On 04/15/2013 02:54 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-04-15 2:02 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
Were this one of my systems (none of which is in a prod scenario, so
take it with a grain of salt), I'd emerge -e --keep-going @system, and
then emerge --resume a few times. You're stuck
On 04/14/2013 01:55 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Apr 14, 2013 1:42 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com
mailto:mike...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
What I meant was: given 4 physical AMD cores (but only 2 FPUs, courtesy
of AMD's Bulldozer/Piledriver arch) vs 4 virtual Intel cores (2 cores
split
On 04/14/2013 04:32 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Apr 14, 2013 1:27 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com
mailto:mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/14/2013 01:55 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Apr 14, 2013 1:42 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com
mailto:mike...@gmail.com
mailto:mike...@gmail.com
On 04/13/2013 01:45 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
[snip]
Three, AMD has no concept of Hyperthreading.
Correct.
Just match -j to the number of cores your CPU provides, and that's
it.
Well, YMMV. You can spend a lot of time adjusting -j on a per-system
basis to account for things like I/O. Right
On 04/13/2013 01:50 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 07:03:26AM +0200, Tamer Higazi wrote:
Hi people!
My old core2duo machine says slowly goodbye and I am at this lever after
7 years for buying myself a new developer machine, that should serve me
well for a long time
On 04/13/2013 05:49 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 02:44:20PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
I'm currently holding out on my Core2 though, because Haswell is on the
doorstep, and I first wanna see what the market has to offer. The CPU part
might not gain much in performance
On 04/09/2013 06:02 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-04-08 3:56 PM, Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
Since Gentoo now recommends GrUB rather by default, it might be nice
for folks to know how to use this.
? So the handbook used to recommend LILO? I installed my first gentoo
box
So I'm about to try setting up the x32 arch in a VM. I notice there's no
handbook for it, though there is for amd64 and x86. I'm considering x32
for its lighter memory footprint...
Does anyone know of any notable differences between the setup process
for amd64 and x32, or should I expect things
On 04/09/2013 09:46 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
So I'm about to try setting up the x32 arch in a VM. I notice there's no
handbook for it, though there is for amd64 and x86. I'm considering x32
for its lighter memory footprint...
Does anyone know of any notable differences between the setup
So, I'm trying to verify whether or not Pidgin can talk to Google Voice
on my laptop. When searching around for instructions, I get the
impression that this is supposed to just work, and I don't see much in
the way of people actually having difficulty with it.
In my case, if someone calls me, my
On 04/08/2013 11:04 AM, Bruce Hill wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 03:09:43PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:25:50AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-04-05 4:11 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 02:38:21PM -0500, Bruce Hill wrote:
Just
On 04/08/2013 11:39 AM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
On Apr 8, 2013 9:07 PM, Michael Hampicke gentoo-u...@hadt.biz
mailto:gentoo-u...@hadt.biz wrote:
Am 08.04.2013 17:20, schrieb Michael Mol:
So, I'm trying to verify whether or not Pidgin can talk to Google Voice
on my laptop. When searching
On 04/08/2013 12:04 PM, Bruce Hill wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 09:31:43PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:16:45 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
If /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules is an empty file or a
symlink to /dev/null,
The first can obviously be taken quite
On 04/08/2013 12:28 PM, Bruce Hill wrote:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:58:38PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 22:35:22 -0400
Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com wrote:
As for /sbin/ip. I have no such command.
I'd recommend installing and becoming familiar with the iproute2
package. I
On 04/07/2013 10:01 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
Manually bringing up eth0 using ifconfig got me up and running. It's
quite shaky though. net.eth0 does not work any more and of course
neither does sshd or any other service that requires net.eth*. Thanks
Michael.
If they're supposed to be
Are you using 802.1x or wireless on that machine? If not, I can't think
of a reason you'd need it, outside of it being a hard dependency of some
other package.
On 04/07/2013 10:22 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
Installing wpa_supplicant got the network scripts working again. Not
sure why. Does
On 04/06/2013 08:53 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
I took a closer look at /etc/udev/70-something-rules-net and
/sys/class/net/eth0/ and all the ATTR (i.e., address, type, dev_id)
line up fine. I did not find a name file in /sys/class/net/eth0 however,
name=eth0 in etc/udev/70-something-rules-net.
2: sit0
inte6 ff02::1
3: eth0
link 33:33:00:00:00:01
inet6 ff02:1
4: eth1
link 33:33:00:00:00:01
inet6 ff02:1
Too much inte6 for my liking... Did I somehow get rid of ipv4?
N.
On 4/6/13, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/06/2013 08:53 PM, Nick Khamis wrote
. I have no such command.
N.
On 4/6/13, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
/sbin/ip, not /etc/ip
Those inet6 addresses beginning with ff02 are link-local addresses.
Those are automatically configured on a link simply by the link being up.
Something is failing to configure your
/wpa_supplicant.sh: line 68: _is_wireless: command not found
/etc/init.d/net.eth0: line 548: _exists: command not found
Sorry I can't paste stuff directly. I am literally taking phone pics
and communicating through my laptop.
N.
On 4/6/13, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
It's probably
On 04/06/2013 11:19 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
Hello Michael,
Is it because you disabled udev's renaming entirely via the kernel
command-line parameter? Because you've done some magic in
/etc/udev/rules.d/?
I did not change 70-something contents. I deleted it and let udev regenerate
it.
On 04/06/2013 11:06 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2013-04-06, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
Ahhh... I think now I understand...
So. Here's my summarization of the situation:
* The ethX naming can change, i.e., the interfaces can get out of order
* So, to fix this, udev decided to
On 04/04/2013 10:59 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2013-04-03, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 03 Apr 2013 20:46:37 Bruce Hill wrote:
Therefore, all's well that's still working! And AFAIR, on at least 2 of
those machines, the 70-persistent-net.rules was never something I did
On 04/01/2013 09:12 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 13:57:42 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
I still don't understand what's so bad with MAC-based identification? I
mean, uniqueness defined through MAC Address identity, the system name
is just a label...
MAC addresses are not
On 04/01/2013 09:54 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:29:08 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
MAC addresses are not human-friendly. It would be OK if you could set
up aliases, so your firewall rules could use enaabbccddeeff while you
could still type eth0.
Frankly, I never found
On 04/01/2013 03:26 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 01:44:18PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
On 2013-03-31, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
On 2013-03-31, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
Since it's
On 03/31/2013 03:55 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:40:09 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
instead of pushing a completely
different (and possibly less reliable) naming scheme by default.
Whilst I wouldn't want them changing on me (though if your physically
changing the pci
On 03/31/2013 07:12 PM, walt wrote:
Any of you admin types out there have any grumpy thoughts about this
article? :) Is it really just marketing BS from cloudflare, or is it
solid stuff?
http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet
Can't tell one way or another.
On 03/31/2013 10:00 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
130331 walt wrote:
Any of you admin types out there have any grumpy thoughts about this ?
http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet
There was a good story in 'Guardian' :
On 03/29/2013 09:27 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 29/03/2013 10:53, Norman Rieß wrote:
That is just evil. Have you no alternative to this ISP?
--
Peter
Like free and open DNS servers? ;-) Like the one i am talking about and
was told it was unnessesary crap?
When you describe
On 03/29/2013 01:46 PM, Dale wrote:
»Q« wrote:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:54:37 +
Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 29 March 2013, at 03:36, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
...
I can only imagine he was pointing out that you have a single CPU
with four cores in it.
You're right,
On 03/29/2013 07:01 PM, William Kenworthy wrote:
On 30/03/13 06:34, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Thursday 28 March 2013 20:53:49 Paul Hartman wrote:
In my case, my ISP's DNS servers are slow (several seconds to reply),
On 03/28/2013 03:51 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Thu, March 28, 2013 07:59, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 28/03/2013 04:56, Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/27/2013 05:51 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 27/03/2013 22:41, Michael Mol wrote:
The case for systemd is twofold:
...
2) Reduce the amount of CPU
On 03/28/2013 12:28 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2013-03-27, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
The case for systemd is twofold:
1) Boot-to-desktop session management by one tool.
Ah, the old universal generic tool approach. I've seen a lot of
money and time poured into black-hole
On 03/28/2013 10:35 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 28/03/2013 15:16, Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/28/2013 03:51 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Thu, March 28, 2013 07:59, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 28/03/2013 04:56, Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/27/2013 05:51 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 27/03/2013 22:41
On 03/28/2013 04:51 AM, Norman Rieß wrote:
Hello,
i am using pdns recursor to provide a dns server which should be usable
for everybody.The problem is, that the server seems to be used in dns
amplification attacks.
I googled around on how to prevent this but did not really find
something
On 03/28/2013 12:06 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Mar 28, 2013 10:38 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com
mailto:mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/28/2013 04:51 AM, Norman Rieß wrote:
Hello,
i am using pdns recursor to provide a dns server which should be usable
for everybody.The problem
On 03/28/2013 03:16 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 28/03/2013 17:38, Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/28/2013 04:51 AM, Norman Rieß wrote:
Hello,
i am using pdns recursor to provide a dns server which should be usable
for everybody.The problem is, that the server seems to be used in dns
amplification
On 03/28/2013 04:53 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Or just use the ISP's DNS caches. In the vast majority of cases, the ISP
knows how to do it right and the user does not.
Generally true, though I've known people to
On 03/28/2013 04:57 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
listened to the dangers and even now simply redesigned DNSSEC.
Or they could fudge it by making every request requiring padding larger
than the response. Bandwidth would increase astronomically but amp
attacks would have to find other avenues.
On 03/27/2013 10:25 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok...
So, what is this all about?
Does all of this mean that udev is now going *completely* away,
*totally* replaced by systemd?
If so, has there been any kind of formal announcement about this
*anywhere*??
Hold your horses.
The devs will work
On 03/27/2013 10:33 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/27/2013 10:25 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok...
So, what is this all about?
Does all of this mean that udev is now going *completely* away,
*totally* replaced by systemd?
If so, has there been any kind of formal announcement about this
*anywhere
On 03/27/2013 01:08 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Jake Margason jmargason...@gmail.com wrote:
I ran away from Arch last year to get away from all this systemd stuff. I
hope that you guys will continue to support openrc for as long as possible.
Don't do top
On 03/27/2013 04:00 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2013-03-27, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
The real drive behind systemd is enterprise cloud type computing for
Red Hat. The rest is snake oil and much of the features already exist
without systemd. With more snake oil of promises
On 03/27/2013 05:51 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 27/03/2013 22:41, Michael Mol wrote:
The case for systemd is twofold:
...
2) Reduce the amount of CPU and RAM consumed when you're talking about
booting tens of thousands of instances simultaneously across your entire
infrastructure
On 03/26/2013 01:54 PM, Stroller wrote:
Searching portage, I find there are quite a number of alternative whois
clients.
I think I have always used net-misc/whois in the past I now notice that a BSD
whois is available, a generic and an advanced jwhois.
Presumably there are some
On 03/20/2013 04:47 AM, Michael Hampicke wrote:
Am 20.03.2013 03:58, schrieb Michael Mol:
Does anybody know of time lock flash drives?
The scenario I'm looking at is to have a drive that's only accessible
for a certain amount of time after being powered on. It would hold
crypto keys
On 03/20/2013 07:04 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I'm looking for software that can be used to control a child's usage of
the computer (not Internet filtering). At the very least it should be
able to control length of login sessions and when the child is able to
login. Ideally it would also be able
On 03/19/2013 05:09 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
If you're going to call me out for ignoring things, missing things or
simply not knowing things, please highlight what it is. the quote
isn't very enlightening in this context. You have a nasty habit of
referencing things without inlining them or
Does anybody know of time lock flash drives?
The scenario I'm looking at is to have a drive that's only accessible
for a certain amount of time after being powered on. It would hold
crypto keys in a server context.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 03/19/2013 11:18 PM, William Kenworthy wrote:
On 20/03/13 10:58, Michael Mol wrote:
Does anybody know of time lock flash drives?
The scenario I'm looking at is to have a drive that's only accessible
for a certain amount of time after being powered on. It would hold
crypto keys in a server
On 03/20/2013 12:23 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 03/19/2013 11:28 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
Not so much. The idea would be that you could power cycle the
device to get access to it again. The device would be read for the
keys at system bootup, but then would shut itself off after a few
On 03/18/2013 04:38 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Wait, K9 Mail doesn't have a plain text option?
Perhaps I shouldn't be surprised, as I am also unable to comprehend why K9
might enforce top-posting on replies.
K9 Mail can do both plain text and bottom posting.
Both set in Account
On 03/18/2013 04:21 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On 15 March 2013, at 17:32, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
If you use the Gentoo hardened Tinfoil Linux you will need lots of ram
and wait ages to boot but firefox will just pop up.
I'm sorry, I don't understand this statement. Could you possibly
On 03/18/2013 05:38 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
It's one of Blueness projects based on Hardened Gentoo. It loads
into ram at boot (you need something like 4 gig of ram) which
takes ages from dvd but could be from an ssd/hdd (defeating half
the point without a ro switch though). It can update
On 03/18/2013 08:15 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:38:11 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
K9 Mail can do both plain text and bottom posting.
Both set in Account settings/Sending mail.
It can write but forces html onto users, which potentially includes
On 03/18/2013 08:05 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:16:52 -0400 Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 03/18/2013 04:38 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
It can write but forces html onto users,
You seem to miss some of the details.
About that. See the attachment. It's
On 03/18/2013 08:10 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:28:04 -0400
Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
Even though it is from a DVD it can be updated just like standard
linux. The problem is, if you run out of ram then things get killed.
(Frankly, this sounds quite nice
On 03/16/2013 11:00 PM, Joseph wrote:
Any recommendation for HTML editor Graphical.
I've tried to use Open Office but it not user friendly.
I used Bluefish...around a decade ago. But it's in Portage.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 03/16/2013 11:39 PM, Joseph wrote:
On 03/16/13 23:10, Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/16/2013 11:00 PM, Joseph wrote:
Any recommendation for HTML editor Graphical.
I've tried to use Open Office but it not user friendly.
I used Bluefish...around a decade ago. But it's in Portage.
Not user
On 03/15/2013 04:34 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
On 03/16/2013 04:06 AM, Mick wrote:
On Friday 15 Mar 2013 17:36:48 Kevin Chadwick wrote:
From the headers of his email:
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo speed comparison to other distros
References: 51418728.7020...@gmail.com
In-Reply-To:
On 03/14/2013 11:17 AM, Bruce Hill wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 07:29:54PM +0800, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
html
head
meta content=text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
http-equiv=Content-Type
/head
body bgcolor=#FF text=#00
div class=moz-cite-prefixOn 03/14/2013 04:15
On 03/11/2013 06:45 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:22:39AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
You are being over-simplistic.
Lack of IPv4 address space *caused* NAT to happen, the two are
inextricably intertwined.
Agreed. But we shouldn't be pointing out that NAT has
On 03/11/2013 06:34 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On 03/09/2013 07:53 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
There is no reason to believe that IPv6 will result in an
increased use of IPsec.
Bull. The biggest barrier to IPsec use has been NAT! If an
intermediate router has to rewrite the packet to change
On 03/11/2013 07:09 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
No, there was simply no useful result that came up. Incidentally,
both links you provide *did* come up...but I dismissed them
because I couldn't imagine anyone using them as a reference except
in trying to deride Henning Brauer.
On 03/10/2013 12:19 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 10/03/2013 03:42, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:41:13PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote
The trouble with NAT is that it destroys peer-to-peer protocols.
The first was FTP in Active mode.
In its day, it was OK. Nowadays, we use
On 03/09/2013 07:53 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Lookup ipvshit
I'll give you a hint.
The guy who wrote most of the pf firewall that MAC OSX now uses as well
as QNX, the latest version originating from OpenBSD and being far better
than iptables has bought up lots of ipv4 just to stay away
On 03/09/2013 07:53 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
There is no reason to believe that IPv6 will result in an
increased use of IPsec.
Bull. The biggest barrier to IPsec use has been NAT! If an
intermediate router has to rewrite the packet to change the
apparent source and/or destination
On 03/10/2013 05:43 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 10/03/2013 23:07, Michael Mol wrote:
All those examples you give are much like a bunch of home machines
sitting behind a NAT gateway onto the internet. That's actually OK
and I reckon that is the intended use of NAT.
I want to point out
On 03/10/2013 09:56 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 03/10/2013 06:00 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
It's been ages since I looked at that link and longer addresses
would certainly be needed anyway but certainly with DNSSEC again
concocted by costly unthoughtful and unengaging groups who chose
On 03/11/2013 12:00 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 05:07:25PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote
NAT behind a home router is bad, too. For IPv4, it's only necessary
because there aren't enough IPv4 addresses to let everyone have a unique
one.
The best real reason for moving
On 03/08/2013 03:32 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 08/03/2013 02:29, Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/07/2013 05:24 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Anyone know if there's a way to get /etc/hosts to support the notion of
an include file? I did my homework and found nothing, maybe someone else
knows more.
I
On 03/08/2013 02:50 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
1. The craziness of trying to conserve IPv4 space
2. NAT. Finally, a good solid techical reason to make NAT just go away
and stay away. Permanently. Forever.
It's a great shame that isn't all it fixed (ipv5), then your job
wouldn't have been so
On 03/08/2013 07:45 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
What would have been best, could have been done years ago and
not cost lots of money and even more in security breaches and
what I meant by ipv5 and would still be better to switch to even
today with everyone being happy to switch to it is simply
On 03/08/2013 07:50 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Unfortunately, your logic is flawed.
Where would you put the additional bits of address?
That would involve rewriting the IP Header.
Your assumption that I do not know that is flawed. I did a review of
ipv6 before it was released and
On 03/07/2013 10:49 AM, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 06.03.2013 22:30, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
On 06/03/2013 23:22, Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/06/2013 04:07 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 06/03/2013 22:59, Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/06/2013 03:54 PM, Grant wrote:
I lowered my MaxClients setting
On 03/07/2013 03:45 PM, Grant wrote:
I lowered my MaxClients setting in apache a long time ago after
running out of memory a couple times. I recently optimized my
website's code and sped the site way up, and now I find myself
periodically up against MaxClients. Is a RAM upgrade the only
On 03/07/2013 04:34 PM, Grant wrote:
Michael's proxy suggestion is excellent too - I use nginx for this
a lot. It's amazingly easy to set up, a complete breath of fresh
air after the gigantic do-all beast that is apache. Performance
depends a lot on what your sites actually do, if every page
On 03/07/2013 04:44 PM, Grant wrote:
Thanks Michael, I think I will set up nginx to serve my images. That
should take a big load off apache. Is nginx still beneficial when
using the Worker MPM?
It...depends?
nginx in reverse caching proxy mode will simply serve up objects before
the
On Mar 7, 2013 5:28 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know if there's a way to get /etc/hosts to support the notion of
an include file? I did my homework and found nothing, maybe someone else
knows more.
I really do need this, I have an app that discovers things on the
On 03/07/2013 05:24 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Anyone know if there's a way to get /etc/hosts to support the notion of
an include file? I did my homework and found nothing, maybe someone else
knows more.
I really do need this, I have an app that discovers things on the
network and knows their
On 03/06/2013 03:54 PM, Grant wrote:
I lowered my MaxClients setting in apache a long time ago after
running out of memory a couple times. I recently optimized my
website's code and sped the site way up, and now I find myself
periodically up against MaxClients. Is a RAM upgrade the only
On 03/06/2013 04:07 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 06/03/2013 22:59, Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/06/2013 03:54 PM, Grant wrote:
I lowered my MaxClients setting in apache a long time ago after
running out of memory a couple times. I recently optimized my
website's code and sped the site way up
On 03/04/2013 10:23 PM, Francisco Ares wrote:
2013/3/4 Andrew Lowe 2505...@curtin.edu.au mailto:2505...@curtin.edu.au
On 5/03/2013 8:52 AM, Andrey Moshbear wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Silvio Siefke
siefke_lis...@web.de mailto:siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
On 02/27/2013 11:48 PM, Jarry wrote:
Hi Gentoo users,
what is the proper way of changing static IP-address remotely
without the need to restart the whole system (or locking
me out)?
I have one interface with static IP, so first I'm going to edit
/etc/conf.d/net. Then I will set up
On 02/28/2013 05:43 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 28.02.2013 16:37, schrieb Mike Gilbert:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/27/2013 11:48 PM, Jarry wrote:
Hi Gentoo users,
what is the proper way of changing static IP-address remotely
without
On 02/25/2013 01:56 AM, Mick wrote:
On Monday 25 Feb 2013 03:00:56 Michael Mol wrote:
[snip]
Of course you could start covering the inside of your walls with aluminium
foil
My house has plaster-and-lathe walls and aluminum siding.
Frankly, it works out to about the same thing. .
[snip
On 02/24/2013 09:49 PM, walt wrote:
I've been connecting my google nexus 7 tablet to my wireless router
using the standard ssid/password method until last week, when I found
that my router will allow wireless connections based on the tablet's
MAC address.
What I don't know is whether the
On 02/22/2013 10:51 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Hi all,
Weird, I don't use it much, but needed to run a traceroute today, and it
is failing with:
# traceroute 192.168.1.4
traceroute to 192.168.1.4 (192.168.1.4), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
send: Operation not permitted
I know the problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/18/2013 11:12 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Feb 19, 2013 9:10 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com
mailto:mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 18, 2013 8:35 PM, Tamer Higazi th9...@googlemail.com
mailto:th9...@googlemail.com wrote:
hi people! I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/2013 06:43 PM, ckard wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Silvio Siefke
siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
Hello,
i run the update from calibre yesterday and now calibre not
startet. Has someone the same and has fix?
On Feb 18, 2013 8:35 PM, Tamer Higazi th9...@googlemail.com wrote:
hi people!
I have used all the time firehol (gentoo sources 3.3.8) to make my
firewall rules. After kernel 3.4.x I can't make use of it any more.
Has anyone of you got firehol running on a genoo system with a 3.4.x
kernel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2013 12:05 AM, Grant wrote:
The responses all come back successfully within a few seconds.
Can you give me a really general description of the sort of
problem that could behave like this?
Your server is just a single computer, running
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2013 08:53 PM, Stroller wrote:
On 10 February 2013, at 05:05, Grant wrote:
... Your server is just a single computer, running multiple
processes. Each request from a user (be it you or someone else)
requires a certain amount of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/2013 06:07 PM, Stroller wrote:
On 11 February 2013, at 17:43, Michael Mol wrote:
...
If so, I don't understand why apache2 seems to bog down a bit
for about 10 minutes afterward.
Now that's a new (and important!) piece of information
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/2013 08:05 PM, Stroller wrote:
On 12 February 2013, at 00:04, Michael Mol wrote:
I am sorry if I have caused you offence on any other occasion -
if so, please feel free to explain why.
Primarily, what bothers me is your typically
On Feb 10, 2013 3:29 AM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 06:11, schrieb Grant:
I received the following ELOG message after an emerge:
* One or more symlinks to directories have been preserved in order to
* ensure that files installed via these symlinks remain
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/02/2013 13:49, Michael Mol wrote:
On Feb 10, 2013 3:29 AM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 06:11, schrieb Grant:
I received the following ELOG message after an emerge:
* One
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/09/2013 05:36 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
There are several things you can do to improve the state of
things. The first and foremost is to add caching in front of the
server, using an accelerator proxy. (i.e. squid running in
accelerator mode.)
On Feb 9, 2013 9:26 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, so long as Apache doesn't have any additional modules loaded. If
it's got something like mod_php loaded (extraordinarily common),
mod_perl or mod_python (less common, now) then the init time of
mod_php gets added to the
101 - 200 of 1358 matches
Mail list logo
