--
Robbe
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.ng
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/14981036/attachment.pgp>
-
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.ng
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/56b66225/attachment.pgp>
It took me a little while to realize that he's probably asking about the
fact that the insert capability of the old fproxy gateway page is
gone. Was this intentional? Is there any way to force the old fproxy
gateway page to appear?
Not that I ever used the gateway page for anything but a
http://locut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/a59e8531/attachment.pgp>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 September 2002 16:02, William_dw -- Sqlcoders wrote:
> >-Original Message-
>
> From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org
>
> >[mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Robert Bihlmeyer
> >Sent: 06 September 2002 12:44
>
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:44:08AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:06:16PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > This could easily be the problem as I know that Matthew recently made
> > > some modifications to the announcement code.
> > Yup. Build 500 had a combinatorial
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/c0f7a720/attachment.pgp>
> > >
> > >As a final thought, couldn't we just work around deficiencies like
> > >that? What happens if you send "text/x-really-plain" instead?
> > >
> > >--
> > >Robbe
> >
> > As far as I've found IE really likes HTML, unless it pop's up a file
> > download box it will try to interpret any HTML
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:24:02AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
<>
> With KEEP_HISTORY set to false (it isn't changed anywhere in the code as far
> as i can see) nothing is ever done with the history vector, but stores a
> pretty large amount of data anyway, making StateChain objects much
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:30:50PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:17:38PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
< >
> > I think desired behavior would be something like the way browsers treat
> > SSL pages - warning whenever it is loads a page besides the current. This
> >
)
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/15aa9d85/attachment.pgp>
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/32e99100/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:46:44PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
< >
> > We all agree that we cannot ask most all users to install browser
> > plugins, because maintaining such for X browsers on Y platforms is not
> > realistic. But most users probably don't give a hoot about complicated
> >
>-Original Message-
>From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org
>[mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Robert Bihlmeyer
>Sent: 06 September 2002 12:44
>To: devl at freenetproject.org
>Subject: [freenet-dev] MSIE issues
>As a final thought, couldn't we just work around
--- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/0d9235c1/attachment.pgp>
Since I have never worked on it, it has never really bothered me, but it
seems to me that the filter is a lot of wasted effort. I mean, you are
doing something in a place where it is extremely difficult and unsafe
(the proxy) rather than in a place where it could be both easy, safe,
and more use
d
mtoseland at blueyonder.co.uk
amphibian at sourceforge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Looking for $coding (I'm cheap)
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/d7b702eb/attachment.pgp>
..
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/c825c89e/attachment.pgp>
hacker.
Looking for $coding (I'm cheap)
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/aa16f131/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:15:03PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:31:58AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > While looking into making the various error and information pages
> > that FProxy throws up conform to our nice new theme, I noticed how
> > completely ugly the
In local.freenet, you wrote:
> Those who try the current snapshot will now notice that the=20
> gateway.html page is now replaced by an Infolet.
Yeah, great, it's broken. Why do you hardcode the node's IP into
the page? Now you can't easily use [ssh] port-frowarding to connect
to a remote fproxy.
http://www.uprizer.com/
Personal Homepage http://locut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/1968386d/attachment.pgp>
or
prevents other nodes from contacting it is the policy decision that
should be made.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/f7f40a2e/attachment.pgp>
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/8e2f71bf/attachment.pgp>
er.com/
Personal Homepage http://locut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/2e45a528/attachment.pgp>
>From Ian Clarke
>java -Xrunhprof:heap=sites,depth=4,format=a freenet.node.Main
As expected, the memory used when a 498 node blows up is mostly storing the
announcement events for the hopefully fixed announcement bug, but I also
noticed that in StateChain.java:
L19:
public static boolean
sonal Homepage http://locut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/cab4492a/attachment.pgp>
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 10:21:48PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 09:23:58PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote:
> > But still, we should be extremely firm in warning users about the use
> > of M$IE and the insecurity of it. I personally think that even
> > ALLOWING users to view
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 20:38:56 -0400
Greg Wooledge wrote:
[DSB occuring right after "Upstream node sent bad data!"]
I've seen this too, but I've also seen the "bad data" message without
any obvious DSB consequences.
I've also gotten messages around that time about "unable to send
CB_BAD_DATA" or
In local.freenet, you wrote:
Those who try the current snapshot will now notice that the=20
gateway.html page is now replaced by an Infolet.
Yeah, great, it's broken. Why do you hardcode the node's IP into
the page? Now you can't easily use [ssh] port-frowarding to connect
to a remote fproxy.
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:15:45PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:53:19PM -0700, Simon G wrote:
I've been getting out of memory crashes too: I've also noticed that the
ticker contents display is filling up with megabytes of:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:06:48PM -0700, Reuben Balik wrote:
I was looking at the Freenet project page and I
noticed that there hasn't been a release until
December. Since the latest build seems pretty stable
(I haven't had a problem) and has a nice interface
(although I dislike the
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:31:58AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
While looking into making the various error and information pages
that FProxy throws up conform to our nice new theme, I noticed how
completely ugly the FProxy code is. If someone is considering
some significant work to improve
Since I have never worked on it, it has never really bothered me, but it
seems to me that the filter is a lot of wasted effort. I mean, you are
doing something in a place where it is extremely difficult and unsafe
(the proxy) rather than in a place where it could be both easy, safe,
and more use
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:18:26PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
Since I have never worked on it, it has never really bothered me, but it
seems to me that the filter is a lot of wasted effort. I mean, you are
doing something in a place where it is extremely difficult and unsafe
(the proxy)
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:46:44PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
We all agree that we cannot ask most all users to install browser
plugins, because maintaining such for X browsers on Y platforms is not
realistic. But most users probably don't give a hoot about complicated
attacks
From Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
java -Xrunhprof:heap=sites,depth=4,format=a freenet.node.Main
As expected, the memory used when a 498 node blows up is mostly storing the
announcement events for the hopefully fixed announcement bug, but I also
noticed that in StateChain.java:
L19:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:17:38PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:46:44PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
We all agree that we cannot ask most all users to install browser
plugins, because maintaining such for X browsers on Y platforms is not
realistic. But
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:06:16PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:15:45PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:53:19PM -0700, Simon G wrote:
I've been getting out of memory crashes too: I've also noticed that the
ticker contents display is
Ian said he'd rebuilt the snapshot, looks like the snapshot builder is
having problems because it's still at version 500. Which is a really bad
idea.
--
Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Looking for $coding (I'm cheap)
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:30:50PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:17:38PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
I think desired behavior would be something like the way browsers treat
SSL pages - warning whenever it is loads a page besides the current. This
would
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:24:02AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
With KEEP_HISTORY set to false (it isn't changed anywhere in the code as far
as i can see) nothing is ever done with the history vector, but stores a
pretty large amount of data anyway, making StateChain objects much larger
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:06:16PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
This could easily be the problem as I know that Matthew recently made
some modifications to the announcement code.
Yup. Build 500 had a combinatorial explosion of announcements (within
the node). Build 501 largely fixed
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:37:38PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Ian said he'd rebuilt the snapshot, looks like the snapshot builder is
having problems because it's still at version 500. Which is a really bad
idea.
Weird - try now.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:44:08AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:06:16PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
This could easily be the problem as I know that Matthew recently made
some modifications to the announcement code.
Yup. Build 500 had a combinatorial explosion
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:44:08AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:06:16PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
This could easily be the problem as I know that Matthew recently made
some modifications to the announcement code.
Yup. Build 500 had a combinatorial explosion
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:58:13AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is good, but we really can't up the build number that frequently
for our users - it will really piss them off.
As a guideline - we should try not to increment the build number more
than once a week.
Uh, no.
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:48:31AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:37:38PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Ian said he'd rebuilt the snapshot, looks like the snapshot builder is
having problems because it's still at version 500. Which is a really bad
idea.
Weird - try
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:15:03PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:31:58AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
While looking into making the various error and information pages
that FProxy throws up conform to our nice new theme, I noticed how
completely ugly the FProxy
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 11:27:22PM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:
Ok, let it be said I love the new UI. However, since : is just redirecting
to :8890, can't we just merge the two interfaces?
It screws up my setup of using squid to redirect freenet requests, but I think I
can work around
Travis Bemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that a good compromise would be to put up a warning page
where the user has to type I do know that Micro$oft Internet
Explorer is an insecure piece of shit as specified by the page into
a text item in a form (the $ would be mandatory) and then
Gianni Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 03 September 2002 17:11, you wrote:
The FEC code in freenet-ext.jar is not GPL compatible.
I hadn't turned it on by default yet because the fproxy UI code still has
some bugs in it. Maybe it's time to turn it on bugs and all.
As
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Bihlmeyer
Sent: 06 September 2002 12:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [freenet-dev] MSIE issues
As a final thought, couldn't we just work around deficiencies like
that? What happens if you send
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:43:47PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
Travis Bemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that a good compromise would be to put up a warning page
where the user has to type I do know that Micro$oft Internet
Explorer is an insecure piece of shit as specified by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 September 2002 16:02, William_dw -- Sqlcoders wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Bihlmeyer
Sent: 06 September 2002 12:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 05:57:55PM -0500, Timm Murray wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 September 2002 16:02, William_dw -- Sqlcoders wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Bihlmeyer
As a final thought, couldn't we just work around deficiencies like
that? What happens if you send text/x-really-plain instead?
--
Robbe
As far as I've found IE really likes HTML, unless it pop's up a file
download box it will try to interpret any HTML looking text in the file
Hi. I have committed changes that allow external (in-freenet)
stylesheets in freenet. Previously this was possible only by exploiting
bugs in Microsoft Internet Explorer, or adding text/css to the safe
types list (I strongly recommend against either path). The text/css
MIME type will now be
It took me a little while to realize that he's probably asking about the
fact that the insert capability of the old fproxy gateway page is
gone. Was this intentional? Is there any way to force the old fproxy
gateway page to appear?
Not that I ever used the gateway page for anything but a
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:48:56PM -0500, Ed Onken wrote:
It took me a little while to realize that he's probably asking about the
fact that the insert capability of the old fproxy gateway page is
gone. Was this intentional? Is there any way to force the old fproxy
gateway page to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 September 2002 17:51, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:43:47PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
Travis Bemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that a good compromise would be to put up a warning page
where the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 September 2002 19:19, William_dw -- Sqlcoders wrote:
As a final thought, couldn't we just work around deficiencies like
that? What happens if you send text/x-really-plain instead?
--
Robbe
As far as I've found IE
62 matches
Mail list logo
