Re: [gentoo-user] konsole selected text
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel D Jones wrote: | When I select Konsole's Linux Colors schema, selected text appears to be | black text on a black background. Under options, I can alter colors but I | don't appear to be able to choose the background and foreground colors that | are used for highlighting. Any hints on how to fix this appreciated. | Hi, on my machine I use the Linux Colors schema for years and it works perfectly. If mark stuff it inverts the colors, i.e. grey text on black background gets black text on grey background. Just some (maybe unrelated) pointers: *) man dircolors (gentoo uses textcolors extensively) *) Try to move your kde config somewhere else and try again with a clean config. Maybe its something with KDE colors you changed before ? hope to help Thomas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHuU8orpEWPKIUt7MRAi0JAJ94L/NEHH+dQl8fr/Jb7b99GJ+/yQCgmzVA lL52wX4DB2jt8aRbGeVb86A= =qywq -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-embedded] ld error and multilib question
On Monday 18 February 2008, DK Smith wrote: Hello, do not cross-post to multiple lists at once. I'm compiling a kernel for arch Intel EM64T on an amd64 host. not an embedded question nor do you need crossdev. ask the amd64 peeps. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] [query] kernel-2.6.24 + ndiswrapper
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 23:31 +0530, dell core2duo wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 15:47 -0600, Dan Farrell wrote: On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:28:39 +0100 Etaoin Shrdlu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, I am more interested to get things working. Quality would be my second priority. As I said before, I did not have any problem (unfortunately, I cannot access the hardware now and check the bandwidth issue). I have not yet gotten the new driver to work, though admittedly I didn't have much time to try and so went for ndiswrapper pretty quickly. how did you get ndiswrapper to work? It worked for me for 2.6.23, but not for 2.6.24. I have a BCM4306 and I'm having some trouble getting the kernel driver to work, so I'd like to use ndiswrapper in the mean time. I guess there are some problems with ndiswrapper on kernel-2.4.26. I didn't get ndiswraper worked with kernel-2.4.26. Oh, I thought you meant ndis with 2.4.26. did you tried kernel b43 module ?? Read below links, these may help you. I use b44 for my eth0 (always have). The problem with ndiswrapper was that b44 was grabbing wlan0 before ndis could. I couldn't ping over the wlan so I assumed b44 didn't work, but I was just playing around with routes, and I have managed to get both eth0 and wlan0 working with b44 together (no ndis). If you understood that sentence, congratulations! so no more ndis it seems! thanks, -- Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au An engineer is someone who does list processing in FORTRAN. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] [query] kernel-2.6.24 + ndiswrapper
On Feb 18, 2008 5:59 PM, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 23:31 +0530, dell core2duo wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 15:47 -0600, Dan Farrell wrote: On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:28:39 +0100 Etaoin Shrdlu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, I am more interested to get things working. Quality would be my second priority. As I said before, I did not have any problem (unfortunately, I cannot access the hardware now and check the bandwidth issue). I have not yet gotten the new driver to work, though admittedly I didn't have much time to try and so went for ndiswrapper pretty quickly. how did you get ndiswrapper to work? It worked for me for 2.6.23, but not for 2.6.24. I have a BCM4306 and I'm having some trouble getting the kernel driver to work, so I'd like to use ndiswrapper in the mean time. I guess there are some problems with ndiswrapper on kernel-2.4.26. I didn't get ndiswraper worked with kernel-2.4.26. Oh, I thought you meant ndis with 2.4.26. I mean kernel 2.6.24 !! did you tried kernel b43 module ?? Read below links, these may help you. I use b44 for my eth0 (always have). The problem with ndiswrapper was that b44 was grabbing wlan0 before ndis could. I couldn't ping over the wlan so I assumed b44 didn't work, but I was just playing around with routes, and I have managed to get both eth0 and wlan0 working with b44 together (no ndis). If you understood that sentence, congratulations! I understand little bit not fully. I didn't get how you managed without b43 module ? would be great if you could explain that. thanks, flukebox so no more ndis it seems! thanks, -- Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au An engineer is someone who does list processing in FORTRAN. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] konsole selected text
On Monday 18 February 2008 04:26:01 Thomas Kahle wrote: Daniel D Jones wrote: | When I select Konsole's Linux Colors schema, selected text appears to be | black text on a black background. Under options, I can alter colors but I | don't appear to be able to choose the background and foreground colors that | are used for highlighting. Any hints on how to fix this appreciated. Hi, on my machine I use the Linux Colors schema for years and it works perfectly. If mark stuff it inverts the colors, i.e. grey text on black background gets black text on grey background. Yes, I've been using it for a long time as well without issues. I've never had this issue before. Just some (maybe unrelated) pointers: *) man dircolors (gentoo uses textcolors extensively) I'm familiar with dircolors. To the best of my knowledge, there's nothing in dircolors which configures how selected text is displayed. It's simply inverted text. That is, the background color and the foreground color are switched. A little more experimenting has shown that this is what happens on my terminal with any color other than the default light gray on black. For example, if I do a ls, the files show up in various colors based on dircolors. If I select colored files, they show up in inverse. But if I select non-colored light gray text, I get black on black. If I use 'less' to display a file, there's a status line at the bottom which shows the line number, etc. in inverted text. On my terminal, it's black on black and invisible. If I highlight it with the mouse, however, it shows up as light gray on black and is visible. If I switch to another tty (CTL-ALT-F2) and log in, dircolors settings work properly. Selected text with gpm shows up as inverse, and the status line at the bottom of the 'less' windows displays properly as well. So I don't think the issue is with dircolors. It's only with inverted normal text on konsole. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] [OT] SSH port forwards behind restrictive firewall
Hi All, I think that I have confused myself with this. I am behind a firewall/http proxy which seems to only allow outbound connections on ports 80 443 for web browsing. This is not enough for me, as I would like to use my mail client to send and receive mail from behind the firewall. I tried connecting to ssh servers which listen on different ports, besides tcp/22 and I was not successful. This is probably an indication that the internet gateway machine only accepts connections for packets that have a destination to ports 80 443. If the above is correct, am I right to assume that to be able to run a tunnel through this internet gateway I should run something like: ssh -L :localhost:443 [EMAIL PROTECTED] or are ssh packets somehow distinguishable by their headers, so that a cleverly crafted firewall will still identify them and drop them? -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] konsole selected text
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi again, But if I select non-colored | light gray text, I get black on black. If I use 'less' to display a file, | there's a status line at the bottom which shows the line number, etc. in | inverted text. On my terminal, it's black on black and invisible. If I | highlight it with the mouse, however, it shows up as light gray on black and | is visible. | It's only with inverted normal text on konsole. Just to be sure, by Konsole you mean the KDE Terminal Emulator. I guess the problem is not there in xterm ? Did you try to move .kde to another place and start with a clean config. Then you can distinguish a config problem from something else. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHub/OrpEWPKIUt7MRAmaYAJwIcB4/UpMY1W/oAUJsLuBArsNxHACffUly tU+1NSXcth7aUe/YNDiar0w= =JgZf -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] OpenVPN setup
On Sunday 17 February 2008, Grant wrote: What wasn't mentioned is that SSL covers transport encryption, not necessarily application security. What that means is if you open IMAP, SMTP, CUPS, and SSH daemons over the internet then you also need to keep (better) track of security vulnerabilities found in those applications, and fix them as needed. SSL alone won't help you there. Whereas if you're only running, say OpenVPN over the Internet then that's the only application you gotta look out for. Also, doing things such as running IMAP over SSL using accounts with weak passwords doesn't gain you much either. Good points Albert. Is a daily 'emerge --sync emerge -avDuN world' generally enough as far as tracking security vulnerabilities? It will sure help. So will strong passwds, denyhosts, or fail2ban and equivalents, a well configured IDS, etc. and close monitoring of the log files. Let's be honest, a machine that runs services has the potential to get cracked one way or another. A well configured machine has a disproportionately small probability of getting cracked, than your average WinXP IT illiterate user around the world. So, it's really a matter of how paranoid you would like to get about it. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] SSH port forwards behind restrictive firewall
On Monday 18 February 2008, Mick wrote: Hi All, I think that I have confused myself with this. I am behind a firewall/http proxy which seems to only allow outbound connections on ports 80 443 for web browsing. This is not enough for me, as I would like to use my mail client to send and receive mail from behind the firewall. I tried connecting to ssh servers which listen on different ports, besides tcp/22 and I was not successful. This is probably an indication that the internet gateway machine only accepts connections for packets that have a destination to ports 80 443. If the above is correct, am I right to assume that to be able to run a tunnel through this internet gateway I should run something like: ssh -L :localhost:443 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yup, that's pretty much it. Essentially you have set up a tunnel from port on the local machine (the exact port is irrelevant for firewall purposes, it's mostly random in normal connections anyway) to port 443 on remote_sshd.com. Hopefully you have control over that remote host and now you can do anything you feel like from there, bypassing probably hours of work by some firewall admin evil grin Which all goes to show the utter futility out firewalling outbound connections from anyone with clue 0. Unless of course ... or are ssh packets somehow distinguishable by their headers, so that a cleverly crafted firewall will still identify them and drop them? There are such products around, called names like Level 7 firewalls etc. They look inside packets and try to deduce what's being transported. HTML traffic is easy, just look for appropriate URLs. https is less so, to the best of my knowledge https traffic looks a whole lot like ssh, as they are basically wrapped in the same layer. The essential difference is the remote port number. Try the above and see what happens -- Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] SSH port forwards behind restrictive firewall
On Monday 18 February 2008, Mick wrote: Hi All, I think that I have confused myself with this. I am behind a firewall/http proxy which seems to only allow outbound connections on ports 80 443 for web browsing. This is not enough for me, as I would like to use my mail client to send and receive mail from behind the firewall. I tried connecting to ssh servers which listen on different ports, besides tcp/22 and I was not successful. This is probably an indication that the internet gateway machine only accepts connections for packets that have a destination to ports 80 443. If the above is correct, am I right to assume that to be able to run a tunnel through this internet gateway I should run something like: ssh -L :localhost:443 [EMAIL PROTECTED] This command still tries to contact the remote host on port 22, and is blocked by the firewall. IIUC to exit the local firewall you should have the remote sshd listening on port 443 or 80. ssh -p 443 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Of course, the remote /etc/ssh/sshd_config must have Port 443 (or 80). If this works and you are able to actually connect to the remote ssh, you can add local or remote port forwarding to this basic command. So, as an example for email, you can do something: ssh -p 443 -L :smtpserver:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and configure your mail client to send to localhost, port . Another alternative (depending upon how many ports you need to forward) could be to use SOCKS. or are ssh packets somehow distinguishable by their headers, so that a cleverly crafted firewall will still identify them and drop them? That depends. The block might be solely port-based, or the firewall might very well able to do deep packet inspection beyond the TCP port, and recognize HTTP packets (as well as FTP, IRC, etc.), even if they use a different port. However, I'm not sure how it would be able to look into encrypted packets, like eg SSH or HTTPS packets (other than maybe recognize that they are indeed SSH or HTTPS, it should not be able to understand what's actually passing inside the flow, since the payloads are encrypted). Such a firewall could however block SSH packets even if they are destined to port 80 or 443 (since they are not HTTP traffic), so the above commands would not work. However, even with this kind of firewall you might still be able to tunnel SSH inside HTTP, so that packets look like regular HTTP traffic and can traverse the firewall. A program for doing that is httptunnel (in portage). Hope this helps. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] evince and letter size paper
At Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:30:52 +0100 Henry Gebhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nonetheless, whenever evince starts up it defaults to A4 paper. Any help would be appreciated. What size are your PDFs? In particular the output from pdfinfo pdffile.pdf | grep 'Page size' might be interesting. Indeed it might one file was Page size: 595.276 x 841.89 pts (A4) So now I need to check my pdf generators. Thanks. allan -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] evince and letter size paper
At Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:08:11 + Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 16 February 2008, Allan Gottlieb wrote: emerging libpaper says elog run \paperconfig -p letter\ as root to use letter-pagesizes elog or paperconf with normal user privileges. I did the first and when I run paperconf it says letter as does cat /etc/papersize Nonetheless, whenever evince starts up it defaults to A4 paper. Any help would be appreciated. I am only quoting from the man pages here, papercof -d should run the default paper size which from what you're saying above is set to letter? Has evince got it's own application level configuration for paper size under printer settings, or something like that? I couldn't find one. It does have file - print setup and that says A4, which I always change to US letter, but it doesn't stick. thanks, allan -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] SSH port forwards behind restrictive firewall
Mick wrote: Hi All, I think that I have confused myself with this. I am behind a firewall/http proxy which seems to only allow outbound connections on ports 80 443 for web browsing. This is not enough for me, as I would like to use my mail client to send and receive mail from behind the firewall. I tried connecting to ssh servers which listen on different ports, besides tcp/22 and I was not successful. This is probably an indication that the internet gateway machine only accepts connections for packets that have a destination to ports 80 443. If the above is correct, am I right to assume that to be able to run a tunnel through this internet gateway I should run something like: ssh -L :localhost:443 [EMAIL PROTECTED] or are ssh packets somehow distinguishable by their headers, so that a cleverly crafted firewall will still identify them and drop them? I don't have a direct answer, but it depends on the configuration of the firewall. You can analyze for content and you can also allow all traffic. -- == Nick Stinemates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://nick.stinemates.org AIM: Nick Stinemates MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] == -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with qt? Almost ALL masked or keyworded now.
Am Montag, 18. Februar 2008 schrieb Dale: So even the qt3 that I have installed is masked. What's going on? I have and plan to keep KDE 3.5.8 around for a while so I assume it needs qt3 but yet KDE 4.0 needs qt4 if I understand correctly. What's the best thing to do here? I'd guess that somebody just made a small mistake. Let's see how things look tomorrow. Bye... Dirk signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with qt? Almost ALL masked or keyworded now.
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:35:40 -0600 Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I was planning to install KDE 4.0.1 and finally got it all fetched. Sort of ran into this tho. [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -evp world These are the packages that would be fetched, in order: Calculating world dependencies \ !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy x11-libs/qt have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_rc1 (masked by: package.mask) /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: # Caleb Tennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] (19 Dec 2007) # Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Mask qt-4.4 package while testing them in portage # Plus packages depending on them - x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - x11-libs/qt-4.3.2-r1 (masked by: ) - x11-libs/qt-4.3.2 (masked by: package.mask) - x11-libs/qt-4.3.1-r1 (masked by: package.mask) - x11-libs/qt-3.3.8-r4 (masked by: package.mask) - x11-libs/qt-3.3.4-r8 (masked by: package.mask) For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. (dependency required by kde-base/arts-3.5.8 [ebuild]) !!! Problem resolving dependencies for kde-base/kpf !!! Depgraph creation failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # This is what qt looks like as to what is available and what is masked: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # equery list -p x11-libs/qt [ Searching for package 'qt' in 'x11-libs' among: ] * installed packages [I--] [M ] x11-libs/qt-3.3.8-r4 (3) [I--] [ ] x11-libs/qt-4.3.2-r1 (4) * Portage tree (/usr/portage) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/kylixlibs3-borqt-3.0 (0) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/kylixlibs3-borqt-3.0-r1 (0) [-P-] [M ] x11-libs/qt-3.3.4-r8 (3) [-P-] [M ] x11-libs/qt-4.3.1-r1 (4) [-P-] [M ] x11-libs/qt-4.3.2 (4) [-P-] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-assistant-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-core-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-embedded-3.3.8 (3) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-gui-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-phonon-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-script-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-sql-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-svg-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-test-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-xmlpatterns-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qwt-qt3-5.0.2 (5) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qwt-qt3-5.0.2-r1 (5) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qwtplot3d-qt3-0.2.7 (0) [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # So even the qt3 that I have installed is masked. What's going on? I have and plan to keep KDE 3.5.8 around for a while so I assume it needs qt3 but yet KDE 4.0 needs qt4 if I understand correctly. What's the best thing to do here? Thanks Dale :-) :-) Hmm that's odd. You should have some versions of qt that aren't masked... 13:50 jeeves qt-3.3.4-r8[3]: mips qt-3.3.8-r4[3]: alpha amd64 hppa ia64 ~mips ppc ppc64 sparc x86 ~x86-fbsd qt-4.3.1-r1[4]: qt-4.3.2[4]: qt-4.3.2-r1[4]: alpha amd64 hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 sparc x86 qt-4.3.3[4]: ~alpha ~amd64 ~hppa ~ia64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86 ~x86-fbsd qt-4.4.0_rc1[4]: (M) ~x86 Have you synced recently? Are you postive you don't have any local package.masks affecting this? (Granted anything KDE 4.x is masked iirc) Also.. why are you completely rebuilding world to just install the new KDE? :/ -- Ken69267 Gentoo AMD64 AT signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with qt? Almost ALL masked or keyworded now.
Dale wrote: Hi, I was planning to install KDE 4.0.1 and finally got it all fetched. Sort of ran into this tho. [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -evp world These are the packages that would be fetched, in order: Calculating world dependencies \ !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy x11-libs/qt have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_rc1 (masked by: package.mask) /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: # Caleb Tennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] (19 Dec 2007) # Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Mask qt-4.4 package while testing them in portage # Plus packages depending on them - x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - x11-libs/qt-4.3.2-r1 (masked by: ) - x11-libs/qt-4.3.2 (masked by: package.mask) - x11-libs/qt-4.3.1-r1 (masked by: package.mask) - x11-libs/qt-3.3.8-r4 (masked by: package.mask) - x11-libs/qt-3.3.4-r8 (masked by: package.mask) For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. (dependency required by kde-base/arts-3.5.8 [ebuild]) !!! Problem resolving dependencies for kde-base/kpf !!! Depgraph creation failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # This is what qt looks like as to what is available and what is masked: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # equery list -p x11-libs/qt [ Searching for package 'qt' in 'x11-libs' among: ] * installed packages [I--] [M ] x11-libs/qt-3.3.8-r4 (3) [I--] [ ] x11-libs/qt-4.3.2-r1 (4) * Portage tree (/usr/portage) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/kylixlibs3-borqt-3.0 (0) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/kylixlibs3-borqt-3.0-r1 (0) [-P-] [M ] x11-libs/qt-3.3.4-r8 (3) [-P-] [M ] x11-libs/qt-4.3.1-r1 (4) [-P-] [M ] x11-libs/qt-4.3.2 (4) [-P-] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-assistant-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-core-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-embedded-3.3.8 (3) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-gui-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-phonon-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-script-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-sql-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-svg-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-test-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-xmlpatterns-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qwt-qt3-5.0.2 (5) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qwt-qt3-5.0.2-r1 (5) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qwtplot3d-qt3-0.2.7 (0) [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # So even the qt3 that I have installed is masked. What's going on? I have and plan to keep KDE 3.5.8 around for a while so I assume it needs qt3 but yet KDE 4.0 needs qt4 if I understand correctly. What's the best thing to do here? Thanks Dale :-) :-) Are you sure you didn't unmask your qt package using /etc/portage/package.keywords and install the wrong version? -- == Nick Stinemates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://nick.stinemates.org AIM: Nick Stinemates MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] == -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] SSL CUPS and SMTP on port 587
I uncommented the above line and added the following to main.cf: smtpd_tls_security_level = may as instructed here: http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#server_enable and restarted postfix, but I still can't send. In claws-mail, I tried specifying 587 and I'm specifying Use SSL for SSMTP. I'm guessing TLS isn't set up properly? You need more than that. My /etc/postfix/main.cf looks like this and you'll need to create the actual certs listed below as well. I recommend smtpd_tls_auth_only so that anyone trying to smtp auth is required to do it over an encrypted session. # TLS stuff smtpd_tls_security_level = may smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/postfix/newkey.pem smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/postfix/newcert.pem smtpd_tls_CAfile = /etc/postfix/cacert.pem #smtpd_tls_loglevel = 3 #smtpd_tls_received_header = yes smtpd_tls_session_cache_timeout = 3600s tls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandom Additionally check to see what port Postfix is listening on. It's on port 465 on my server and you'll need to set your mail client to SSL rather than TLS. Thank you kashani. Now I'm getting Relay access denied. I've been sending via squirrelmail running on the same server so I need to make an adjustment. What I'd like to do is allow relaying for any authenticated smtp client but I don't see any option for that in the main.cf comments. I tried adding grant to the postdrop group with no luck. Is allowing relay access based on authentication not something postfix does? It makes sense to me. How do you guys make the relay decision? - Grant Here's my main.cf (I'm using postgrey): mydestination = mydomain.com setgid_group = postdrop smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10030 reject_unauth_destination, permit virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual message_size_limit = 2048 smtpd_tls_security_level = may smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/ssl/postfix/server.key smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/ssl/postfix/server.crt smtpd_tls_CAfile = /etc/ssl/postfix/server.pem smtpd_tls_session_cache_timeout = 3600s tls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandom How does that look? - Grant -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with qt? Almost ALL masked or keyworded now.
On Monday 18 February 2008, Dale wrote: So even the qt3 that I have installed is masked. What's going on? I have and plan to keep KDE 3.5.8 around for a while so I assume it needs qt3 but yet KDE 4.0 needs qt4 if I understand correctly. What's the best thing to do here? Well, it's not all masked in the tree: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ eix -e qt [I] x11-libs/qt Available versions: (3) 3.3.4-r8 3.3.8-r4 (4) 4.3.1-r1 4.3.2 4.3.2-r1 (~)4.3.3 [M](~)4.4.0_rc1 You've been using autounmask lately? Maybe that screwed it up. Or maybe you did, especially aas you just confessed in public to being an idiot :-) Check the contents of /etc/portage/package.mask/* -- Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] SSH port forwards behind restrictive firewall
On Monday 18 February 2008, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: On Monday 18 February 2008, Mick wrote: Hi All, I think that I have confused myself with this. I am behind a firewall/http proxy which seems to only allow outbound connections on ports 80 443 for web browsing. This is not enough for me, as I would like to use my mail client to send and receive mail from behind the firewall. I tried connecting to ssh servers which listen on different ports, besides tcp/22 and I was not successful. This is probably an indication that the internet gateway machine only accepts connections for packets that have a destination to ports 80 443. If the above is correct, am I right to assume that to be able to run a tunnel through this internet gateway I should run something like: ssh -L :localhost:443 [EMAIL PROTECTED] This command still tries to contact the remote host on port 22, and is blocked by the firewall. Oops! Yes, the primary ssh connection will take place to port 22 on the server, unless this is specified separately as you show below. IIUC to exit the local firewall you should have the remote sshd listening on port 443 or 80. ssh -p 443 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Of course, the remote /etc/ssh/sshd_config must have Port 443 (or 80). If this works and you are able to actually connect to the remote ssh, you can add local or remote port forwarding to this basic command. So, as an example for email, you can do something: ssh -p 443 -L :smtpserver:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and configure your mail client to send to localhost, port . Another alternative (depending upon how many ports you need to forward) could be to use SOCKS. With option -D on the server. Hmm, need to explain that the ssh server is NOT the mail server (and last time I looked gmail did not accept ssh connections to their mail servers!), but a router I run at home. The idea is that I will set up corresponding forwarding rules on the router. Is that sound? PS. Unless I missed it Kmail does not have settings for SOCKS. Thank you for your help. :) -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with qt? Almost ALL masked or keyworded now.
Kenneth Prugh wrote: On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:35:40 -0600 Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I was planning to install KDE 4.0.1 and finally got it all fetched. Sort of ran into this tho. [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -evp world These are the packages that would be fetched, in order: Calculating world dependencies \ !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy x11-libs/qt have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_rc1 (masked by: package.mask) /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: # Caleb Tennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] (19 Dec 2007) # Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Mask qt-4.4 package while testing them in portage # Plus packages depending on them - x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - x11-libs/qt-4.3.2-r1 (masked by: ) - x11-libs/qt-4.3.2 (masked by: package.mask) - x11-libs/qt-4.3.1-r1 (masked by: package.mask) - x11-libs/qt-3.3.8-r4 (masked by: package.mask) - x11-libs/qt-3.3.4-r8 (masked by: package.mask) For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. (dependency required by kde-base/arts-3.5.8 [ebuild]) !!! Problem resolving dependencies for kde-base/kpf !!! Depgraph creation failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # This is what qt looks like as to what is available and what is masked: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # equery list -p x11-libs/qt [ Searching for package 'qt' in 'x11-libs' among: ] * installed packages [I--] [M ] x11-libs/qt-3.3.8-r4 (3) [I--] [ ] x11-libs/qt-4.3.2-r1 (4) * Portage tree (/usr/portage) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/kylixlibs3-borqt-3.0 (0) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/kylixlibs3-borqt-3.0-r1 (0) [-P-] [M ] x11-libs/qt-3.3.4-r8 (3) [-P-] [M ] x11-libs/qt-4.3.1-r1 (4) [-P-] [M ] x11-libs/qt-4.3.2 (4) [-P-] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-assistant-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-core-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-embedded-3.3.8 (3) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-gui-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-phonon-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-script-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-sql-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-svg-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-test-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-xmlpatterns-4.4.0_rc1 (4) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qwt-qt3-5.0.2 (5) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qwt-qt3-5.0.2-r1 (5) [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qwtplot3d-qt3-0.2.7 (0) [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # So even the qt3 that I have installed is masked. What's going on? I have and plan to keep KDE 3.5.8 around for a while so I assume it needs qt3 but yet KDE 4.0 needs qt4 if I understand correctly. What's the best thing to do here? Thanks Dale :-) :-) Hmm that's odd. You should have some versions of qt that aren't masked... 13:50 jeeves qt-3.3.4-r8[3]: mips qt-3.3.8-r4[3]: alpha amd64 hppa ia64 ~mips ppc ppc64 sparc x86 ~x86-fbsd qt-4.3.1-r1[4]: qt-4.3.2[4]: qt-4.3.2-r1[4]: alpha amd64 hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 sparc x86 qt-4.3.3[4]: ~alpha ~amd64 ~hppa ~ia64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86 ~x86-fbsd qt-4.4.0_rc1[4]: (M) ~x86 Have you synced recently? Are you postive you don't have any local package.masks affecting this? (Granted anything KDE 4.x is masked iirc) Also.. why are you completely rebuilding world to just install the new KDE? :/ I synced a few days ago. Dial-up sucks here. Maybe I do have some masked locally. I think I did that when I was installing 4.0.0 now that you mention it. Yup, I had it masked. Dale is a idiot. Dale is a idiot. You get the idea. :/ Still get a error tho. Calculating world dependencies - !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ~x11-libs/qt-core-4.4.0_rc1 have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - x11-libs/qt-core-4.4.0_rc1 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword) /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: # Caleb Tennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] (19 Dec 2007) # Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Mask qt-4.4 package while testing them in portage # Plus packages depending on them For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. (dependency required by x11-libs/qt-xmlpatterns-4.4.0_rc1 [ebuild]) !!! Problem resolving dependencies for kde-base/kpf !!! Depgraph creation failed. I'll use autounmask and let it deal with it. :-) I guess it was force of habit to type in world. I dunno. Let's see what I can mess up now. Dale :-) :-) -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with qt? Almost ALL masked or keyworded now.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In any case, to stay out of trouble you should compile KDE4 against QT 4.3.3 Just delete everything with qt-4.4.0 from the package.unmask file after running autounmask. this saves you a lot of trouble. Dale wrote: | Hi, | | I was planning to install KDE 4.0.1 and finally got it all fetched. | Sort of ran into this tho. | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -evp world | | These are the packages that would be fetched, in order: | | Calculating world dependencies \ | !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy x11-libs/qt have been masked. | !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your | request: | - x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_rc1 (masked by: package.mask) | /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: | # Caleb Tennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] (19 Dec 2007) | # Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | # Mask qt-4.4 package while testing them in portage | # Plus packages depending on them | | - x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) | - x11-libs/qt-4.3.2-r1 (masked by: ) | - x11-libs/qt-4.3.2 (masked by: package.mask) | - x11-libs/qt-4.3.1-r1 (masked by: package.mask) | - x11-libs/qt-3.3.8-r4 (masked by: package.mask) | - x11-libs/qt-3.3.4-r8 (masked by: package.mask) | | For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man | page or | refer to the Gentoo Handbook. | (dependency required by kde-base/arts-3.5.8 [ebuild]) | | | | !!! Problem resolving dependencies for kde-base/kpf | !!! Depgraph creation failed. | [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # | | This is what qt looks like as to what is available and what is masked: | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # equery list -p x11-libs/qt | [ Searching for package 'qt' in 'x11-libs' among: ] | * installed packages | [I--] [M ] x11-libs/qt-3.3.8-r4 (3) | [I--] [ ] x11-libs/qt-4.3.2-r1 (4) | * Portage tree (/usr/portage) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/kylixlibs3-borqt-3.0 (0) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/kylixlibs3-borqt-3.0-r1 (0) | [-P-] [M ] x11-libs/qt-3.3.4-r8 (3) | [-P-] [M ] x11-libs/qt-4.3.1-r1 (4) | [-P-] [M ] x11-libs/qt-4.3.2 (4) | [-P-] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 (4) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_rc1 (4) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-assistant-4.4.0_rc1 (4) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-core-4.4.0_rc1 (4) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.4.0_rc1 (4) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-embedded-3.3.8 (3) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-gui-4.4.0_rc1 (4) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.4.0_rc1 (4) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-phonon-4.4.0_rc1 (4) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.4.0_rc1 (4) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-script-4.4.0_rc1 (4) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-sql-4.4.0_rc1 (4) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-svg-4.4.0_rc1 (4) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-test-4.4.0_rc1 (4) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.4.0_rc1 (4) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-xmlpatterns-4.4.0_rc1 (4) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qwt-qt3-5.0.2 (5) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qwt-qt3-5.0.2-r1 (5) | [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qwtplot3d-qt3-0.2.7 (0) | [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # | | So even the qt3 that I have installed is masked. What's going on? I | have and plan to keep KDE 3.5.8 around for a while so I assume it needs | qt3 but yet KDE 4.0 needs qt4 if I understand correctly. What's the | best thing to do here? | | Thanks | | Dale | | :-) :-) | -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHueWOrpEWPKIUt7MRApnxAKCRRkR+XffAUk0FXHXZF2PrYRMGngCdFLMb oApjrgND3kuc7iN3f1j+eQo= =n1oT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] SSL CUPS and SMTP on port 587
Grant wrote: Here's my main.cf (I'm using postgrey): mydestination = mydomain.com setgid_group = postdrop smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10030 reject_unauth_destination, permit virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual message_size_limit = 2048 smtpd_tls_security_level = may smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/ssl/postfix/server.key smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/ssl/postfix/server.crt smtpd_tls_CAfile = /etc/ssl/postfix/server.pem smtpd_tls_session_cache_timeout = 3600s tls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandom How does that look? Where is your mynetwork statement. You need to have at least 127.0.0.1 in it or locally generated emails won't be able to relay. kashani -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] SSL CUPS and SMTP on port 587
Here's my main.cf (I'm using postgrey): mydestination = mydomain.com setgid_group = postdrop smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10030 reject_unauth_destination, permit virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual message_size_limit = 2048 smtpd_tls_security_level = may smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/ssl/postfix/server.key smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/ssl/postfix/server.crt smtpd_tls_CAfile = /etc/ssl/postfix/server.pem smtpd_tls_session_cache_timeout = 3600s tls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandom How does that look? Where is your mynetwork statement. You need to have at least 127.0.0.1 in it or locally generated emails won't be able to relay. I actually don't have a mynetworks statement in main.cf at all and I send from squirrelmail all over the place. I won't be able to specify a single IP for my laptop. Can I allow authenticated users to send? - Grant -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] SSL CUPS and SMTP on port 587
Grant wrote: I actually don't have a mynetworks statement in main.cf at all and I send from squirrelmail all over the place. I won't be able to specify a single IP for my laptop. Can I allow authenticated users to send? You connect to squirrelmail from many different IPs via HTTP, but squirrelmain only calls SMTP from the localhost IP, 127.0.0.1. So add the default mynetworks back in if you want Squirrelmail to be able to send at all. And quit trying out poorly thought out security tricks in Postfix if you don't know what you're doing. Once that is fixed you can start looking at why you can't authenticate. I'm going to guess that you haven't bothered to setup smtp authentication via sasl yet. kashani -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with qt? Almost ALL masked or keyworded now.
Alan McKinnon wrote: On Monday 18 February 2008, Dale wrote: So even the qt3 that I have installed is masked. What's going on? I have and plan to keep KDE 3.5.8 around for a while so I assume it needs qt3 but yet KDE 4.0 needs qt4 if I understand correctly. What's the best thing to do here? Well, it's not all masked in the tree: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ eix -e qt [I] x11-libs/qt Available versions: (3) 3.3.4-r8 3.3.8-r4 (4) 4.3.1-r1 4.3.2 4.3.2-r1 (~)4.3.3 [M](~)4.4.0_rc1 You've been using autounmask lately? Maybe that screwed it up. Or maybe you did, especially aas you just confessed in public to being an idiot :-) Check the contents of /etc/portage/package.mask/* Actually, I hadn't used autounmask, yet. I was trying not to use it actually. When I ran autounmask, it fixed it. I got a couple blocks to deal with but after autounmask did it's thing, it seems a lot happier now. I had tried the keyword and unmask file off the Gentoo howto but I guess it needs a little update or something. Oh, I keep back-ups of my /etc directory and even a couple old copies of keyword/unmask/mask files, just in case I do something silly. Yea, I sometimes do things that makes me feel like a idiot. Don't we all tho?? Dale :-) :-) -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] SSL CUPS and SMTP on port 587
I actually don't have a mynetworks statement in main.cf at all and I send from squirrelmail all over the place. I won't be able to specify a single IP for my laptop. Can I allow authenticated users to send? You connect to squirrelmail from many different IPs via HTTP, but squirrelmain only calls SMTP from the localhost IP, 127.0.0.1. So add the default mynetworks back in if you want Squirrelmail to be able to send at all. And quit trying out poorly thought out security tricks in Postfix if you don't know what you're doing. I haven't removed the mynetworks statement. It was never there. Could it be somewhere other than main.cf and master.cf? Maybe 127.0.0.1 is the default. I can send from squirrelmail just fine as always. Admittedly all over the place was a bad choice of words. Once that is fixed you can start looking at why you can't authenticate. I'm going to guess that you haven't bothered to setup smtp authentication via sasl yet. I didn't realize I wasn't authenticating. I'm working on sasl now. - Grant kashani -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] SSH port forwards behind restrictive firewall
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 07:26:28PM +, Penguin Lover Mick squawked: ssh -p 443 -L :smtpserver:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and configure your mail client to send to localhost, port . Another alternative (depending upon how many ports you need to forward) could be to use SOCKS. With option -D on the server. Hmm, need to explain that the ssh server is NOT the mail server (and last time I looked gmail did not accept ssh connections to their mail servers!), but a router I run at home. The idea is that I will set up corresponding forwarding rules on the router. Is that sound? Does your mail server at home have a real ip address? You can do ssh -l username -p 443 -N ssh.server.address -L localport:mail.server.address:remoteport And you don't need to worry about setting up forwarding rules on the router. It might even work with private ip addresses for the mail server (I've never tried that... but it could be true that the ssh server will try to look up the ip address of mail server relative to where it is sitting, in that case it should be possible to address something behind an NAT). W -- Pintsize: Hehe, yeah, that does sound like a pretty empty, pointless existence. Marten: You are not helping, you know. Pintsize: Wait, I'm supposed to be HELPING? Sortir en Pantoufles: up 437 days, 20:52 -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] SSH port forwards behind restrictive firewall
On Monday 18 February 2008, Willie Wong wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 07:26:28PM +, Penguin Lover Mick squawked: ssh -p 443 -L :smtpserver:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and configure your mail client to send to localhost, port . Another alternative (depending upon how many ports you need to forward) could be to use SOCKS. With option -D on the server. Hmm, need to explain that the ssh server is NOT the mail server (and last time I looked gmail did not accept ssh connections to their mail servers!), but a router I run at home. The idea is that I will set up corresponding forwarding rules on the router. Is that sound? Does your mail server at home have a real ip address? You can do ssh -l username -p 443 -N ssh.server.address -L localport:mail.server.address:remoteport And you don't need to worry about setting up forwarding rules on the router. The mail server is on the Internet, not accessible by ssh. I intended to use the router to bounce the ssh connection and forward it to the mail server. laptop -- |firewall| -- router -- mailserver sshsshssl Essentially, thinking of using the router as a proxy server. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-user] ld error clues sought
Hello, Can anyone share their knowledge about ld errors, such as this one? LD arch/x86_64/boot/compressed/vmlinux ld: i386:x86-64 architecture of input file `arch/x86_64/boot/compressed/head.o' is incompatible with i386 output Perhaps there is something about the current configuration of my AMD box that produces errors when compiling a linux kernel for a different arch? To indicate the arch of the host I running: make.conf has march=k8, cpu is AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+. The linux kernel currently running is 2.6.18-*. Any pointers to links that may explain when one needs to use the gentoo cross compiler tools? Liewise, any ideas when multilib is required? I tried modifying the USE flags for gcc but it did not appear to change whol gcc would be built. My goal is to compile a linux kernel 2.6.16-* for a Xeon based network appliance. The config of that kernel specifies Intel EM64T arch. I'm attempting to determine why this fails to build on an AMD Gentoo box but yet the kernel will build without an error on a RHEL host with a Intel processor. I'd like to determine what is different with the respective toolchains. Any suggestions? Cheers, DK -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with qt? Almost ALL masked or keyworded now.
On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Dale wrote: Actually, I hadn't used autounmask, yet. I was trying not to use it actually. When I ran autounmask, it fixed it. I got a couple blocks to deal with but after autounmask did it's thing, it seems a lot happier now. I had tried the keyword and unmask file off the Gentoo howto but I guess it needs a little update or something. So it's sorted now then? Oh, I keep back-ups of my /etc directory and even a couple old copies of keyword/unmask/mask files, just in case I do something silly. Good man :-) Yea, I sometimes do things that makes me feel like a idiot. Don't we all tho?? Yes, sadly, we all do that. Much too often in fact. There's even a name for it: school fees -- Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] [query] kernel-2.6.24 + ndiswrapper
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 18:37 +0530, dell core2duo wrote: On Feb 18, 2008 5:59 PM, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 23:31 +0530, dell core2duo wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 15:47 -0600, Dan Farrell wrote: On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:28:39 +0100 Etaoin Shrdlu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, I am more interested to get things working. Quality would be my second priority. As I said before, I did not have any problem (unfortunately, I cannot access the hardware now and check the bandwidth issue). I have not yet gotten the new driver to work, though admittedly I didn't have much time to try and so went for ndiswrapper pretty quickly. how did you get ndiswrapper to work? It worked for me for 2.6.23, but not for 2.6.24. I have a BCM4306 and I'm having some trouble getting the kernel driver to work, so I'd like to use ndiswrapper in the mean time. I guess there are some problems with ndiswrapper on kernel-2.4.26. I didn't get ndiswraper worked with kernel-2.4.26. Oh, I thought you meant ndis with 2.4.26. I mean kernel 2.6.24 !! Whoops, that's what I meant I thought you meant :S did you tried kernel b43 module ?? Read below links, these may help you. I use b44 for my eth0 (always have). The problem with ndiswrapper was that b44 was grabbing wlan0 before ndis could. I couldn't ping over the wlan so I assumed b44 didn't work, but I was just playing around with routes, and I have managed to get both eth0 and wlan0 working with b44 together (no ndis). If you understood that sentence, congratulations! I understand little bit not fully. I didn't get how you managed without b43 module ? would be great if you could explain that. OK, I made a mistake there too. b44 I use for eth0, *b43* was grabbing wlan0 before ndiswrapper could. I tried playing with b43 and the cutter tool, but it didn't work as I mentioned before. I had to use the old bcm43xx module. There were some kernel options to change, and a different cutter tool. I followed the instructions here: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HARDWARE_BCM43xx cya, -- Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au Perl is designed to give you several ways to do anything, so consider picking the most readable one. -- Larry Wall in the perl man page -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] SSL CUPS and SMTP on port 587
I actually don't have a mynetworks statement in main.cf at all and I send from squirrelmail all over the place. I won't be able to specify a single IP for my laptop. Can I allow authenticated users to send? You connect to squirrelmail from many different IPs via HTTP, but squirrelmain only calls SMTP from the localhost IP, 127.0.0.1. So add the default mynetworks back in if you want Squirrelmail to be able to send at all. And quit trying out poorly thought out security tricks in Postfix if you don't know what you're doing. I haven't removed the mynetworks statement. It was never there. Could it be somewhere other than main.cf and master.cf? Maybe 127.0.0.1 is the default. I can send from squirrelmail just fine as always. Admittedly all over the place was a bad choice of words. Once that is fixed you can start looking at why you can't authenticate. I'm going to guess that you haven't bothered to setup smtp authentication via sasl yet. I didn't realize I wasn't authenticating. I'm working on sasl now. Got it! Thanks a lot for everyone's help. I'm running courier-imapd-ssl, postfix, and saslauthd. With the following config everything should be encrypted between my laptop and the server: /etc/postfix/main.cf: [snip] smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes smtpd_sasl2_auth_enable = yes smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous smtpd_sasl_local_domain = smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated, permit_mynetworks, check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10030 reject_unauth_destination, permit virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual message_size_limit = 2048 smtpd_tls_security_level = may smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/ssl/postfix/server.key smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/ssl/postfix/server.crt smtpd_tls_CAfile = /etc/ssl/postfix/server.pem smtpd_tls_session_cache_timeout = 3600s tls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandom /etc/postfix/master.cf: smtp inet n - n - - smtpd smtps inet n - n - - smtpd -o smtpd_tls_wrappermode=yes /etc/sasl2/smtpd.conf: mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN pwcheck_method:saslauthd - Grant -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Where to report bugs for KDE 4?
Hi, seems there are no bug reports yet for KDE 4 in Gentoo's bugzilla, which makes me wonder wether it is ok to do so or wether they should be reported elsewhere. Bye... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wanheimerstraße 68 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40468 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
