On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:29:19 -0400, David Corbin wrote:
> What's the best way to find out what all the "split ebuilds" are?
emerge -pv kde-meta. Or just look through /usr/portage/kde-base.
--
Neil Bothwick
Sleep is an excellent way of listening to an opera. - James S
Hi,
I might be wrong but I can't remember this has happened earlier.
When emerging the new kde-base/kde-meta-4.11.2 (about 250 packages
here) portage runs
update-mime-database /usr/share/mime many many times.
Is this a new nuisance?
Thanks for a comment,
Helmut
Hi there,
How many memory is reasonable for virtuoso to use?
I just had a view via htop, and I was surprised to see virtuoso-t processes
occupying more than 1.5 GB (!), althoug there is a maximum of 128MB defined.
Memory leak?
Versions involved:
dev-db/virtuoso-server-6.1.6
kde-base/kde-meta
Hi there,
How many memory is reasonable for virtuoso to use?
I just had a view via htop, and I was surprised to see virtuoso-t processes
occupying more than 1.5 GB (!), althoug there is a maximum of 128MB defined.
Memory leak?
Versions involved:
dev-db/virtuoso-server-6.1.6
kde-base/kde-meta
0
[ebuild N] kde-base/akregator-3.5.0
[ebuild N] kde-base/konqueror-akregator-3.5.0
[ebuild N ] kde-base/kicker-applets-3.5.0
[ebuild N] kde-base/konq-plugins-3.5.0
[ebuild N] kde-base/kaddressbook-3.5.0
[ebuild N] kde-base/kaddressbook-plugins-3.5.0
[ebuild N ] k
in
> any KDE libs save one, which has kde-meta in the world file. Not even
> my mythtv box, which need QT has any kde libs installed.
>
And all of these machines are using the kde profile?
actice this before I destroy my system.
I love your optimism :)
> > If you emerge kde-meta, you'll have everything that the monolithic kde
> > ebuild gave you, just in manageable bite-sized chunks.
> Hmph. You call 300 separate ebuilds manageable? I suppose it is if
> y
uired a different set of bloat.
> >
> > Maybe it's time to make a backup, then remove all USE flags from
> > make.conf and package.use, set your profile to
> > default/linux//10.0/desktop/kde and rebuild. Alan and Neil's
> > idea of a set of the meta-pack
de. But that's just me, I guess.
> -meta packages are designed to be manually added to world by users who
> wish an easy way to emerge everything.
Fine, but did you actually have a look at the gst-plugins-meta
package? It does *NOT* add everything. It is *NOT* at all like
the kde-meta
4.3.5 USE="-semantic-desktop*"
[ebuild R ] kde-base/dolphin-4.3.5 USE="-semantic-desktop*"
[ebuild R ] kde-base/kdebase-runtime-meta-4.3.5 USE="-semantic-desktop*"
[ebuild R ] kde-base/kmail-4.3.5 USE="-semantic-desktop*"
[ebuild R ] kde-base/kde
about is USE flags only for features that
require other sub-systems outside KDE to be installed as well. Like ppp
for example, or printers and scanners for another. Obviously a policy
run by a human is what it will take otherwise it gets out of hand very
very quickly.
'emerge *-meta' i
lculating dependencies ... done!
> [nomerge ] app-admin/sudo-1.7.4_p5
> [nomerge ] virtual/mta-0
> [ebuild N ] mail-mta/ssmtp-2.62-r8 USE="ipv6 ssl -maxsysuid (-md5sum)"
> [ebuild N ] virtual/mta-0
> [nomerge ] kde-base/kde-meta-4.4.5
> [n
ifc on my machine)
>>
>> - Mark
>
> Yes of course. Sorry for the imprecise statement. But the point is my
> profile turns on R by default so just by emerging kde-meta I end up with
> the GCC fortran compiler and packages that require a fortran compiler.
>
> And if the f
a subset of the following complete expression:
python? ( python_targets_python2_7 ) qt5? ( !qt4 ) kde? ( qt4 )
(dependency required by "kde-apps/kdenlive-15.12.0-r1::gentoo" [ebuild])
(dependency required by "kde-apps/kdemultimedia-meta-15.08.3::gentoo"
[ebuild])
(dependency required by
ching: fortran)
no matching entries found
However, kde-base/kde-meta-4.6.4 pulls in kde-base/kdeedu-meta-4.6.4
which pulls in kde-base/kantor which pulls in dev-lang/R (since my
profile
has the R use flag enabled) which pulls in virtual
of them pull
> in
should have been "(desktop and server)"
> > any KDE libs save one, which has kde-meta in the world file. Not
> even
> > my mythtv box, which need QT has any kde libs installed.
> >
>
> And all of these machines are using the kde profile?
are built with kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.10-r2 but some
> are in use with were built with kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.9-r4, e.g.
> app-office/kformula When I try to re-emerge app-office/kformula separately
> it fails
> with some linker errors.
>
> So, how can I cut my Gordian knot? (except re-eme
Hi All,
Apologies if this has been asked before. I uninstalled my monolithic
KDE and am ready to install the split KDE ebuilds. I want to install
everything except toys, games and educational packages. Since the
DO_NOT_COMPILE is not meant to be used anymore, how would you suggest
I go about
Installed versions: 3.3.8-r4(3)
> 4.3.4(4)
>
> This says in the "Available" section that there are two SLOTs for qt - 3
> and 4 - and there are several versions available in both branches. On
> my box, I have qt-3.3.8-r4 installed in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vladimir Rusinov wrote:
>
>
> On 3/14/08, *Chuck Robey* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I am trying to inst
>
> Hi,
>
> First question, was it installed directly, or as a dependency for
> something else?
I'm pretty sure, it was a dependency.
> (/var/lib/portage/world) If it is a dependency, is the package that
> depends on it, shown in the world file?
I think it was a
p), but a few years ago the system started requiring bluez and I
>> couldn't get out of it. I do not ever plan to use wireless on this
>> box...
>
> Do you have the bluetooth USE flag set?
>
> Have you emerged kde-meta?
>
>
I have emerged kde-meta, but until this
enview-4.3.5 USE="-semantic-desktop*"
[ebuild R ] kde-base/akonadi-4.3.5 USE="-semantic-desktop*"
[ebuild R ] net-wireless/kbluetooth-0.4.2 USE="-semantic-desktop*"
[ebuild R ] kde-base/plasma-workspace-4.3.5 USE="-semantic-desktop*"
[ebuild R ] kde-base/dolph
On Monday, August 08, 2016 10:45:09 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 08/08/2016 19:20, Michael Mol wrote:
> > On Monday, August 08, 2016 06:52:15 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> On 08/08/2016 17:02, Michael Mol wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > [nomerge ] kde-apps/kde-apps-
On Thursday 24 January 2008 21:33:12 Dale wrote:
> I emerged autounamsk and used the command "autounmask
> kde-base/kde-meta-4.0.0" without the quotes of course. There may be a
> block or two. I had one that involved qt. I also had to mask qt 4.4
> since it does not have d
mple way (maybe a
> script) to do this? As far as I'm concerned, I'd really like to unmerge
> everything installed from the overlay.
Unmerge the packages you specifically merged (kde-meta:4.1 perhaps;
whichever packages are in your world file) then run depclean. That's
how I do it.
Paul
On Thursday 23 June 2011 21:35:21 Neil Bothwick did opine thusly:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:45:36 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > If you consider spending a couple of days farting around
> > > with
> > > fortran to be "much easier"... :P
> >
> &g
Jamie Dobbs wrote:
>At the moment if I do an emerge -uDpv world I can see it wanting to
>downgrade a huge amount of packages whihc I obviously do not want to do.
>
>
Add any packages that you want the ~x86 keyword accepted for to
/etc/portage/package.keywords. Something like
kde-b
Am Sonntag, 5. Oktober 2008 07:19:37 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> It getting more confused:
>
> This morning I did a
> [...]
> emerge -pv kde
Now I am confused. Thought you wanted to install kde-meta???
> still reports:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebui
On 2/14/06, b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2)Does kde 3.5 pulls in a lot of ~x86 dependecies?
You can determine this yourself:
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 emerge -pv kde-base/kdebase-meta
> 3)What are current known bugs/instabilities/issues/what of KDE 3.5
> packages I should be aw
ot; show?
>
> Here is the info requested:
Okay, I know the problem. The command you ran should actually return
nothing since you don't have any packages named kde installed. (It's a
bug that kde-env and kde-meta get returned)
Anyhow, the command you probably want to use is 'equ
[blocks b ] kde-base/kde-meta:4.3[-kdeprefix]
("kde-base/kde-meta:4.3[-kdeprefix]" is blocking kde-base/kde-meta-)
[blocks B ] app-arch/lzma-utils ("app-arch/lzma-utils" is blocking
app-arch/xz-utils-)
[blocks B ] app-arch/xz-utils ("app-arch/xz-uti
he sets in kde-testing just examples, which
are equivalent to what to get with the meta ebuilds? And, they're not in
portage, so they are not needed at all to install kde. So no, not copying them
will not cause any breakage, using them may do so.
Bye...
Dirk
signature.asc
Des
n?
>>>
>>> However, I don't see any kde4 packages. Maybe they're still moving them
>>> over?
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I really shouldn't try troubleshooting when tired...
>>
>> I had t
I thank the four of you for the insight I learn more in 5 mins then I did in an
afternoon,I have two last question tho
> As a example, if you want a
> full KDE install, you just emerge the kde meta package and it gets
> recorded in the world file. The emerge command will take care of
Am Sonntag, 5. Oktober 2008 10:10:33 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> solfire:/root>emerge kde-meta
> Calculating dependencies -!!! Digest verification failed:
> !!! /usr/portage/kde-base/kdebase-startkde/kdebase-startkde-4.1.2-r1.ebuild
> !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded
er:
Calculating dependencies . . done!
[ebuild NS ] kde-base/kdebase-meta-4.1.2 [3.5.9] 0 kB
[ebuild NS ] kde-base/kdegraphics-meta-4.1.2 [3.5.9] 0 kB
[ebuild NS ] kde-base/kdemultimedia-meta-4.1.2 [3.5.9] 0 kB
[ebuild NS ] kde-base/kdeutils-meta-4.1.2 [3.5.9] USE="
ca -cs -cy -da -de -dz
-el -en -en_US -en_ZA -eo -es -et -fa -fi -fr -ga -gl -gu_IN -he -hi_IN -hr -hu
-it -ja -km -ko -ku -lt -lv -mk -ml_IN -mr_IN -nb -ne -nl -nn -nr -ns -or_IN
-pa_IN -pl -pt -pt_BR -ru -rw -sh -sk -sl -sr -ss -st -sv -sw_TZ -ta_IN -te_IN
-tg -th -ti_ER -tn -tr -ts -uk -ur_IN -v
dom with kde4 to discern
> best practices. My default goal is to use
> sets to have something smilarly to the meta
> stuff, but not using meta now, so customizing
> my onw sets, or following other Gentooers
> that want massive (all) kde applications
> on many workstations, as to hav
On Monday 03 November 2008 17:31:59 Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
> Whenever i try to emerge KDE-META-4.1.2-r1, everything goes fine until the
> process suddenly dies with the following epitaph:
>
> ACCESS DENIED chmod: /usr/share/config
> chmod: changing permissions of `/u
a-3.5.0)
> [ebuild N] kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.0 +arts -debug
> -kdeenablefinal -kdexdeltas -xinerama 2,888 kB
You cannot mix split and monolithic ebuild for the same part of KDE.
Superkaramba is in kdeutils, so you cannot also merge it separately.
Either remove suprerkaramba or emer
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 18:28:39 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> You seem to have been more confused than enlightened by the tricks I
> posted. If you want to nuke kde completely you should just do:
>
> # cd /var/db/pkg && emerge -Cva kde-base/*
You should also "rm -fr
3.5.9 (3.5)
> > [I--] [ ~] kde-base/kwin-3.5.9 (3.5)
> > [I--] [ ~] kde-base/kwin-4.0.1 (kde-4)
> > [I--] [ ~] kde-base/plasma-4.0.1 (kde-4)
> > [I--] [ ~] kde-base/krunner-4.0.1-r1 (kde-4)
> > [I--] [ ~] kde-base/libtaskmanager-4.0.1 (kde-4)
>
> Hm ... It will only r
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Joseph wrote
> I have a problem getting rid of KDE (those meta package might be
> easy to install/upgrade but getting rid of them is not easy).
> When I run emerge -uDNav world I get:
>
> =x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.7.2 kde
>
> =x11
On Sunday 20 January 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> On 20 January 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My portage-fu is apparently up the creek. Again.
> >
> > Trying to emerge kde-4.0.0, I get this:
> >
> > ======
> > nazgul ~ #
n removed
for kde-3.5.10.
So kde apps are trying to upgrade themselves to 3.5.10, which conflicts with
the monolithic 3.5.9 packages.
Options:
1. Mask all of 3.5.10 and every package
2. Remove monolithic packages and install -meta packages
3. Dump kde-3
--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
On Sunday 05 October 2008 10:10:33 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> solfire:/root>emerge kde-meta
> Calculating dependencies -!!! Digest verification failed:
> !!! /usr/portage/kde-base/kdebase-startkde/kdebase-startkde-4.1.2-r1.ebuild
> !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
El Tue, 10 May 2005 17:03:26 +
Juan Ignacio Sánchez Lara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dijo:
This has been discussed before. Look it up in the archives, there's a
thread with instructions on how to do this started on april 11.
Basically you need to add the kde packages themselves (not kde-me
up a new konsole
session.
Once I manually set these they seem to stay set under the old monolithic
KDE builds. Now under KDE Meta I seem to be missing something.?
Who knows after the last few weeks.
James
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 3 Mar, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Mittwoch 03 März 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to upgrade all my installed package from, say, kde-base/* .
>> emerge -u kde-base/kde-meta doesn't work unfortunately.
>>
>> Is there
tisdagen den 31 maj 2011 22:00:28 skrev Dale:
> Does anyone remember the discussion I had about kde packages being in
> the system set when doing a emerge -e system? If I for example unmerge
> kde-meta then run --depclean, I bet I would get the error about system
> packages being
Currently running KDE 3.3. I get the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# emerge --pretend kde-meta
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[blocks B ] =kde-base/kdebase-3.4* (is blocking
kde-base/kscreensaver-3.4.1)
[blocks B ] =kde-base
ned on me is only printing 3 blocking packages at a time - very
> slow progress
>
> Its just dawned on me that this is kde-meta - is there a way to just
> remove all kde at once?
>
> BillK
>
>
Hi
Something like this should help
# equery list kde-base/ | grep 3\.5 | xargs
me ages to unmerge packages as I have emereg world, which its just
> > dawned on me is only printing 3 blocking packages at a time - very
> > slow progress
> >
> > Its just dawned on me that this is kde-meta - is there a way to just
> > remove all kde at once?
> &g
Jorge Almeida schreef:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>
>> Jorge Almeida schreef:
>>
>>> I'm trying to emerge kde-meta. It fails with imlib:
>>>
>>> checking for gif_lib.h... no configure: error: *** GIF header not
>
that USE flag enabled in
> make.conf :-D
Well, I don't have fortran use enabled
mail-proxy ~ # euse -i fortran
global use flags (searching: fortran)
[- ] fortran - Adds support for fortran (formerly f77)
local use flags (searching: fortran)
****
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:38:22 +0100 (CET), Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> since kde-4.2 seems be to unblocked now, I'd like to try it.
> But there are 408 (!) blocked packages.
>
> emerge --unmerge kde-meta
> didn't do anything.
>
> So, what's a feasible way to u
m was quite happy in Linux with just that, except it was on a mac and there is no flash plugin for da mac...
If you want to see all the kde stuff you have installed, do "equery l kde-base/" (you have to have gentoolkit installed). What I do on the first kde install is emerge the kde-meta, t
t;
>
> You are trying to merge the kde monolithic builds when you already
> have the modular builds installed. They are incompatible.
>
> Perhaps you wanted "emerge -p kde-meta"?
>
> -Richard
>
--
Han Solo:
Traveling through hyperspace ain't like dusting
crops, boy.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
t list packages. You add them to
the system with emerge @. Here is one of mine:
$ cat /etc/portage/sets/alan-kde
kde-apps/kdeadmin-meta
kde-apps/kdeartwork-meta
kde-apps/kdebase-meta
kde-apps/kdebase-runtime-meta
kde-apps/kdegraphics-meta
kde-apps/kdemultimedia-meta
kde-apps/kdenetwork-meta
kde-apps/k
4.2
> #...@kdewebdev-4.2
>
> so as you can see - a set can be create out of other sets.
>
>
>
Ahhh, so a specific version can be placed in there just like in the
world file. Neato !!!
Lets say I have a set named dk-kde, with the prefix Allen suggested, and
I put kde-meta in tha
; Settings -> Advanced is:
>> Adapt the desktop theme
>> Automatic start
>> Device actions
>> Filebindings
>> Fetch from CDDB
>> Hardware
>> KDE-wallet
>> KDE-resources
>> Session manager
>> Desktop search
>> Service manager
>> --
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:12:41 -0600, Dale wrote:
> I have a rig that I need to free up some space on the hard drive. I
> want to remove KDE completely. Naturally doing a emerge unmerge kde
> does not get the job done. What is a easy way to do this?
If you installed the kde meta-pack
ove all USE flags from
> make.conf and package.use, set your profile to
> default/linux//10.0/desktop/kde and rebuild. Alan and Neil's
> idea of a set of the meta-packages you want sounds good to me too.
>
> Then you'll really have a clean system.
You will have whatever sy
Hi,
is there a command which shows all dependencies of a package?
Unfortunately, qdepends doesn't do the job, e.g.
qdepends kde-base/kde-meta shows no dependencies at all while there are
more than 200 of them.
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.
On 12/21/11 02:11, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Joseph wrote
I have a problem getting rid of KDE (those meta package might be
easy to install/upgrade but getting rid of them is not easy).
When I run emerge -uDNav world I get:
=x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.7.2 kde
!
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-libs/grantlee-0.1".
(dependency required by "kde-base/kjots-4.5.95" [ebuild])
(dependency required by "kde-base/kdepim-meta-4.5.95" [ebuild])
(dependency required by "kde-base/kde-meta-4.6.2[semantic-desktop]
they are being pulled in as dependencies ... ?
>>
>> Further to what Alan said, I don't even have print-manager installed here.
>> I checked what would be pulled in if I did install it and found 10
>> dependencies, including the two Alan mentioned. Did you install
Will do
thanks for the explanation
2008/11/3 Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Monday 03 November 2008 17:31:59 Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
> > Whenever i try to emerge KDE-META-4.1.2-r1, everything goes fine until
> the
> > process suddenly dies with the following
Hello,
I am trying to emerge kde-meta but getting the following error message
Calculating dependencies... done!
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/emerge", line 43, in
retval = emerge_main()
File "/usr/lib64/portage/pym/_emerge/main.py", line 1907, i
On Thursday 27 January 2011 23:08:55 James wrote:
> kmix will not run. The icon just bounces and then terminates.
>
> Previously, installed kde4 using kde-meta. Rebuilding kde-meta
> does not go into all of the individual packages.
>
> I've never had trouble with kmix
onsolekit?
>
When I want a real barebones desktop (say for a VM test) without all the
cruft of
GNOMNE or KDE, I generally use LXDE
emerge ldxe-meta lxdm
(two packages, the meta package does not include the desktop manager)
then config /etc/conf.d/xdm to start "lxdm"
Gets most of the
> -Richard
>
Further oin this, If I emerge alsa-lib like emerge -u world wants to do , kde
will not start. It locks up at teh splash screen, about when the sound server
would be started. This appears to be a kde problem somewhere. What needs to
be re-emerged I can't guess, It seems you
My laptop normally runs gnome but T want to demo some other desktops
tomorrow and kde is giving me problems - kde-meta 4.4.5 is installed. I
think last time I did this it was kde-3.5 but that almost two years ago
now and the same method isnt working for 4.4.5. I have a different user
setup for
. I use
> this command:
>
> autounmask kde-base/kde-meta-4.5.1
Easier way would be to install the KDE overlay and use the etc files
provided in the Documentation directory for unmasking and so on. If
you want to stick to KDE ebuilds from portage proper, you could copy
the etc files from the
On 4/10/06, Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I tried using --tree --verbose earlier. Strangely enough, it looks
> like KPDF is requiring this. I alread have Konqueror installed:
Ok. I am getting lost in the maze of the kde-functions and kde-meta
eclasses, but I t
On Thursday 01 March 2007, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] problem emerging kde-meta':
> On Thursday 01 March 2007 22:54:43 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > Your problem is that you are trying to mix them. That is difficult or
&g
"x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.2" [ebuild])
(dependency required by "kde-base/kteatime-4.2.4" [installed])
(dependency required by "kde-base/kdetoys-meta-4.2.4" [installed])
(dependency required by "kde-base/kde-meta-4.2.4" [installed])
OK, let's try:
addin
lains the reason for dropping Lcms:0 .
>
> Unfortunately, Kde-Sunset appears to require Lcms:0 for Libmng:0 ,
> which is required by Qt-Meta:3 & which aren't included in Kde-Sunset
> itself. For now, I can simply ignore the warning, but it looks
> as if it wb no longer possible to inst
localhost ~ # emerge --pretend kde-meta
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[blocks B ] =kde-base/kdebase-3.4* (is blocking kde-base/kdialog-3.4.1)
[blocks B ] =kde-base/kdebase-3.4* (is blocking
kde-base/kdebase-kioslaves-3.4.3)
[blocks
; Unfortunately, Kde-Sunset appears to require Lcms:0 for Libmng:0 ,
>> which is required by Qt-Meta:3 & which aren't included in Kde-Sunset
>> itself. For now, I can simply ignore the warning, but it looks
>> as if it wb no longer possible to install Kde-Sunset on a new m
allow one instance of
>>>> Dolphin to run at a time.
>>> When you press Meta+E ("meta" being the key with the Windows logo on
>>> most keyboard), you can start a new Dolphin instance. Dolphin doesn't
>>> have to be already open for this to work.
something better than unmerge all of KDE:3.5
> and let revdep-rebuild find out.
>
> Furthermore, how to unmerge all of KDE:3.5, e.g.
> emerge --unmerge kde-base/kde-meta:3.5
> does not work.
Some of your questions are answered here, right on the top (I hope I
link to the
d to the kde profile, at which time
> it seems to about 80% of kde-meta became part of @system.
That's a completely separate topic, the kde profile, unsurprisingly, sets
the kde USE flag. Then something in system becomes dependent on KDE
packages.
One could even argue that on a KDE system,
Hey ho,
I've installed KDE 3.4.0 using the split ebuilds. Originally I did not
install kdebase-meta but just kdebase-startkde, then the extras like
kicker and kate and stuff (no Konqueror; I use Krusader and Firefox).
This did not last, as I had to install the rest of kdebase-meta when I
w
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:08:23 +0200, b.n. wrote:
> Could you share your relevant package.mask and package.keywords, for
> the laziest of us? :)
emerge autounmask
autounmask kde-meta
:-)
--
Neil Bothwick
The trouble with the world is that everybody in it is three drinks
ugh they
>> go to different slots.
>> Even portage-2.2_rc62 is unable to cope with that.
>
>
> Remove ALL version-specific information for kde entries from world.
There are no specific version of kde in world
> Don't mix and match -meta packages and sets.
What do you
On 12/21/11 02:11, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Joseph wrote
I have a problem getting rid of KDE (those meta package might be
easy to install/upgrade but getting rid of them is not easy).
When I run emerge -uDNav world I get:
=x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.7.2 kde
I have a problem getting rid of KDE (those meta package might be easy to
install/upgrade but getting rid of them is not easy).
When I run emerge -uDNav world I get:
The following USE changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by kde-base/libkonq-4.7.3, required by kde-base/kdepasswd-4.7.3
n KDE 4. But monos are still around. There is a list of the monos in
> the url I posted in another mail to this thread.
Would it be possible to modify the kde-meta eclass so that a split vs
monolithic block gave a more informative error message. Even a generic
message pointing to that URI would
On Dienstag, 12. August 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I installed same days ago the kde-meta 4.1 (one question: when does it come
> in official portage tree?). I have almost no problem, only kmail doesn't
> work properly.
> I have an ISP that requires login authentica
$ kcmshell4 icons
This module is provided by kde-base/kcontrol, which is pulled in by
kde-base/kdebase-runtime-meta. Do you have both of those installed?
You need the second one for KDE apps to function properly.
Cheers,
Bryan
On Sunday 11 October 2009 09:45:08 Dale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently did some upgrading which lead to some other packages having
> to be rebuilt. I have one that can't build and hasn't been able to for
> ages so I assume it isn't going to be fixed. It is hearts wh
On 8/14/06, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2. Which should be performed first kde monolithic-->meta
or Xorg to Xorg-modular?
I don't think it actually matters.
3. Is there any method to streamline/automate these tasks
so that the machines compile the new software overnig
On Monday, 12 June 2006 3:17, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> Once again... portage is mad at me, I guess... unless I'm not alone
> kdepim is required by KDE:
> treat ~ # equery --nocolor depends kdepim-3.5.2-r2
> [ Searching for packages depending on kdepim-3.5.2-r2... ]
&g
or-3.5.0
[ebuild N] kde-base/kicker-applets-3.5.0
[ebuild N] kde-base/konq-plugins-3.5.0
[ebuild N] kde-base/kaddressbook-3.5.0
[ebuild N] kde-base/kaddressbook-plugins-3.5.0
[ebuild N] kde-base/kdeaddons-meta-3.5.0
[ebuild N] kde-base/kgeography-3.5.0
[ebu
. Unmerge
the set, emerge kde-meta then do a depclean to catch any stragglers.
--
Neil Bothwick
Confucius say :
He who play in root, eventually kill tree!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
s called Patience (the filename is 'kpat'.) I use
>it frequently.
>
>
>
>
>
Yea, I have that one. I think I did kde-meta for my install and I think
it got ALL the KDE stuff. O_O
Dale
:-)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday 17 January 2008 17:06:28 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Roll on KDE4 when this monolithic nonsense will go away and there will
> only be -meta ebuilds.
Actually it was decided to keep monolithics in KDE 4.0.0. Splits are now the
default which means they are listed first in any-of depe
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Thursday 24 January 2008 21:33:12 Dale wrote:
>
>> I emerged autounamsk and used the command "autounmask
>> kde-base/kde-meta-4.0.0" without the quotes of course. There may be a
>> block or two. I had one that involved qt. I a
501 - 600 of 1469 matches
Mail list logo
