Eric:
Is the DirectorySlash side of things ever useful for these methods?
You're thinking that maybe the return DECLINED statement could move
up to the top of fixup_dir()? I've pondered that myself, but I think
that's a much bigger change than just restoring the 2.2.x behaviour
which should
cove...@apache.org wrote:
restore http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=233369
under a configurable option: don't run mod_dir if r-handler is already set.
PR53794
I like this, and it's certainly a more configurable solution to
the problem with mod_dav which came up last week:
Graham Leggett wrote:
I am currently struggling to turn mod_dav on. In theory, it is just
Dav on, but in practice I am getting a 405 Method Not Allowed
in response to PROPFIND
By any chance, are you using 2.4.x/trunk and do you have mod_dir
included in the build? I have a patch for a
Graham Leggett wrote:
The second is that the module seems to want to respond to all methods,
GET, POST, PROPFIND, etc when in theory it should only respond to GET.
Yes, exactly. The history here seems to be due to a change made for
PR 25435, which made it into 2.4.x but was vetoed for
Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.26 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.2.26 GA.
+1: CentOS 5.5 (x86_64), APR 1.4.8, APR-util 1.5.2, OpenSSL 1.0.1e
Chris.
wr...@apache.org wrote:
Wrap at 80 still, here at httpd project
Amen to that. :-)
Chris.
--
GPG Key ID: 088335A9
GPG Key Fingerprint: 86CD 3297 7493 75BC F820 6715 F54F E648 0883 35A9
Jeff Trawick wrote:
[ ] Release mod_fcgid 2.3.9 as GA
+1
Chris.
--
GPG Key ID: 088335A9
GPG Key Fingerprint: 86CD 3297 7493 75BC F820 6715 F54F E648 0883 35A9
Jeff Trawick wrote:
The app is out of spec either way. I think the trunk behavior is better.
I'd agree on both counts (the latter IMHO, of course). For reference,
here's a breakdown of 2.3.7 vs. trunk behaviour for Authorizers:
Authorizer response2.3.7
Jeff Trawick wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1357986view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1357986view=rev
Log:
Avoid internal sub-requests and processing of Location headers when
in FCGI_AUTHORIZER mode, as the mod_fcgid_authenticator(), etc. hook
Chris Darroch wrote:
The intent of r1357986 was to deal with a particular, wonky
sub-case, when the Authorizer returns 200 (so the spec paragraph
doesn't apply in this case, as it's a 200 OK response), but adds
a Location header with a relative (not absolute) path. In this case,
2.3.7
+1 with many thanks,
Chris.
--
GPG Key ID: 088335A9
GPG Key Fingerprint: 86CD 3297 7493 75BC F820 6715 F54F E648 0883 35A9
Nick:
The idea is to introduce a non-default UseListenScheme On setting
which uses the scheme from the Listen directive when constructing
self-referencing URLs:
Can you clarify for the lazy among us how this might interact with
existing configuration options for self-referencing URLs? I'm
Hi --
I thought I'd toss out a patch I've been working on lately; it's been
a long time since I committed directly, so if some of the regulars
wouldn't mind giving some feedback first, I'd appreciate it.
The idea is to introduce a non-default UseListenScheme On setting
which uses the scheme
Hi --
I notice we have the .wmz and .sub file extentions each defined twice
in trunk mime.types:
.wmz: application/x-msmetafile, application/x-ms-wmz
.sub: text/vnd.dvb.subtitle, image/vnd.dvb.subtitle
Any ideas on which to keep? I'm happy to make the trivial commit,
but I don't follow
Hi --
I recently needed to wire up httpd's rotatelogs to a named pipe (a FIFO)
instead of to stdin. For context, we have a non-httpd server process
configured to write to the pipe instead of a log file; further, this
server likes to intermittently open, write to, and close its various
log
Jeff Trawick wrote:
what about limiting the number of characters logged and potentially
sent to the client via error-notes?
(%.120s anyone?)
Sounds good to me ... are there any debug/trace log which truncate
output in a similar way that could serve as best practices examples?
I fished
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util_script.c
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util_script.c?rev=1362538r1=1362537r2=1362538view=diff
==
---
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Most of that is not user-visible stuff for CHANGES. (CHANGES would be
barely usable by users if every refactor or other code improvement was
described therein.)
Improved logging for AAA handling perhaps?
Sure -- I just didn't want it to go unremarked, mostly in case
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 6/29/2012 6:25 PM, Chris Darroch wrote:
If this looks OK, I'd love to commit and move on to the next
patch ... assuming I can keep paddling near the shore and avoid those
dangerous undertows! Thanks and cheers,
Looks sensible to me.
Thanks, Bill
Hi --
After many years sailing far away from httpd shores, I happen to be
making a visit again and might have a trickle of mod_fcgid patches
to share. Because it's been a while I thought I'd post the first
one or two for RTC instead of just committing them directly.
This one is just adding
Igor Galić wrote:
One of the several things I'm uncertain about, though,
is how to distinguish the case of just wanting to override, say,
the Host header *after* the VirtualHost has been selected (perhaps
this is the default case, to work like RemoteIPHeader), from the
extra case of using
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 5/3/2012 6:14 PM, Igor Gali? wrote:
Wouldn't it be more appropriate to hack up^W^Wexpand mod_remoteip?
That answer seems sensible to me, too.
Thanks, guys, for pointing me at mod_remoteip; I agree it's a more
logical place for this kind of thing.
The
Daniel Gruno wrote:
[+/-1] Add commentary system to the trunk documentation.
+1
Chris.
--
GPG Key ID: 088335A9
GPG Key Fingerprint: 86CD 3297 7493 75BC F820 6715 F54F E648 0883 35A9
Hi --
It's been a remarkably long time since I had anything useful
to commit, and I'm pretty rusty, so I thought I'd throw this out for
discussion as a RTC despite the CTR rules on trunk. I promise I won't
be offended if anyone says it's a stupid hack and should never be
committed, because,
+1
Chris.
--
GPG Key ID: 088335A9
GPG Key Fingerprint: 86CD 3297 7493 75BC F820 6715 F54F E648 0883 35A9
Eric Covener wrote:
I'd set my ThreadStackSize really low, to 64 KB, and while that usually
lets you run without trouble
I was just about to document that _lowering_ the stack size with
ThreadStackSize is unreliable since the underlying call used only sets
a _minimum_ stack size, not an
Stefan:
This is PR 49437.
crypt_data is a bit more than 128K on my Linux box.
Yup, mine too, my bad -- typing while tired.
Any opinions how this could be improved?
- use malloc/free instead. This may be bad for performance (e.g.
glibc's malloc will use mmap/munmap by default for blocks
Hi --
It's been ages since I wrote to the list; as always, my apologies.
I hope to get back to some actual programming soon, unless life gets
in the way again.
In the meantime, a quick note for anyone who might at some point
stumble over the same thing and go to Google for help. I set up a
Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Because it's way too verbose in configurations where several Require
directives are in a RequireAny block. In this case every Require
that does not match would produce an ERROR-level log message, even if
the request is finally allowed by a later Require directive. I
poir...@apache.org wrote:
Author: poirier
Date: Sun Jun 20 19:48:13 2010
New Revision: 956396
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=956396view=rev
Log:
First pass at documentation for upgrading to 2.4.
Went through CHANGES and tried to pick out things that would
require a 2.2 user to make
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.6-alpha are (will be) available
at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/- 1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha
Vote closes at 15:00 UTC on Wednesday June 16 2010.
I think I'm just squeaking in under the
Jeff:
I haven't seen any other complaints (yet), so I'm in no big hurry to
get out another release. I'll wait until we have a handful of
solutions ready for real end-user problems, unless we see that this
issue is affecting a number of people.
OK, great. I'll try to move on to my next
Jeff:
Go ahead with the fix; I'll review in detail and test it once you
commit your final version.
OK, I'll test more today first. Thanks.
BTW, I haven't seen (or recognized) a commit to allow both a FastCGI
authorizer and a FastCGI handler for the same request. Have I missed
something
Jeff Trawick wrote:
... to correct a regression when used with httpd 2.0.x on some
Unix-ish platforms.
OK, noted. I very much hope to pack in some additional changes
to the wrapper management code this week; time's still on my side
at the moment. I spent some of Friday on it but what
Jeff Trawick wrote:
... to correct a regression when used with httpd 2.0.x on some
Unix-ish platforms.
OK, I have a first cut at what I'm hoping to commit shortly, unless
anyone sees problems. Let me know if you want me to hold off until
you've cut another GA; otherwise I'll continue
Chris Darroch wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Chris Darroch has a patch for that, which is a small part of
http://people.apache.org/~chrisd/patches/mod_fcgid_auth/mod_fcgid-1auth-trunk.patch
[snip]
Yes -- and I'm really, really going to prioritize breaking this
patchset up (I know I'm
Jeff Trawick wrote:
mod_fcgid doesn't currently provide a callable API. There are no
public functions or structures.
That's what I thought, but it's great to have it confirmed.
2.3.4 is GA already. 2.3.5 is being tested now and hopefully will be a GA too.
Plz hold off on any serious
Jeff Trawick wrote:
mod_fcgid users, please try out mod_fcgid-2.3.5.tar.gz (or .tar.bz2)
or the win32/netware suitable package mod_fcgid-2.3.5-crlf.zip from
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_fcgid/
and cast your vote:
+1 to release as 2.3.5-GA
Chris.
--
GPG Key ID: 366A375B
GPG Key
Jeff Trawick wrote:
maybe increasing the granularity of the lock could help
(multiple busy lists with the inode used as a hash to get to the
proper busy list)
I happen to have a module, unrelated to mod_fcgid, which manages
a fairly large shared-memory cache across a number of user
Chris Darroch wrote:
Because this runs on Linux and we're just using the APR defaults,
the process locks are SysV semaphores. Maybe sometime in the far
future, once glibc 2.10 appears on our systems, we might try
APR_LOCK_PROC_PTHREAD and see if we can't get the shiny new
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Chris Darroch has a patch for that, which is a small part of
http://people.apache.org/~chrisd/patches/mod_fcgid_auth/mod_fcgid-1auth-trunk.patch
which applies to the old mod_fcgid 2.2 but which he has submitted here
for inclusion. If you get stuck, look in there at some
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[X] +1 to release as 2.3.4-beta
Chris.
--
GPG Key ID: 366A375B
GPG Key Fingerprint: 485E 5041 17E1 E2BB C263 E4DE C8E3 FA36 366A 375B
Jeff Trawick wrote:
FCGIDOutputBufferSize - FCGIDResponseBufferSize
FCGIDBusyTimeout - FCGIDRequestTimeout
FCGIDBusyScanInterval - FCGIDRequestTimeoutScanInterval (unfortunate
name for unfortunate concept)
Hmm ... can't say I have any opinion on those, really. I suppose
Response is
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Beyond beta, I think we have something that is clearly better than the
2007 mod_fcgid 2.2 release and should get out the door soon as a GA (as
long as testing doesn't show any regression). I just made what I hope
are uncontroversial changes to the directive names. I'll
Rainer Jung wrote:
The names of the configuration directives of mod_fcgid are somehow
inconsistent. At least it's abit hard to remmber, that some directives
use a prefix FCGI, others use FastCgi (and most do not have a prefix for
a namespace).
I'm not sure, how important we take configuration
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Please fetch up the newly minted mod_fcgid-2.3.1.tar.gz (or bz2)
or the win32 suitable package mod_fcgid-2.3.1-crlf.zip from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_fcgid/
review, take it for a spin, and cast your choice
[X] +1 to release as 2.3.1-beta
Gave
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Chris Darroch wrote:
[X] +1 to release as 2.3.1-beta
Gave it a quick compile and test run -- no heavy testing but it
handles a pre-2.3 script fine, at least. So I'd vote we get a beta
out there and encourage others to take a look. Thanks again,
Thanks Chris
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Interestingly, I found this post from Chris some time ago that covers
the issue:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mod-fcgid-us...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00085.html
His patch:
http://people.apache.org/~chrisd/patches/mod_fcgid_auth/mod_fcgid-1auth-trunk.patch
Yes -- we
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Thank you for all this work ... it's much appreciated, especially
since I've been utterly useless lately on the httpd front. Thanks again!
So... if I throw the effort at getting unix to build clean for httpd-2.0
branch, you won't be offended ;-?
Seriously, no
wr...@apache.org wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=807823view=rev
Log:
suppose this would be worth noting
Changes with mod_fcgid 2.3.1
+ *) Complete the unix port to 2.3-dev trunk. [William Rowe]
Thank you for all this work ... it's much appreciated, especially
since I've
Dan Poirier wrote:
I've added a patch to bug 16057 to replace the use of shared memory with
socache. I was hoping the changes would be less pervasive, but the
shared memory assumption showed up in a lot of places.
Comments on the proposed changes would be more than welcome.
Can't wait to
Jim Jagielski wrote:
No +1... When do you think you might work on this? I have some cycles
today and would like to start the migration.
Thanks for tackling this ... I see much stuff going on! I fear
the time gap between idea and implementation seems to grow ever larger
these days. I was
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
But, I would like to set up the query as follows:
AuthDBDUserRealmQuery \
SELECT md5(uname || ':' || %s || ':' || upass) FROM uaccount WHERE uname =
%s
^^... to be realmto be user
... ^^
It seems to me we have no
Joe Orton wrote:
w.r.t. locking, my take for socache was: you either duplicate the code
in every provider, or you duplicate the code in every API consumer, so
it wasn't obvious what was best. I expected the latter would be both
simpler and more flexible, so went for that.
It looks like
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
I think a new directive with formats support is preferable to
keep compatibility with existing directives.
We definitely need compatibility with existing directives.
That's why I figured the extra parameter would be optional --
if you only provided one parameter, the
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Remove mod_slotmem (server/slotmem.c) and the associated
ap_slotmem_*() wrapper functions.
It's just an additional abstraction, agreed. I'm fine with removing it
but got the impression that people *wanted* that abstraction.
jean-frederic clere wrote:
In mod_cluster
Jim Jagielski wrote:
But my personal preference would be to remove it and instead
add an unsigned int flags field to ap_slotmem_provider_t, and
define some flag values, such as AP_SLOTMEM_FLAG_NOTMPSAFE = 0x0001
(read not MP-safe) and AP_SLOTMEM_FLAG_PERSIST = 0x0002.
Again, +1 for this
Jim Jagielski wrote:
At any rate, moving responsibility for locking up to the
caller level, as the socache API does, I think makes a lot of
sense. It means that a caller running in a single-process,
single-threaded context can simply choose not to add the overhead
of a global lock. Other
jean-frederic clere wrote:
It would be great to pass server_rec* and apr_pool_t* arguments
to all the methods (except maybe num_slots() and slot_size()).
Some providers may need to report error messages, and to do that
they really need a server_rec*. They may also need to allocate
data from
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 14, 2009, at 3:36 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Yeah... when a do is done, we want to ensure that
none of the slots change since we are touching all slots.
In general, we assume that with get and put, only one thread is
touch any particular slot at one time.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Chris, I'm really confused. Are you asking to branch httpd trunk into
a 2.4 branch (bad, we aren't there) or a 2.3 branch (overkill IMHO, if
we don't have cycles to get to 2.4/3.0 with what's in trunk, we certainly
don't have cycles to make the determinations of
Hi --
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Many people use mod_fcgid on Apache 2.0/2.2. The message should be that
mod_fcgid development has moved to the ASF, and existing users are not
being left behind in the transition. So a branch for mod_fcgid 2.x is
maintained for httpd 2.0/2.2 users just as our own
Ronald Park wrote:
I did have one minor nit to pick with the implementation of the
DBDInitSQL command. A user might presume that the order of commands
listed in the config file would be preserved when the commands are run.
By using a hash table, you'll likely get a random order causing
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I think most of the stuff in NOTICE is documentation that belongs
in README. The only things we put in NOTICE files are copyright
or attribution lines required by the original copyright owners.
OK, thanks -- made a quick edit this morning.
Makefile and .deps should
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Done. I set all of Ryan Pan's commits to svn:author=pqf
(for consistency), loaded the whole thing under httpd/mod_fcgid
and fixed the eol-style to native.
Please relicense the directory and files first before making any
other changes.
Thanks! I think the
Kevac Marko wrote:
Prepared statements are not executed, just parsed (simplified), so no,
it is not important for initialization statement to be before prepared
statements.
Right; what I wondered was whether you needed to execute some
sort of magic initialization statement which would then
Kevac Marko wrote:
It's great idea. But are you sure that it is good idea to change both
main httpd.conf and VirtualHost for new DB connection to be added?
These are separate things... It will introduce problems if, for
example, httpd.conf is root writable and virtualhost-blabla.conf is
user
Kevac Marko wrote:
I'm not experienced in commiting patches to open source projects, so I
am very thankful for your comments.
No problem -- thanks for pushing this patch along!
One thought I had overnight is that you might, if you like, want
to tackle the init SQL patch first, which
Chris Darroch wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Yes, that is what I prefer as well. All paperwork is done, so please
let us know when you have an export. I (or one of the other svnadmins)
will have to massage it a bit to prefix the sourceforge ids, so just
point us to the dump file when you
Kevac Marko wrote:
Here I am again.
The patch works well for us.
Is there something else that I can do for now?
I'm going to try to find some time to take a look -- thanks for the
patch; it's good to see the DBDGroup idea being taken further than
my initial notions.
On an initial quick
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I'd suggest that we import the code into SVN by starting not
with this temporary package, but with a cvs2svn export of the
SourceForge commit history. The relicensing can then follow as
a single subsequent commit. Sound OK?
Yes, that is what I prefer as well. All
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I ended up fixing all website generation to utf-8 -- I am surprised
that it lasted this long with just iso-8859-1.
Thanks -- looks good!
Yes, that is what I prefer as well. All paperwork is done, so please
let us know when you have an export. I (or one of the
Hi --
I wrote:
The httpd-mod_fcgid.xml file is my first whack at the IP clearance
template.
I renamed this .xml.utf8 this morning because I realized it has some
non-ASCII UTF-8 character sequences in it. I don't know if those will
pass through the Incubator's XML-to-HTML transformation
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Work's been incredibly busy, so I haven't had time to
do much on the refactoring of slotmem yet...
Fair dos; no pressure from here, certainly. Glad to hear work's
been busy! :-)
Chris.
--
GPG Key ID: 366A375B
GPG Key Fingerprint: 485E 5041 17E1 E2BB C263 E4DE C8E3
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
sounds great, the form is here;
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.xml
Good god is incubator/public/trunk/ a mess ;-)
I've tried to wade through this and the results are here:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
sounds great, the form is here;
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.xml
Good god is incubator/public/trunk/ a mess ;-)
OK, I'll take a whack at filling it out and post back the results --
might
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Sorry, let this thread continue too long, sorry I've been distracted.
+1; wrowe, sctemme, issac, rjung, trawick, lars, niq, covener, fielding,
jerenkrantz and chrisd.
and the support of Albert Lash, Brian Akins and Brian McCallister.
The vote passes; next step
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Based on the enthusiasm of the module authors to adopt the AL and offer
the mod_fcgid code to the httpd community, please vote
+/-1
[ ] Accept mod_fcgid into httpd
Unless I missed a -1, that looked like a lot of +1s to me ... is
there a standard length of
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Based on the enthusiasm of the module authors to adopt the AL and offer
the mod_fcgid code to the httpd community, please vote
[+1] Accept mod_fcgid into httpd
And as others have already expressed, many thanks to Ryan and everyone
else involved.
Chris.
--
GPG
Tim Jensen wrote:
I am new to the list. Love apache. It has served me well for over
a decade. Keep up the great work.
I had previously contributed a patch to the mod_fcgid module
whose ownership is being transfered to ASF. As author of my
minor little patch to mod_fcgid I gladly transfer
pqf wrote:
Now both authors have subscribe this maillist and claimed to transfer all
rights to the patch
to the Apache Software Foundation, is it OK? Can we move forward now?
Excellent question -- it would seem we have resolved the outstanding
issues here, so what is the next step? If
Jim Jagielski wrote:
- create() - takes num_items and item_size
- to be called during initial config pass, providers
should not initialize or create mutexes here, etc.
should not??
That comes from writing mod_shmap which lets you load a bunch of
socache
Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
Hi,
my name is Piotr Gackiewicz and I am the autor of these patches.
I confirm, that I personaly consider them as minor changes and agree, that
you should put them into minor patch group. Without signing CLA and official
Software Grant.
I appreciate transferring this
Hi --
On 31 Dec 2008, at 05:48, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Foes anyone have a sense of whether these would indeed require
a CLA and SGA?
They look like simple repairs to me. More importantly, if he thinks
they are simple repairs and he is happy to see them Apache Licensed,
then there is no
Hi --
First of all, many thanks to Jim Jagielski, Jean-Frederic Clere,
and Brian Akins for the slotmem API! Personally I think it would be
great to see the mod_auth_digest and/or mod_proxy module gradually migrate
toward using either the slotmem or socache APIs, as appropriate (and
perhaps
pqf wrote:
version 1.10 ( Jul 3rd 2006 )
1. Use poll() instead of select() in UNIX. It becomes problematic on
apache2 with large number of logfiles. Apache2 calls poll()
(when OS supports it), and in that case it doesn't need to be recompiled
with larger FD_SETSIZE. select() is still
Hi --
I wrote:
What we had before was:
if (apr_atomic_casptr((volatile void**)(queue_info-recycled_pools),
new_recycle, next) == next) {
but also:
if (apr_atomic_cas32((queue_info-idlers), prev_idlers + 1,
prev_idlers) ==
Basant Kumar kukreja wrote:
Yes, unless until we clearly understand that volatile is not useful here, we
should keep it.
The thing that makes me reasonably sure this is OK (and this is for
trunk/2.4 only) is that there are other apr_atomic_*() functions used
in fdqueue.c without any
pqf wrote:
Sorry for the delay, I have track down all patches base on my ChangeLog
( I keep my mail archive), so here is my brief:
Minor patches
...Ignore here, I attach a file to show every modification to
every ChangeLog entry. (If anyone think any change is major, please
let me know)
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
How many are we talking about (in the significant category)? The
easiest way probably depends on how many people, how easy they are
to contact, etc.
Ryan, do you have a rough sense of this?
From my own review of the ChangeLog, it looks like there are
roughly
pqf wrote:
I have signed the two documents
( http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt and
http://www.apache.org/licenses/iclas), and emailed the scan
version to secretary at apache.org.
So what I should do next is? Should I contact all major contributors
and ask for the agreement to
Joe Orton wrote:
Both modules look very neat! Are you going to commit them? I might
debate the naming of mod_shmap ;)
Heh, thanks. I don't know, I hadn't really thought about committing
them ... maybe the shmap one is more useful to other folks?
- have all providers consistently
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
the struct process_score in scoreboard.h contains a sb_type member. Can
anyone please explain what that item is for? I couldn't find any usage
in the code.
Looks like this was added back in r89115 along with a number of
other things which were (mostly) quickly
Joe Orton wrote:
mod_shmap would be useful at least in modules/test so I can write some
perl-framework tests for mod_socache!
OK, I'll think about doing that. The m4/dsp/NWGNU wizardry required
makes me tired just thinking about it, though. :-) In the meantime,
I think they compile again
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Sorry, but I currently don't get the reason for moving the negate check down
in the code.
So far as I'm aware, there's no functional or even performance
difference at the moment (not that performance really matters here,
since this function runs at configuration time).
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Not quite sure if this is really correct because apr_atomic_casptr
wants to have a (volatile void**) as first parameter.
That's what made me less than sure ... but my gcc 4.1.2 -Wall
definitely doesn't like that void** (dereferencing type-punned pointer ...).
I
pqf wrote:
When you wrote mod_fcgid, was there any code which you borrowed
from mod_fastcgi?
No. I didn't borrow any code from mod_fastcgi.
Your current intention is for mod_fcgid to be available under
the GPL version 2.0, correct? Could you confirm that you wanted
the GPL to
Hi --
I believe Pan Qingfeng (潘庆峰), the developer of mod_fcgid, has
joined this list for the time being while the possibility of mod_fcgid
becoming project in the Apache incubator is discussed. I'll use his
English name of Ryan Pan from here on.
I asked Ryan to join so that he could answer
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I don't see a problem with RequireNone inverting the logic, and
I think it would actually be useful for blocking a set of bad
clients. Is it difficult to include that without MatchNotAny?
Not at all difficult; trivial, in fact. The only reason I took
it out as well
Joe Orton wrote:
* include/ap_socache.h: Use C++ safety wrappers, and rename -delete
to -remove since the former is a C++ reserved word.
Thanks again for the socache refactoring! I've been trying to
keep these two modules up-to-date with both the socache stuff and
Apache ZooKeeper
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
