http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14521
I understand the licensing issues, but this is going to break the next
release for us (and has already broken our test environment). I'd like
to offer a bounty of $800 for a patch that re-implements CLVM. We'll
pay $200 for a working patch that applies
I'd be happy to try more if I had access to any contact info. As it
is, things in the surrounding code have changed enough that a bit of
re-factoring would need to be done even if there were permission.
My hunch is that unless he's switched roles, once the new version is
released he may come out
it back upstream is what I'm interested in.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 07/31/2012 09:48 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
I'd be happy to try more if I had access to any contact info. As it
is, things in the surrounding code have changed enough
, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 07/31/2012 09:48 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
I'd be happy to try more if I had access to any contact info. As it
is, things in the surrounding code have changed enough that a bit of
re-factoring would need to be done even
...@citrix.com wrote:
The most complicated part in rommer's patch is LVM snapshot. If snapshot
support is not a must, then adding CLVM is simple as RBD.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:33 PM
To: cloudstack-dev
sure, just let me know how to send it in.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
Could you send the patch to reviewboard, and remove the snapshot part?
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3
hacked a fix by editing /var/cache/cloud/cmdline in the ssvm to use
NfsSecondaryStorageResource. Now I hit
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15143;, x != java.lang.String,
not sure if this is a regression or due to my hack.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com
SDN is more or less an alternative for vlans, which he doesn't want to use
anyway. He has separate network segments already.
There isn't very much good documentation for cloudstack networking. I
wanted to do something similar a few months back and ended up frustrated. I
had vlans, but wanted my
host, then stop/start ssvm.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 3:57 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: re-implement clvm
hacked a fix by editing /var/cache/cloud/cmdline in the ssvm to use
data volumes on CLVM : passed
Delete CLVM data volumes : passed
New CLVM vol snapshot : passed
Create CLVM vol from snapshot : passed
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
What's the process exactly when the management server adds a host?
Does it ssh in run cloud-setup-agent, then start the agent? Is it
viable to manage agent.properties on your own when it really needs to
be in sync with what the management server (and cloud) knows about?
For example you can't just
This is a great idea. As I was playing with the CLVM stuff I began
thinking this will get really hairy if they keep adding new types.
Your proposal and outline makes sense to me, but I'm not a core
developer :-)
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi all,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6470/#review10131
---
On Aug. 8, 2012, 3:11 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote
Hi all,
I'm testing the ability to specify an IP address to use, and have
run into a few issues. I'm running 3.0.2 off of the website.
If I use iptonetworklist, I never even get the network I want. It
creates a new private source nat network or uses the default one
currently existing for the
---
Create system VMs on CLVM : passed
Create instances on CLVM : passed
Create data volumes on CLVM : passed
Delete CLVM data volumes : passed
New CLVM vol snapshot : passed
Create CLVM vol from snapshot : passed
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6470/#review10153
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Marcus Sorensen
On Aug. 10, 2012, 8:35 p.m
a network interface. In all three of these we basically
need to create a new instance from a template of the original and
specify its original IP.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
I should mention that if I remove 'ipaddress' from the networkids
version
://reviews.apache.org/r/6470/#review10152
---
On Aug. 10, 2012, 8:35 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r
Awesome, thanks.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Jason Bausewein
jason.bausew...@tier3.com wrote:
Hi Marcus, I could test it out on Monday and let you know the result.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 10:31 AM
-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 9:37 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: iptonetworklist, networkids
Awesome, thanks.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Jason Bausewein jason.bausew...@tier3.com
wrote:
Hi Marcus, I
Also, you can usually set a default network on a tagged/trunked port, so
that no config changes to the existing infrastructure would be required
(aside from implementing the new hardware). Existing stuff just works off
of the native network for that port, and anything that needs tags can do
so.
yes, I'll create a new patch based on the master. Thanks
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:50 PM, edison su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
On Aug. 10, 2012, 8:36 p.m., edison su wrote:
Ship It!
Marcus Sorensen wrote:
please ship r3, looks like I beat you by only a minute, so I'm not sure
you
CLVM vol from snapshot : passed
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
So the impression is that we should wait for the jira setup to submit
any further bugs, correct?
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
On 8/14/12 9:50 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:12:27PM -0400, David
I just submitted it to bugs.cloudstack.org thinking I could just
resubmit later. Seems like a fairly critical (being that it creates
broken VMs) yet relatively simple bug to fix if someone who knows the
code could look at it.
Basically when I create a VM with two NICs, where both networks have
: passed
Create zone, deploy instance: passed
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
(noreplace)
- Marcus
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6658/#review10428
---
On Aug. 16, 2012, 7:26 p.m., Marcus Sorensen
I would prefer to stick to ant for 4.0, particularly because switching
now could be a barrier to some devs in their progress toward bugfixing
4.0, if they have to take some time to get their build environment
working again... unless it's the very last thing you do.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:26
: passed
Installed RPMs to hypervisor host : passed
Started/stopped via init scripts: passed
Create zone, deploy instance: passed
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
these
configuration files to suite their needs, without noreplace, these files
will be replaced with a new cloudstack RPM upgrade.
Marcus Sorensen wrote:
The reason that was pulled is because line 531 includes db.properties,
and so we get an RPM build error stating that the file was asked
I'm totally fine with a switch, my only concern was around when it's
done. Aside from just implementing the build bits in the git repo
(sounds like there are resources for this), I picture there being a
bit of work on every developer's part to switch their dev
environments. This might be as simple
,
Marcus Sorensen
/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java 6f6a754
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6720/diff/
Testing
---
Tested latest 4.0 and master as of ce54bfa7fae560470d82f6d22545398cecb5294b, UI
now reports password rather than 'undefined'.
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
---
successfully ran and installed system template after making the change
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
the
centos one is).
On Aug 24, 2012 8:20 PM, Matthew Patton mpat...@inforelay.com wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:33:50 -0400, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com
wrote:
The file scripts/storage/secondary/**cloud-install-sys-tmplt had a
syntax error:
The comparison is wrong too.
There appear
Guys,
In development/testing, I occasionally run into issues with the ssh
keys on the system VMs. Today specifically, I've been trying to hunt
down issues most of the day and still only have a hunch about the
process. Most of what I'm finding are the default authorized_keys
(anthony@mobl-ant),
on the management server itself, and indeed it
does update the systemvm.iso on the management server. Is this
pointless?
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 08/27/2012 11:26 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
Guys,
In development/testing, I occasionally run
chdir into '/root/.ssh'. Doing a
'chmod u+x /root/.ssh' fixed this part and the keys came down. I'll
submit a patch.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, thanks, this helps a lot.
Should cloud-agent write .ssh/id_rsa.cloud on every startup if
necessary
/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java
5623260
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6793/diff/
Testing
---
removed /root/.ssh, restarted cloud-agent, and saw that the id_rsa.cloud gets
populated now.
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
/.ssh, restarted cloud-agent, and saw that the id_rsa.cloud gets
populated now.
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
I've got two zones running the same build of cloudstack (a recent copy
of master). One of them creates routers that turn into ugly
multi-headed beasts, and by that I mean that any time I create a port
forwarding or iptables rule for that router I get a new public NIC
with an identical IP address,
-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 5:10 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: VM router spawning multiple public nics
I've got two zones running the same build of cloudstack (a recent copy
of master). One of them creates routers
:
On 08/28/2012 12:18 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
Yes, thanks, this helps a lot.
Should cloud-agent write .ssh/id_rsa.cloud on every startup if
necessary? Or perhaps just on joining the cluster?
It's almost the same. When the Agent itself starts (joins the cluster again)
it receives the key
for now to make
things work. If the code were already in place to differentiate
between multiple untagged nics I think that fixing my problem would be
trivial, but since its not, I'll just find an alternative solution.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote
, if we wanted to add an IP to a
router it might not know which untagged interface to apply it to.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 12:23 PM
in
vlanAllocatedToVM (as with multiple untagged networks), we get the
wrong nicNum, no?
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 1:40 PM
To: cloudstack-dev
for KVM, but I thought it was worth a
mention. I'd be happy to try to help get it ready if someone has time
to nudge me in the right direction.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com
related commands...
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 6:49 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: VM router spawning multiple public nics
I can confirm that the patch has fixed my particular issue
on business logic + Vpc VR management, I can help with that.
-Alena.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 10:16 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: VM router spawning multiple public nics
I'd
,
but you're saying I should put an implementation of these in
VirtualRoutingResource.java for KVM? Sorry, still trying to piece
together how everything relates.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
Yes, it is.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen
... is that right?
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Just want to clarify:
We can add implementation of
SetupGuestNetworkCommand/SetNetworkACLCommand/SetSourceNatCommand/Site2SiteVpnCfgCommand
in VirtualRoutingResource.
So the Xen implementation
_virtRouterResource.executeRequest(cmd);
in libvirtcomputingResource.java.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:32 AM
To: Edison Su
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Anthony Xu; Kelven Yang;
Vijayendra
in virtualroutingresource.
Does it make sense?
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:47 AM
To: Edison Su
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Anthony Xu; Kelven Yang;
Vijayendra Bhamidipati
Subject: Re: VPC for KVM
have an out of date systemvm image or
something?
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
I've made some good progress today, I'll probably have it all working
tomorrow, but I have a question. Looking at the API command
associateIpAddress and the functional
, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:21 PM
To: Edison Su
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Anthony Xu; Kelven Yang;
Vijayendra Bhamidipati
Subject: Re: VPC for KVM
.
Rebooted VPC router and tested everything again.
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
and tested everything again.
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
VMs on all three
networks. Added IPs, created portforwarding rule port 22 to VM on network 3,
added TCP port 22 ingress rule for network 3, SSH'ed into the VM via public IP.
Rebooted VPC router and tested everything again.
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
31, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 1:58 PM
To: Edison Su
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Anthony Xu; Kelven Yang;
Vijayendra Bhamidipati
Subject: Re
I've been working on bringing KVM up to speed on the VPC stuff, and
there are a few things I've come across that seem to be incomplete for
Xen as well. I'd just like to get some feedback on the current state
of VPC. I believe these are not specific issues to my implementation,
but if they should
, 2012, 7:37 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6883/
---
(Updated Sept. 3, 2012, 7:37 p.m
Should the current master have all of these changes now? Following
your procedure and then executing a './waf rpm' leaves me with no RPMs
and the messages:
[386/386] copy: usage/conf/log4j-cloud_usage.xml.in -
artifacts/default/usage/conf/log4j-cloud_usage.xml
Error: Could not find or load main
Thanks for replying.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote:
On 9/4/12 10:21 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been working on bringing KVM up to speed on the VPC stuff, and
there are a few things I've come across that seem
On Sep 4, 2012 2:28 PM, Anthony Xu xuefei...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 12:42 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Anthony Xu
Subject: Re: Status of VPC
On 9/4/12 10:21 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow
I'm getting xapi-5.6.100-1-SNAPSHOT.jar from a fresh pull of the 4.0
repo, then following the install-non-oss.sh instructions
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
What the name of the jar for xapi under deps folder on your environment?
Sent from my iPhone
On
/VpcManagerImpl.java d24009d
server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java 1836176
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6926/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
So, the RPMs build fine for me with the current 4.0 tree, but
installing them and trying to use them, it seems something was missed,
getting a 500 on the client:
The absolute uri: http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core cannot be resolved
in either web.xml or the jar files deployed with this
nevermind, just bitten by the stuff not being included anymore and had
to install a few more dependencies.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
So, the RPMs build fine for me with the current 4.0 tree, but
installing them and trying to use them, it seems
Trying to get a working RPM build of 4.0 going... I assume my latest
issue is related to this. class not found:
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource, if
someone is building RPMs isn't it safe to assume they want the
kvm/libvirt pieces? What was Wido's fix? I don't see this
jakarta-taglibs-standard, I think I added it in the rpm
dependence, but seems not got installed automatically.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 10:31 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Edison Su
Thanks
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Anthony Xu xuefei...@citrix.com wrote:
Thanks. I wasn't able to find where this is triggered. Could you point
me
there so I can replicate it for KVM?
I think I missed some patches, I'll merge them ASAP.
I'm trying to build apache master, but maven
password - I've seen some emails regarding this, that the password
server doesn't seem to be set up for the various private nics
I'll put the fix to master branch today.
was this your CS-16222 fix? I was under the impression that it had to
do with /opt/cloud/bin/passwd_server needing to bind
Speaking of docs, anyone know where cloudstack 201 is, a.k.a how to write
plugins?
On Sep 7, 2012 2:09 PM, Will Chan will.c...@citrix.com wrote:
A very warm welcome to the community! I am certainly looking forward to
working with you all.
Sorry for this belated welcome but this week has been
I've got an issue with the CLVM on KVM support, it seems that the
patch disks are created on the fly when a system VM is started. If I
reboot a system VM 5 times I'll end up with 5 patch disks. I'm the one
who submitted the CLVM patch, and I don't see that there's much
difference between what
at this point?
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got an issue with the CLVM on KVM support, it seems that the
patch disks are created on the fly when a system VM is started. If I
reboot a system VM 5 times I'll end up with 5 patch disks. I'm the one
who
thanks, so this affects all hypervisors/storage backends that use the
patch disk, or should I code my solution specific to KVM?
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday
blockresize'?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
Patch is always welcome. Will you change UI also? Maybe we can't check in UI
part at this moment, but at least, the backend code should be ok.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 12, 2012, at 9:37 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
I mainly wanted to send out some feelers to see if there was an
imminent branch merge or something.
It depends how big
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 09/13/2012 06:36 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
I mainly wanted to send out some feelers to see if there was an
imminent branch merge or something. If not, I'll clean up mine a bit
and let people have a look. I haven't
as
expected, resets the volume state to Ready
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
in launching new routers with the latest 4.0 build I'm getting no
passwd server, chkconfig --list show it turned off, and even turning
it on, it gets turned off automatically.
root@r-190-VM:~# cat /etc/default/cloud-passwd-srvr
#set ENABLED to 1 if you want the init script to start the password
Now that I'm not running security groups (VPC), I was running into
issues with iptables filtering bridged traffic. I know the easy fixes
(iptables -I FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged -j ACCEPT or
echo 1 /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables), but in
looking through the
to that setting being 1.
On Sep 14, 2012 12:25 AM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
Security_group.py - addfwframework will set bridge-nf-call-iptables to 1.
It should be called when agent starts.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 13, 2012, at 11:10 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com
, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
in launching new routers with the latest 4.0 build I'm getting no
passwd server, chkconfig --list show it turned off, and even turning
it on, it gets turned off automatically.
root@r-190-VM:~# cat /etc/default/cloud-passwd-srvr
#set ENABLED to 1
: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7116/diff/
Testing
---
running cent 6.3 in my test environments. Main difference in this change is
that it attempts to configure cgroups now. Tested cloud-setup-agent and it
successfully runs now instead of failing.
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
, and then verified that code
still functioned as expected (which is to delete the patch disk when the system
vm is stopped)
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
in launching new routers with the latest 4.0 build I'm getting no
passwd server, chkconfig --list show it turned off, and even turning
it on, it gets turned off automatically.
root@r-190-VM:~# cat /etc
/etc/default controls variables for the /etc/init.d scripts. It looks
like we're using /etc/default/cloud-passwd-srvr to override the
'ENABLED' variable in /etc/init.d/cloud-passwd-srvr.
So there are two switches controlling services, in cloud-early-config
we echo whether or not the script
: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 4:09 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: passwd server not set to start
/etc/default controls variables for the /etc/init.d scripts. It looks
like we're using /etc/default/cloud-passwd-srvr
in the VPC.
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
need to turn it on in patchsystemvm.sh, when type=vpcrouter, execute
routing_svcs also.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 5:15 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: passwd server not set to start
Sounds like a routing issue. I would start on the VR and do an 'ip route
show', then look for default gateway and try to ping that. I imagine you
will see the issue there, either wrong IP/network, no route, or no
connectivity (bridging not working).
On Sep 15, 2012 2:07 PM, Nguyễn Đình Việt
-- Forwarded message --
From: Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:17 AM
Subject: RE: Review Request: resize volume initial implementation
To: Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com
Thanks! Replies below.
On Sep 14, 2012 4:12 AM, Koushik Das koushik
---
none
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
Did he say which distribution? I recently submitted a fix for cent 6.3, it
wasn't setting up the cgconfig service.
I second drumming cloud-setup-agent. If you look at the management server
log you should see the exact command/arcs being sent to the host. Copy that
and run it manually to see where
Drumming? I meant running!
On Sep 19, 2012 12:49 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Did he say which distribution? I recently submitted a fix for cent 6.3, it
wasn't setting up the cgconfig service.
I second drumming cloud-setup-agent. If you look at the management server
log you
when I was trying to
setup 3.02 and had this fix for it in /etc/cgconfig.conf:
*group virt {
cpu {
cpu.shares = 9216;
}
}*
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com
wrote:
Did he say which distribution? I recently submitted
you can also check /var/log/libvirt/libvirtd.log to see what error
libvirt might be throwing about creating storage.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Busy Dev busyd...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using NFS for both primary and secondary (which are hosted by the same
machine that hosts the management
-
kel...@bbits.ca
address: 55 East 7th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5T 1M4
tel: +1 604 713 8560 ext:114
fax: +1 604 605 0964
skype: kelcey.damage
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday
Cloudstack seems to let you create guest traffic types on multiple
physical networks. However, when I try this with KVM I end up always
bridging to whatever device is used for guest.network.device.
It looks like the issue is in
1 - 100 of 797 matches
Mail list logo
