Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[glen]

erm to get attached to 
those kinds of feelings.

But then what is all this “choice” and “free will” language doing, beyond just 
allowing us to label feelings?  Where does it come from?  What role is it 
playing?

I can imagine that it is something like a socially constructed prosthetic 
system.  There is lots of stuff that happens in mind-activity, which minds 
don’t carry out regularly (or maybe at all) in isolation, but which they can 
scaffold their way through by evolving external prosthetic systems.  So, game 
boards for playing combinatorial games.  Counting and rhythm for dealing with 
enumeration, time and other stuff.  Many structure of language for organizing 
thought patterns and images.  We wouldn’t say that the minds aren’t “thinking” 
or “solving” whatever the problem is because they employ a prosthetic system in 
doing so.  We can instead say that, like neoteny and like lots of other things 
that are extreme in human minds, they have taken on capacity for a lot of 
complexity by offloading the completion of many parallelizable tasks to 
constructed niches, which the minds as a community then generate, maintain, and 
evolve.

Likewise, one can imagine that these abstractions of “will” and “choice” get 
used by some of the resolving-activities, to direct attention or imagination 
(among the many places it could be directed at any moment) to images of others, 
social sanction, imaginations of fear of blame, guilt, reprisal, or whatever, 
and then one navigates through the language-mediated rules of that game, to 
results that feed back as part of the resolution-activity to send the hive to 
one place or another.  This would be consistent with thinking that a lot of 
freewill and choice language takes it most concrete form in legal and punitive 
institutionalism. There it is not only the hive of actions in individual minds 
that make some joint move; it is all of those in a population of people with 
yet further constructed niches (rules, roles, authorizations of force, etc.) 
that act collectively to serve inputs to the coordinating activities at the 
“times of choice”.

I don’t supposed I could weave a philosophical system out of such vague 
imagery, or even make it into anything psychological.  But at least it gives me 
some metaphors to attach the terms to that don’t seem completely unanchored (to 
me, by my admittedly arbitrary tastes).

Eric




On Jan 26, 2024, at 11:06 AM, Marcus Daniels  wrote:

LLMs are causal models.   Science is about building causal models.    It is 
bizarre to me that there are scientists that carve out a special case for their 
own mind.   Even people like Scott Aaronson talk this way.   As far as I can 
tell, it is just vanity.
*From:*Friam mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>>*On 
Behalf Of*Steve Smith
*Sent:*Friday, January 26, 2024 7:38 AM
*To:*friam@redfish.com <mailto:friam@redfish.com>
*Subject:*Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will


Does ChatGPT have choices?

I "can't help myself", so here goes:

I've been reading Sopolsky's "Behave" which paves the runway (or exit ramp) for his 
recent "Determined".  His deep background in neuroendocrinology leads to some very 
compelling arguments which pretty much degenerate to:

"do you believe in causality? if so, then where do you suppose the spirit or soul 
intervene to break the chain dominoes that have been set up by everything that you are 
and has happened to you up to that instant?"

He does a fancy little mocking dance, three card monte style, of homunculii he 
contrives for the purpose of debunking any fanciful regression/recursion escape 
plans you might have in that direction.

To hear him tell it we (as are all AIs/LLMs/etc) essentially giant pachinko 
machines:

:

His arguments on the topic seem unassailable in spite of my own deep and abiding sense of 
"choice" at many levels.  It also doesn't help my cognitive dissonance that he 
speaks entirely colloquially using many words we all associate with choice...  he speaks 
_as if_ he makes choices and others do as well even if he seems to ignore the specific 
word, choice.

I like the conceit of:  "the universe is deterministic but not prestateable"

I guess this is why they call it "the HARD problem of consciousness"?

For those of you who read this far, it would seem you "couldn't help yourself" or as my mother used to quip 
"you must not have had anything better to do", and for those who have not, the same goes for hitting 
 or  (or having set up a spam-filter at an earlier time to avoid repeating the 
"decision" personally)...

PS re: Breaking Bad

I've only dropped a few Pachinko balls in my life, but I couldn't help agonizing over the trajectory of each one, 
feeling as if at every bounce they were at risk of "breaking bad" (or "good")...   since many here 
are at least part-time simulants (as Glen I believe refers t

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Marcus Daniels]

Eric writes:

< It seems like I remember reading, years ago when this was in a spate of 
articles, about the anterior cingulate gyrus and the amygdala as brain regions 
that go active when some kind of conflict or heterogeneous input needs to be 
resolved somehow. >

This seems consistent with Transformer-based neural nets.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10450673/

From: Friam  on behalf of David Eric Smith 

Date: Sunday, January 28, 2024 at 11:50 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
Cc: David Eric Smith 
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will
I mostly sit on the sidelines in these freewill and choice discussions, because 
I don’t know what anybody else wants from the terms and the language using 
them.  I wonder whether the people using them know what they want from them, or 
if they would regard that as a meaningful thing to ask of someone.  So I hear 
evidence of this or that degree of regularity or context-sensitivity, and have 
no idea what problem they are supposed to be addressing.

But it leaves me wondering what questions I could ask that would give me some 
traction.

First, how much of this freewill and choice language is really anchored in its 
main features in the nature of human experience, and how much is exercise of a 
culturally inherited and partly arbitrary speech convention?  I mean this in 
the sense one might ask of language: there is some evidence that aspects of 
language use are inherently human and regular, as we see from invented 
isolated-group languages (deaf kids etc.) or from pidgin-creole transitions.  
But any particular language is of course conventional in much of its structure, 
and most kids raised without a language will not, by themselves, create a 
substitute in time.

I can imagine there are aspects of both for the freewill and choice thing.

But what would be the “native and unambiguous” aspect?  I feel like to say 
anything, I first have to think of the activities going on in the mind like a 
hive of bees, partly autonomous but partly coordinated.  Other activities also 
always-working are serving to maintain coordination where it is needed.  For 
example, if my elbow moves in one direction, then the laws of physics say it 
will not have moved in some different direction.  So while there may be many 
chaotic inputs to elbow movement, at some point they need to resolve into an 
action that there will only be one of.

So if, David Chalmers-like, I am to claim that there is an experiential aspect 
called “feeling that I choose”, what the hell should that refer to?  I could 
guess that, in cases where there is some significant spread in the contributors 
to an action, and the resolving activities have to do some work against some 
tension to resolve to some definite action, the self-modeling and 
self-reporting aspects of awareness might present those as a report of a 
tension, to which evolved language will then attach a tag “choosing” so that we 
can refer to it in ourselves and in each other.  It seems like I remember 
reading, years ago when this was in a spate of articles, about the anterior 
cingulate gyrus and the amygdala as brain regions that go active when some kind 
of conflict or heterogeneous input needs to be resolved somehow.

Thus: to the extent that Cheyne-Stokes breathing doesn’t even need the brain, 
it is pretty hierarchical, and I don’t expect that it will ever report itself 
too me as offering freedom to “choose” something.  Presumably it won’t report 
itself at all.  But other things look more like Seely’s process of a hive of 
bees choosing where to migrate.  Lots of signals come in from significantly 
independent origins, and there can be a long period of balance among several 
possible outcomes before something tips, and the hive goes somewhere.  That 
tension will feel to me like some symbol needs to be attached to the tipping, 
and there is an opportunity for some “choice” or “will” term to get attached to 
those kinds of feelings.

But then what is all this “choice” and “free will” language doing, beyond just 
allowing us to label feelings?  Where does it come from?  What role is it 
playing?

I can imagine that it is something like a socially constructed prosthetic 
system.  There is lots of stuff that happens in mind-activity, which minds 
don’t carry out regularly (or maybe at all) in isolation, but which they can 
scaffold their way through by evolving external prosthetic systems.  So, game 
boards for playing combinatorial games.  Counting and rhythm for dealing with 
enumeration, time and other stuff.  Many structure of language for organizing 
thought patterns and images.  We wouldn’t say that the minds aren’t “thinking” 
or “solving” whatever the problem is because they employ a prosthetic system in 
doing so.  We can instead say that, like neoteny and like lots of other things 
that are extreme in human minds, they have taken on capacity for a lot of 
complexity by offl

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[David Eric Smith]

 the hive to 
one place or another.  This would be consistent with thinking that a lot of 
freewill and choice language takes it most concrete form in legal and punitive 
institutionalism. There it is not only the hive of actions in individual minds 
that make some joint move; it is all of those in a population of people with 
yet further constructed niches (rules, roles, authorizations of force, etc.) 
that act collectively to serve inputs to the coordinating activities at the 
“times of choice”.

I don’t supposed I could weave a philosophical system out of such vague 
imagery, or even make it into anything psychological.  But at least it gives me 
some metaphors to attach the terms to that don’t seem completely unanchored (to 
me, by my admittedly arbitrary tastes).

Eric



> On Jan 26, 2024, at 11:06 AM, Marcus Daniels  wrote:
> 
> LLMs are causal models.   Science is about building causal models.It is 
> bizarre to me that there are scientists that carve out a special case for 
> their own mind.   Even people like Scott Aaronson talk this way.   As far as 
> I can tell, it is just vanity.  
>  
> From: Friam mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> On 
> Behalf Of Steve Smith
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 7:38 AM
> To: friam@redfish.com <mailto:friam@redfish.com>
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will
>  
> 
> 
> Does ChatGPT have choices? 
> I "can't help myself", so here goes:
> 
> I've been reading Sopolsky's "Behave" which paves the runway (or exit ramp) 
> for his recent "Determined".  His deep background in neuroendocrinology leads 
> to some very compelling arguments which pretty much degenerate to:
> 
> "do you believe in causality? if so, then where do you suppose the spirit or 
> soul intervene to break the chain dominoes that have been set up by 
> everything that you are and has happened to you up to that instant?"
> 
> He does a fancy little mocking dance, three card monte style, of homunculii 
> he contrives for the purpose of debunking any fanciful regression/recursion 
> escape plans you might have in that direction.
> 
> To hear him tell it we (as are all AIs/LLMs/etc) essentially giant pachinko 
> machines:
> 
> :
> 
> His arguments on the topic seem unassailable in spite of my own deep and 
> abiding sense of "choice" at many levels.  It also doesn't help my cognitive 
> dissonance that he speaks entirely colloquially using many words we all 
> associate with choice...  he speaks _as if_ he makes choices and others do as 
> well even if he seems to ignore the specific word, choice.
> 
> I like the conceit of:  "the universe is deterministic but not prestateable"
> 
> I guess this is why they call it "the HARD problem of consciousness"?  
> 
> For those of you who read this far, it would seem you "couldn't help 
> yourself" or as my mother used to quip "you must not have had anything better 
> to do", and for those who have not, the same goes for hitting  or 
>  (or having set up a spam-filter at an earlier time to avoid 
> repeating the "decision" personally)...  
> 
> PS re: Breaking Bad
> 
> I've only dropped a few Pachinko balls in my life, but I couldn't help 
> agonizing over the trajectory of each one, feeling as if at every bounce they 
> were at risk of "breaking bad" (or "good")...   since many here are at least 
> part-time simulants (as Glen I believe refers to himself), even the most 
> aggressive attempts at introducing "random" (noise, annealing, etc.) either 
> degenerate to "pseudo-random" or engage with a physical system (e.g. sample a 
> pixel-value from a webcam trained on a lava lamp) which of course is 
> deterministic if arbitrarily complex.
> 
> 
>  
>  
> Anyone interested in feeding FRIAM Archive to a custom LLM. :-)
>  
> Prompt: Interpret Marcus use of gdb analogy in this thread:
>  
> GPT: 
> The analogy used by Marcus in the context of the TV show "Breaking Bad" and 
> the concept of free will involves a comparison with using the "step" command 
> in GDB (GNU Debugger). GDB is a tool used by programmers to debug code. The 
> "step" command in GDB allows the user to execute program code one line at a 
> time, observing the behavior and state of the program at each step.
>  
> In "Breaking Bad," the main character, Walter White, is drawn into a life of 
> crime. The analogy suggests that watching Walter White's descent into this 
> life is like using the "step" command in GDB. Each step represents a decision 
> or action taken by Walter, leading him deeper into the criminal world. Just 
> as a programme

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Steve Smith]

On 1/26/24 4:18 PM, glen wrote:
You're probably more competent at parsing it than I am, which is why I 
said "enjoyed" rather than some other stronger description of my 
reaction. But when you say "plain language" and "common sense", I 
blanch a bit. I thought they were talking about things like actual 
truth, truth-following, reliability, justifiability (which I think of 
as "walkable", i.e. you can parse it to find where a false belief went 
wrong), etc. I think their "convergence" is simply saying that 
subjective [proba|plausi]bility provides a better platform unless 
those traditional values converge. But it's possible he's saying the 
traditional value scoring has to guide the theories toward subjective 
[proba|plausi]bility. Had I more energy, I'd spend the time to figure 
that out. Maybe you can simply tell me what it means. >8^D

/I'm just an LLM's familiar, I don't think I can help with that. /_>8^D_
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Steve Smith]

On 1/26/24 3:13 PM, glen wrote:

I enjoyed this brief assessment of subjective probability/plausibility:

https://home.snafu.de/erich/ibe_2023.pdf

And I kindasortamaybe agree with their conclusion in favor of 
"convergence":


"Convergence: Traditional epistemic values can over time yield 
evaluations of theories differing from those of subjective 
plausibility and probability, yet theories that count as overall 
epistemically best at a time must in finitely many steps revise to 
theories that are most likely true given the available evidence."


I only felt half-able to parse through this set of esoteric 
arguments/assertions/discussions from the rarified world of Philosophy 
of Language and Value Theory?


Is it saying in "plain language" that starting with abstract evaluations 
of the quality of a theory/explanation/narrative, one often ends up 
settling on such things which do not align with common sense yet 
following a process of combining those abstractions with 
measurements/observations one can converge on something "closer to truth"?




-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[glen]

Yeah, but it all boils down to what "same way" means. Addiction is canalized by 
dopaminergic pathways, right? So if you're canalized to that, then even if there are 
small effect differences in the way you react, they might be swamped by the large effect 
sameness forced by the need for dopamine. I haven't looked into it. But I've heard that 
psychopaths have higher levels of dopamine, whereas those of us with restless leg 
syndrome don't have enough of it. Maybe the answer is to give everyone restless leg! 
Yeah, that's the ticket.

On 1/26/24 11:35, Marcus Daniels wrote:

We don’t have the same molecular composition from identical histories, so there 
is no reason to think we’d all react the same way.

*From:*Friam  *On Behalf Of *Jochen Fromm
*Sent:* Friday, January 26, 2024 11:18 AM
*To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

 > The more one identifies with some (set of) narrative(s), the less free will 
one has.

Interesting. Yes, probably.

I believe the question of free will is related to the question if we all 
experience the world in the same way. This is also a question we have discussed 
frequently here at FRIAM if I recall correctly. Do we all act in the same way 
if we are confronted with a situation where we have to make a decision? In 
general no, but all drug addicts act alike if they are confronted with a 
situation which involves the stuff they are addicted to. The more addicted they 
are, the less free will.

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/jan/02/the-big-idea-could-you-have-made-different-choices-in-life
 
<https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/jan/02/the-big-idea-could-you-have-made-different-choices-in-life>


--
ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Steve Smith]

On 1/26/24 12:35 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:


We don’t have the same molecular composition from identical histories, 
so there is no reason to think we’d all *react* the same way.


is that technically *act* or *re-act*?   Like my pachinko analogy, it is 
all *re*action, all the way down... no such thing as *action*, right?-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Steve Smith]

I just learned about the work of De Finetti who apparently added the 
notion of "subjective probability" to the extant body of Bayesian 
probability at the time (1937).   "Probability is not about the system 
but rather about your knowledge of the system"...


From Wikipedia

   *Bruno de Finetti*(13 June 1906 – 20 July 1985) was an
   Italianprobabilist
   statistician
   andactuary
   , noted for the "operational
   subjective" conception ofprobability
   . The classic exposition
   of his distinctive theory is the 1937/"La prévision: ses lois
   logiques, ses sources subjectives"/,^[1]
    which
   discussed probability founded on the coherence of betting odds and
   the consequences ofexchangeability
   .


















On 1/26/24 11:46 AM, glen wrote:

The concept of causality is so irritating. It's like some kind of 
cafeteria style religion, where you pick and choose whatever attribute 
you like and toss all the attributes you dislike. So Marcus' 
identification of uncorrelated observations speaks directly to SteveS' 
assignation of an independent trajectory mutation at each pin in the 
game. The trajectory isn't random, but each turn in the trajectory is 
random. Similar with the difference between determinism and 
prestatability. Similar with the difference between causal chains 
versus causal networks.


All this is simply to torque my arm out of place patting myself on the 
back again. What matters is the *scope*, not some penultimate 
reduction to some Grand Unified Theory/Philosophy of the world. Nobody 
can say anything coherent without mentioning the scope of whatever it 
was they said ... the language within which they said it, etc.



On 1/26/24 07:37, Steve Smith wrote:
I've only dropped a few Pachinko balls in my life, but I couldn't 
help agonizing over the trajectory of each one, feeling as if at 
every bounce they were at risk of "breaking bad" (or "good")...   
since many here are at least part-time simulants (as Glen I believe 
refers to himself), even the most aggressive attempts at introducing 
"random" (noise, annealing, etc.) either degenerate to 
"pseudo-random" or engage with a physical system (e.g. sample a 
pixel-value from a webcam trained on a lava lamp) which of course is 
deterministic if arbitrarily complex.


On 1/26/24 08:14, Marcus Daniels wrote:
One of the usual claims is that science couldn’t occur without 
independent observations.   I would co-opt Glen’s rhetoric here about 
parallax.  What’s need is largely uncorrelated observations.
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Marcus Daniels]

We don’t have the same molecular composition from identical histories, so there 
is no reason to think we’d all react the same way.

From: Friam  On Behalf Of Jochen Fromm
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 11:18 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

> The more one identifies with some (set of) narrative(s), the less free will 
> one has.

Interesting. Yes, probably.

I believe the question of free will is related to the question if we all 
experience the world in the same way. This is also a question we have discussed 
frequently here at FRIAM if I recall correctly. Do we all act in the same way 
if we are confronted with a situation where we have to make a decision? In 
general no, but all drug addicts act alike if they are confronted with a 
situation which involves the stuff they are addicted to. The more addicted they 
are, the less free will.
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/jan/02/the-big-idea-could-you-have-made-different-choices-in-life

-J.


 Original message 
From: glen mailto:geprope...@gmail.com>>
Date: 1/26/24 4:19 PM (GMT+01:00)
To: friam@redfish.com<mailto:friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

Absolutely. If we parse out what character or personality means, we might come 
to the idea that it's a forcing structure comprised of the cumulative 
consequences of past decisions. If one's "identity" is (and has been) 
quasi-stable around, say, American Football, then any tiny little choice like 
"Hey let's go hiking this weekend." ... "No, I'm going to a Super Bowl party." 
will subtly guide one's trajectory through time and space.

The more one identifies with some (set of) narrative(s), the less free will one 
has.

On 1/25/24 13:34, Jochen Fromm wrote:
> Could you say that a strong character or personality reduce our free will 
> too, because they restrict our choices and decisions?

--
ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Jochen Fromm]

> The more one identifies with some (set of) narrative(s), the less free will 
> one has.Interesting. Yes, probably.I believe the question of free will is 
> related to the question if we all experience the world in the same way. This 
> is also a question we have discussed frequently here at FRIAM if I recall 
> correctly. Do we all act in the same way if we are confronted with a 
> situation where we have to make a decision? In general no, but all drug 
> addicts act alike if they are confronted with a situation which involves the 
> stuff they are addicted to. The more addicted they are, the less free 
> will.https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/jan/02/the-big-idea-could-you-have-made-different-choices-in-life-J.
 Original message From: glen  Date: 
1/26/24  4:19 PM  (GMT+01:00) To: friam@redfish.com Subject: Re: [FRIAM] 
Breaking Bad and Free Will Absolutely. If we parse out what character or 
personality means, we might come to the idea that it's a forcing structure 
comprised of the cumulative consequences of past decisions. If one's "identity" 
is (and has been) quasi-stable around, say, American Football, then any tiny 
little choice like "Hey let's go hiking this weekend." ... "No, I'm going to a 
Super Bowl party." will subtly guide one's trajectory through time and 
space.The more one identifies with some (set of) narrative(s), the less free 
will one has.On 1/25/24 13:34, Jochen Fromm wrote:> Could you say that a strong 
character or personality reduce our free will too, because they restrict our 
choices and decisions?-- ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ-. --- - / 
...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .FRIAM Applied Complexity 
Group listservFridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriamto (un)subscribe 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.comFRIAM-COMIC 
http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/archives:  5/2017 thru present 
https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/  1/2003 thru 6/2021  
http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[glen]

The concept of causality is so irritating. It's like some kind of cafeteria 
style religion, where you pick and choose whatever attribute you like and toss 
all the attributes you dislike. So Marcus' identification of uncorrelated 
observations speaks directly to SteveS' assignation of an independent 
trajectory mutation at each pin in the game. The trajectory isn't random, but 
each turn in the trajectory is random. Similar with the difference between 
determinism and prestatability. Similar with the difference between causal 
chains versus causal networks.

All this is simply to torque my arm out of place patting myself on the back 
again. What matters is the *scope*, not some penultimate reduction to some 
Grand Unified Theory/Philosophy of the world. Nobody can say anything coherent 
without mentioning the scope of whatever it was they said ... the language 
within which they said it, etc.


On 1/26/24 07:37, Steve Smith wrote:

I've only dropped a few Pachinko balls in my life, but I couldn't help agonizing over the trajectory of each one, 
feeling as if at every bounce they were at risk of "breaking bad" (or "good")...   since many here 
are at least part-time simulants (as Glen I believe refers to himself), even the most aggressive attempts at 
introducing "random" (noise, annealing, etc.) either degenerate to "pseudo-random" or engage with a 
physical system (e.g. sample a pixel-value from a webcam trained on a lava lamp) which of course is deterministic if 
arbitrarily complex.


On 1/26/24 08:14, Marcus Daniels wrote:

One of the usual claims is that science couldn’t occur without independent 
observations.   I would co-opt Glen’s rhetoric here about parallax.  What’s 
need is largely uncorrelated observations.


--
ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[glen]

+1

Every failed communication effort I engage in is followed by my reaction to the 
failure. When I've been primed that day/week to be calm and collected, my 
reaction is to either try again or politely quit the effort. But when I've been 
primed to be reactionary and aggressive, my reaction matches that priming. The 
only difference between me and a dog is that my computer is slightly more 
universal than the dog's computer.

On 1/26/24 10:00, Marcus Daniels wrote:

For example, my dog has a sequence of actions she takes to indicate she would 
like to go outside and pee.   If I am asleep, I may not see or hear them.   
Nonetheless she appears to have guilt if there is a mistake.   Apparent guilt 
is just a thing that happens when her intent is not realized.


--
ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Marcus Daniels]

For example, my dog has a sequence of actions she takes to indicate she would 
like to go outside and pee.   If I am asleep, I may not see or hear them.   
Nonetheless she appears to have guilt if there is a mistake.   Apparent guilt 
is just a thing that happens when her intent is not realized.

From: Friam  On Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 9:32 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will



The person that knows their path is bound, rationally discards the 
self-regulation of guilt, and in that sense has more “freedom”.

Yah... that's kinda the vibe I get from DT, Bannon, Stone, Miller and many of 
the Jan 6 crowd.

I have a thing with the triad of Blame/Shame/Guilt   I think a lot of folks 
conflate Shame and Guilt and avoid the (healthy?) self-regulation of Guilt in 
the name of refusing to be (unhealthily)Shamed.   Shame-avoidance does seem to 
enhance Freedom-sensation the same way a warm gun fits the hand (Beetles 
reference), but Guilt-embrace seems (to me) to allow for a finer attention to 
detail in the fractal landscape of Choice (whether it is an illusion or not) 
which maybe in some way increases freedom of choice/will?

I'm probably wrong about all this (whatever wrong means in this case) but it is 
how I have come to model my own personal responsibility (no matter what 
Sapolsky says about whether I have any choices or not).

My own Labrynthian path through the Maze of Being is something of a Return to 
Grace journey...  not literally the Judeo-Christian Grace (involving Eden and 
Apples and Serpents and such) but something metaphorically aligned.  Best I can 
tell, I'll only reach that state (of Grace) asymptotically (as with Satori?) on 
a trajectory of senescence and/or extinction (of the ego with or without the 
body)?   At that point maybe Satori and Grace are synonyms?


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Marcus Daniels]

I don’t think it is the explanation in their case.  They are just sociopaths.

From: Friam  On Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 9:32 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will



The person that knows their path is bound, rationally discards the 
self-regulation of guilt, and in that sense has more “freedom”.

Yah... that's kinda the vibe I get from DT, Bannon, Stone, Miller and many of 
the Jan 6 crowd.

I have a thing with the triad of Blame/Shame/Guilt   I think a lot of folks 
conflate Shame and Guilt and avoid the (healthy?) self-regulation of Guilt in 
the name of refusing to be (unhealthily)Shamed.   Shame-avoidance does seem to 
enhance Freedom-sensation the same way a warm gun fits the hand (Beetles 
reference), but Guilt-embrace seems (to me) to allow for a finer attention to 
detail in the fractal landscape of Choice (whether it is an illusion or not) 
which maybe in some way increases freedom of choice/will?

I'm probably wrong about all this (whatever wrong means in this case) but it is 
how I have come to model my own personal responsibility (no matter what 
Sapolsky says about whether I have any choices or not).

My own Labrynthian path through the Maze of Being is something of a Return to 
Grace journey...  not literally the Judeo-Christian Grace (involving Eden and 
Apples and Serpents and such) but something metaphorically aligned.  Best I can 
tell, I'll only reach that state (of Grace) asymptotically (as with Satori?) on 
a trajectory of senescence and/or extinction (of the ego with or without the 
body)?   At that point maybe Satori and Grace are synonyms?


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Steve Smith]

The person that knows their path is bound, rationally discards the 
self-regulation of guilt, and in that sense has more “freedom”.


Yah... that's kinda the vibe I get from DT, Bannon, Stone, Miller and 
many of the Jan 6 crowd.


I have a thing with the triad of Blame/Shame/Guilt   I think a lot 
of folks conflate Shame and Guilt and avoid the (healthy?) 
self-regulation of Guilt in the name of refusing to be 
(unhealthily)Shamed.   Shame-avoidance does seem to enhance 
Freedom-sensation the same way a warm gun fits the hand (Beetles 
reference), but Guilt-embrace seems (to me) to allow for a finer 
attention to detail in the fractal landscape of Choice (whether it is an 
illusion or not) which maybe in some way increases freedom of choice/will?


I'm probably wrong about all this (whatever wrong means in this case) 
but it is how I have come to model my own personal responsibility (no 
matter what Sapolsky says about whether I have any choices or not).


My own Labrynthian path through the Maze of Being is something of a 
Return to Grace journey...  not literally the Judeo-Christian Grace 
(involving Eden and Apples and Serpents and such) but something 
metaphorically aligned.  Best I can tell, I'll only reach that state (of 
Grace) asymptotically (as with Satori?) on a trajectory of senescence 
and/or extinction (of the ego with or without the body)?   At that point 
maybe Satori and Grace are synonyms?


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Marcus Daniels]

The person that knows their path is bound, rationally discards the 
self-regulation of guilt, and in that sense has more “freedom”.

From: Friam  On Behalf Of Prof David West
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 8:41 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

Science fiction: The Traveler, by John Twelve Hawks is set in a dystopian (near 
future) 'Big Brother' world of absolute and constant surveillance. The hero, a 
"Traveler" uses a random number generator to make every action choice, else be 
eliminated by the evil forces controlling the world. The world of the Traveler 
is a simple and short extrapolation: the surveillance state, especially London 
and the accumulation of Big Data that allows the "Govt." to predict with almost 
absolute accuracy where you will be, within 10 meters, 24 hours from now; based 
on your on-line presence and meta-data from your cell phone.

That fiction seems to be a metaphorical expression of Sopolsky's argument—to 
me, at least.

Another kind of metaphor for 'Free Will' might be the behavior of those 
suffering from Cotard's Syndrome: thinking they are already dead, they act with 
no concern for consequences and their actions appear, to others, to be random 
or psychopathic.

Finally, the ideal of "non-attached" action and the omniscience that comes with 
achievement of Satori allows one to consciously and intentionally take the 
"correct," non karma accruing, action at every moment seems like the ultimate 
'free will' in the sense that "you" intentionally make the correct turn at each 
juncture of Sopolsky's deterministic maze. Note this does not free you from the 
maze; merely allows you to actually choose each step of the path through the 
maze.

davew


On Fri, Jan 26, 2024, at 9:37 AM, Steve Smith wrote:


Does ChatGPT have choices?

I "can't help myself", so here goes:

I've been reading Sopolsky's "Behave" which paves the runway (or exit ramp) for 
his recent "Determined".  His deep background in neuroendocrinology leads to 
some very compelling arguments which pretty much degenerate to:

"do you believe in causality? if so, then where do you suppose the spirit or 
soul intervene to break the chain dominoes that have been set up by everything 
that you are and has happened to you up to that instant?"

He does a fancy little mocking dance, three card monte style, of homunculii he 
contrives for the purpose of debunking any fanciful regression/recursion escape 
plans you might have in that direction.

To hear him tell it we (as are all AIs/LLMs/etc) essentially giant pachinko 
machines:

:[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pachinko][https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/19/Masamura_Gauge_All_15.jpg/225px-Masamura_Gauge_All_15.jpg]

His arguments on the topic seem unassailable in spite of my own deep and 
abiding sense of "choice" at many levels.  It also doesn't help my cognitive 
dissonance that he speaks entirely colloquially using many words we all 
associate with choice...  he speaks _as if_ he makes choices and others do as 
well even if he seems to ignore the specific word, choice.

I like the conceit of:  "the universe is deterministic but not prestateable"

I guess this is why they call it "the HARD problem of consciousness"?

For those of you who read this far, it would seem you "couldn't help yourself" 
or as my mother used to quip "you must not have had anything better to do", and 
for those who have not, the same goes for hitting  or  (or having 
set up a spam-filter at an earlier time to avoid repeating the "decision" 
personally)...

PS re: Breaking Bad

I've only dropped a few Pachinko balls in my life, but I couldn't help 
agonizing over the trajectory of each one, feeling as if at every bounce they 
were at risk of "breaking bad" (or "good")...   since many here are at least 
part-time simulants (as Glen I believe refers to himself), even the most 
aggressive attempts at introducing "random" (noise, annealing, etc.) either 
degenerate to "pseudo-random" or engage with a physical system (e.g. sample a 
pixel-value from a webcam trained on a lava lamp) which of course is 
deterministic if arbitrarily complex.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pachinko]








Anyone interested in feeding FRIAM Archive to a custom LLM. :-)



Prompt: Interpret Marcus use of gdb analogy in this thread:



GPT:

The analogy used by Marcus in the context of the TV show "Breaking Bad" and the 
concept of free will involves a comparison with using the "step" command in GDB 
(GNU Debugger). GDB is a tool used by programmers to debug code. The "step" 
command in GDB allows the user to execute program code one line at a time, 
observing the behavior and state of the program at each step.



In "Breaking Bad,"

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Steve Smith]

good to hear your "voice",  DaveW!
Finally, the ideal of "non-attached" action and the omniscience that 
comes with achievement of Satori allows one to consciously and 
intentionally take the "correct," non karma accruing, action at every 
moment seems like the ultimate 'free will' in the sense that "you" 
intentionally make the correct turn at each juncture of Sopolsky's 
deterministic maze. Note this does not free you from the maze; merely 
allows you to actually choose each step of the path through the maze.


If I understand the metaphor intended, it seems that this reduces a maze 
to a labyrinth?


My own (limited) apprehension of Satori would suggest that if I were to 
achieve (approach?) that state the "maze" would reduce to a "labyrinth" 
as suggested above?


Or in the idiom of physics, Sapolsky's model suggests to me that human 
activity (consciousness in general) reduces to a "least action path", 
albeit through a high-dimensional space that nobody has (can?) identify 
in the same way Einstein said "God doesn't play Pachinko with the 
Universe" and insisted on there being simply "hidden variables"?


We are all just following geodesics on a high-dimensional manifold, and 
the illusion we call consciousness is a model running in our brains 
which seeks to modify itself up until there are "no surprises"?   
Seeking enlightenment/Satori is an alternate path (to tweaking up one's 
internal model of reality) of choosing to (noticing) that said model 
will always be low-dimensional and will never be equal to the territory 
and therefore relaxes the attention into simply *noticing* the 
maze-following "choices" as they are made?



-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Prof David West]

Science fiction: *The Traveler*, by John Twelve Hawks is set in a dystopian 
(near future) 'Big Brother' world of absolute and constant surveillance. The 
hero, a "Traveler" uses a random number generator to make every action choice, 
else be eliminated by the evil forces controlling the world. The world of the 
Traveler is a simple and short extrapolation: the surveillance state, 
especially London and the accumulation of Big Data that allows the "Govt." to 
predict with almost absolute accuracy where you will be, within 10 meters, 24 
hours from now; based on your on-line presence and meta-data from your cell 
phone.

That fiction seems to be a metaphorical expression of Sopolsky's argument—to 
me, at least.

Another kind of metaphor for 'Free Will' might be the behavior of those 
suffering from Cotard's Syndrome: thinking they are already dead, they act with 
no concern for consequences and their actions appear, to others, to be random 
or psychopathic.

Finally, the ideal of "non-attached" action and the omniscience that comes with 
achievement of Satori allows one to consciously and intentionally take the 
"correct," non karma accruing, action at every moment seems like the ultimate 
'free will' in the sense that "you" intentionally make the correct turn at each 
juncture of Sopolsky's deterministic maze. Note this does not free you from the 
maze; merely allows you to actually choose each step of the path through the 
maze.

davew



On Fri, Jan 26, 2024, at 9:37 AM, Steve Smith wrote:
> 
>> Does ChatGPT have choices?
> I "can't help myself", so here goes:
> 
> I've been reading Sopolsky's "Behave" which paves the runway (or exit ramp) 
> for his recent "Determined".  His deep background in neuroendocrinology leads 
> to some very compelling arguments which pretty much degenerate to:
> 
> "do you believe in causality? if so, then where do you suppose the spirit or 
> soul intervene to break the chain dominoes that have been set up by 
> everything that you are and has happened to you up to that instant?"
> 
> He does a fancy little mocking dance, three card monte style, of homunculii 
> he contrives for the purpose of debunking any fanciful regression/recursion 
> escape plans you might have in that direction.
> 
> To hear him tell it we (as are all AIs/LLMs/etc) essentially giant pachinko 
> machines:
> 
> :
> 
> His arguments on the topic seem unassailable in spite of my own deep and 
> abiding sense of "choice" at many levels.  It also doesn't help my cognitive 
> dissonance that he speaks entirely colloquially using many words we all 
> associate with choice...  he speaks _as if_ he makes choices and others do as 
> well even if he seems to ignore the specific word, choice.
> 
> I like the conceit of:  "the universe is deterministic but not prestateable"
> 
> I guess this is why they call it "the HARD problem of consciousness"? 
> 
> For those of you who read this far, it would seem you "couldn't help 
> yourself" or as my mother used to quip "you must not have had anything better 
> to do", and for those who have not, the same goes for hitting  or 
>  (or having set up a spam-filter at an earlier time to avoid 
> repeating the "decision" personally)... 
> 
> PS re: Breaking Bad
> 
> I've only dropped a few Pachinko balls in my life, but I couldn't help 
> agonizing over the trajectory of each one, feeling as if at every bounce they 
> were at risk of "breaking bad" (or "good")...   since many here are at least 
> part-time simulants (as Glen I believe refers to himself), even the most 
> aggressive attempts at introducing "random" (noise, annealing, etc.) either 
> degenerate to "pseudo-random" or engage with a physical system (e.g. sample a 
> pixel-value from a webcam trained on a lava lamp) which of course is 
> deterministic if arbitrarily complex.
> 
> 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> Anyone interested in feeding FRIAM Archive to a custom LLM. :-)
>>  
>> Prompt: Interpret Marcus use of gdb analogy in this thread:
>>  
>> GPT: 
>> The analogy used by Marcus in the context of the TV show "Breaking Bad" and 
>> the concept of free will involves a comparison with using the "step" command 
>> in GDB (GNU Debugger). GDB is a tool used by programmers to debug code. The 
>> "step" command in GDB allows the user to execute program code one line at a 
>> time, observing the behavior and state of the program at each step.
>>  
>> In "Breaking Bad," the main character, Walter White, is drawn into a life of 
>> crime. The analogy suggests that watching Walter White's descent into this 
>> life is like using the "step" command in GDB. Each step represents a 
>> decision or action taken by Walter, leading him deeper into the criminal 
>> world. Just as a programmer observes the progression of a program one step 
>> at a time in GDB, the viewer observes Walter's journey into criminality in a 
>> step-by-step manner.
>>  
>> The implication here is that Walter's choices, while appearing to be 
>> individual 

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Marcus Daniels]

One of the usual claims is that science couldn’t occur without independent 
observations.   I would co-opt Glen’s rhetoric here about parallax.  What’s 
need is largely uncorrelated observations.

From: Friam  On Behalf Of Marcus Daniels
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 8:07 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

LLMs are causal models.   Science is about building causal models.It is 
bizarre to me that there are scientists that carve out a special case for their 
own mind.   Even people like Scott Aaronson talk this way.   As far as I can 
tell, it is just vanity.

From: Friam mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> On 
Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 7:38 AM
To: friam@redfish.com<mailto:friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will


Does ChatGPT have choices?

I "can't help myself", so here goes:

I've been reading Sopolsky's "Behave" which paves the runway (or exit ramp) for 
his recent "Determined".  His deep background in neuroendocrinology leads to 
some very compelling arguments which pretty much degenerate to:

"do you believe in causality? if so, then where do you suppose the spirit or 
soul intervene to break the chain dominoes that have been set up by everything 
that you are and has happened to you up to that instant?"

He does a fancy little mocking dance, three card monte style, of homunculii he 
contrives for the purpose of debunking any fanciful regression/recursion escape 
plans you might have in that direction.

To hear him tell it we (as are all AIs/LLMs/etc) essentially giant pachinko 
machines:

:[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pachinko#/media/File:Masamura_Gauge_All_15.jpg][https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/19/Masamura_Gauge_All_15.jpg/225px-Masamura_Gauge_All_15.jpg]

His arguments on the topic seem unassailable in spite of my own deep and 
abiding sense of "choice" at many levels.  It also doesn't help my cognitive 
dissonance that he speaks entirely colloquially using many words we all 
associate with choice...  he speaks _as if_ he makes choices and others do as 
well even if he seems to ignore the specific word, choice.

I like the conceit of:  "the universe is deterministic but not prestateable"

I guess this is why they call it "the HARD problem of consciousness"?

For those of you who read this far, it would seem you "couldn't help yourself" 
or as my mother used to quip "you must not have had anything better to do", and 
for those who have not, the same goes for hitting  or  (or having 
set up a spam-filter at an earlier time to avoid repeating the "decision" 
personally)...

PS re: Breaking Bad

I've only dropped a few Pachinko balls in my life, but I couldn't help 
agonizing over the trajectory of each one, feeling as if at every bounce they 
were at risk of "breaking bad" (or "good")...   since many here are at least 
part-time simulants (as Glen I believe refers to himself), even the most 
aggressive attempts at introducing "random" (noise, annealing, etc.) either 
degenerate to "pseudo-random" or engage with a physical system (e.g. sample a 
pixel-value from a webcam trained on a lava lamp) which of course is 
deterministic if arbitrarily complex.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pachinko#/media/File:Masamura_Gauge_All_15.jpg]


Anyone interested in feeding FRIAM Archive to a custom LLM. :-)

Prompt: Interpret Marcus use of gdb analogy in this thread:

GPT:
The analogy used by Marcus in the context of the TV show "Breaking Bad" and the 
concept of free will involves a comparison with using the "step" command in GDB 
(GNU Debugger). GDB is a tool used by programmers to debug code. The "step" 
command in GDB allows the user to execute program code one line at a time, 
observing the behavior and state of the program at each step.

In "Breaking Bad," the main character, Walter White, is drawn into a life of 
crime. The analogy suggests that watching Walter White's descent into this life 
is like using the "step" command in GDB. Each step represents a decision or 
action taken by Walter, leading him deeper into the criminal world. Just as a 
programmer observes the progression of a program one step at a time in GDB, the 
viewer observes Walter's journey into criminality in a step-by-step manner.

The implication here is that Walter's choices, while appearing to be individual 
conscious decisions, are part of an inevitable progression, much like the 
sequential execution of code in a debugger. This raises questions about free 
will and determinism, mirroring the discussion in the FRIAM group about whether 
free will is an illusion, especially in the context of strong compulsions or 
character traits that might limit one's range of choices.
___

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Marcus Daniels]

LLMs are causal models.   Science is about building causal models.It is 
bizarre to me that there are scientists that carve out a special case for their 
own mind.   Even people like Scott Aaronson talk this way.   As far as I can 
tell, it is just vanity.

From: Friam  On Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 7:38 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will



Does ChatGPT have choices?

I "can't help myself", so here goes:

I've been reading Sopolsky's "Behave" which paves the runway (or exit ramp) for 
his recent "Determined".  His deep background in neuroendocrinology leads to 
some very compelling arguments which pretty much degenerate to:

"do you believe in causality? if so, then where do you suppose the spirit or 
soul intervene to break the chain dominoes that have been set up by everything 
that you are and has happened to you up to that instant?"

He does a fancy little mocking dance, three card monte style, of homunculii he 
contrives for the purpose of debunking any fanciful regression/recursion escape 
plans you might have in that direction.

To hear him tell it we (as are all AIs/LLMs/etc) essentially giant pachinko 
machines:

:[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pachinko#/media/File:Masamura_Gauge_All_15.jpg][https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/19/Masamura_Gauge_All_15.jpg/225px-Masamura_Gauge_All_15.jpg]

His arguments on the topic seem unassailable in spite of my own deep and 
abiding sense of "choice" at many levels.  It also doesn't help my cognitive 
dissonance that he speaks entirely colloquially using many words we all 
associate with choice...  he speaks _as if_ he makes choices and others do as 
well even if he seems to ignore the specific word, choice.

I like the conceit of:  "the universe is deterministic but not prestateable"

I guess this is why they call it "the HARD problem of consciousness"?

For those of you who read this far, it would seem you "couldn't help yourself" 
or as my mother used to quip "you must not have had anything better to do", and 
for those who have not, the same goes for hitting  or  (or having 
set up a spam-filter at an earlier time to avoid repeating the "decision" 
personally)...

PS re: Breaking Bad

I've only dropped a few Pachinko balls in my life, but I couldn't help 
agonizing over the trajectory of each one, feeling as if at every bounce they 
were at risk of "breaking bad" (or "good")...   since many here are at least 
part-time simulants (as Glen I believe refers to himself), even the most 
aggressive attempts at introducing "random" (noise, annealing, etc.) either 
degenerate to "pseudo-random" or engage with a physical system (e.g. sample a 
pixel-value from a webcam trained on a lava lamp) which of course is 
deterministic if arbitrarily complex.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pachinko#/media/File:Masamura_Gauge_All_15.jpg]


Anyone interested in feeding FRIAM Archive to a custom LLM. :-)

Prompt: Interpret Marcus use of gdb analogy in this thread:

GPT:
The analogy used by Marcus in the context of the TV show "Breaking Bad" and the 
concept of free will involves a comparison with using the "step" command in GDB 
(GNU Debugger). GDB is a tool used by programmers to debug code. The "step" 
command in GDB allows the user to execute program code one line at a time, 
observing the behavior and state of the program at each step.

In "Breaking Bad," the main character, Walter White, is drawn into a life of 
crime. The analogy suggests that watching Walter White's descent into this life 
is like using the "step" command in GDB. Each step represents a decision or 
action taken by Walter, leading him deeper into the criminal world. Just as a 
programmer observes the progression of a program one step at a time in GDB, the 
viewer observes Walter's journey into criminality in a step-by-step manner.

The implication here is that Walter's choices, while appearing to be individual 
conscious decisions, are part of an inevitable progression, much like the 
sequential execution of code in a debugger. This raises questions about free 
will and determinism, mirroring the discussion in the FRIAM group about whether 
free will is an illusion, especially in the context of strong compulsions or 
character traits that might limit one's range of choices.

CEO Founder, Simtable.com
stephen.gue...@simtable.com<mailto:stephen.gue...@simtable.com>

Harvard Visualization Research and Teaching Lab
stephengue...@fas.harvard.edu<mailto:stephengue...@fas.harvard.edu>

mobile: (505)577-5828

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 4:20 PM Frank Wimberly 
mailto:wimber...@gmail.com>> wrote:
GNU Debugger?

---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Steve Smith]

On 1/25/24 13:34, Jochen Fromm wrote:

Could you say that a strong character or personality reduce our free 
will too, because they restrict our choices and decisions?

On 1/26/24 8:18 AM, glen wrote:
Absolutely. If we parse out what character or personality means, we 
might come to the idea that it's a forcing structure comprised of the 
cumulative consequences of past decisions. If one's "identity" is (and 
has been) quasi-stable around, ...


I like (who cares what I like?  who cares who cares... ... ? )  this 
formulation as it matches my own intuitive conception of "self", 
"self-image", "ego" and the adaptive value to either/all organism, 
collective, species...   the more stable the "identity", the easier one 
is to integrate into a larger system (even if the "identity" is highly 
aggressive/disruptive)...


for the individual organism in predator-prey systems, this can make you 
an "easy" (or predictable) prey.  I think that is what Walter White was 
doing as he "broke bad", he went from trope-predictable "victim" to 
"wiley-prey" to "wolf in sheeps clothing" to "socio-psychopathic 
pachinko ball" (IMO).


The more one identifies with some (set of) narrative(s), the less free 
will one has.


I really appreciate (whatever that means for someone/thing which has no 
free will?)  this view as well, it feels (caveat, caveat...) like it 
helps me (caveat, caveat...) to parse and understand your (Glen's) many 
references to the distinctions between "episodic" and "narrative" on 
this forum.


As a proxy for Sopolsky, I can't directly acknowledge free will being on 
any spectrum since it is in fact (apparently (caveat, caveat...)?) an 
illusion?   Did I mention "hard problem"?


As "modelers and simulators" many of us can perhaps relate 
"narrative(s)" to model(s) and notice our strategies for "model-fitting" 
and the risks of "over-fitting" and the opportunities (pitfalls) of 
meta-modeling?




-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Steve Smith]

Does ChatGPT have choices?


I "can't help myself", so here goes:

And in the spirit of recursion, I fed my text to both GPT-4 and Bard 
asking for a "concise summary"


Bard: "I'm just a language model,so I can't help you with that."

and

GPT:

   "The text is a contemplative reflection on the concepts of
   determinism, free will, and consciousness, drawing from Robert
   Sapolsky's works "Behave" and "Determined." It explores the idea
   that human behaviors and choices might be predetermined by
   neurobiological and environmental factors, akin to the deterministic
   nature of artificial intelligence and large language models. The
   author grapples with the cognitive dissonance between this
   deterministic view and the personal sensation of making choices,
   touching upon the philosophical "hard problem of consciousness." The
   discussion extends to the nature of randomness in deterministic
   systems, both in human decision-making and AI, highlighting the
   complexities and challenges in understanding consciousness and free
   will."

and

DALL-E (via GPT-4) when asked for an image reflecting on the text:

   Error creating image

   I'm unable to generate an image based on the original text due to
   content policy constraints. The policy ensures that generated
   content aligns with specific guidelines, and in this case, the
   complexity and abstract nature of the concepts described in the text
   fall outside the scope of what can be visually represented through
   the image generation tool. If you have another idea or concept for
   an image, feel free to share, and I'll do my best to assist you!
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Steve Smith]

Does ChatGPT have choices?


I "can't help myself", so here goes:

I've been reading Sopolsky's "Behave" which paves the runway (or exit 
ramp) for his recent "Determined".  His deep background in 
neuroendocrinology leads to some very compelling arguments which pretty 
much degenerate to:


"do you believe in causality? if so, then where do you suppose the 
spirit or soul intervene to break the chain dominoes that have been set 
up by everything that you are and has happened to you up to that instant?"


He does a fancy little mocking dance, three card monte style, of 
homunculii he contrives for the purpose of debunking any fanciful 
regression/recursion escape plans you might have in that direction.


To hear him tell it we (as are all AIs/LLMs/etc) essentially giant 
pachinko machines:


:

His arguments on the topic seem unassailable in spite of my own deep and 
abiding sense of "choice" at many levels.  It also doesn't help my 
cognitive dissonance that he speaks entirely colloquially using many 
words we all associate with choice...  he speaks _as if_ he makes 
choices and others do as well even if he seems to ignore the specific 
word, choice.


I like the conceit of:  "the universe is deterministic but not prestateable"

I guess this is why they call it "the HARD problem of consciousness"?

For those of you who read this far, it would seem you "couldn't help 
yourself" or as my mother used to quip "you must not have had anything 
better to do", and for those who have not, the same goes for hitting 
 or  (or having set up a spam-filter at an earlier time to 
avoid repeating the "decision" personally)...


PS re: Breaking Bad

I've only dropped a few Pachinko balls in my life, but I couldn't help 
agonizing over the trajectory of each one, feeling as if at every bounce 
they were at risk of "breaking bad" (or "good")...   since many here are 
at least part-time simulants (as Glen I believe refers to himself), even 
the most aggressive attempts at introducing "random" (noise, annealing, 
etc.) either degenerate to "pseudo-random" or engage with a physical 
system (e.g. sample a pixel-value from a webcam trained on a lava lamp) 
which of course is deterministic if arbitrarily complex.



Anyone interested in feeding FRIAM Archive to a custom LLM. :-)

Prompt: Interpret Marcus use of gdb analogy in this thread:

GPT:

The analogy used by Marcus in the context of the TV show "Breaking 
Bad" and the concept of free will involves a comparison with using the 
"step" command in GDB (GNU Debugger). GDB is a tool used by 
programmers to debug code. The "step" command in GDB allows the user 
to execute program code one line at a time, observing the behavior and 
state of the program at each step.


In "Breaking Bad," the main character, Walter White, is drawn into a 
life of crime. The analogy suggests that watching Walter White's 
descent into this life is like using the "step" command in GDB. Each 
step represents a decision or action taken by Walter, leading him 
deeper into the criminal world. Just as a programmer observes the 
progression of a program one step at a time in GDB, the viewer 
observes Walter's journey into criminality in a step-by-step manner.


The implication here is that Walter's choices, while appearing to be 
individual conscious decisions, are part of an inevitable progression, 
much like the sequential execution of code in a debugger. This raises 
questions about free will and determinism, mirroring the discussion in 
the FRIAM group about whether free will is an illusion, especially in 
the context of strong compulsions or character traits that might limit 
one's range of choices.



CEO Founder, Simtable.com
stephen.gue...@simtable.com

Harvard Visualization Research and Teaching Lab
stephengue...@fas.harvard.edu

mobile: (505)577-5828

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 4:20 PM Frank Wimberly  wrote:

GNU Debugger?

---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 4:11 PM Marcus Daniels
 wrote:

Walter White was drawn into that life as sure as water runs
downhill.  Watching him go deeper and deeper was like
repeating “step” in GDB.

*From:*Friam  *On Behalf Of *Jochen
Fromm
*Sent:* Thursday, January 25, 2024 1:34 PM
*To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group

*Subject:* [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

Since one of you mentioned today that free will is a recurring
FRIAM topic I was thinking about it and found this SCIAM
article that argues that human beings do have the power to
make conscious choices.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/free-will-is-only-an-illusion-if-you-are-too/

On the other hand the drug addicts in Breaking Bad and
elsewhere clearly demonstrate that drug addiction inevitably

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Marcus Daniels]

The choice could be drawn from a deterministic random number generation, which 
I claim could not be discriminated from a quantum random number generator in 
any meaningful way.  

-Original Message-
From: Friam  On Behalf Of glen
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 7:19 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

Absolutely. If we parse out what character or personality means, we might come 
to the idea that it's a forcing structure comprised of the cumulative 
consequences of past decisions. If one's "identity" is (and has been) 
quasi-stable around, say, American Football, then any tiny little choice like 
"Hey let's go hiking this weekend." ... "No, I'm going to a Super Bowl party." 
will subtly guide one's trajectory through time and space.

The more one identifies with some (set of) narrative(s), the less free will one 
has.

On 1/25/24 13:34, Jochen Fromm wrote:
> Could you say that a strong character or personality reduce our free will 
> too, because they restrict our choices and decisions?

-- 
ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Marcus Daniels]

Does ChatGPT have choices?

From: Friam  On Behalf Of Stephen Guerin
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 3:36 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

Anyone interested in feeding FRIAM Archive to a custom LLM. :-)

Prompt: Interpret Marcus use of gdb analogy in this thread:

GPT:
The analogy used by Marcus in the context of the TV show "Breaking Bad" and the 
concept of free will involves a comparison with using the "step" command in GDB 
(GNU Debugger). GDB is a tool used by programmers to debug code. The "step" 
command in GDB allows the user to execute program code one line at a time, 
observing the behavior and state of the program at each step.

In "Breaking Bad," the main character, Walter White, is drawn into a life of 
crime. The analogy suggests that watching Walter White's descent into this life 
is like using the "step" command in GDB. Each step represents a decision or 
action taken by Walter, leading him deeper into the criminal world. Just as a 
programmer observes the progression of a program one step at a time in GDB, the 
viewer observes Walter's journey into criminality in a step-by-step manner.

The implication here is that Walter's choices, while appearing to be individual 
conscious decisions, are part of an inevitable progression, much like the 
sequential execution of code in a debugger. This raises questions about free 
will and determinism, mirroring the discussion in the FRIAM group about whether 
free will is an illusion, especially in the context of strong compulsions or 
character traits that might limit one's range of choices.

CEO Founder, Simtable.com
stephen.gue...@simtable.com<mailto:stephen.gue...@simtable.com>

Harvard Visualization Research and Teaching Lab
stephengue...@fas.harvard.edu<mailto:stephengue...@fas.harvard.edu>

mobile: (505)577-5828

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 4:20 PM Frank Wimberly 
mailto:wimber...@gmail.com>> wrote:
GNU Debugger?

---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 4:11 PM Marcus Daniels 
mailto:mar...@snoutfarm.com>> wrote:
Walter White was drawn into that life as sure as water runs downhill.
Watching him go deeper and deeper was like repeating “step” in GDB.

From: Friam mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> On 
Behalf Of Jochen Fromm
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 1:34 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
mailto:friam@redfish.com>>
Subject: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

Since one of you mentioned today that free will is a recurring FRIAM topic I 
was thinking about it and found this SCIAM article that argues that human 
beings do have the power to make conscious choices.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/free-will-is-only-an-illusion-if-you-are-too/

On the other hand the drug addicts in Breaking Bad and elsewhere clearly 
demonstrate that drug addiction inevitably takes away our free will and 
replaces it by a strong compulsion to get and consume the drug, no matter how 
devastating the consequences are.

Robert McKee says in his book "Story: Substance, Structure, Style and the 
Principles of Screenwriting" that true character is revealed in the choices a 
human being makes under pressure. Could you say that a strong character or 
personality reduce our free will too, because they restrict our choices and 
decisions?

-J.

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Marcus Daniels]

Yes, the path unclear but the steps certain given the context.

From: Friam  On Behalf Of Frank Wimberly
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 3:20 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

GNU Debugger?

---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 4:11 PM Marcus Daniels 
mailto:mar...@snoutfarm.com>> wrote:
Walter White was drawn into that life as sure as water runs downhill.
Watching him go deeper and deeper was like repeating “step” in GDB.

From: Friam mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> On 
Behalf Of Jochen Fromm
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 1:34 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
mailto:friam@redfish.com>>
Subject: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

Since one of you mentioned today that free will is a recurring FRIAM topic I 
was thinking about it and found this SCIAM article that argues that human 
beings do have the power to make conscious choices.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/free-will-is-only-an-illusion-if-you-are-too/

On the other hand the drug addicts in Breaking Bad and elsewhere clearly 
demonstrate that drug addiction inevitably takes away our free will and 
replaces it by a strong compulsion to get and consume the drug, no matter how 
devastating the consequences are.

Robert McKee says in his book "Story: Substance, Structure, Style and the 
Principles of Screenwriting" that true character is revealed in the choices a 
human being makes under pressure. Could you say that a strong character or 
personality reduce our free will too, because they restrict our choices and 
decisions?

-J.

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Stephen Guerin]

Anyone interested in feeding FRIAM Archive to a custom LLM. :-)

Prompt: Interpret Marcus use of gdb analogy in this thread:

GPT:
The analogy used by Marcus in the context of the TV show "Breaking Bad" and
the concept of free will involves a comparison with using the "step"
command in GDB (GNU Debugger). GDB is a tool used by programmers to debug
code. The "step" command in GDB allows the user to execute program code one
line at a time, observing the behavior and state of the program at each
step.

In "Breaking Bad," the main character, Walter White, is drawn into a life
of crime. The analogy suggests that watching Walter White's descent into
this life is like using the "step" command in GDB. Each step represents a
decision or action taken by Walter, leading him deeper into the criminal
world. Just as a programmer observes the progression of a program one step
at a time in GDB, the viewer observes Walter's journey into criminality in
a step-by-step manner.

The implication here is that Walter's choices, while appearing to be
individual conscious decisions, are part of an inevitable progression, much
like the sequential execution of code in a debugger. This raises questions
about free will and determinism, mirroring the discussion in the FRIAM
group about whether free will is an illusion, especially in the context of
strong compulsions or character traits that might limit one's range of
choices.

CEO Founder, Simtable.com
stephen.gue...@simtable.com

Harvard Visualization Research and Teaching Lab
stephengue...@fas.harvard.edu

mobile: (505)577-5828

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 4:20 PM Frank Wimberly  wrote:

> GNU Debugger?
>
> ---
> Frank C. Wimberly
> 140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
> Santa Fe, NM 87505
>
> 505 670-9918
> Santa Fe, NM
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 4:11 PM Marcus Daniels  wrote:
>
>> Walter White was drawn into that life as sure as water runs downhill.
>>  Watching him go deeper and deeper was like repeating “step” in GDB.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Friam  *On Behalf Of *Jochen Fromm
>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 25, 2024 1:34 PM
>> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
>> friam@redfish.com>
>> *Subject:* [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will
>>
>>
>>
>> Since one of you mentioned today that free will is a recurring FRIAM
>> topic I was thinking about it and found this SCIAM article that argues that
>> human beings do have the power to make conscious choices.
>>
>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/free-will-is-only-an-illusion-if-you-are-too/
>>
>> On the other hand the drug addicts in Breaking Bad and elsewhere clearly
>> demonstrate that drug addiction inevitably takes away our free will and
>> replaces it by a strong compulsion to get and consume the drug, no matter
>> how devastating the consequences are.
>>
>>
>>
>> Robert McKee says in his book "Story: Substance, Structure, Style and the
>> Principles of Screenwriting" that true character is revealed in the choices
>> a human being makes under pressure. Could you say that a strong character
>> or personality reduce our free will too, because they restrict our choices
>> and decisions?
>>
>>
>>
>> -J.
>>
>>
>> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
>> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>> archives:  5/2017 thru present
>> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>>
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru present
> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Frank Wimberly]

GNU Debugger?

---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 4:11 PM Marcus Daniels  wrote:

> Walter White was drawn into that life as sure as water runs downhill.
>  Watching him go deeper and deeper was like repeating “step” in GDB.
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam  *On Behalf Of *Jochen Fromm
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 25, 2024 1:34 PM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
> friam@redfish.com>
> *Subject:* [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will
>
>
>
> Since one of you mentioned today that free will is a recurring FRIAM topic
> I was thinking about it and found this SCIAM article that argues that human
> beings do have the power to make conscious choices.
>
> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/free-will-is-only-an-illusion-if-you-are-too/
>
> On the other hand the drug addicts in Breaking Bad and elsewhere clearly
> demonstrate that drug addiction inevitably takes away our free will and
> replaces it by a strong compulsion to get and consume the drug, no matter
> how devastating the consequences are.
>
>
>
> Robert McKee says in his book "Story: Substance, Structure, Style and the
> Principles of Screenwriting" that true character is revealed in the choices
> a human being makes under pressure. Could you say that a strong character
> or personality reduce our free will too, because they restrict our choices
> and decisions?
>
>
>
> -J.
>
>
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru present
> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

[Marcus Daniels]

Walter White was drawn into that life as sure as water runs downhill.
Watching him go deeper and deeper was like repeating “step” in GDB.

From: Friam  On Behalf Of Jochen Fromm
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 1:34 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
Subject: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

Since one of you mentioned today that free will is a recurring FRIAM topic I 
was thinking about it and found this SCIAM article that argues that human 
beings do have the power to make conscious choices.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/free-will-is-only-an-illusion-if-you-are-too/

On the other hand the drug addicts in Breaking Bad and elsewhere clearly 
demonstrate that drug addiction inevitably takes away our free will and 
replaces it by a strong compulsion to get and consume the drug, no matter how 
devastating the consequences are.

Robert McKee says in his book "Story: Substance, Structure, Style and the 
Principles of Screenwriting" that true character is revealed in the choices a 
human being makes under pressure. Could you say that a strong character or 
personality reduce our free will too, because they restrict our choices and 
decisions?

-J.

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/