Hi Chris
The only thingdifferent about this site is that
it uses Windows authentication
to force a login.
Any ideas?
Does the site work with anonymous access enabled? Host header for
domain correct?
-Nick
Heimir Eidskrem wrote:
Hi Heimir
Not sure why this is not working.
Check your log file - if necessary run it on debug for a few emails -
this should give you your answer.
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL
On 14 Jul 2005 at 18:49, Matt wrote:
Why does this always happen to me...
karma
-Nick
I was looking to leave my IMail/Declude setup as my gateway spam
blocking component, and move hosted E-mail to a different server. All
I needed in the hosted mail server was something that
Hi Richard,
Richard Farris wrote:
I got hit again with these two
[69.60.97.208]
209.97.209.0/24
other than blacklisting the IP, how
do you stop it...
What I do is lookup the IP on senderbase. puts its ip addresses that
send mail in an ip_hosts.txt file and score that
Declude support -
Would you comment on this? Is there a problem with 'CONTAINS' ? Would
you kindly share what other issues are being addresses in 'one they are
testing now' ?
Thanks!
-Nick
John Carter wrote:
I have reported to Declude a
problem with the "CONTAINS" statement.
Hi David,
Are you aware of any bugs with the CONTAINS filter statement?
Thanks!
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
Kevin,
After reviewing your files you had sent me this is the problem you are
having:
1. The email you received was encoded in BASE64 (Msg failed BASE64)
2. In your global.cfg you
Hello -
I am looking for some insight on these guys. I get quite a bit of what
is best described as suspicious email from their networks - are they a
legit or are they clever spammers?
Thanks!
-Nick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yesterday I complained about the lack of participation on
Hi Will,
Sorry you are having problems - Declude is a good product - it may be
something simple here. I would say the most common thing is a dns issue
- stuff stacks up waiting for dns responses. Check that out first - send
more info too!
-Nick
Will wrote:
A number of years ago I
Richard Farris wrote:
Is there a box I can put in front of
my Imail server that will help take some of the load off of the spam
filtering that Declude is doing
Hi Richard -
One method is to put ORF in front of your IMail box and via its
recipients blacklist feature refuse
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Thursday, August
04, 2005
1:43 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail]
Spam box
Richard Farris wrote
Hi Andrew -
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
Also, I'd be a little
skeptical that ORF would do the job for Goran, as he is basically an
ISP for multiple organizations.
Common :) Don't be so negative..
He would need extracts from
their GALs for each organization, or whatever the
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Thursday, August
04, 2005
6:10 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail]
Spam box
Hi Andrew -
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
Also,
I'd be a little skeptical
Morning Dave,
That would deny his internal
users the ability to resolve external domains.
Well you *may* have me on this one :) I do not know what dns server is
being used.
I use SimpleDNS so I can allow recursion by ip address/subnet. Bind
as well does this:
[ recurseallow ]
David -
Would you kindly confirm exactly what version of Declude this 3.0 beta
is derived from? Is it 2.0.6.16 ?
Thanks
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
Thanks for the feedback.
I have posted decludeproc.exe 3.0.12 which should take care of the issue of
decludeproc stopping on its own.
Also
included.
Thanks -
-Nick
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:48 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] D3: Service stopped on its own, files
Hi David -
I like the spfpass test - coupled with filters it does help aginst false
positives.
[I prepend all my tests with the test type - thanks Kami! - it makes
these filters easier to write -]
Here is my spfgood filter - I score it with a -12:
SKIPIFWEIGHT26
TESTSFAILEDEND
Tyran Ormond wrote:
That still means that I have to setup includes for each of the
possible sending domains, still unacceptable and reason enough for me
to discard SPF completely.
Well be advised not all your mail will get delivered. I have some
insurance agencies whose mail will bounce if
Hi Kim,
Kim Premuda wrote:
We installed the latest 3.0.3 beta tonight; the decludeproc service shot to 99% of CPU and stayed there for 15 minutes. During this time we accumulated over 1000 items in the proc folder; nothing was going out.
I experienced the maxed out
Hi Kim,
Kim Premuda wrote:
I experienced the maxed out processor(s) - I only tried it for a few min
and then went back to 2.0.16. Haven't tried it since!
-Nick
Nick,
The beta version 3.0.3 does not automatically create the 'work' folder below the 'proc' folder (ie.
Hi Tim,
Timothy Bohen wrote:
Thats pretty cool, so which ones should I be running in my global.cfg?
Your mileage will vary!
Here are the stats from my site for yesterday:
http://mdlp.madriveraccess.com/
I would suggest score low - check results often - and tune to fit your
needs.
Hi Matt -
Matt wrote:
Nick,
I think that it is worth while to point out that your stats are likely
skewed by dictionary attacks and backscatter. The overwhelming
predominance of SURBL and Sniffer-Pharmacy hits (named slightly
differently on your system), along with the massive number
Help from the guru's please...
Wouldn't [shouldn't] this email fail the ROUTING test?
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES-[IANA Reserved]-UNITED STATES-destination
X-Note: SMTP Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note: Sent from: [Revdns: [No Reverse DNS]] [RemoteHostDomain:
lgvsoft.at] [RemoteIP:
Erik wrote:
If Declude could confirm the order of how/which tests are run, it would be
nice to know.
I agree.
The archives may help but as I recall Scott [former of Declude] was
nebulous in what the order is. The only thing for sure was filters ran
last in the order listed in global.cfg
Hi Travis -
Sandy's plugin does the 'somehow' part. Simply have it point to your spamd.
Here is the line from my global.cfg that may help -
EXTERNAL.SPAMASSASSIN_v3.04externalNONZERO
e:\imail\declude\spamd\spamc32.exe -D -d 12.152.254.3 -a 16000 -lt 4 ht
100 -f 6
to change.
what are these flags?
spamc32.exe -D -d 12.152.254.3 -a 16000 -lt 4 ht 100 -f
If you download Sandy's spamc32.exe it includes docs and samples. He can
explain it better than I. [I forgot.. sorry!. ]
-Nick
- Original Message - From: Nick Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED
Travis Sullivan wrote:
SPAMASSASSINexternalnonzero c:\imail\declude\spamc32.exe
-cw %WEIGHT% -sw 10 -f choose a weight 0
-f is supposed to be the filename... but the example doesn't give
one. So, how does spamc send a file name to spamd?
Declude hands it off to it. Actually I
Travis Sullivan wrote:
So, the only thing I will see in the headers is the total score SA
results:
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMASSASSIN: Message failed SPAMASSASSIN: 3.
And declude scores only for the test group, like other tests in the
global.cfg file?
Correct. Very slick huh? And good job
Anyway, the next version of SPAMC32 is coming out very soon with the
ability to consult a local SPAMC32 log file (rather than the main
SPAMD log file) to check which individual SA rules failed for each
message; this is a definite need.
Hi Sandy,
Well since you are working on the
Hi Keith,
Keith Johnson wrote:
Nick,
If you don't mind, is SA heavy on the CPU? What kinda load are
you running with SA?
First I am no authority here but am willing to share my experience.
Sandy's spamd32 seems to be no issue as near as I can tell. The cpu
issue is with spamd. .I
Thank you David - will let you know if I see any issues!
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
2 new Directives
WAITFORTHREADS 1500
Located in the Declude.cfg - Defined in milliseconds eg. 1500 = 1.5 seconds
this can be changed so that when the maximum threads are in use this time
specifics the
Well this is more of a question than a stab -
Can we see the full header? Yesterday I had something very similar -
email from Venezuela but the ip was registered in Virginian according
to Arin.
-Nick
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Anyone want to take a stab at this one I would
David,
I just want you to know I really appreciate your participation in this
list. I find it very helpful and reassuring!
Thanks!!
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
We have received the ticket and are currently looking into the issues
regarding MAILFROM and COUNTRY
David B
www.declude.com
John, [or others ]
I use SpamReview to review held email. How does this fit now into the
mix with 3x Declude? I presume SpamReview will dump the 'return to
queue' files back into the /spool dir. Is this ok?
-Nick
John T (Lists) wrote:
I understand that in Declude 2.x and lower
Hi -
Well this is what I do on these -
Right off I put the ip space in my ipfile_suspicious_networks
65.175.2.0/24 Viper Hosting
If I keep getting spam from then then they go to the ipfile_networks
which I score higher.
Same for an entry into ipfile_suspicious_hosts
I then I would
You are always on top of this stuff Matt!
-Nick
Matt wrote:
This is spam from Scott Ricter, Spamhaus's #1 listed spammer. This
particular block is 65.175.2.0/24. Surprisingly it isn't widely
listed, but I did find it in MAILPOLICE, and if you have URIBL
support, it is also in SURBL
Dave,
You need to stop/start deccon.exe That wil reset the counter so to speak.
Question to Declude support -
How does this work with Declude 3x?
Thanks!
-Nick
Dave Doherty wrote:
Hi all,
Running Declude version 1.82 with Hijack...
One of my customers go caught by Hijack a couple of
Thanks !
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
Stop/restart the decludeproc service
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 12:53 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re
Thanks John!
-Nick
John T (Lists) wrote:
A clarification on how to reset Hijack:
For Declude versions 2.x and below, you need to end the Deccon.exe process.
It is also best to do this with Imail SMTP and Queue Manager service stopped
and no Declude.exe processes running to ensure that no
good link. I saw the apache errors as well - but only 168 total.
-Nick
Matt wrote:
Do you think it is possible that this is connected to the rash of
broken spamware that started yesterday (Apache error message from spam
zombies)? I have gotten probably 5,000 of those in the last 24 hours.
Matt wrote:
Are you sure about that?
As sure as I can be -
Since midnight we have received 1,233 of them. Yesterday was even worse.
Today we have received 276.
-Nick
Matt
Nick Hayer wrote:
good link. I saw the apache errors as well - but only 168 total.
-Nick
Matt wrote:
Do
Here ya go Andy:
http://www.declude.com/tools/header.php
-Nick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can someone point me to detailed info on what the BADHEADERS test looks
at and/or how this error can be remedied? Already looked in the declude
manual, not enough info.
Thanks, Andrew
ISP guy
---
Andy -
Very kool with the script! Thanks for sharing. I can sure use it -
-Nick
Andy Schmidt wrote:
I have done this in two ways.
You can export the registry and then use an editorthat can handle line
breaks and other control characters(such as MS Words) to massage the
text
Hi Travis -
I think most folks use combo's - the idea is to further punish an email
that fails more than one reliable test [like sniffer and xbl or ???.].
This is where Declude really shines - being able to punish emails
further based on previous test results. - you do not have to score
Travis -
You are not slow - this is some what confusing until you get the hang of it.
Are you all set? Do you understand now how it works?
-Nick
Travis Sullivan wrote:
I think I got it... I am slow, I know :)
global.cfg contents:
COMBO filter C:\IMail\Declude\lists\combo.txt x 0 0
Hi Travis -
That looks correct - and is how I do mine. One suggestion though - the
first line in the filter should be
SKIPIFWEIGHTweight that is slightly above your delete weight
The idea is here is to prevent a filter from firing needlessly, Along
that same idea - filters execute in the
email you can see the testing order.
-Nick
Travis
- Original Message - From: Nick Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] found something new to me
Hi Travis -
That looks correct - and is how I
Hi Richard,
You need to rename the files removing the ip address - so each fire
begins with its respective 'Q' or 'D' and put those renamed files in
the spool dir.
-Nick
Richard Farris wrote:
Message
I had some mail stuck in HOLD2 that
I want to let go..I copied it and put it
ernet"
-
Original Message -
From:
Nick Hayer
To:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent:
Monday, October 31, 2005 7:45 AM
Subject:
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Help
Hi Richard,
You need to rename the files removing the ip address - so each f
There is in declude.cfg the switch DNSOVERRIDE ; I am not clear if this
will take multiple dns boxes or not -
-Nick
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Travis,
My understanding is that Declude only uses the first DNS server
specified in IMAIL. This can be overridden in the global.cfg, but
Would any one know what ip would trigger a listing in the ipfile? Is it
any ip along the route, the connecting ip, or the sending ip?
Thanks -
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
Travis Sullivan wrote:
It is my understanding that it's just the sending IP, the last server
that connects to your server.
So can there be a way to filter [detect] on the other ip's contained in
the route? for example:
Host MTA(1)MTA(2) MTA(3).
Now MTA(2) is a forwarder and I would
Hi David,
David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ] wrote:
Please note that we receive a large amount of spam at our technical
support email address for the ticket system. When I look through the
tickets, I delete whatever looks like spam, as well as all tickets
that do not contain a subject.
Hi John,
What I do in these cases is I have and ip file called
IP_FILE_SUSPICIOUS_NETWORK
(scored 25% of delete weight)
slap this network in there and if it re-occurs I move it to IP_FILE_NETWORK
(scored 40% of delete weight.)
I have the same scenario for the actual hosts themselves -
David Barker wrote:
Christian,
Another way that you could deal with this specific Microsoft Office Outlook
build is to create a filter that contains the following:
HEADERS -8 CONTAINS Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
As a suggestion to limit the collateral damage I would
Well Matt when I read the link I was figuring you were fessing up to
how far off you were [are] on SPF - it was only until I read the end
that I understood to what you were referring. :)
-Nick
Matt wrote:
Hmm, who would have thunk?
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Success
Date
;)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick
Hayer
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 3:31 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though
Well Matt when I read the link I was figuring you
Hello -
I have this log entry :
E-mail whitelisted - automatically passing all spam tests [Imail]
I cannot figure out why this occurred - does anyone know what [Imail]
is to cause a whitelist?
Thanks!
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just
Travis - I am not clear on what you are asking - the global.cfg is where
'$default.junkmail' lives for outgoing mail - is that it?
-Nick
Travis Sullivan wrote:
I searched, not a lot to be honest, the archive, and manual, but
couldn't find info on setting up outgoing mail scanning with
Right on -
Thanks Matt
-Nick
Matt wrote:
Nick,
This is a WHITELIST SUBJECT filter in your Global.cfg. It is matching
[Imail] in the subject line.
Matt
Nick Hayer wrote:
Hello -
I have this log entry :
E-mail whitelisted - automatically passing all spam tests [Imail]
I cannot figure
I believe the COUNTRIES test would flag UK in the example below.
COUNTRY would not -
-Nick
Gary Steiner wrote:
Are you saying that if there are multiple countries in the path, it will flag all of them? I haven't seen that. For example, one spam I received today was like this:
Unknown will work as well as I recall..
-Nick
Kevin Bilbee wrote:
As far as I know declude only supports SPFFAIL and SPFPASS.
Please direct me to the release notes/documentation if I am wrong.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Matt wrote:
Hi Matt -
I have not had any issues at all - what other clues do you have to
offer? In your logs is there any simularity among the last message
processed before the crash(s). Do you record the 'peak memory usage' -
to see if there is some kind of of memory issue? Run the smtp
that would only add load to my system as a whole. I am in fact
working towards doing virus scanning after all JunkMail processes so
that I can save on processing power.
Matt
nick hayer wrote:
Matt wrote:
Hi Matt -
I have not had any issues at all - what other clues do you have to
offer? In your
Hi Geoff
Geoff Varney wrote:
Hi all,
I now successfully have
JunkMail using SPAMC32 to access a
Linux spamd server for SPAM. I am training the bayes database as the
user that
SPAMC32 is using to contact the spamd server. However, in this setup I
am not
getting any subject
I am trying to detect emails that are sent via webmail - be it from
yahoo, hotmail, etc. Can that be reliably done? What do I need to look
for in the headers?
Thanks!
-Nick
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
: nick hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 5:56 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] web email detection
I am trying to detect emails that are sent via webmail - be it from
yahoo, hotmail, etc. Can that be reliably done? What do I need to
look
Dan Geiser wrote:
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT, WEIGHT-HOLD,
KROPKA-IP, PSBL, UCEPROTECTL1, FILTER-SUBJECT ('olex') [148]
...or something similar to that.
a WARN will give you the line number within the filter that failed. That
has been my solut'n..
-Nick
It would
Title: OT: Old Imail Forum
Hi Sharyn,
We missed ya! What bring you back to this neck of the woods?
-Nick
Sharyn Schmidt wrote:
I just tried signing up for the IMAIL
forum after a long absence and I'm noticing it is all webbased now?
Is the old Forum still around
Hi Kevin
Lots you could do - to wack this guy you could have a filter that that said
REMOTEIP END NOTCONTAINS 65.249.245.
REVDNS 0 CONTAINS csh.
I am not sure if REMOTEIP or REVDNS or MAILFROM is appropriate but you
get the idea..
In addition you could have an ipfile that you could list
I would suggest you look to add a URI filtering product like out
invURIBL.
David of Declude -
Will this feature be available in a future release?
Thanks
-Nick
All of these domains are listed on SURBL/URIBL. URI filtering is very
effective at capturing these patterns well before these
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 1:55 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] weighting domains
I would suggest you look to add a URI filtering product like out
invURIBL.
David of Declude
Thanks Sandy - very kool!
On a block is any message returned to the sending mta - like a 550 or?
Configurable would be nice but I will not go as far as ask for it to be
a feature - however on the other hand :
For a feature - I need to be able to wild card a domain.
Currently maybe 5-10% of
Matt wrote:
I wouldn't care at all if the year was 3 months shorter.
Well at the expense of 25% shorter lifespan? Come on - its not that bad!.
[ Here in VT the kids have been snowboarding since before Thanksgiving.
Had 8 of snow at the house last night!]
-Nick
Matt
Orin Wells wrote:
Hi David,
David Lewis-Waller wrote:
If you could put up with
petrol at 93p a litre (which by my calc is approx $5.90 per U.S. gallon)
In the US taxes are based on income - whereas for you it would seem to
be based on consumption - I actually do not know which is 'cheaper' but
it would
Hi Todd,
Todd wrote:
Quite a bit of spam has been getting
though lately. IPR tests are not stopping it and it only contains gif
as the message body. I am including one of gifs. Any way to stop this?
I use three filters - 2 have to kick off for the third to fire which
The filter will stop processing if "Content-Type:
image/gif " in not contained in the body of the email.
-Nick
Todd wrote:
Scott,
I am looking through the Declude
manualto determine what you are doing. I don't think I understand
NOTCONTAINS. I would think CONTAINS mean
Try CONTAINS instead of BEGINSWITH
Make sure you have at least one crlf [a bunch would not hurt] at the
end of the filter file.
-Nick
Todd wrote:
I created a filter with the string
BODY0BEGINSWITHimg src="">
The declude.cfg goes like this
GIFINBODYFILTER filter
News
SUBJECT 50 STARTSWITH press release
SUBJECT 50 STARTSWITH news
SUBJECT 50 STARTSWITH top news
SUBJECT 50 STARTSWITH headline news
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 1:16 PM
Scott Fisher wrote:
Does anyone have software to convert an IPFile to an DNS zone? My
IPFile has poped over 100 kb...
I can do it in a heartbeat for you in foxpro - I need a sample zone and
the ip file. If you have a copy of foxpro I will include the code back
to you.
-Nick
-
I sure do get allot of spam from this ip space - are they legit and are
lacking in their monitoring or ?
Thanks -
-Nick
OrgName:WholeSale Internet
OrgID: WHOLE-125
Address:1102 Grand Ave Suite 905
City: Kansas City
StateProv: MO
PostalCode: 64106
Country:US
John T (Lists) wrote:
Is abend
some kind of French word?
AbnormalEnding. - circa 1985 - coined with the introduction of
Microsoft products.
-Nicko
;)
John T
eServices
For You
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I was trying to make a joke but it is hard to do vie email at times.
:) Especially to Windows diehards :)))
I learned the abend term from Novell which is where I presumed
it was coined. I know nothing about mainframe admin so it may have
been born there.
-Nick
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Hi David,
Would you kindly elaborate on the ramifications of such a failure? I am
interested in when its fixed but more importantly its ramifications.
Are you saying that a hardware/network/software issue on your end can
in anyway disarm/defuse/alter/change the way Declude functions on its
David,
David Franco-Rocha wrote:
B) Your software is NEVER downgraded
for any reason, either automatically or otherwise
hmm - would you kindly shut down your key server for awhile and monitor
the list in the meantime?
-Nick
We have had a few reports from
customers who
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
I don't think it's me, I think it's Declude. Seems Declude is not even
interpreting these as zero scores, but simply not matching them to any
test definition at all? That's a substantial bug, if so. Can anyone
else,
I cannot get neg values returned I'm running
Matt -
So Are you using ORF to tarpit or MS SMTP and if the latter besides the
2 reg tweaks below do you make any other changes? The threads thing is
ok?
Thanks
-Nick
Matt wrote:
I just confirmed that this works properly. If the size limit is
exceeded for the DSN, it strips all
Thanks Sandy!
-Nick
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
--
SPAMC32 Release 0.5.58
1/10/2006
*
Release notes for this version:
[ + Added feature]
[ * Improved/changed feature ]
[ - Bug fix ]
[ ^ Cosmetic/naming change ]
Matt wrote:
I'm sure that Nick will volunteer to have his server monitored by me
so that I can test this out on another box. I believe that he is also
on 2.0.6.16 as well.
sure and I am. Off list we need to discuss -
-Nick
Matt
David Barker wrote:
FYI Hyperthreading
Markus Gufler wrote:
My
conclusion for this day:
Normaly I should stay in bed
today as I'm more ill then healthy.
Agreed! We need you Markus so get well!
-Nick
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, January
What do you think?
I asked Matt and he said for me to try the link :)
-Nick
Received: from mx2.madriveraccess.com [12.152.254.14] by mx1.vtbass.com
with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.15) id A234DC20330; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:45:24 -0500
Received: from hugin5.snet.uvm.dk ([195.231.243.86]) by
, and maybe note the
submission to the Sniffer list, though I'm sure that Pete is seeing
this also.
Matt
Nick Hayer wrote:
What do you think?
I asked Matt and he said for me to try the link :)
-Nick
Received: from mx2.madriveraccess.com [12.152.254.14] by
mx1.vtbass.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.15
Does anyone block them ?
bcentral.com, bcentralhost.com, linkexchange.com, listbot.com, and
listbuilder.com
Thanks for your input -
-Nick
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe,
Hi Jerod,
I use jffnms http://www.jffnms.org/ Its open source [free] runs on all
platforms and is very good.
-Nick
Jerod M. Bennett wrote:
Hey,
I know this is off topic, but I respect the knowledge and opinions of the
people on this list.
What software / services do you guys use to
John T (Lists) wrote:
BTW, what
server did DAD stand for? (It
never made it off the design board, of if it did it never became a
beta, only
an alpha.)
well with family court so prevalent I would guess MOM got all of DAD's
stuff?
-Nick :)
John T
eServices
For
Title: Logged spam getting to mailbox
Odd - just because its always the same email. What number do you delete
on? Although the logs will balloon in size running the Declude in DEBUG
may shed some light. I presume this is Declude 3x ver?
-Nick
Agid, Corby wrote:
Hello,
I'm
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Has no
one realized that this product is a commercial competitor to IMail or
SmarterMail, with no relevance to Declude?
I missed the post. .I actually had to look in my deleted emails to find
the email to which you were referring.. Obviously you are right - I
Morning..
Below is a sample email - which I classify as Nigerian sales. I am
having a tough time flagging them as the come from generally generally
legit accounts, have no links, etc. I have a filter that kinda works
but no question a lot slips thru. Can anyone suggest a way I can get
these?
X-Note:
X-Note: This email was scanned for spam. [Details at
http://spamstats.madriveraccess.com]
X-Note: This email has been virus scanned by F-Prot,McAfee AV, and ClamAV.
X-Note: Please send abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Country-Chain:
X-Hello:
X-Note: SMTP
X-Note:
X-Note: This email was scanned for spam. [Details at
http://spamstats.madriveraccess.com]
X-Note: This email has been virus scanned by F-Prot,McAfee AV, and ClamAV.
X-Note: Please send abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Country-Chain:
X-Hello:
X-Note: SMTP
X-Note:
X-Note: This email was scanned for spam. [Details at
http://spamstats.madriveraccess.com]
X-Note: This email has been virus scanned by F-Prot,McAfee AV, and ClamAV.
X-Note: Please send abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Country-Chain:
X-Hello:
X-Note: SMTP
101 - 200 of 329 matches
Mail list logo
