On 2013-07-31 11:20 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
If you don't use the systemd USE flag (and never install anything that
depends on systemd), you will not get systemd installed, but many
packages will install systemd unit files in /urs/lib/systemd/system.
This unit files
Hey list
after the many discussions here about systemd I had a flash of
objectivity (“Who cares if people rant about Lennart, the concept seems
sound and I don’t care about separate /usr”). So I wanted to try systemd
on my netbook.
I cloned the / partition from sda2 to sda7 and chrooted
Am 03.09.2013 13:46, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
Hey list
after the many discussions here about systemd I had a flash of
objectivity (“Who cares if people rant about Lennart, the concept
seems sound and I don’t care about separate /usr”). So I wanted to
try systemd on my netbook.
I
everything and part of this foiled plot
revealed itself two days ago. It was said earlier in the list by
systemd supporters, that this project is modular, fine split to
binaries and thus critical issues in the pid 1 are not that likely.
And just look at systemd-209 release notes:
http
Hello,
mean this i must install now systemd? What can do when i not want systemd.
The system what i have is good, i want not change to systemd.
[ebuild U ~] sys-devel/gettext-0.19 [0.18.3.2] USE=acl cxx ncurses nls
openmp -cvs -doc -emacs -git -java -static-libs 16,221 kB
[ebuild R
On 18/09/2014 02:12, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
Mark David Dumlao wrote:
The code is out there. Freely available. Both systemd and sysvinit.
If you wanted to measure both, you could, literally, in the time it
took since you first posted in this thread till now you could have
measured several
On Thursday, October 30, 2014 06:31:25 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:56 AM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Sunday, October 26, 2014 02:16:24 PM Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
And with systemd, rebooting to a new kernel takes just a few seconds ;)
And here I
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
And, no, I won't install any package which is merged into systemd. As
you mentioned udev, what do you need udev for if you don't use systemd?
Just install eudev. Works perfectly without any systemd dependency.
Like I
On 31/08/2015 13:49, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>> A clue is in the ebuilds for systemd:
>> >
>> > sysv-utils? (
>> > !sys-apps/systemd-sysv-utils
>> > !sys-apps/sysvinit )
>> >
>> > That's a ha
68
> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=02
> >>
> >> It seems to me like this is a portage issue with the resolver.
> >> Running emerge -1 python-systemd sounds like it fixes the issue.
> >> Apparently once it is installed portage will figur
James tampabay.rr.com> writes:
Boy this just keeps getting stranger and stranger.
So I::
emerge -C sys-fs/udev
emerge eudev
no problems,
then in /etc/portage/package.mask I masked off::
sys-apps/systemd
sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration
On a normal, routine update, I have abou
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 16:40:47 + (UTC), James wrote:
> emerge -uDtvp @world reveals the same trouble::
>
> [ebuild R] sys-apps/dbus-1.8.16::gentoo USE="X systemd* -debug
> -doc (-selinux) -static-libs {-test}" ABI_X86="32 (64) (-x32)" 0 KiB
> [ebui
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Peter Humphrey <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sunday 28 Aug 2016 10:55:56 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 10:43:17 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> > I'd still like to know where the directory /usr/lib64/systemd/boot/e
On 08/30/2017 01:39 PM, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote:
> I do not want to start a whole systemd storm, glad i was offline for
> that. however, in my case i'd really like to avoid systemd. can i
> setup with out systemd, or do i need to remove and patch later.
> obvi
Am Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:55:22 +0200
schrieb Raffaele Belardi <raffaele.bela...@st.com>:
> 2. emerge -C gnome networkmanager
You don't need to uninstall networkmanager except you want to uninstall
it for some other reasons. It doesn't need gnome or systemd.
> 5. emerge -N lxde-meta
-mapper -hardened" 0 KiB
> [blocks B ] sys-apps/systemd[-cgroup-hybrid(+)]
> ("sys-apps/systemd[-cgroup-hybrid(+)]" is blocking
> app-emulation/docker-19.03.12)
>
> Total: 1 package (1 new), Size of downloads: 0 KiB
> Conflict: 1 block (1 unsatisfied)
>
&g
:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N ] app-emulation/docker-19.03.12::gentoo USE="container-init
overlay seccomp -apparmor -aufs -btrfs -device-mapper -hardened" 0 KiB
[blocks B ] sys-apps/systemd[-cgroup-hybrid(+)]
("sys-apps/systemd[-cgroup-hybrid(+)]" is bl
, but slows down the boot
> > > process. It is
> > > /lib/systemd/system/systemd-networkd-wait-online.service. Because
> > > many jobs wait in queue for a while, till this fails.
> >
> > Are you using systemd-networkd or something else to manage your
> >
On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 9:03 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 17 April 2022 12:13:06 -00 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> --->8
> > It looks like this is cause my using mixed keywords, amd64 for udev and
> > ~amd64 for systemd-boot/utils. Does keywording udev-250 reso
or not:
Feb 14 06:36:31 ccs.covici.com systemd[1]: Starting local.service...
Feb 14 06:36:31 ccs.covici.com systemd[1]: Starting
systemd-update-utmp-runlevel.service...
Feb 14 06:36:31 ccs.covici.com bash[5753]: rm: cannot remove
'/etc/ppp/provider_is_up': No such file or directory
Feb 14 06:36:31
split-usr flag
enabled on my profile (5):
[5] default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop (stable)
[6] default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop/gnome (stable)
[7] default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop/gnome/systemd (stable)
[8] default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop/gnome/systemd/merged-usr (stable)
[9]
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 04.03.2013 20:42, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Next systemd-issue (yes, I know ... openrc is there as well ...):
I get warnings like superblock date is in the future --- REPAIRED for
filesystems at boot-time
static-libs
Removing this didn't help either.
No special use-flags for systemd in package.use.
profile:
default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome
portage tree pulled in again right now ... still:
# emerge -1 udev systemd
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/systemd-198-r5
Am 25.03.2013 22:56, schrieb Mike Gilbert:
Try just emerge -v1 systemd. You no longer need sys-fs/udev, and it
should be removed when you upgrade to sys-apps/systemd-r5.
Oh, interesting. I understand. Is there any information somewhere on
this (no ranting! just asking for ... as other users
On 03/27/2013 10:25 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok...
So, what is this all about?
Does all of this mean that udev is now going *completely* away,
*totally* replaced by systemd?
If so, has there been any kind of formal announcement about this
*anywhere*??
Hold your horses.
The devs will work
On 03/27/2013 10:33 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/27/2013 10:25 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok...
So, what is this all about?
Does all of this mean that udev is now going *completely* away,
*totally* replaced by systemd?
If so, has there been any kind of formal announcement about this
*anywhere
On 07/31/2013 11:20 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
For the record, I now think it's a waste of time trying to stop the
installation of tiny files that basically do nothing, either in
/usr/lib/systemd/system or in /etc/init.d, but you have the option if
you so desire.
The nice thing about
Hi. I am having a problem booting using systemd and an initrd generated
by genkernel.
I get the message that says (may be slight paraphrase) that
/dev/mapper/linux--files-64--root does not appear to be a valid /, try
again.
Now in the gentoo guide to systemd, I did what I think it wanted me
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:38 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am having a problem booting using systemd and an initrd generated
by genkernel.
I get the message that says (may be slight paraphrase) that
/dev/mapper/linux--files-64--root does not appear to be a valid /, try
again
: systemd in make.conf file: USE=...
to enable it globally?
Supposedly, you should enable local flags per package in
/etc/portage/package.use, but many does put it on make.conf.
Either way, if you are using systemd, you *should* set the systemd USE
flag on everything, otherwise the package
they *truly* require systemd.
I don't understand what you mean by the extent of these programs.
Sorry, worded that badly... I meant, basically, how many programs now
require systemd...
The packages requiring loingd.
I can't for the life of me think of any reason that server daemons
like postfix
to use whatever one wants, but I ask
to respect mine as well. That's why I propose a separate systemd
profile for those willing to use it.
Then write. Just be aware that to write a systemd profile, you need to
use systemd.
Or to create a non-systemd profile :)
That's the best response I've
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Sebastian Beßler
sebast...@darkmetatron.de wrote:
On 21.02.2014 08:42, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
So all talks about systemd being modular are nothing more than
nonsense. Guess what will happen on segfault in libsystemd.so?
Segfaults in pid 1 are so nice to bear
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:37:22 -0800, walt wrote:
% ls -l /etc/systemd/system/systemd-networkd.service.wants/
systemd-resolved.service
- /usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-resolved.service
wpa_supplicant@wlan0.service
- /usr/lib64/systemd/system/wpa_supplicant@.service
Yes, thank you
Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Got it, finally :-)
> >
> > fail2ban wants sys-apps/systemd[python(-)], and systemd-219_p112 is the
> > highest version with an expli
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 21:00:02 +1100, Adam Carter wrote:
> Still blocked - anything else i should try?
>
> tnx.
>
>
> # emerge -a1 =sys-apps/systemd-226-r2 dev-libs/libgudev virtual/libgudev
Why are you including libgudev in the merge list? If it's a dependency
of systemd, let
emerge -1avt systemd
These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R] sys-apps/systemd-218-r5:0/2::gentoo USE="acl gudev
introspection kmod lz4 pam policykit python seccomp ssl (-apparmor) -audit
-cryptsetup -curl -doc -elf
On Dec 17, 2015 9:37 PM, "Adam Carter" <adamcart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The gudev USE flag is deprecated from systemd, and the functionality is
now provided by libgudev (see bug 552036). However, i get the following
block;
>
> # emerge -a1 =sys-apps/syst
The gudev USE flag is deprecated from systemd, and the functionality is now
provided by libgudev (see bug 552036). However, i get the following block;
# emerge -a1 =sys-apps/systemd-226-r2 dev-libs/libgudev
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done
On 06/06/2016 06:04 PM, Tom H wrote:
>
> 1) I've never used systemd on Gentoo but I assume that you can
> co-install openrc and systemd. So you'd want to check whether systemd
> is running:
>
> [ -d /run/systemd/system ]
>
I think the way I did this, it will
On Tuesday 09 Feb 2016 17:55:54 James wrote:
> Jc García gmail.com> writes:
> > >> What I'm
> > >> missing is why the "-systemd" setting in make.conf did not overrule
> > >> these missteps? Is there way to set something, anything anywh
On Sunday 28 Aug 2016 10:55:56 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 10:43:17 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I'd still like to know where the directory /usr/lib64/systemd/boot/efi
> > came from though.
>
> Surely it's from systemd-boot, it is installed by systemd he
/dev/disk/by-partuuid/f3fa7b95-0a65-4716-924a-ae3f30811de5
> >
> > File: └─/EFI/systemd/systemd-bootx64.efi (systemd-boot 231)
> > File: └─/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI
> >
> > Those binaries have been built on my system: by what process
Kai Krakow wrote:
Am Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:27:57 +0200
schrieb Raffaele Belardi <raffaele.bela...@st.com>:
Looks like systemd does not provide a unit file for hdparm yet,
right? If so I suppose I'll have to write my own.
In general I suppose the same holds for everything that was
unde
d.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com
> <mailto:mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com> wrote:
>
> I do not want to start a whole systemd storm, glad i was
> offline for
> that. however, in my case i'd really like to avoid systemd. can i
> setup
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 4:39 PM, <mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com> wrote:
> are some of the available kernels not systemd,
Michael's answer was correct, but I just wanted to note that the
kernel and systemd are really two different things. You don't really
need to do anythin
Am 23.11.18 um 09:36 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:33:03 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>>>>> What version does "qlist ICv systemd" show?
>>>>
>>>> No version, just a long list of files.
>>>
>
Am 23.11.18 um 10:09 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>> # qlist -ICv systemd sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration-7
>>> sys-apps/systemd-236-r5
>>
>> Since no one else has come up with anything less kludgy, and I
>> assume you have already tried reins
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 21:41:41 -0400, John Covici wrote:
> Apr 17 18:39:55 ccs.covici.com systemd-coredump[5334]: Process 5332
> (umount.davfs) of user 0 dumped core.
> Apr 17 18:39:55 ccs.covici.com systemd[1]:
> systemd-coredump@0-5333-0.service: Succeeded.
>
> I can't
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 03:20:25 -0400,
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 21:41:41 -0400, John Covici wrote:
>
> > Apr 17 18:39:55 ccs.covici.com systemd-coredump[5334]: Process 5332
> > (umount.davfs) of user 0 dumped core.
> > Apr 17 18:
On 2019.08.16 12:26, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 08/16/2019 05:25:34 PM, Jack wrote:
try "lsof /cdrom"? It says the mount point, not the device, might
be busy.
Unfortunately, the problem is still there.
dmesg shows
[ 1326.461161] systemd-udevd[9882]: Process 'cdrom_id --eject-me
nterleaved
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi. On my latest update of world, I have a few blockers which I am
> >>> unable to figure out how to solve -- I will put the related output below
> >>> with inserted comments. I am using "unstable" gentooan
in gmane).
portage won't let me downgrade unless I downgrade systemd to 2.10 --
should I do that?
You mean 210. I'm on 208; my LVM test system is basically stable.
However Jc says he's got it to work with dracut 037-r1; perhaps try
that version first?
What I do know is that with dracut 037
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:56 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/25/2012 02:42 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:24 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
I just installed and booted with systemd and most services are working
normally, except syslog.service and remote
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:19 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/05/2013 05:43 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
[I will be going to systemd since it is aparently required for
gnome-3.8. I first want to try systemd on a test system so am building
that one up.]
On my main system (currently
ones right to use whatever one wants, but I
ask to respect mine as well. That's why I propose a separate
systemd profile for those willing to use it.
Then write. Just be aware that to write a systemd profile, you
need to use systemd.
Or to create a non-systemd profile :)
That's
, what exactly is wrong with systemd writing a dhcp server
client, and an ntp client? Is that project prohibited from writing such
software? Are they not allowed to do it? Does it break legal laws? Is
there an NDA or non-compete clause in the mix that I'm not aware of?
Because they are the only
Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 31/08/2015 13:49, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> >> A clue is in the ebuilds for systemd:
> >> >
> >> > sysv-utils? (
> >> > !sys-apps/systemd-sysv-utils
> >&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/18/2015 07:43 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
> emerge -1avt systemd
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild R ]
> sys-apps/systemd-218-r5:0/2::gent
On 31/08/2015 16:03, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 31/08/2015 13:49, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>>>> A clue is in the ebuilds for systemd:
>>>>>
>>>>> sysv
e meaning doesn't :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It looks like fail2ban wants systemd without python support, but the
> >>>>> true reason is still hidden. The fail2ban ebuild has this:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> RDEPEND=&
v...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>>>>>> The words make sense, the meaning doesn't :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It looks like fail2ban wants systemd without python support, but the
>>>>>>> true reason is still hidden. The fail2ban ebuild has
ve a few blockers which I am
>>> unable to figure out how to solve -- I will put the related output below
>>> with inserted comments. I am using "unstable" gentooand I have masked
>>> ncurses-6 for the time being. Portage also wants to downgrade my
>>> systemd
I hadn't synced one of my stable boxes for a while and tried today.
This brings in gnome-3.8 and with it systemd. I realize I will need to
*run* systemd to go to gnome-3.10. Indeed I do run systemd on my two
main systems (~amd64).
I was hoping to put off converting to systemd on this stable
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:45 AM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I hadn't synced one of my stable boxes for a while and tried today.
This brings in gnome-3.8 and with it systemd. I realize I will need to
*run* systemd to go to gnome-3.10. Indeed I do run systemd on my two
main systems (~amd64).
I
downgrade unless I downgrade systemd to 2.10 --
should I do that?
You mean 210. I'm on 208; my LVM test system is basically stable.
However Jc says he's got it to work with dracut 037-r1; perhaps try
that version first?
What I do know is that with dracut 037, me and Stefan ran intro
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
On 2014-02-20 1:36 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
The moment I saw that the profile is already done, I changed my
mind; the people using systemd ALREADY did the work (which seems to be
trivial, BTW; I
parameter wrong on purpose, and systemd (inside dracut)
dropped
me inside a rescue shell.
Interesting. Perhaps it just enables shell access.
There is a separate option that configures whether dracut drops to a
shell at all, or if it just hangs on failure. The latter might be
desirable
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
Actually, it does work (see attached screenshot). I set my root= kernel
command line parameter wrong on purpose, and systemd (inside dracut
On 02/05/14 15:01, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
[snip]
If you are using GRUB2, change /etc/default/grub and modify
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX so it has init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd. Then run
grub2-mkconfig again.
Beware, systemd requires some kernel config options set or it will not
work. For systemd
referred to it as a 'rant'), while I agree with most everything you said,
your primary point - that it should be the people who *don't* want systemd
doing all of the work - was backwards, and that was what I wanted to point
out.
I'm afraid this is the part that's backwards.
You are wrong.
So, please
-read your 'extremely overly enthusiastic' post (this plus the
content is why I referred to it as a 'rant'), while I agree with
most everything you said, your primary point - that it should be
the people who *don't* want systemd doing all of the work - was
backwards, and that was what I wanted
64/17.1/desktop
stable
amd64default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop/gnome
stable
amd64default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop/gnome/systemd
stable
amd64
default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop/gnome/sys
are a normal laptop user, systemd has
replaced most of the functionality of consolekit; so if you boot with
systemd, several packages need to have enable the systemd USE flag
(and the consolekit one disabled). In particular, pambase and polkit
need to set either systemd or consolekit, but cannot set
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 04.03.2013 20:42, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Next systemd-issue (yes, I know ... openrc is there as well ...):
I get warnings like
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:45 PM, João Matos jaon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list,
do you know some guide to switch form systemd to openrc, or keep both? I
googled and I didn't find.
The motivation is that I'm studing many server stuff, and I'm tired of
search for alternatives to systemd
William Hubbs closed bug #409385[1] as fixed, introducing
virtual/service-manager and adding it to the @system set, and dropping
OpenRC from baselayout's post dependencies.
Therefore, as of today, anyone can have a Gentoo machine with only
systemd, with no OpenRC installed. Since
systemd, with no OpenRC installed. Since that was the raison d'être of
the gentoo-systemd-only overlay[2], I'm deprecating it soon.
If you install dracut you will also pull sysvinit (it's needed for
killall5, IIRC),
Seems like the bin/pidof - ../sbin/killall5 dependency is removed in
git:
https
Am 03.09.2013 13:46, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
Hey list
after the many discussions here about systemd I had a flash of
objectivity (“Who cares if people rant about Lennart, the concept seems
sound and I don’t care about separate /usr”). So I wanted to try systemd
on my netbook.
I
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
I just did 'emerge -pv digikam' for 3.3.0
it wants to install 54 pkgs, incl systemd ;
10 pkgs are KDE include Marble.
Is my surprise
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 26/09/13 04:30, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:18:54 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Róbert Čerňanský
ope...@tightmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I am currently updating my system and Portage wants to replace udev
(204) with systemd (208). My question is (hopefully
On Feb 4, 2014 7:28 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/04/14 18:38, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
[snip]
I'm using XFCE It all started to happen after I switched to systemd. So
maybe on the weekend I'll try to switch one of the machine back to udev.
I think all I need is to unmerge
On Feb 4, 2014 7:38 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/04/14 18:03, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to go from systemd to udev?
I don't like the way systemd works. I have a problem with mounting USB
sick
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:07:12 +0400, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
Then write. Just be aware that to write a systemd profile, you need to
use systemd.
Or to create a non-systemd profile :)
We already have many of those, because systemd is not the default. Part
of making it the default
On 16.02.2014 21:56, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Hello List.
and all are linked (not compilelink) in such a manner that you can't
just pick and choose. Oh no, you get the full treatment if you like it
or not.
A few weeks ago I wanted to see what systemd is really like so I started
a little
it
or not.
A few weeks ago I wanted to see what systemd is really like so I started
a little test and switched to systemd on my private gentoo desktop
system. I don't care what people say, if possible only my personal
experience matters.
First I thought that with systemd I have to use all the things
On 2014-02-18 4:05 PM, Sebastian Beßler sebast...@darkmetatron.de wrote:
First I thought that with systemd I have to use all the things shipped
with systemd like journald (which I don't like because I think that a
binary file for syslogs is just broken) so I looked into the config
files
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 21:48:01 +, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk
wrote:
I thought I'd have another look at systemd, so switched profiles, made
sure I had all the kernel options needed and then did an emerge -uN
world.
It seems the systemd profile masks the static and static-libs USE
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Fox halfsocial...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned sys-fs/eudev. I
decided used because I had systemd only to used udev and unmerge systemd.
Now I can't use Banshee which I use as my music player because
On 02/23/2014 07:25 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Fox halfsocial...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned sys-fs/eudev. I
decided used because I had systemd only to used udev and unmerge systemd.
Now I can't use
to
some strange values which involved so much feedback that I had to go to
a root window and restore again. The strange thing is that I had no
problems like this under openrc, so I wonder what systemd is doing and
how I can get around it.
The settings are supposed to be automatically
On 6/4/2014 9:47 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
You seem to think the Upower devs simply decided to use systemd instead
of doing it themselves. In fact, they were always using code, from either
systemd or pm-utils. The fact that development stopped on pm-utils is
neither the fault
Question 2: What is up with the last section talking about the net setup
rules only with respect to systemd?
OpenRC is currently still the default init system for gentoo if I'm not
mistaken, so why does this comment only reference systemd, totally ignoring
OpenRC users?
Nothing in this news
Am Mon, 23 Jun 2014 20:39:13 -0400
schrieb gottl...@nyu.edu:
I think I had first misinterpreted the news msg, but want to be sure I
do understand it correctly now.
The message ends with
All non-systemd users are recommended to choose between:
# emerge --oneshot --noreplace 'sys-power
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:11 AM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
Thing is, I don't see any benefit, for myself, in systemd.
If people want to use it, fine.
But, if people are trying to force it upon everyone, then I will have a
problem with it.
It cuts both ways. Let's assume
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 04:11:56PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote
USE=systemd simply means to enable support for systemd, not that it is
running. Generally stuff like this should be a matter of
configuration, not build
Alec Ten Harmsel <a...@alectenharmsel.com> wrote:
>
> On 2015-11-24 13:17, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > I am running systemd-226-r1
>
> There's your problem ;)
>
> I'm really kidding.
>
> > and am having some strange problems with
> > systemd-
On Tuesday 14 June 2016 06:46:32 J. Roeleveld wrote:
>On Monday, June 13, 2016 02:10:27 PM James wrote:
>> wabe gmail.com> writes:
>> Still, if you manage 1000 linux workstations, then systemd does have
>> it's merits.
>
>Serious question: What makes systemd more
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:53:53 + (UTC), James wrote:
> Well I have one system I need to migrate to eudev. All sorts of things
> are now calling for *systemd* and I do not want that at all.
>
> Here is the blockers on the latest list ::
>
> [blocks B ] sys-fs/eu
301 - 400 of 6173 matches
Mail list logo
