Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > Is it too much overhead to create/maintain a Fossil forum page with phpBB > or similar? A mail list seems so linear to capture diverse ideas and > proposed solutions. Let

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion < > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > >> Is it too much overhead to cr

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Put or keep the sender's display name (in their original From field) in the display name part of the From: address. That way your messages would be from: Richard Hipp That way who sent the message will still be evident in most email interfaces, and most

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Is it too much overhead to create/maintain a Fossil forum page with phpBB or similar? A mail list seems so linear to capture diverse ideas and proposed solutions. Let alone, scanning past issues is far from efficient. On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-us

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

The only problem (or annoyance) I see with that is that we don't know from who the email come from unless we look at the signature at the bottom. -- Martin G. > Le 22 juin 2016 à 10:54, Fossil SCM user's discussion > <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> a écrit : > >

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On 6/22/16, Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > The only problem (or annoyance) I see with that is that we don't know from > who the email come from unless we look at the signature at the bottom. I agree. I just don't know of an alternative.

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

> Le 22 juin 2016 à 13:19, Fossil SCM user's discussion > <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> a écrit : > >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion >> <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: >> >> >>> On Wed,

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Jun 22, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > > Ah, another apparent side effect of this change is that users now get a copy > of their own posts sent to them. That wasn't the case before. You did still get a copy of yo

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On 22 June 2016 at 10:07, Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > Is it too much overhead to create/maintain a Fossil forum page with phpBB or > similar? A mail list seems so linear to capture diverse ideas and proposed > solutions. Let alone, scann

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

-- Shal Farley<s...@cheshireeng.com> Cheshire Engineering Corporation +1 626 303 1602 http://www.CheshireEng.com On 6/22/2016 10:19 AM, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org <mailto:

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Stephan wrote: Ah, another apparent side effect of this change is that users now get a copy of their own posts sent to them. That wasn't the case before. As the unsigned person said, suppressing your own message on its return to you is a feature of some email systems - specifically including

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Jun 22, 2016, at 10:24 AM, Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > > > Live with the spam. It’s small potatoes as problems go. > > No, it is a huge PR problem. “Huge?” Breaking news, the Internet is full of porn. Film at 11. (No, no

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Jun 22, 2016, at 9:20 AM, Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > > On 6/22/16, Fossil SCM user's discussion > <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: >> The only problem (or annoyance) I see with that is that we don't know from

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

r's discussion > <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > > The only problem (or annoyance) I see with that is that we don't know from > who the email come from unless we look at the signature at the bottom. > > -- > Martin G. > >> Le 22 juin 201

[fossil-users] More reply spam...

> Live with the spam. It’s small potatoes as problems go. > No, it is a huge PR problem. Innocent users find Fossil and have a quick question, so they send a message to the list and immediately get back porn. Not a good first impression. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:20:56AM -0400, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote: > On 6/22/16, Fossil SCM user's discussion > <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > > The only problem (or annoyance) I see with that is that we don't know from > > who the email

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Hi, (I replied to the last message sent at this point, not to the original post in this thread) Unfortunately I am not mailing-list clued, and I don't have a solution for this current spam-problem. With risk of stating the obvious: the tree-like nature of a thread is now gone (isn't it?) This

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On 23 June 2016 at 09:32, Michai Ramakers wrote: > strange... tree-view of a thread is present when viewing individual > messages in the archive (e.g. my last mail, > http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg23445.html), > but not on the

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:26:02 +0200, Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:54:47 -0400: This is an experiment. Hopefully one that is short lived. :-) It's pretty confusing to see a

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Hello again, One of the biggest mistakes I've noticed with many software projects is that they do think that "trying to force people to give bugs they've found in a website like github, is a good idea". I say it's wrong. a) Most people prefer e-mail to inform.b) most people don't have time to

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:58:01 -0600: > Just filter it, either at the mailing list or at each client. Problem > solved. I think this is the most sensible approach, however, in the case presented, it isn't possible to filter at the mailing

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

strange... tree-view of a thread is present when viewing individual messages in the archive (e.g. my last mail, http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg23445.html), but not on the threads-overview page (http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/).

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> writes: > Hopefully one that is short lived. :-) +1 > It's pretty confusing to see a bunch of emails coming from ``Fossil SCM > user's discussion'' in my MUA. +1 > In addition, I like to know who is speakin

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:54:47 -0400: > This is an experiment. Hopefully one that is short lived. :-) It's pretty confusing to see a bunch of emails coming from ``Fossil SCM user's discussion'' in my MUA. I often like to brain filter messages (e.g. dec

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:58:01 -0600: > > No, it is a huge PR problem. > > Huge? Maybe not to some, but, it's certainly not something that we want coming as a result of emails to the ML. > I never correlated the posting to this list and t

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

I too find this very confusing. I don't know who each message is from. Many people (myself included) don't have their name by default in their signature (if they even have one) and asking everyone to either add one for every email they send to anyone or to manually remember to sign each post to

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

SCM user's discussion Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 7:42 PM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam... On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:20:56AM -0400, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote: On 6/22/16, Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-s

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

that it is easy to do of course) Best Regards K. De : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On 2016-06-23 06:48:38, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote: > Both lists require moderator action on first post for each (a configuration > choice). That's not exactly a feature that only google groups offers. > Google's spam logic is really good at picking out spam before >

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > Michal - the answer is super-simple - move the email list to Google Groups. > > > I don't think that helps any because the spam is not coming through the mailing list. Th

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On 2016-06-23 10:14:25, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:26:02 +0200, Fossil SCM user's discussion > <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > > > Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:54:47 > > -0400: > >

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On 06/23/2016 05:57 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote: I agree. This sucks. Also writing because I want some juice spam to inspect. Finally not understanding why the list of subscribers cannot be better controlled, given the underlying issue is a spammer is subscribed

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

logic is really good at picking out spam before moderators are asked for action - maybe too good (you can't turn spam-filtering off). - Paul H On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > (I replied to

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

> > > I agree. This sucks. Also writing because I want some juice spam to > inspect. > Finally not understanding why the list of subscribers cannot be better > controlled, given the underlying issue is a spammer is subscribed to the > ML. > The spammers bot is subscribing new accounts as needed

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

* Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> [20160622 16:40]: > As anyone who has recently posted to this mailing lists probably > already knows, some miscreant has again set up a reply-spam bot. > Whenever you post to this list, the bot sends porn-spam as a

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 06:48:38AM -0400, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote: > Michal - the answer is super-simple - move the email list to Google Groups. Please no. I find Google Groups to be super painful. It also doesn't fix the problem. Jo

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:54:47AM -0400, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote: > In an effort to thwart this attack, I have converted fossil-users into > an "anonymous" list. That means that the email address of senders is > always stripped. Replies can go to the mailing lis

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

What about stripping the email address in the but leave the display name. Not sure if that capability exists. - Scott Doctor sc...@scottdoctor.com On 06/22/2016 11:12, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote: It's a disaster to not have the sender in the usual sender FROM

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

<-- argg :) On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > The current shape is almost unusable. I say "almost", because we haven't > had a new thread on an actual on-topic subject since it was start

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

just a mailing list. --Ross Berteig On 6/22/2016 10:50 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote: Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:58:01 -0600: This is how it happens: 1) spam bot subscribes to the mailing list 2) normal user subscribes to the mailing list and asks

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On 6/23/2016 11:22 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote: I didn't write the MLM (It's "mailman" for what that's worth). I didn't even install it. ... Do you have patches for us? Alas, no. I'm not familiar with mailman or with Python. A glance at the mailman docs suggests th

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

What about putting up a system which periodically sends out a request to list subscribers to confirm they are not a bot? Like, answering a simple question. Those who don't pass could be put on hold and stop receiving emails from the list. The request could be sent only to subscribers which have

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On 6/23/2016 9:11 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote: Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:24:26 +0200: the tree-like nature of a thread is now gone (isn't it?) No, threading should still work. Just start a new thread with a different subject. Typically

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Is the software for the mailing list open source? If so, can i get a link to its location. - Scott Doctor sc...@scottdoctor.com On 06/23/2016 13:51, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote: Yes, very hard to follow anonymous discussion and returned copies. Every other product

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > Is the software for the mailing list open source? If so, can i get a link to > its location. https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/ ㎝ -- |:**THE BEER-WARE LICENSE** *

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:24:26 +0200: > the tree-like nature of a thread is now gone (isn't it?) No, threading should still work. Just start a new thread with a different subject. Typically threading is handled by Reference or In-Re

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:54:46 +0200: > Finally not understanding why the list of subscribers cannot be better > controlled, given the underlying issue is a spammer is subscribed to > the ML. Probably the most flexibility would come fr

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:48:38 -0400: > Both lists require moderator action on first post for each (a > configuration choice). Google's spam logic is really good at picking > out spam before moderators are asked for action - maybe too

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:57:46 -0400: > Or you could stick with this "from:fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org, > to: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org" situation, and lose loads of > goodwill. Hopefully everyone understands this

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:05:16 +0700: > Which prevents the simple approach we used on sqlite-users to flush > out the spammer. (this reply is mainly so I can see the exciting spam > messages everyone else is talking about...). Too bad, it w

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:02:33 +0200: > I'd rather fossil not go there. [Google] +1 Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000576cb4aa ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fos

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:38:24 -0700: > Thinking slightly outside the box, I wonder if some sort of variant of > a honey-pot could be made to work. Set up an "official" bot that posts > daily. Have it post a joke of the day, trivia,

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > Any email sent to the spam trap triggers an automatic unsubscription. This would be effective only if the spam is sent from the same address subscribed to the list, no? If

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Fri, 24 Jun 2016 06:28:03 +0200: > This would be effective only if the spam is sent from the same address > subscribed to the list, no? If it was so then it would be trivial to > solve the problem. Yes, you're right, as I realized in an emai

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on 23 Jun 2016 22:23:47 -0600: > Yes, I think this is the best option actually, and one that I've used > before. The trick would be to setup a server that does not filter > email, because if it filters out the spam before it can b

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Brad here. How big *is* the current list of subscribers? -bch On Jun 23, 2016 9:33 PM, "Fossil SCM user's discussion" < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Fri, 24 Jun 2016 06:28:03 +0200: > > > This would be effect

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > > How big *is* the current list of subscribers? 519 members -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Fri, 24 Jun 2016 06:28:03 +0200: > > > This would be effective only if the spam is sent from the same address > >

[fossil-users] PHP Composer support for Fossil

To all the PHP developers who use Fossil, here is something that might be useful to you: support for Fossil repositories in Composer. I personally don't like Composer: it is intrusive, it might run shell scripts on package install, its packages are not signed and can not be trusted, it is quite

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:16 AM, Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > > The trick is to figure out how to put a short nonce in each outbound subject > line. Maybe just member serial number, but something unique to the > recipient. I didn't w

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Dr. H. > ... the bot's reply uses In-Reply-To and duplicates the subject line > from a prior legitimate email. There's your hook: the subject line. The trick is to figure out how to put a short nonce in each outbound subject line. Maybe just member serial number, but something unique to the

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > > The problem isn't that the messages are being posted to the ML, but that the > bot is passively harvesting email addresses from messages it receives from > the ML >

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > > Both lists require moderator action on first post for each (a > configuration choice). Google's spam logic is really good at picking out > spam before moderators ar

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Yes just remove the email address but not the name, and problem solved in a better way until we find a solution to block this bot. Cheers, -- bohwaz ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] there is no way to unset tarball prefix

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > (Sat, 25 Jun 18:40) Fossil SCM user's discussion: > > fwiw, i disagree. This patch removes an option from the user (specifying > an > > empty string) and doe

Re: [fossil-users] there is no way to unset tarball prefix

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: fwiw, getting my own posts as a new mail, leading to (A) getting each submitted post sent right back to me as a new mail and (B) 2 copies of each post on my local thread (the one i

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

This is what I've said ... (just show names if people do want that) To block the bot isn't it easy to just say to Google, etc. and the mailman admin of the mailman website that is used by Fossil that there is a bot ?I'm quite sure that they may help.   Best Regards K. De : Fossil SCM

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

will be spammed; you will be trolled; welcome aboard. Barry (an almost nobody on this list, weight=$0.02) On 25 June 2016 at 07:08, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > No, anonymity doesn't sucks... > I want anonymity because as I said, people don't

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 1:18 AM, Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > periodically ? > Sometimes I do not even read my e-mails... And sometimes you read only the first line, apparently. > At least, Fossil knows who are not bot... (Am I a

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

K, And IMHO, they can whitelist some of us ... can't they ? No, I don't think they can. The limitation is that the Fossil list is run on software (Mailman v2.1.14) that doesn't have any of these features that we've been imagining (myself included). At the very least the list would have

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

periodically ?Sometimes I do not even read my e-mails... At least, Fossil knows who are not bot... (Am I a bot ? Seriously?)And IMHO, they can whitelist some of us ... can't they ? Best Regards K. De : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> À : Foss

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

for the behavior we do want for this mailing list)Have a nice WE, everyone. Best Regards K. De : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Envoyé le : Vendredi 24 juin 2016 17h43 Objet : Re: [fossil-users] More repl

Re: [fossil-users] please, please revert the change to the mailing list!

I concur. - Paul Hammant On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > I use Gmane to access the mailing list, and with new change *every* > post is shown as coming from "Fossil SCM user's discussion".

[fossil-users] please, please revert the change to the mailing list!

I use Gmane to access the mailing list, and with new change *every* post is shown as coming from "Fossil SCM user's discussion". This is a *massive* degradation in the usability of the list for me, and presumably for those others of us that use Gmane. Please revert this change! I ha

Re: [fossil-users] please, please revert the change to the mailing list!

I agree 100%. I end up ignoring messages from the Fossil mailing list almost entirely now, as I am normally fairly selective regarding who's messages I open if I'm in a hurry. Kind regards, Philip Bennefall On 6/26/2016 10:11 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote: I concur. - Paul Hammant

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Another immensely popular tool for team, including open-source dev and user teams is slack - https://slack.com/ HipChat is a alternative - https://hipchat.com/ Host it yourself Slack-alikes using open-source include http://www.mattermost.org/ and https://www.zulip.org/ These of these tools

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On 24 June 2016 at 18:46, Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > Another immensely popular tool for team, including open-source dev and user > teams is slack - https://slack.com/ > HipChat is a alternative - https://hipchat.com/ > > Host it

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

as Fossil and they use a Forum (phpBB, http://www.newlispfanclub.alh.net/forum/index.php) On 25 June 2016 at 12:37, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > On 24 June 2016 at 18:46, Fossil SCM user's discussion > <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org>

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Oh... If we're offering alternatives, I recently joined https://gitter.im/red/red and don't completely hate its interface. On 25 June 2016 at 09:46, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > Another immensely popular tool for team, including open-s

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 21:46:29 -0400 / Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> said : > Another immensely popular tool for team, including open-source dev > and user teams is slack - https://slack.com/ > HipChat is a alternative - https://hipchat.com/ I a

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:08:49 -: > No, anonymity doesn't sucks...I want anonymity because as I said, > people don't want or even can't show up there details.And IMHO, > privacy is something that we would like to have for ou

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Fri, 24 Jun 2016 06:28:03 +0200: > This would be effective only if the spam is sent from the same address > subscribed to the list, no? If it was so then it would be trivial to > solve the problem. There is another alternative that will be

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:18:41 -: >And IMHO, they can whitelist some of us ... can't they ? Exactly how would that solve the problem? Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000576e1e72 ___ fossil-users mailing l

Re: [fossil-users] there is no way to unset tarball prefix

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > Hello, > > if tarball prefix is defined as an empty string (unset), > then Fossil will use it. > > I think, it would be better to use project-name: > ...

Re: [fossil-users] please, please revert the change to the mailing list!

Due to the move to anonymous messages I unsubscribed from the list. However I'm still getting messages. Did the changes break unsubscribing or am I not being patient enough? On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > I

Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam...

Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> writes: > Every other product I use has a forum and manages spam with > moderation and user reporting. Forum threads are way more efficient > to follow. All the mailing lists which I follow are via Gmane and Foss

Re: [fossil-users] please, please revert the change to the mailing list!

Fossil SCM user's discussion decía, en el mensaje "[fossil-users] please, please revert the change to the mailing list!" del 26/6/2016 16:42:26: > I use Gmane to access the mailing list, and with new change *every* > post is shown as coming from "Fossil

[fossil-users] Mainmenu wraps poorly on small screens

Hello everybody: (this is John Rouillard - rouilj) I have a smaller laptop I use daily with FF 47.0 and chromium 50.0.2661. If I look at: https://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html it is missing the "More..." menu item and I have a single row menu bar. If I look at the home page: