code questions in hereforget
this off topic stuff.

hey, mike I think we need an CFOT-List so that people
can vent their odd OT questions/iterations/musings there

and magically no one will respond, and soon they will see
how absolutely unimportant most of these are ;)

..tony

Tony Weeg
Senior Web Developer
Information System Design
Navtrak, Inc.
Fleet Management Solutions
www.navtrak.net
410.548.2337 

-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


If you consider yourself a programmer because you write cfml then you're
saying cfml is a programming language?

Ade

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 August 2002 18:52
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java
or
C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF. This
is a
totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every level. I
program.
So do you. We're programmers.


 whats the difference?
 


__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Michael Dinowitz

So your saying that this thread has moved from anything useful into totall off topic 
stuff and should be moved to CF-Community? I agree. Please forward all posts on this 
thread to CF-Community.
(maybe I should add a feature to the list to automatically move a threat to different 
lists. )


 WHO,
 
 they told me at walmart when I bought that
 book on java that I was going to be a programmer
 in 21 days.
 
 its refund time.
 
 programmer schmogrammers, developes schmelopers
 
 its all the samewho caresits just nomenclature.
 lets get back to code questions in hereforget
 this off topic stuff.
 
 hey, mike I think we need an CFOT-List so that people
 can vent their odd OT questions/iterations/musings there
 
 and magically no one will respond, and soon they will see
 how absolutely unimportant most of these are ;)
 
 ..tony
 
 Tony Weeg
 Senior Web Developer
 Information System Design
 Navtrak, Inc.
 Fleet Management Solutions
 www.navtrak.net
 410.548.2337 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:59 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer
 
 
 If you consider yourself a programmer because you write cfml then you're
 saying cfml is a programming language?
 
 Ade
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 28 August 2002 18:52
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer
 
 
 In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java
 or
 C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF. This
 is a
 totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every level. I
 program.
 So do you. We're programmers.
 
 
  whats the difference?
  
 
 
 
__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Tangorre, Michael

Lets face it, not everyone is going to agree that scripting languages are programming 
languages. I personally think that programming languages encompass scripting languages 
as well (I have a C++ background as well as others.. PERL, CF, JAVA, etc..). I tend to 
notice that people who know C++/JAVA/etc... ALONG with CF tend to side with those who 
think that CF is not a programming language for the simple reason that they would like 
to stand out from others.. the 1 up attitude. I think this is ridiculous. It's 
simple, there is no definitive answer. I can do many things with C++ I can not do with 
CF and vice versa... now whats the difference?

Lets move on to a more useable discussion.

-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


If you consider yourself a programmer because you write cfml then you're
saying cfml is a programming language?

Ade

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 August 2002 18:52
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java or
C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF. This is a
totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every level. I program.
So do you. We're programmers.


 whats the difference?
 


__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Nick McClure

A programmer writes code, of any sort, it is a stretch but you can call
HTML code.

A developer may be a programmer as well, but I see a developer as
somebody who creates something, or develops something, it might not
involve programming, but it does not exclude it.

Home Developer, Web Developer, Application Developer.

 -Original Message-
 From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:42 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: programmer vs. developer
 
 whats the difference?
 
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Matt Robertson

I agree with Michael.  If you 'develop' an application that involves
stuff like conditional branching, variables blah blah you are
programming.  Even a DOS batch file could be considered programming,
although the vast majority of them were just line by line command files.
The batch file 'language' was a programming language.  CFML is a
programming language.  To say otherwise is a semantic argument that
doesn't belong anywhere but a classroom.

P.s. I'm wearing asbestos underwear... ;D

--Matt Robertson--
MSB Designs, Inc.
http://mysecretbase.com



-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:59 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


If you consider yourself a programmer because you write cfml then you're
saying cfml is a programming language?

Ade

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 August 2002 18:52
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java
or
C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF. This
is a
totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every level. I
program.
So do you. We're programmers.


 whats the difference?
 


__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Brad Roberts

Check out the 3rd entry:
http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=programmer

I'm not from a programming background, and ironically, neither are my
clients.  So as far as I'm concerned, I'm whatever my client is looking for.
Who cares what title I have, as long as I can meet the requirements of my
customers.  Most don't even ask (or care) what programming language I use.
They just want pretty buttons :)

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:52 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


 In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language
 like Java or C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting
 language like CF. This is a totally artificial distinction and
 one I reject on every level. I program. So do you. We're programmers.


  whats the difference?
 
 
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Jason Miller

That nails it for me - I couldn't agree more.

Im a programmer because I use a computer language to write applications
(even a single template) that runs on a computer to process some data.



Michael Dinowitz wrote:


Define a programming language and see if CF fits into it. Does it store
variables? Do conditional logic? iterate loops? convert data? What makes
C++ a programming language and CF not one? If you say that CF is just
built on top of C++, then every C++ and java programmer aren't really
programmers as they're not writing machine code. 
The argument is an artificial one. 
I'm a programmer because I use a computer language to write applications
(even a single template) that runs on a computer to process some data.



If you consider yourself a programmer because you write cfml then you're
saying cfml is a programming language?

Ade

-Original Message-
From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  [
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Sent: 28 August 2002 18:52
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java
or
C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF. This
is a
totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every level. I
program.
So do you. We're programmers.



whats the difference?





__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Ben Johnson

 whats the difference?

I always thought programmer sounded so 80's.  Developer is just the
hip, new term.  I believe the cool name now is Information Architect.
g


Ben Johnson
Information Architect
www.architekture.com
[p] 720.934.2179
 
 

__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Bill Wheatley

Developer is just another way to say programmer since programmer is a
Dorky type work.

I'm a programmer i dont care if its just asp its still programming. I do C++
 C  JSP and the rest of the shit out there.
And if i want to be called programmer i will. But lately the trend is to be
called developer becuase programmer is the geek version.

IMHO. Its same old crap where someone says because you do CF you're not as
much a real programmer as someone who does C or ASP even because its more
complicated. Being complicated does not a programming langauage make.

CF is simplistic but i've seen some awesomely complex CF apps before. Its
all in the eyes of the beholder.




Bill Wheatley
Senior Database Developer
Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer
EDIETS.COM
954.360.9022 X159
ICQ 417645
- Original Message -
From: Fitch, Tyler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:13 PM
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


 Yes,

 We program.  But in the grand scheme of things, for demographic purposes
 we are considered developers, not just MM but to the computer world.
 Programmers beat us to the programming way back when computers were
 invented.  They got first rights to use that name in generic terms.

 We don't do what they do.  We program web pages/applications, but are
 considered 'developers'.

 I'm glad you feel so strongly about it, but I think it doesn't really
 matter and you definitely shouldn't be losing any sleep over it.  That's
 just me.

 t

 **
 Tyler M. Fitch
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer
 http://isitedesign.com
 **

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:52 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


 In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java
 or C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF.
 This is a totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every
 level. I program. So do you. We're programmers.


  whats the difference?
 

 
__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Nick McClure

What do you mean, we don't do what they do?

 -Original Message-
 From: Fitch, Tyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 
 We don't do what they do.  We program web pages/applications, but are
 considered 'developers'.


__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Smith, Matthew P -CONT(DYN)

About $30-50k a year.  ; )


-Original Message-
From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: programmer vs. developer

whats the difference?

__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread charlie griefer

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 

 Developes?  How does that differ from develop? ;-) 
 

Develope (deh-veh-lohp) v: - to develop in the middle of the night without 
anybody else's prior knowledge.  Usually done in groups of two, and in seedy 
computer labs in Las Vegas. 


 -Novak 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Adrian Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:54 AM
 Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer 
 
 
 A developer developes, a programmer programs. 

 -Original Message-
 From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 28 August 2002 18:42
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: programmer vs. developer 


 whats the difference? 

 
 
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Shawn Grover

grins

Does that mean that you only do web apps Tyler?

I know a large number of people on this list bounce from web apps, to
desktop apps (via VB, C/C++, Delphi, C#, etc.) - myself included.
Currently, I help with a web app project while I wait for my client to get
back to me regarding the VB app I'm doing for them.  Does this make me a
developer or a programmer?

My thoughts.

Shawn Grover

-Original Message-
From: Fitch, Tyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


Yes,

We program.  But in the grand scheme of things, for demographic purposes
we are considered developers, not just MM but to the computer world.
Programmers beat us to the programming way back when computers were
invented.  They got first rights to use that name in generic terms.

We don't do what they do.  We program web pages/applications, but are
considered 'developers'.

I'm glad you feel so strongly about it, but I think it doesn't really
matter and you definitely shouldn't be losing any sleep over it.  That's
just me.

t

**
Tyler M. Fitch
Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer
http://isitedesign.com
** 

-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java
or C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF.
This is a totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every
level. I program. So do you. We're programmers.


 whats the difference?
 


__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Alex

No difference. But I have noticed less talented people like to have a more
sophisticated title.

On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Phoeun Pha wrote:

 whats the difference?
 
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Marius Milosav

What about a new term:
develogrammer
or
prograloper

For sure will impress managers looking for new buzzwords

Marius Milosav
www.scorpiosoft.com
It's not about technology, it's about people.
Virtual Company (VICO) Application Demo
www.scorpiosoft.com/vicodemo/login.cfm

- Original Message -
From: Tangorre, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:22 PM
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


 Thanks MOTO  :-)



 -Original Message-
 From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:54 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


 A developer developes, a programmer programs.

 -Original Message-
 From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 28 August 2002 18:42
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: programmer vs. developer


 whats the difference?


 
__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Alex

I am certified as a sun java programmer. It's the first level in the tests
and basically just a syntax test.

On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Phoeun Pha wrote:

 Mikey,

 It's just that i saw certification classes for Java programmer, and Java
 developer.  Is developer reserved for WEB?  And programmer reserved for
 Stand Alone apps?

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:52 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


 In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java or
 C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF. This is a
 totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every level. I program.
 So do you. We're programmers.


  whats the difference?
 

 
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread todd

He has a OT List, CFCommunity.

~Todd

On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Tony Weeg wrote:

 WHO,
 
 they told me at walmart when I bought that
 book on java that I was going to be a programmer
 in 21 days.
 
 its refund time.
 
 programmer schmogrammers, developes schmelopers
 
 its all the samewho caresits just nomenclature.
 lets get back to code questions in hereforget
 this off topic stuff.
 
 hey, mike I think we need an CFOT-List so that people
 can vent their odd OT questions/iterations/musings there
 
 and magically no one will respond, and soon they will see
 how absolutely unimportant most of these are ;)
 
 ..tony
 
 Tony Weeg
 Senior Web Developer
 Information System Design
 Navtrak, Inc.
 Fleet Management Solutions
 www.navtrak.net
 410.548.2337 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:59 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer
 
 
 If you consider yourself a programmer because you write cfml then you're
 saying cfml is a programming language?
 
 Ade
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 28 August 2002 18:52
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer
 
 
 In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java
 or
 C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF. This
 is a
 totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every level. I
 program.
 So do you. We're programmers.
 
 
  whats the difference?
  
 
 
 
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Adams, Iain

I think a developer is one who takes a concept and produces a functioning
application with all that makes it such. A programmer on the other hand is
given specific tasks and writes the code to fulfil that task. A programmer
would be given a task such as write this block to accomplish this function
while a developer would be involved in writing an application from end to
end with all the functionality included. Developers I think typically work
on projects from end to end.

My $.02

-Original Message-
From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


I agree with Michael.  If you 'develop' an application that involves
stuff like conditional branching, variables blah blah you are
programming.  Even a DOS batch file could be considered programming,
although the vast majority of them were just line by line command files.
The batch file 'language' was a programming language.  CFML is a
programming language.  To say otherwise is a semantic argument that
doesn't belong anywhere but a classroom.

P.s. I'm wearing asbestos underwear... ;D

--Matt Robertson--
MSB Designs, Inc.
http://mysecretbase.com



-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:59 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: programmer vs. developer


If you consider yourself a programmer because you write cfml then you're
saying cfml is a programming language?

Ade

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 August 2002 18:52
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java
or
C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF. This
is a
totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every level. I
program.
So do you. We're programmers.


 whats the difference?
 



__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: programmer vs. developer

2002-08-28 Thread Phoeun Pha

I think it's ego and class distinction.  I remember my first time trying to
learn to make web pages, and I would use an application to do itsay,
dreamweaver.  I'd ask some coder questions, and he would go off on how these
programs sucked and Notepad all the way!.

I guess it's like this.  He had to learn how to make DHTML menus using raw
code.  I just pressed a button and thought I was a coder!




-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer


Sorry son, but us humans have beaten you to the name human way back.
Doesn't matter that your the same, but you can't be a human. How about
neo-human? Its just as good.
We're programmers as much as someone 10 years ago are programmers. Hey, many
of us were programmers back then as well.
Its a false distinction that has a definition only within the minds of those
who want to make the distinction. 

 Yes,
 
 We program.  But in the grand scheme of things, for demographic purposes
 we are considered developers, not just MM but to the computer world.
 Programmers beat us to the programming way back when computers were
 invented.  They got first rights to use that name in generic terms.
 
 We don't do what they do.  We program web pages/applications, but are
 considered 'developers'.
 
 I'm glad you feel so strongly about it, but I think it doesn't really
 matter and you definitely shouldn't be losing any sleep over it.  That's
 just me.
 
 t
 
 **
 Tyler M. Fitch
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer
 http://isitedesign.com
 ** 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:52 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: programmer vs. developer
 
 
 In MMs mind, a programmer is one who uses a compiled language like Java
 or C++. A developer is someone who uses a scripting language like CF.
 This is a totally artificial distinction and one I reject on every
 level. I program. So do you. We're programmers.
 
 
  whats the difference?
  
 
 

__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



  1   2   >